Brain metastases reduce overall survival rates of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); patients with epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (ERBB2 [formerly HER2])-mutant NSCLC are more likely to have baseline brain metastases. Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) is an approved ERBB2-directed treatment for previously treated unresectable or metastatic ERBB2-mutant NSCLC.

SOLACE2 (ACTRN12618000686202) investigates whether 12-weeks of olaparib, or cyclophosphamide-olaparib priming, improves subsequent durvalumab-olaparib progression-free survival (PFS), and is superior to olaparib monotherapy without any priming, in platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer (n = 114). We also evaluate the utility of CUP-CC assay, an immune signature of C-C chemokine receptor type 4 up-regulation, chemokines, and cytokines. Priming with olaparib, or cyclophosphamide-olaparib, followed by durvalumab-olaparib, are both associated with longer PFS compared to olaparib monotherapy, but do not reach the pre-specified primary endpoint of 36-week trial threshold (PFS36). PFS36 rates are 47.4% (95% CI, 31.0-62.1; olaparib priming then olaparib-durvalumab), 48.7% (32.5-63.2; olaparib-cyclophosphamide then olaparib-durvalumab) and 35.1% (20.4-50.3; olaparib monotherapy). PFS is significantly longer for the homologous recombination deficient (N = 71) as compared to the proficient (HRP) (N = 29) subgroups (Hazard Ratio (HR) 0.55, 0.35-0.87). CUP-CC+ subgroup (N = 58) has a significantly longer PFS (HR 0.31, 0.19-0.49) than CUP-CC- (N = 46). Future studies should investigate whether CUP-CC has the potential to personalize poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor therapies for patients who are BRCA wild-type, including HRP patients.

Older adults with HER2-positive early breast cancer are underrepresented in clinical trials, and the benefit of chemotherapy in this population remains uncertain. We evaluated the HER2DX genomic assay within the randomized RESPECT trial (NCT01104935), which compared adjuvant trastuzumab with or without chemotherapy in patients aged 70-80 years. In this prespecified translational analysis (Trans-RESPECT), HER2DX scores were available for 154 patients. The HER2DX risk score classified 74.0% as low risk and 26.0% as high risk. Ten-year relapse-free and overall survival were higher in the low-risk group. HER2DX remained independently associated with overall survival in multivariable analysis. The HER2DX immune, luminal, and proliferation signatures that compose the risk score were also prognostic. While the HER2DX pCR score was not prognostic overall, exploratory subgroup analyses suggested a potential survival benefit from chemotherapy in the pCR-high group. HER2DX offers prognostic value and may guide chemotherapy use in older patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer. Clinical Trial Information NCT01104935.

Cervical cancer, a prevalent female malignancy, is treated with surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, immunotherapy and targeted therapy. Yet, prognosis remains influenced by multiple factors. Epithelial-mesenchymal transformation (EMT) is an important link in the malignant progression of tumor cells and has an important impact on the progression and prognosis of cervical cancer. This study aimed to analyze effect of Baofukang suppository on the related indexes of EMT of tumor cells in cervical cancer patients. Eighty patients with cervical cancer received in The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University from March 2020 to March 2022 were randomized into a control group (chemotherapy alone, n=40) and a study group (chemotherapy + Baofukang, n=40). Post-treatment, the study group showed significantly lower mRNA levels of EMT markers Vimentin and N-cadherin, and higher E-cadherin and β-catenin (p<0.05). Additionally, interleukin-6 (IL-6) decreased while interleukin-2 (IL-2) and interferon-γ (INF-γ) increased (p<0.05). Immune function improved, with higher CD3+, CD4+ and CD4+/CD8+ ratios, and lower CD8+ (p<0.05). The adverse reactions between two groups were not unconspicuous (p>0.05). The adjuvant therapy of Baofukang Suppository can effectively regulate the relevant indexes of tumor cell EMT, delay or prevent the EMT of tumor cells.

COMPEL (NCT04765059) was a global, randomized, double-blind study that evaluated osimertinib plus chemotherapy versus placebo plus chemotherapy in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) following non-central nervous system (CNS) progression on first-line osimertinib.

The randomized phase II MA.38 trial estimated the relative progression-free survival (PFS) associated with second-line endocrine therapy plus palbociclib administered on a 100 mg continuous daily dosing (CDD) schedule compared with the standard dose schedule (SDS) of 125 mg (days 1-21 of a 28-day cycle). A total of 180 patients were allocated 1:1 to protocol therapy. Molecular profiling was performed on the archival tissue and cell-free DNA (cfDNA) at enrollment, 3 months, and 6 months. The primary analysis for PFS demonstrated a similar outcome for the CDD versus SDS treatment strategy: HR = 0.93 (90% confidence interval, 0.66-1.30). Secondary efficacy measures for CDD versus SDS included the following: overall survival, HR = 1.07 (90% confidence interval, 0.67-1.69); response rate, 16.1% versus 18.0% (P = 0.66); median duration of response, 4.2 months (range, 2.8-13.9 months) versus 5.6 months (range, 2.4-13.9 months; P = 0.86); and clinical benefit rate, 53.2% versus 57.3% (P = 0.89). cfDNA profiling of the baseline enrollment sample prior to palbociclib commencement showed low tumor fraction (HR = 2.28; P = 9.9 × 10-6); higher short/long fragment length ratios (HR = 1.19; P = 0.049) and cfDNA variants in FGFR4 (HR = 3.65; P = 0.012) were prognostic and associated with inferior PFS. Variants in TP53 (HR = 2.48; P = 0.006) and ESR1 (HR = 3.42; P = 0.005) detected at 12 weeks on treatment were also associated with poor PFS. CDD palbociclib 100 mg dosing was not associated with improved efficacy compared with the standard intermittent 125 mg dosing schedule. Additionally, we identified prognostic biomarkers in alignment with prior research and demonstrated the value of cfDNA dynamics, including fragment length ratios and tumor fraction as a measure of treatment response.

In the phase 3 PhALLCON trial (NCT03589326), ponatinib demonstrated superior efficacy, patient-reported treatment tolerability, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) compared to imatinib in adults with newly diagnosed Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). To explore the association between clinical response and HRQoL and substantiate the superior effect of ponatinib over imatinib on HRQoL, we analyzed the impact of clinical response and treatment tolerability on changes in HRQoL.HRQoL was assessed using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Leukemia (FACT-Leu) questionnaire and the EQ-5D-5 L. Treatment tolerability was assessed using the FACT-GP5 item "bothered by treatment side effects." Linear mixed-effects regression models were used to examine changes in HRQoL over time, with clinical response status and patient-reported overall treatment tolerability as time-varying predictors, while controlling for significant covariates.This analysis included data from 238 patients (159 ponatinib, 79 imatinib). Achieving clinical response (complete remission or incomplete remission) was associated with significantly better changes from baseline across all FACT-Leu domains and the EQ-visual analogue scale than not achieving clinical response (p < 0.05). Treatment-related side effects led to significantly and meaningfully worse changes in HRQoL than "not bothered by treatment," with higher levels of "bother" associated with greater worsening in HRQoL from baseline.Taken together with the better treatment tolerability and longer response duration of ponatinib compared to imatinib, these findings further substantiate the HRQoL benefit of ponatinib over imatinib in patients with Ph + ALL.

Although neoadjuvant immunotherapy showed promising efficacy in locally advanced microsatellite instability-high or mismatch repair-deficient (MSI-H/dMMR) colon cancer, whether dual immune checkpoint inhibition provides additional benefit over anti-PD-1 monotherapy remains unclear. This randomized phase 1b trial (NCT05890742) evaluated a neoadjuvant regimen of IBI310 (anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 [CTLA-4]) plus sintilimab (n = 52) versus sintilimab monotherapy (n = 49). Surgery was performed in 51 and 45 patients, respectively. The primary endpoint, pathological complete response (pCR) rate, was significantly higher in the combination compared to the monotherapy arm within the modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population (78.4% versus 46.7%, p = 0.0015), with consistent results in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population (76.9% versus 42.9%). Safety in both arms was comparable and manageable without new safety signals. After a median follow-up of 21.4 months, no disease recurrences occurred. One death occurred in each arm due to postoperative complication and adverse events. These findings demonstrate the added benefit of neoadjuvant IBI310 plus sintilimab over sintilimab monotherapy for locally advanced MSI-H/dMMR colon cancer.

Primary endpoint treatment-change-free survival (TCFS), defined as time from randomization to death or initiation of a new disease-modifying treatment in the phase 2 DELTA trial. AML, acute myeloid leukemia; EPAG, eltrombopag; HMA, hypomethylating agents; IC, intensive chemotherapy.

Despite recent advancements demonstrating the potential of tumor-agnostic biomarkers to guide effective therapies, randomized evidence supporting the clinical superiority of precision oncology approaches compared to standard therapies remains limited. The ROME trial was a multicenter, randomized, open-label phase 2 study comparing tailored treatment (TT) to standard of care (SoC) in patients with advanced solid tumors progressing after one or two lines of therapy. Comprehensive genomic profiling on tissue and blood was performed to identify actionable alterations. Overall response rate (ORR) was the primary endpoint, and progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), time to treatment failure (TTF), time to next treatment (TTNT) and safety were the secondary endpoints. Between November 2020 and August 2023, 1,794 patients were screened, 897 were evaluated by the molecular tumor board (MTB) and 400 were randomized to TT or SoC. TT achieved a significantly higher ORR (17.5% versus 10%; P = 0.0294) and improved median PFS (3.5 months versus 2.8 months; hazard ratio = 0.66 (0.53-0.82), P = 0.0002). TT also showed superior 12-month PFS rates (22.0% versus 8.3%). Median OS was similar, with a 52% crossover rate. Grade 3/4 adverse events were also similar (40% TT versus 52% SoC). These results highlight the potential of TT to improve outcomes for patients with diverse actionable genomic alterations. These results also provide relevant evidence supporting a tumor-agnostic precision oncology strategy and highlight the potential of TTs, guided by genomic profiling and MTB recommendations, to significantly improve outcomes for patients with diverse actionable genomic alterations. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04591431 .

Profiling residual disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) might identify molecular target and tumor microenvironmental features to guide adjuvant therapy. We explored the characteristics of residual triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) in the prospective MIRINAE trial (KCSG-BR18-21), a phase II study evaluating adjuvant atezolizumab plus capecitabine versus capecitabine in TNBC without pathological complete response after NAC (NCT03756298) through multi-omics analyses.

The role of low-dose aspirin (LDA) in cancer prevention among older adults is unclear. Identifying individuals likely to experience benefit or harm is crucial for guiding personalized prevention strategies.

The global phase III RELAY trial demonstrated the efficacy of ramucirumab (RAM) plus erlotinib (ERL) in patients with untreated metastatic epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We present safety and efficacy profiles of RAM+ERL in Japanese elderly (aged ≥ 75 years) patients in RELAY.

The aim of this study was to explore the biological impact of chemotherapy during epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment in individuals with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

To develop a treatment-agnostic joint model leveraging longitudinal circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) dynamics to predict overall survival (OS) across different treatment regimens without incorporating treatment information using data from the IMpower150 trial in treatment-naïve metastatic non-squamous NSCLC patients.

Aspirin reduces the incidence of colorectal adenoma and colorectal cancer among high-risk persons. Observational studies suggest that aspirin may also improve disease-free survival after diagnosis, particularly among patients with tumors harboring somatic PIK3CA mutations. However, data from randomized trials are lacking.

To assess the effectiveness of personalized embryo transfer (pET) in enhancing intrauterine pregnancy rates in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) without recurrent implantation failure (RIF).

To assess modified folinic acid/leucovorin, fluorouracil, irinotecan, oxaliplatin (FOLFIRINOX [mFFX]) versus gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel (GnP) in de novo metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and explore predictive biomarkers.

Amivantamab plus lazertinib significantly improved progression-free and overall survival versus osimertinib in patients with previously untreated, EGFR-mutant advanced NSCLC. EGFR-targeted therapies are associated with dermatologic adverse events (AEs), which can affect quality of life (QoL). COCOON was conducted to assess prophylactic management and improve treatment experience.

Previous results from this phase 3 trial showed that progression-free survival among participants with previously untreated EGFR (epidermal growth factor receptor)-mutated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) was significantly improved with amivantamab-lazertinib as compared with osimertinib. Results of the protocol-specified final overall survival analysis in this trial have not been reported.