Opportunistic salpingectomy is defined as the removal of both fallopian tubes as part of a surgical procedure planned for other reasons. The goal is primary prevention of ovarian cancer. The procedure is offered to patients who are not known to be at increased risk of developing ovarian cancer. This is in contrast to high-risk patients with a germline mutation, particularly BRCA1/2, for whom risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy is generally recommended. Premalignant cells and early occult cancers have been detected in RRSO specimens in the fimbrial funnel region, but not on the ovarian surface. The presence of mitoses, nuclear atypia, and staining in response to p53 mutation in these serous intraepithelial carcinomas (STIC) indicates the initial genetic changes in the fallopian tube mucosa that subsequently lead to the development of advanced peritoneal carcinomas. The identification of STICs has challenged the traditional view of the pathogenesis of the largest subset of epithelial ovarian cancers, namely the high-grade serous cancers of the ovary, fallopian tubes, and peritoneum. In a position statement published in 2015, the German Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie (AGO) Kommission Ovar recommended that patients be informed of the latest findings on the development and potential benefits of bilateral salpingectomy at the time of hysterectomy. This may reduce the risk of developing ovarian cancer later in life. However, the scientific evidence has not been deemed sufficient to justify a general recommendation. In the same year, the Austrian AGO published a statement recommending the broad use of opportunistic salpingectomy without reservation. This review examines the current status of molecular pathology studies, recent evidence on the clinical implications of STIC, new data on the use of opportunistic salpingectomy, and published patient outcomes since then. The question of whether the potential benefit of opportunistic salpingectomy, outweighs the potential harms associated with surgical morbidity, which have not been conclusively excluded, should be revisited in light of these recent data.

Molecular testing plays a critical role in guiding optimal treatment decisions for lung cancer patients across a variety of clinical settings. While guidelines for biomarker testing exist in other jurisdictions, to date no best practice guidelines have been developed for the Australian setting. To address this need, the Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia collaborated with the Thoracic Oncology Group of Australasia to identify state-based pathologists, oncologists and consumer representatives to develop consensus best practice recommendations. Sixteen recommendations were established encompassing appropriate biomarkers, lung cancer subtype, tumour stage, specimen types, assay selection and quality assurance protocols that can inform and standardise best practice in molecular testing of lung cancer. These multidisciplinary evidence-based recommendations are designed to standardise and enhance molecular testing practices for lung cancers and should help ensure laboratories provide high-quality molecular testing of lung cancer for all Australians, including those from regional or remote communities.

Homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) is a key biomarker in the management of high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC), guiding treatment decisions, particularly regarding the use of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi). As multiple HRD assays are available, each with distinct methodologies and cutoff values, the interpretation and clinical application of HRD testing remain complex. This intergroup statement, endorsed by the German Ovarian Cancer Commission, NOGGO, AGO Austria, and AGO Swiss, aims to provide guidance on the indications, appropriate use, and limitations of HRD testing in ovarian cancer.

Precision oncology is a multi-step process including patient selection, tumor profiling, molecular tumor board discussion and personalized cancer management. So far, it remains largely unstandardized. The implementation of precision oncology can be beneficial for patients but implementation differs widely between tumor types and local practices. A working group was established by the Austrian, German and Swiss societies for Hematology and Medical Oncology to establish an expert consensus on evidence-based standards and implementation of precision oncology. Herein, we present a summary of this guideline. The full documents are available at www.onkopedia-guidelines.info.

Chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) has a heterogeneous disease course and a variable preva-lence across populations. Appropriate management for achieving optimal outcomes requires consideration of multiple factors, including disease-related factors like genomic alterations, patient characteristics and fitness, availability and access to treatments, and logistics/cost. This review aims to provide comprehen-sive and pragmatic recommendations for the management of treatment-naïve (TN) CLL that are relevant to Singapore's clinical context.

Around 10% of cases of primary hyperparathyroidism are thought to be genetic in origin, some of which are part of a syndromic form such as multiple endocrine neoplasia types 1, 2A or 4 or hyperparathyroidism-jaw tumor syndrome, while the remainder are cases of isolated familial primary hyperparathyroidism. Recognition of these genetic forms is important to ensure appropriate management according to the gene and type of variant involved, but screening for a genetic cause is not justified in all patients presenting primary hyperparathyroidism. The indications for genetic analysis have made it possible to propose a decision tree that takes into account whether the presentation is familial or sporadic, syndromic or isolated, patient age, and histopathological type of parathyroid lesion. Thus, the first consensus recommendation is to propose genetic screening to any patient with a familial form of primary hyperparathyroidism (≥2 1st or 2nd degree relatives) or in syndromic presentation or a sporadic isolated presentation if the patient is under 50 years of age, or over 50 with a recurrent or multi-glandular form, carcinoma, atypical parathyroid tumor and/or loss of parafibromin expression. The panel of genes currently recommended for first-line treatment comprises MEN1, CDKN1B, CDC73, CASR, GNA11, AP2S1 and GCM2. Other genes may also be involved in familial primary hyperparathyroidism, but in a much more rarely and less consistently. The second recommendation is to propose genetic screening, up to and including whole-genome sequencing in the event of inconclusive panel analysis, to patients with proven familial primary hyperparathyroidism and/or pediatric onset. The role of the genetic practitioner is to interpret the sequencing data by categorizing the variants into 5 classes of pathogenicity. The aim of genetic analysis is to identify the genetic variant involved in the patient's phenotype, in order to make or refute a diagnosis of hereditary primary hyperparathyroidism, and to adapt management and monitoring. Appropriate genetic counseling should then be provided for patient and family.

The latest 2022 WHO classification of the parathyroid tumors incorporates recent data on parathyroid pathophysiology, in particular from genetic sequencing. It highlights histological features potentially indicative of underlying genetic abnormalities, because of their implications for patient management. Immunohistochemical markers can help characterize parathyroid lesions and molecular screening. This new classification is a reminder of the imperative need to provide pathologists with comprehensive clinical and paraclinical information for accurate pathological lesion characterization.

Brain metastasis has emerged as a significant challenge in the comprehensive management of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), particularly in those harboring driver gene mutations. Traditional treatments such as radiotherapy and surgery offer limited clinical benefits and are often accompanied by cognitive dysfunction and a decline in quality of life. In recent years, novel small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors targeting epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), and other pathways have been developed, effectively penetrating the blood-brain barrier while enhancing intracranial drug concentrations and improving patient outcomes. This advancement has transformed the treatment landscape for brain metastases in NSCLC. Consequently, the Lung Cancer Medical Education Committee of the Chinese Medical Education Association and the Brain Metastasis Collaboration Group of the Lung Cancer Youth Expert Committee of the Beijing Medical Reward Foundation have jointly initiated and formulated the Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Brain Metastases from Non-small Cell Lung Cancer with Actionable Gene Alterations in China (2025 Edition). This guideline integrates the latest research findings with clinical experience, adhering to multidisciplinary treatment principles, and encompasses aspects such as diagnosis, timing of intervention, and systemic and local treatment options for driver gene positive NSCLC brain metastases. Additionally, it proposes individualized treatment strategies tailored to different driver gene types, aiming to provide clinicians with a reference to enhance the overall diagnostic and therapeutic standards for NSCLC brain metastases in China.
.

The 2024 updates of the Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO) Clinical Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of colorectal cancer emphasize standardizing cancer treatment in China, highlighting the latest advancements in evidence-based medicine, healthcare resource access, and precision medicine in oncology. These updates address disparities in epidemiological trends, clinicopathological characteristics, tumor biology, treatment approaches, and drug selection for colorectal cancer patients across diverse regions and backgrounds. Key revisions include adjustments to evidence levels for intensive treatment strategies, updates to regimens for deficient mismatch repair (dMMR)/ microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) patients, proficient mismatch repair (pMMR)/ microsatellite stability (MSS) patients who have failed standard therapies, and rectal cancer patients with low recurrence risk. Additionally, recommendations for digital rectal examination and DNA polymerase epsilon (POLE)/ DNA polymerase delta 1 (POLD1) gene mutation testing have been strengthened. The 2024 CSCO Guidelines are based on both Chinese and international clinical research, as well as expert consensus, ensuring their relevance and applicability in clinical practice, while maintaining a commitment to scientific rigor, impartiality, and timely updates.

The European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) Clinical Practice Guidelines for the diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of patients with oncogene-addicted metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (mNSCLC), published in January 2023, was modified according to previously established standard methodology, to produce the Pan-Asian adapted (PAGA) ESMO consensus guidelines for the management of Asian patients with oncogene-addicted mNSCLC. The adapted guidelines presented in this manuscript represent the consensus opinions reached by a panel of Asian experts in the treatment of patients with oncogene-addicted mNSCLC representing the oncological societies of China (CSCO), Indonesia (ISHMO), India (ISMPO), Japan (JSMO), Korea (KSMO), Malaysia (MOS), the Philippines (PSMO), Singapore (SSO), Taiwan (TOS) and Thailand (TSCO), co-ordinated by ESMO and the Korean Society for Medical Oncology (KSMO). The voting was based on scientific evidence and was independent of the current treatment practices, drug access restrictions and reimbursement decisions in the different regions of Asia. The latter are discussed separately in the manuscript. The aim is to provide guidance for the optimisation and harmonisation of the management of patients with oncogene-addicted mNSCLC across the different regions of Asia, drawing on the evidence provided by both Western and Asian trials, while respecting the differences in screening practices, molecular profiling and age and stage at presentation. Attention is drawn to the disparity in the drug approvals and reimbursement strategies between the different regions of Asia.

This guideline will discuss radiotherapeutic management of IDH-mutant grade 2 and grade 3 diffuse glioma, using the latest 2021 WHO (5th) classification of brain tumours focusing on: imaging modalities, tumour volume delineation, irradiation dose and fractionation.

Somatic variant testing through next-generation sequencing (NGS) is well integrated into Swiss molecular pathology laboratories and has become a standard diagnostic method for numerous indications in cancer patient care. Currently, there is a wide variation in reporting practices within our country, and as patients move between different hospitals, it is increasingly necessary to standardize NGS reports to ease their reinterpretation. Additionally, as many different stakeholders-oncologists, hematologists, geneticists, pathologists, and patients-have access to the NGS report, it needs to contain comprehensive and detailed information in order to answer the questions of experts and avoid misinterpretation by non-experts. In 2017, the Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics conducted a survey to assess the differences in NGS reporting practices across ten pathology institutes in Switzerland. The survey examined 68 reporting items and identified 48 discrepancies. Based on these findings, the Swiss Society of Molecular Pathology initiated a Delphi method to reach a consensus on a set of recommendations for NGS reporting. Reports should include clinical information about the patient and the diagnosis, technical details about the sample and the test performed, and a list of all clinically relevant variants and variants of uncertain significance. In the absence of a consensus on an actionability scheme, the five-class pathogenicity scheme proposed by the ACMG/AMP guideline must be included in the reports. The Swiss Society of Molecular Pathology recognizes the importance of including clinical actionability in the report and calls on the European community of molecular pathologists and oncologists to reach a consensus on this issue.

Constitutional mismatch repair deficiency (CMMRD), first described 25 years ago, confers an extremely high and lifelong cancer risk, including haematologic, brain, and gastrointestinal tract malignancies, and is associated with several non-neoplastic features. Our understanding of this condition has improved and novel assays to assist CMMRD diagnosis have been developed. Surveillance protocols need adjustment taking into account recent observational prospective studies assessing their effectiveness. Response to immune checkpoint inhibitors and the effectiveness and toxicity of other treatments have been described. An update and merging of the different guidelines on diagnosis and clinical management of CMMRD into one comprehensive guideline was needed. Seventy-two expert members of the European Reference Network GENTURIS and/or the European care for CMMRD consortium and one patient representative developed recommendations for CMMRD diagnosis, genetic counselling, surveillance, quality of life, and clinical management based on a systematic literature search and comprehensive literature review and a modified Delphi process. Recommendations for the diagnosis of CMMRD provide testing criteria, propose strategies for CMMRD testing, and define CMMRD diagnostic criteria. Recommendations for surveillance cover each CMMRD-associated tumour type and contain information on starting age, frequency, and surveillance modality. Recommendations for clinical management cover cancer treatment, management of benign tumours or non-neoplastic features, and chemoprevention. Recommendations also address genetic counselling and quality of life. Based on existing guidelines and currently available data, we present 82 recommendations to improve and standardise the care of CMMRD patients in Europe. These recommendations are not meant to be prescriptive and may be adjusted based on individual decisions.

The standard clinical practice of managing the non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 20 insertion (ex20ins) mutations was elaborated in Chinese expert consensus on non‑small cell lung cancer with EGFR exon 20 insertion mutations (2023 edition), and this rare subset has gradually attracted attention recently. With the deepening of treatment area exploration and the approval of new targeted drugs, there are more options for the diagnosis and treatment of EGFR ex20ins positive NSCLC patients. Therefore, based on the previous version of consensus, the expert panel has updated this consensus on the standardized clinical diagnosis and treatment of EGFR ex20ins mutation NSCLC through reference to literature and clinical data, and combined with the experts' own clinical experience. The updated recommendations includes disease congnition, testing methods, therapy and recent relevant clinical trials for NSCLC patients with EGFR ex20ins mutation, in order to provide better medication reference for clinical physicians.
.

Genomic tumour profiling has a crucial role in the management of patients with solid cancers, as it helps selecting and prioritising therapeutic interventions based on prognostic and predictive biomarkers, as well as identifying markers of hereditary cancers. Harmonised approaches to interpret the results of genomic testing are needed to support physicians in their decision making, prevent inequalities in precision medicine and maximise patient benefit from available cancer management options.

Birt-Hogg-Dubé syndrome (BHD syndrome) is an autosomal dominant multisystem disorder with variable expression due to pathogenic constitutional variants in the FLCN gene. Patients with BHD syndrome are predisposed to benign cutaneous fibrofolliculomas/trichodischomas, pulmonary cysts with an associated risk of spontaneous pneumothorax, and renal cell carcinoma. A requirement for updated International consensus recommendations for the diagnosis and management of BHD syndrome was identified. Based on a comprehensive literature review and expert consensus within the fields of respiratory medicine, urology, radiology, dermatology, clinical oncology and clinical genetics, updated recommendations for diagnosis, surveillance and management in BHD syndrome were developed. With the widespread availability of FLCN genetic testing, clinical scenarios in which a diagnosis should be considered and criteria for genetic testing were defined. Following a clinical and/or molecular diagnosis of BHD syndrome, a multidisciplinary approach to disease management is required. Regular renal cancer surveillance is recommended in adulthood and life-long, but the evidence base for additional tumour surveillance is limited and further research warranted. Recommendations for the treatment of cutaneous, pulmonary and renal manifestations are provided. Awareness of BHD syndrome needs to be raised and better knowledge of the clinical settings in which the diagnosis should be considered should enable earlier diagnosis. Further details, including areas for future research topics are available at: https://www.genturis.eu/l=eng/Guidelines-and-pathways/Clinical-practice-guidelines.html .

Background: The treatment of BRAF V600E gliomas with BRAF inhibitors (BRAFis) and MEK inhibitors (MEKis) has been increasingly integrated into clinical practice for pediatric low-grade gliomas (PLGGs) and pediatric high-grade gliomas (HGGs). However, some questions remain unanswered, such as the best time to start targeted therapy, duration of treatment, and discontinuation of therapy. Given that no clinical trial has been able to address these critical questions, we developed a Canadian Consensus statement for the treatment of BRAF V600E mutated pediatric as well as adolescent and young adult (AYA) gliomas. Methods: Canadian neuro-oncologists were invited to participate in the development of this consensus. The consensus was discussed during monthly web-based national meetings, and the algorithms were revised until a consensus was achieved. Results: A total of 26 participants were involved in the development of the algorithms. Two treatment algorithms are proposed, one for the initiation of treatment and one for the discontinuation of treatment. We suggest that most patients with BRAF V600E gliomas should be treated with BRAFis ± MEKis upfront. Discontinuation of treatment can be considered in certain circumstances, and we suggest a slow wean. Conclusions: Based on expert consensus in Canada, we developed algorithms for treatment initiation of children and AYA with BRAF V600E gliomas as well as a discontinuation algorithm.

Objective: The Cancer Genome Atlas research program (TCGA) developed the molecular classification for endometrial cancer with prognostic and therapeutic utility, which was replaced by the ProMisE (Proactive Molecular Risk Classifier for Endometrial Cancer) classification by consensus and international guidelines due to its high cost. This article aims to present national recommendations from an expert consensus that allows unification and implementation of the molecular classification for women with endometrial cancer nationwide, with a rational use of resources and technology. Methods: Consensus of 36 experts in clinical oncology, oncological gynecology, pathology, and genetics, with clinical practice in the national territory. The leader group performed a literature review and structuring of questions rated 1 to 9 points. A modified nominal group technique was used. There was a face-to-face meeting with master presentations, deliberative dialogue, and Google Forms (Google LLC, Mountain View, CA, USA) questionnaire voting with analysis and discussion of responses. The non-consensual responses led to a second round of voting. The final manuscript was finally prepared and revised. Results: Seven recommendations were formulated integrating the panelist responses based on evidence, but adjusted to the Colombian context and reality. Recommendation 1. The molecular classification is recommended in all the endometrial cancers using the immunohistochemistry markers as subrogated results from the molecular profile initially proposed in the TCGA classification. Recommendation 2. The sequential test strategy is recommended, starting with the immunohistochemistry markers (p53, MLH1, MSH 2, MSH6, PMS2) simultaneously in all the patients, defining to request POLE (DNA polymerase epsilon) (if available) according to the risk classification based on the surgical piece. Recommendation 3. It is recommended, that the gynecologist oncologist should be the one to request the POLE (if available) according to the final pathology report. This test must be requested for all endometrial cancers stage I-II, except in low risk (stage IA low grade endometrioid histology without linfovascular invasion normal p53) and, stages III-IV without residual disease, without affecting the request of subrogated immunohistochemistry molecular markers upon histology. The consensus proposes that the POLE is requested after the immunohistochemistry and according to the categories in the risk classification established by the 2020 ESGO/ESTRO/ESP guidelines. Recommendation 4. It is recommended to perform immunohistochemistry for hormonal receptors for all women with endometrial cancer and the HER2 in patients with p53abn, simultaneously with the others immunohistochemistry markers. Recommendation 5. It is recommended to perform the immunohistochemistry markers (p53, MLH1, MSH2, MSH6 y PMS2) in an initial endometrial biopsy or curettage when the specimen is adequate and available. In case the initial immunohistochemistry is inconclusive, or there are histological discrepancies between the initial and definitive pathology, it is recommended to repeat the molecular profile in the surgical pathology. The immunohistochemistry markers must be reported in the pathology report according to the CAP (College of American Pathologists) recommendations, independently of the type of sample. Recommendation 6. It is recommended to perform MLH1 promoter methylation testing in patients who exhibit loss of expression of MLH1 in immunohistochemistry whether it is accompanied or not with loss of expression of PMS2. All the patients with deficient MMR (mismatch repair), should be sent for genetic counseling to rule out Lynch syndrome. Recommendation 7. It is recommended to consider the molecular classification in addition to the classical histopathological criteria when making adjuvant judgments, as incorporated by the classification of prognostic groups of the 2020 ESGO/ESTRO/ESP guidelines. Conclusions: It is necessary to implement the molecular classification of endometrial cancer in clinical practice in accordance to the Colombian context, due to its prognostic and probably predictive value. This will enable the characterization of the Colombian population in order to offer individualized guided treatments. This is an academic and nonregulatory document.

Treatment of pediatric high-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML), defined either on molecular or cytogenetic features, relies on bone marrow transplant after cytologic remission. However, relapse remains the first post-transplant cause of mortality. In this 13th session of practice harmonization of the francophone society of bone marrow transplantation and cellular therapy (SFGM-TC), our group worked on recommendations regarding the management of post-transplant relapse in AML pediatric patients based on international literature, national survey and expert opinion. Overall, immunomodulation strategy relying on both measurable residual disease (MRD) and chimerism evaluation should be used for high-risk AML. In very high-risk (VHR) AML with a 5-year overall survival ≤30 %, a post-transplant maintenance should be proposed using either hypomethylating agents, combined with DLI whenever possible, or FLT3 tyrosine kinase inhibitors if this target is present on leukemia cells. In the pre-emptive or early relapse settings (< 6 months post-transplant), treatments combining DLI, Azacytidine and Venetoclax should be considered. Access to phase I/II trails for targeted therapies (menin, IDH or JAK inhibitors) should be discussed in each patient according to the underlying molecular abnormalities of the disease.