Precision oncology relies on precision diagnostics, and histopathological diagnosis, along with biomarker evaluation, currently represents the cornerstone for personalized treatment. In gastrointestinal neoplasms, diagnostic assessment and molecular profiling are often performed on biopsy tissue, which may be quantitatively/qualitatively limited. Therefore, appropriate sample management is essential to avoid unnecessary waste and to obtain all the information necessary for treatment planning. Several factors may significantly impact biomarker testing: (i) pre-analytical issues; (ii) heterogeneity in biomarker expression; (iii) lack of standardization in biomarker testing and evaluation. Moreover, in the metastatic setting, inadequate/incomplete clinical information can lead to inappropriate sample handling, with negative implications. The application of appropriate guidelines in testing and reporting biomarker status according to clinical context is, therefore, strongly encouraged. In this position paper, the Italian Group of Gastrointestinal Pathologists (GIPAD), a section of the Italian Society of Pathological Anatomy and Cytology (SIAPeC-IAP), aims to summarize all the clinical and pathological requirements for adequate assessment of prognostic and predictive biomarkers in the gastrointestinal oncology patient, from biopsy acquisition to diagnostic reporting.

The NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) for Genetic/Familial High-Risk Assessment: Breast, Ovarian, Pancreatic, and Prostate are intended to serve as a resource for health care providers to identify individuals who may benefit from cancer risk assessment and genetic counseling and testing; help guide decisions related to genetic testing; and facilitate a multidisciplinary approach in the comprehensive care of individuals at increased risk for hereditary breast, ovarian, pancreatic, and prostate cancer. The current guidelines focus primarily on assessment of pathogenic and likely pathogenic (P/LP) variants associated with increased risk of breast, ovarian, pancreatic, and prostate cancer and recommended approaches to genetic counseling/testing and care strategies in individuals with these P/LP variants associated with increased risk of these cancers. These NCCN Guidelines Insights summarize the panel's most recent recommendations regarding screening for prostate cancer and pancreas cancer, as well as testing criteria for nonepithelial ovarian cancer.

The evolution of serous high grade ovarian cancer management is characterized by a more regulated patients' journey on the one hand and the development of new therapeutic options on the other hand, the selection of which is guided by tumor molecular characteristics. Surgery remains the cornerstone of treatment. It can be performed only in authorized expert sites that can demonstrate sufficient experience from highly skilled surgical teams, and quality criteria including prehabilitation and rehabilitation programs. The diagnostic step is crucial; it comprises multiple biopsies that allow reliable pathological and molecular analyses, and a comprehensive surgical staging. Determination of BRCA1/2 mutation and homologous recombination deficiency statuses by validated methods guide maintenance therapy at advanced stages and referring to oncogenetic consultation if appropriate. For these advanced diseases, the two main questions for surgical strategy are the feasibility of complete resection (without residual disease, CC-0), assessed during surgical exploration of pelvis and abdomen, and the optimal timing of this surgery (upfront or after neoadjuvant chemotherapy). In recurrent diseases, surgery remains a main piece of treatment in case of late relapse and medical treatment depends on drugs used in the first line; in early platinum resistant relapse, a new therapeutic option is available with mirvétuximab soravtansine.

Cancer predisposition syndromes (CPSs), including genetic tumour risk syndromes (genturis), are a heterogeneous group of genetic disorders characterised by an increased risk of developing tumours compared to the general population. CPSs raise reproductive issues for affected individuals because of the risk of passing the disease-causing genetic alterations on to offspring. The demand for reproductive counselling is often unmet due to the lack of sufficient healthcare professionals with the specialised knowledge, experience and skill. Based on a comprehensive literature review of 851 publications and expert consensus (multidisciplinary medical experts and patient representatives), the European Reference Network on genetic tumour risk syndromes (ERN GENTURIS) developed a guideline providing 16 recommendations for reproductive counselling in CPSs. The central recommendation is to offer reproductive counselling proactively to all individuals with a CPS and their relevant family members, together with psychological support and in multidisciplinary collaborations. This guideline aims to standardize the offer of reproductive counselling for individuals with a CPS across Europe, empowers healthcare professionals for their specific tasks, and helps patients dealing with their own challenges.

Unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) exhibits substantial heterogeneity and complexity. The landmark LAURA and POLESTAR studies have established a standard therapeutic model involving targeted consolidation therapy with osimertinib or aumolertinib after definitive chemoradiotherapy for NSCLC patients harboring EGFR-sensitive mutations. However, treatment strategies for patients with other driver gene mutations (e.g., ALK fusions, ROS1 rearrangement) still lack robust support from high-level evidence-based medical study. To enhance the standardization of diagnosis and treatment for unresectable stage III driver-positive NSCLC patients, the Radiotherapy Committee of the Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology convened an expert working group. This group identified common clinical practice issues and conducted an in-depth, problem-oriented analysis of domestic and international guidelines alongside evidence-based medical data. Through multiple rounds of comprehensive discussion and expert voting, this consensus was jointly developed. It provides evidence-based recommendations addressing frequently encountered clinical questions regarding unresectable stage III driver-positive NSCLC, aiming to serve as a key reference for clinical practice.

Measurable residual disease (MRD) monitoring has become a critical component in the management of acute myeloid leukemia (AML), to inform prognosis, guide therapy, and serve as a key end point in clinical trials. The 2025 update of the MRD guideline provides a comprehensive and refined framework for MRD assessment, aligned with the European LeukemiaNet (ELN) 2022 genetic risk classification. Developed by members of the ELN AML MRD Working Party, the guidelines incorporate expert consensus determined through a 2-stage Delphi round. They address the clinical implementation of MRD methodologies, technical considerations, integration into clinical trials, and future directions. Importantly, MRD recommendations are tailored to individual prognostic and genetic subgroups. A new qualitative MRD response category, designated as optimal, warning, or high risk of treatment failure, has been introduced to facilitate contextual interpretation of the MRD burden and its clinical relevance. Notably, ultrahigh-sensitivity next-generation sequencing-based MRD assessment is now recommended for FLT3 internal tandem duplication-mutated AML after intensive chemotherapy and before allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. A total of 56 recommendations were formulated, with 53 achieving a high level of consensus (≥90%). These updated guidelines represent a major step forward toward harmonizing MRD assessments in AML and enhancing its clinical utility across diverse treatment settings.

Waldenström's macroglobulinemia (WM) is a rare, indolent B-cell lymphoma that predominantly affects older adults. In recent years, significant progress has been made in understanding its pathogenesis, identifying relevant biomarkers, and developing novel therapeutic approaches to complement traditional chemoimmunotherapy-collectively reshaping the management landscape of WM. In this article, we provide comprehensive, evidence-based recommendations for the diagnosis, molecular evaluation, and treatment of WM, including strategies for both frontline and relapsed disease. These guidelines are informed by the latest clinical research, expert consensus, and current practice standards, with the goal of equipping clinicians with a practical and effective framework for delivering optimal care to patients with WM.

It has been five years since the last version of the clinical practice guidelines for the management of adult diffuse gliomas was published by the Asian Glioma Genome Atlas (AGGA). Significant progress and revisions have occurred in the diagnosis and treatment of adult diffuse gliomas in recent years. In response to these updates, the joint guideline committee of the Chinese Glioma Cooperative Group (CGCG), the Society for Neuro-Oncology of China (SNO-China), and the Chinese Brain Cancer Association (CBCA) has revised the clinical practice guidelines. This updated guideline emphasizes molecular and pathological diagnostics, as well as the primary treatment modalities of surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and targeted therapy. Additionally, we have incorporated findings from recent clinical trials of new therapies to align with cutting-edge treatment strategies. This guideline is designed to serve as a practical resource for all professionals involved in managing adult diffuse glioma patients, while also providing valuable information for insurance companies and other institutions responsible for regulating cancer care costs in China and beyond.

Approximately 5% of all colorectal cancers have a strong genetic component and are classified as hereditary colorectal cancer (HCRC). Some of the unique features commonly seen in HCRC cases include early age of onset, synchronous/metachronous cancer occurrence, and multiple cancers in other organs. These characteristics require different management approaches, including diagnosis, treatment or surveillance, from those used in the management of sporadic colorectal cancer. Accurate diagnosis of HCRC is essential because it enables targeted surveillance and risk reduction strategies that improve patient outcomes. Recent genetic advances revealed several causative genes for polyposis and non-polyposis syndromes. The Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (JSCCR) first published guidelines for the management of HCRC in 2012, with subsequent revisions every 4 years. The 2024 update to the JSCCR guidelines for HCRC was developed by meticulously reviewing evidence from systematic reviews and the consensus of the JSCCR HCRC Guidelines Committee, which includes representatives from patient advocacy groups for FAP and Lynch syndrome. These guidelines provide an up-to-date summary of HCRC, along with clinical recommendations for managing FAP and Lynch syndrome.

Breast cancer is one of the most common malignancies among women in China. According to GLOBOCAN 2022, more than 350,000 new breast cancer cases were diagnosed in China, ranking second among all newly diagnosed cancers in women. Although breast cancer has entered an era of chronic disease management and overall survival has improved substantially, the prognosis of metastatic breast cancer (MBC) remains unsatisfactory. The genome of MBC is characterized by spatiotemporal heterogeneity and may undergo dynamic evolution. With the continuous identification of actionable alterations, targeted therapies guided by genomic testing have emerged as an important approach to improving patient outcomes. Therefore, the implementation of standardized genomic testing in clinical practice has become an urgent priority. While several international and domestic guidelines have recommended genomic testing for MBC, China still lacks detailed technical specifications and clinical pathways tailored to advanced disease in the local healthcare context. Accordingly, it is imperative to establish a guideline for genomic testing in advanced breast cancer that reflects national realities, ensures strong clinical operability, unifies testing standards, and optimizes workflows, thereby expanding access to precision therapy and improving patient prognosis. Against this background, the Breast Cancer Committee of the Chinese Anti-Cancer Association convened a multidisciplinary working group experts. Following predefined methodological procedures-including clinical question prioritization, systematic evidence retrieval, graded evaluation, and formulation of recommendations-the guideline was developed. It integrates the latest evidence with multidisciplinary expert consensus, providing specific recommendations on key aspects of genomic testing for MBC, including patient eligibility, specimen selection, testing methodologies, and prioritization of target genes. In addition, the guideline systematically summarizes available targeted therapeutic strategies for different genomic alterations, and provides graded recommendations based on both levels of evidence and drug accessibility, thereby ensuring clarity and facilitating clinical implementation. This guideline is closely aligned with the realities of clinical practice and drug accessibility in China, with a strong emphasis on the feasibility of testing and the actionability of results. It establishes a multidisciplinary consensus on standardized pathways for genomic testing in patients with MBC, aiming to bridge precision diagnostics and individualized targeted therapy, and to provide practical guidance for improving the standardization of advanced breast cancer care nationwide.

Breast cancer is one of the most prevalent malignancies among women globally and ranks second in the incidence of malignant tumors among Chinese women. It has become a significant public health issue that seriously threatens women's health, highlighting the urgent need to establish a precision prevention and treatment system. Currently, the diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer have transitioned from traditional histological classification to a precision medicine phase centered on molecular characteristics, significantly enhancing the specificity and effectiveness of clinical treatments. With the rapid development of molecular biology techniques, the continuous discovery and application of new biomarkers have fueled the growing demand for molecular pathological testing in clinical settings. The widespread use of various molecular testing platforms has driven clinical decision-making from population-based and standardized approaches to individualized and refined strategies. This shift enables clinicians to more accurately assess patient prognosis and predict treatment responses, thereby formulating more appropriate treatment plans. However, the emergence of new technologies and biomarkers has also increased the requirements for standardization, normalization of testing procedures, and the establishment of quality control. While this trend brings new opportunities for precision diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer, it also poses higher demands on clinical and pathological practices, necessitating the establishment of unified precision diagnosis and treatment pathways and consensus. The "Guidelines on clinical practice of molecular tests in breast cancer in China (2025 edition)" was developed through a multidisciplinary collaboration among experts in molecular pathology and breast oncology, integrating domestic clinical realities with international advancements. We systematically evaluated evidence quality (GRADE criteria) and recommendation strength based on global clinical studies and practical experiences. The guideline aims to harmonize localized molecular diagnostic expertise with global insights, addressing critical needs in precision therapeutics, hereditary susceptibility assessment, and prognostic recurrence risk stratification. It proposes optimized clinical testing algorithms, emphasizes multidisciplinary integration, and establishes standardized protocols to ensure robust implementation of molecular diagnostics in China. This document serves as an authoritative reference for clinicians and pathologists to refine individualized patient management and jointly promotes the realization of the "Healthy China 2030" strategic goal.

RAD51C, RAD51D, and BRIP1 germline pathogenic variants (GPVs) are associated with increased lifetime risks of tubo-ovarian cancer. Resources for managing RAD51C, RAD51D, and BRIP1 heterozygotes in clinical practice are limited.

To formulate standardized recommendations for recognizing and managing the genetic risk of breast cancer, based on the latest scientific evidence and clinical experience.

Over the years since the 4th Breast Cancer Consensus Conference, a substantial body of new evidence based on clinical trial results has been published, necessitating an update of the 2020 recommendations. This professional guideline primarily reflects the current ESMO, NCCN, ABC, and St. Gallen Consensus Conference statements and recommendations. From a didactic perspective, the text first addresses early-stage breast cancer, followed by locally advanced, locoregionally recurrent, and metastatic breast cancer. At the beginning of both the early-stage and metastatic breast cancer sections, we provide a summary of general principles relevant to the respective field, which apply to the subsequent subsections. Within these subsections, therapeutic options are discussed according to genomic subgroups. At the end of the recommendations, considerations for the management of certain rare clinical scenarios are summarized. The appendices cover, among other topics, multidisciplinary team (tumor board) requirements, recommended chemotherapy protocols, and the definition of menopause.

The Italian Society of Pathology's Molecular Pathology and Precision Medicine Study Group (PMMP/SIAPeC) has released a three-part set of best practice guidelines to stan-dardize and enhance molecular testing in solid tumors. Part I focuses on the pre-analytical phase, emphasizing proper tissue handling and quality control to preserve nucleic acid integrity. Part II addresses the analytical phase, outlining workflows for next-generation sequencing (NGS), from extraction to variant interpretation, with recommendations on choice of platform, gene panels, and bioinformatics. Part III covers the post-analytical phase, offering guidance on structured, clinically meaningful reporting to support thera-peutic decisions, including standards for both tissue and liquid biopsies. Together, these documents aim to harmonize molecular diagnostics, ensuring reliable, high-quality results that support precision oncology.

The NCCN Guidelines for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) provide recommendations for the treatment of NSCLC. These NCCN Guidelines Insights discuss recent updates to the NCCN Guidelines, with a focus on systemic therapy options for the treatment of patients with nonmetastatic NSCLC and the corresponding molecular testing considerations.

Molecular biologists play an important role in therapeutic decisions in the context of Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia (CML). Before treatment, it is mandatory to identify the BCR::ABL1 fusion and any prognostic cytogenetic abnormalities that may be present. During treatment, regular assessment of measurable residual disease (MRD) is essential to objectively evaluate the optimal response and identify situations of resistance to treatment. Monitoring of MRD is also required when considering treatment discontinuations. In cases of resistance, identifying mutations that confer resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitors is essential for adapting the treatment. The Group of Molecular Biologists of Hematologic Malignancies (GBMHM) and the France Intergroup of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (Fi-LMC) convened a panel of experts to critically review methods used for molecular diagnostics and follow-up of patients with CML, define best practices applicable in this context and formulate recommendations.

UK Guidelines for the management of uveal melanoma (UM) were first published in 2015 using an evidence-based systematic approach. The primary aim of this guideline was to optimise patient care by providing recommendations based on the best available scientific evidence. The resulting guideline reflected the strengths and weaknesses of the available evidence, made recommendations that were clinically impactful around prognostication, surveillance, and treatment for patients with primary lesions and metastatic disease. The guideline development process and content met the standards required by NICE and were ultimately NICE accredited. Here, we present an update to these guidelines, highlighting where practice or treatment has changed to such an extent that the original recommendations are now out of date. Presented here are updated guidelines on molecular and genetic testing, management of metastatic disease and clinical surveillance.

Microsatellite instability (MSI) is the accumulation of insertion and deletion variants (instability) in short tandem repeat DNA sequences (microsatellites). High levels of MSI occur following loss of function of the DNA mismatch repair system (MMR). MMR deficiency is an increasingly important cancer biomarker that is associated with chemotherapy resistance and response to immune checkpoint blockade, as well as one of the commonest hereditary cancer syndromes, Lynch syndrome. Since its discovery over two decades ago, our biological understanding, the testing methods, and the clinical implications of MSI analysis have expanded rapidly and up-to-date best practice guidelines are needed. An expert working group reviewed the literature and devised 15 best practice recommendations that were finalised following consultation with clinical and laboratory scientists partnered with EMQN. These include seven recommendations on key technical aspects of MSI testing and eight recommendations on the clinical interpretation and reporting of results. The latter focuses on Lynch syndrome screening and immune checkpoint blockade therapy. Example report wording is provided to assist implementation and standardisation. Common terminology and MSI analysis methods are also discussed. These guidelines are aimed primarily at genomic scientists working in diagnostic testing laboratories, but will provide a useful review of MSI for clinicians, academics, and other related professionals.