Briquilimab is a monoclonal antibody inhibiting stem cell factor (SCF) binding to CD117 (c-Kit). Based on preclinical data demonstrating the antibody clears hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPC) and myeloid malignant cells, we conducted a phase 1 trial examining briquilimab plus nonmyeloablative fludarabine (Flu) and total body irradiation (TBI) as conditioning for older adults with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) undergoing matched donor allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Briquilimab was infused 10 to 14 days before transplant day (TD) 0; Flu 30 mg/m2 and TBI 2 to 3 Gy were administered on TD -4 to -2 and TD0, respectively. Graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis consisted of tacrolimus, sirolimus, and mycophenolate mofetil. Thirty-two patients enrolled (n = 13 AML in complete remission [CR]; n = 3 AML in relapse; n = 16 MDS). Median age was 70 years, and most had detectable measurable residual disease (MRD) at screening. There were no briquilimab infusion reactions, dose-limiting toxicities, or primary graft failure events; briquilimab clearance was predictable across patients. Among the AML in CR cohort, 1-year event-free survival (EFS) was 69.2%; 1-year overall survival (OS) was 75%. Among the MDS cohort, 1-year EFS was 53.8%; 1-year OS was 76.4%. One of 3 patients with AML in relapse experienced a transient response. Marrow samples obtained before and after briquilimab and before Flu/TBI demonstrated AML/MDS HSPC depletion (mean, 62.4% ± 22.7%) with resultant threefold increase in serum SCF. In summary, we demonstrate the feasibility, safety, and proof of concept of CD117 targeting with briquilimab as HCT conditioning for AML/MDS. The trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT04429191.

The phase 3 CRISTALLO trial compared first-line fixed-duration venetoclax-obinutuzumab (VenO) vs fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab (FCR)/bendamustine-rituximab (BR) in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), using undetectable minimal residual disease (uMRD) as the sole primary end point. Previously untreated patients with a cumulative illness rating scale score ≤6 and creatinine clearance ≥70 mL/min without del(17p)/TP53 mutations were randomized 1:1 to VenO or FCR/BR. The primary end point was uMRD (<10-4) in peripheral blood (PB) using next-generation sequencing at month 15. Key secondary end points included uMRD (<10-4) in PB and bone marrow (BM) at end of treatment (EOT) and progression-free survival (PFS). uMRD at deeper cutoffs were explored. At data cutoff (19 March 2024), 80 patients received VenO, and 86 received FCR/BR. Baseline characteristics were generally balanced across arms. The primary end point was met: 81.3% (VenO) and 54.7% (FCR/BR) achieved uMRD (<10-4) in PB at month 15 (P = .0004). uMRD (<10-4) in PB and BM at EOT was also higher with VenO vs FCR/BR. Short follow-up precluded evaluation of PFS at the first planned interim analysis; however, fewer patients progressed/died with VenO vs FCR/BR (7 vs 13). At month 15, 65.0% (VenO) and 25.6% (FCR/BR) achieved uMRD (<10-6) in PB. The overall safety profile was consistent with the known safety profile of each drug. No patient in the VenO arm was deemed high risk for tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) after obinutuzumab debulking; no clinical TLS occurred. These results confirm and extend the findings from the GAIA-CLL13 trial, validating increased depth of response with VenO vs chemoimmunotherapies. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT04285567.

Quadruplet therapy with Isa-VRd (isatuximab, Velcade [bortezomib], Revlimid [lenalidomide], and dexamethasone) followed by Isa-Rd in the randomized phase 3 IMROZ study provided a significant progression-free survival benefit to transplant-ineligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM). In the primary analysis, more Isa-VRd/Isa-Rd-treated patients achieved minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity and MRD-negative complete response (CR) at any time point than patients receiving VRd followed by Rd. Here, we report landmark analysis results of MRD negativity over time and its impact on clinical outcomes in IMROZ. Treatment with Isa-VRd/Isa-Rd led to deeper responses, with higher rates of MRD negativity and MRD-negative CR at the end of induction and during maintenance vs VRd/Rd, up to 60 months of follow-up. Benefit with Isa-VRd/Isa-Rd was observed across key patient subgroups, including older (>70 years) and frail patients. Time to progression (TTP) was significantly prolonged with Isa-VRd/Isa-Rd vs VRd/Rd in patients who converted from MRD negative to MRD positive at any time point. In a landmark analysis of the time of conversion to MRD positivity, TTP in patients who converted from MRD negative at the end of induction to MRD positive also favored Isa-VRd/Isa-Rd. Evaluating MRD status of patients at >1 time point may therefore be useful to support decisions on treatment selection and treatment continuation/discontinuation. Our findings on the degree of MRD negativity and MRD-negative CR benefit achieved during induction and maintenance by patients receiving Isa-VRd/Isa-Rd vs VRd/Rd extend the IMROZ primary analyses and further support Isa-VRd as standard of care for frontline treatment of transplant-ineligible patients with NDMM. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT03319667.

To elucidate the molecular basis underlying differential responses and resistance to ibrutinib in Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM), we conducted a prospective phase 2 trial of ibrutinib monotherapy in treatment-naïve patients. A total of 74 sequential bone marrow (BM) aspirates from 17 patients, collected from baseline through 48 treatment cycles, were profiled using single-cell multiomics. BM cells were segregated primarily into B-cell/plasma cell and T-cell compartments. Longitudinal clonal tracking of malignant B cells/plasma cells identified 3 distinct evolutionary patterns: evolution (early clone contraction with late clone expansion and increasing genomic complexity), devolution (early clone expansion with late clone contraction and genomic simplification), and no evolution (stable clonal architecture). The evolution pattern was strongly associated with disease progression, whereas devolution correlated with durable clinical response. Transcriptomic profiling of resistant clones enabled development and validation of the Waldenström ibrutinib prediction (WIP) score, which predicted treatment response at baseline. Within the WIP signature, LYN emerged as a key regulator; LYN knockdown or inhibition significantly increased WM cell sensitivity to ibrutinib, suggesting a rational combination strategy. In parallel, GZMB+ CD8+ effector-memory T cells expanded after treatment in patients with progressive disease and coexisted with tumor evolution. These cells exhibited persistently impaired cytotoxic programs (eg, GNLY), a dedifferentiated memory-like state, elevated PDCD1 expression, and reduced T-cell receptor diversity. Together, this study provides, to our knowledge, the first single-cell framework of tumor clonal evolution and T-cell dysfunction under ibrutinib in WM, introduces the WIP score as a predictive biomarker for treatment response, and identifies actionable tumor-intrinsic and immune mechanisms driving resistance. This trial was registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT02604511.

The phase 1/2 Intergroup study E4412 investigated checkpoint blockade with nivolumab (Nivo) and ipilimumab (Ipi) combined with the CD30 targeting antibody-drug conjugate brentuximab vedotin (BV) in relapsed/refractory classic Hodgkin lymphoma. A total of 147 patients aged ≥12 years were randomized between BV/Nivo and BV/Ipi/Nivo; 132 patients were included in the primary efficacy analysis. The complete response (CR) rate, was 64.7% (52.2, 75.9) for BV/Nivo and 70.3% (57.6, 81.1) for BV/Ipi/Nivo (1-sided P = .29). The median survival follow-up was 38.0 months (interquartile range, 32.6-48.1). Progression-free survival (PFS) did not significantly differ between the 2 arms (hazard ratio [HR], 0.78, confidence interval [CI], 0.39-1.57; 1-sided P = .24). Treatment-related grade 3+ toxicities in the adult cohort, excluding rash, were similar between both arms (38.5% BV/Nivo and 39.3% BV/Ipi/Nivo); there was a higher frequency of grade 3 rash with BV/Ipi/Nivo (24.6%) compared with BV/Nivo (9.2%). We compared PFS by stem cell transplantation (SCT) status in a planned before hoc comparison; 58 patients received SCT, and 36-month PFS (from SCT) was >90% for both arms. Sixty-six patients were progression free after the first scan and did not undergo SCT. The 36-month PFS was 73.0% (54.5, 85.0) for BV/Ipi/Nivo compared with 45.8% (26.3, 63.4) for BV/Nivo (HR, 0.45; CI, 0.19-1.08; 1-sided P = .03). The study did not meet its primary end point of superior CR rate for the triplet, but it supports the use of checkpoint antibody-drug conjugate induction prior to auto SCT, and there is an intriguing signal of disease control for patients wishing to defer or avoid SCT with the triplet of BV/Ipi/Nivo. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT01896999.

NXT007 is a next-generation, activated factor VIII (FVIIIa)-mimetic bispecific antibody under investigation in the phase 1/2 NXTAGE trial. Here, we report the primary analysis of the multiple-ascending-dose Part B study in people with hemophilia A (PwHA). Eligible participants were men with severe HA without FVIII inhibitors. Four dose cohorts (B1-B4) were planned, with NXT007 administered subcutaneously at maintenance doses of 0.072 mg/kg, 0.28 mg/kg, 0.70 mg/kg, and 1.08 mg/kg, respectively, every 4 weeks. Primary end points were safety (adverse events [AEs] and serious AEs [SAEs]), tolerability, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and efficacy; secondary end points included incidence of anti-drug antibodies (ADAs). Participants in cohorts B1 (n = 10), B2 (n = 6), B3 (n = 6), and B4 (n = 8) had received NXT007 for a median (minimum to maximum) of 114.1 (29-140), 96.4 (88-112), 58.1 (52-72), and 22.2 (4-28) weeks, respectively. Two participants discontinued treatment: NXT007-unrelated AE (n = 1) and complete loss of NXT007 exposure due to ADAs (n = 1). Participants' plasma NXT007 concentration showed a dose-dependent increase, and predicted FVIII-equivalent activity reached a nonhemophilic level (≥40 IU/dL) in B2 onward. NXT007 had a favorable safety profile at all doses. Most AEs were mild/moderate and all 3 SAEs were considered unrelated to NXT007. Mean annualized treated bleed rates were 1.48 (B1), 0.28 (B2), 0.00 (B3), and 0.00 (B4). Two participants had pharmacokinetics-affecting NXT007 ADAs, including the B1 participant who discontinued treatment. NXTAGE Part B demonstrates that NXT007 could provide nonhemophilic coagulation activity in PwHA, with a less burdensome dose regimen than currently available therapies. This trial was registered at Japan Registry of Clinical Trials as jRCT2080224835.

VCAR33, a donor-derived CD33-directed chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR T) product, was developed to decrease relapse of high-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT). We describe preclinical characterization of the VCAR33 construct, which was optimized for long-term antitumor surveillance based on killing and persistence assays. Prior to its use in post-alloHCT maintenance, we evaluated safety and efficacy of VCAR33 in a phase 1/2 clinical study for adults with relapsed or measurable residual disease (MRD)-positive CD33+ AML/MDS after alloHCT. Fifteen patients received VCAR33 across 2 arms stratified by disease burden: 7 patients in arm A (bone marrow blasts ≥5%) at dose level 1 (DL1; 1 × 106 CAR+ Ts per kg) and 8 patients in arm B (bone marrow blasts <5%) at DL1 (n = 5) and DL2 (3 × 106 CAR+ Ts per kg; n = 3). The study ended for nonsafety reasons before escalation to DL3 (1 × 107 CAR+ Ts per kg) and maximum tolerated dose was not determined. The most common treatment-related adverse event was cytokine release syndrome (93.3%; all <grade 3). Four patients (26.7%) experienced immune cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (1 ≥grade 3) and 1 patient (6.7%) had grade 3 acute graft-versus-host disease within 28 days of VCAR33 infusion. Fourteen patients (93.3%) had transient VCAR33 expansion. Overall response rate was 20%: 2 patients had complete remission with incomplete count recovery in arm A and 1 arm B patient achieved MRD clearance. This allogeneic CAR T product demonstrated acceptable safety and preliminary antileukemic activity. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT05984199.

The Pediatric Hodgkin Consortium hypothesized that by increasing chemotherapeutic dose density for Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) they could increase the complete response (CR) rate among patients with favorable-risk HL after 8 weeks of Stanford V (vinblastine, doxorubicin, vincristine, bleomycin, mechlorethamine, etoposide and prednisone) compared with 8 weeks of VAMP (vinblastine, Adriamycin [doxorubicin], methotrexate, and prednisone). This would translate to a decrease in patients who required radiation therapy (RT) to achieve a cure. The HOD08 study was a phase 2 multicenter, investigator-initiated single-arm trial for patients aged ≤21 years with previously untreated stage 1A or 2A HL without mediastinal bulk or extranodal disease extension and <3 sites of disease. Treatment consisted of a modified 8-week Stanford V regimen. Modified, tailored, field RT was administered only to disease sites achieving less than a CR. The primary objective was to increase CR rate after 8 weeks of chemotherapy by at least 20% (from an estimated 44% to 64%) compared with patients treated on a previous trial (HOD99). HOD08 enrolled 85 patients with HL and 72 were evaluable for the primary objective, of whom 55 (76.4%) achieved a CR at all sites and did not receive RT. The 5-year event-free survival and overall survival rates for the entire cohort were 87.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 80.4-95.0) and 98.7% (95% CI, 96.2-100), respectively. A dose-dense modified Stanford V regimen reduced the proportion of pediatric patients with low-risk HL who received RT while maintaining excellent outcomes. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00846742.

Betibeglogene autotemcel (beti-cel) gene therapy for transfusion-dependent β-thalassemia (TDT) involves autologous transplantation of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells transduced with a modified β-globin gene to produce functional adult hemoglobin (Hb) containing βA-T87Q-globin (HbAT87Q). Sixty-three participants with TDT (median age, 17 years [range, 4-35]) received beti-cel in phase 1/2 (n = 22) or phase 3 (n = 41) studies and enrolled in the long-term follow-up LTF-303 study (median follow-up, 5.9 years [range, 2.9-10.1]). Manufacturing refinements in phase 3 increased transduction efficiency, resulting in higher drug product vector copy number and HbAT87Q levels, which translated into higher Hb and transfusion independence (TI) rates than in phase 1/2. TI was achieved by 15 of 22 (68.2%) phase 1/2 participants (median weighted average Hb during TI, 10.2 g/dL) and 37 of 41 (90.2%) of phase 3 participants (median, 11.2 g/dL), and was sustained through last follow-up. Treatment efficacy was similar across ages and TDT genotypes. Among participants achieving TI, 38 of 52 (73%) had discontinued iron chelation at last follow-up, with no increase in liver iron concentration. Markers of ineffective erythropoiesis, including serum transferrin receptor and erythropoietin, improved with restoration of iron homeostasis. Health-related quality-of-life assessment scores showed durable improvements. No malignancies, insertional oncogenesis, or vector-derived replication-competent lentivirus were reported. These findings establish beti-cel as a durable, 1-time therapy that achieves TI, restores iron balance, and improves quality of life, offering a potentially curative treatment option for people with TDT. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT02633943.

Core-binding factor acute myeloid leukemia (CBF-AML) is associated with KIT mutations and deregulated expression of KIT. We report results from the randomized, open-label, phase 3 trial of intensive chemotherapy with or without the multikinase inhibitor dasatinib in adult patients with CBF-AML. Patients received "3+7" induction therapy, followed by 4 cycles of high-dose cytarabine; in the investigational arm, patients received dasatinib 100 mg daily on days 8 to 21 in induction, and on days 6 to 28 in consolidation cycles, followed by 12-month single-agent dasatinib 100 mg daily. Primary end point was event-free survival (EFS). Secondary end points included overall survival, relapse-free survival, and cumulative incidence of relapse. A total of 202 patients were randomly assigned to the standard arm (n = 102) and to the dasatinib arm (n = 100). Median age was 49 years (range, 18-77); 94 patients had t(8;21), 108 had inv(16)/t(16;16); and 58 (28.7%) patients had a KIT comutation. There was no statistically significant difference in EFS (hazard ratio, 0.92; 95% confidence interval, 0.63-1.33; P = .66) or secondary end points between treatment arms. There was also no significant difference in EFS in subgroup analyses according to age, CBF-AML type, and KIT mutation status. The incidence of serious adverse events was higher in the investigational arm (64%) than in the standard arm (36%). In patients with CBF-AML, the addition of dasatinib to intensive chemotherapy failed to improve survival outcomes. The addition of dasatinib was associated with an increase in toxicity. This trial was registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT02013648.

Most patients with early-stage classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) are treated with doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine with or without radiation therapy, although studies are now evaluating the incorporation of novel agents paired with abbreviated chemotherapy. We present the efficacy and safety of AN+AD (brentuximab vedotin [BV] and nivolumab in combination with doxorubicin and dacarbazine) in patients with early-stage cHL. In this phase 2 study, patients with nonbulky (<10 cm) Ann Arbor stage I or II cHL received 4 cycles of AN+AD. The primary end point was complete response (CR) rate at end of treatment (EOT) by investigator. At the time of this analysis, 154 patients received ≥1 dose of AN+AD. The objective response rate at EOT was 96% (95% confidence interval [CI], 91.7-98.6), and the CR rate was 92% (95% CI, 86.0-95.4). In the favorable (n = 56) and unfavorable (n = 97) subgroups, CR rates were 95% (95% CI, 85.1-98.9) and 91% (95% CI, 83.1-95.7), respectively. The proportion of patients with duration of CR of at least 2 years was 96% (95% CI, 90.9-98.4). At a median follow-up of 27.9 months, the estimated 2-year progression-free survival rate was 97% (95% CI, 92.0-98.8). Any-grade and grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 99% and 44% of patients, respectively; no events of febrile neutropenia were reported. Any-grade treatment-emergent immune-mediated adverse events occurred in 22% of patients. One disease-related death was reported after the safety reporting period. Results from this study support the use of BV and nivolumab in combination with limited chemotherapy for patients with nonbulky, early-stage cHL. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT03646123.

Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors improve outcomes for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Long-term data with continuous therapy are limited. With a median follow-up of 10.0 years, we report final results on 84 patients with TP53 aberrations (deletion of chromosomal arm 17p or TP53 mutation) or ≥65 years of age treated with 420 mg of single-agent ibrutinib daily until progression or unacceptable toxicity. A total of 52 (61.9%) patients were previously untreated; 56 (66.7%) had unmutated immunoglobulin heavy-chain variable region; and 53 (63.1%) had TP53 aberrations, including 34 treatment naïve patients. As of 31July 2024, 9 (10.7%) patients continued ibrutinib, 39 (46.4%) discontinued ibrutinib for progressive disease, 31 (36.9%) for adverse events, and 5 (5.9%) withdrew consent. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 7.2 years; median overall survival (OS) was not reached. In patients with and without TP53 aberrations, median PFS was 5.6 years and not reached, and 10-year OS was 51.3% and 75.3%, respectively. The estimated 10-year PFS and OS for patients with TP53-aberrant CLL treated in first line was 38.6% and 65.7%, respectively. Minimal residual disease (MRD) was quantified by peripheral blood flow cytometry annually. Undetectable MRD (uMRD; at 10-4) was achieved in 13 (15.5%) patients after a median of 5 years. Twelve patients maintained uMRD, the longest observation ongoing at 8.0 years. Seventeen (42.5%) patients with best response of high MRD (>10-2) remained progression-free for >5 years. These results highlight durable benefits and deepening responses with ibrutinib, including in high-risk CLL. Whether patients maintaining uMRD for years can safely discontinue therapy should be assessed prospectively. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT01500733.

Many patients receiving frontline tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) for chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML-CP) experience inadequate disease control and/or adverse events (AEs) that impair quality of life. Treatments offering optimal efficacy, safety, and tolerability will support long-term therapy. In the primary analysis from the ASC4FIRST trial, a phase 3 randomized trial comparing asciminib with investigator-selected TKIs (IS-TKIs) in newly diagnosed CML-CP, asciminib demonstrated superior efficacy vs all IS-TKIs and vs imatinib in the imatinib stratum, meeting both primary objectives. In the secondary analysis (2.2 years' median follow-up), major molecular response (MMR) rate at week 96 was 74.1% with asciminib vs 52.0% with IS-TKIs (treatment difference, 22.4% [95% confidence interval (CI), 13.6-31.3]; 1-sided P< .001) and 76.2% with asciminib vs 47.1% with imatinib in the imatinib stratum (treatment difference, 29.7% [95% CI, 17.6-41.8]; 1-sided P< .001), meeting both key secondary objectives. MMR rate was 72.0% with asciminib vs 56.9% with second-generation (2G) TKIs (treatment difference, 15.1% [95% CI, 2.3-28.0]; 1-sided P< .05), suggesting possible clinical benefit, although the study was not designed to formally confirm statistical significance for this secondary end point. Safety/tolerability remained favorable with asciminib vs IS-TKIs. Dose reductions and interruptions, respectively, occurred with asciminib (18.5%; 46.5%), imatinib (23.2%; 47.5%), and 2G TKIs (54.9%; 63.7%). The hazard ratio for time to discontinuation of treatment due to AEs for asciminib vs 2G TKIs was 0.46 (95% CI, 0.215-0.997). With longer follow-up, asciminib continued to demonstrate a favorable benefit-risk profile over IS-TKIs and imatinib, supporting its potential as a treatment option for newly diagnosed CML-CP. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT04971226.

To prevent graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) in patients undergoing myeloablative allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT), a calcineurin inhibitor plus methotrexate is routinely used. Early phase studies suggested improved outcomes with Orca-T, an allogeneic T-cell immunotherapy that uses purified donor regulatory T cells to prevent GVHD with significantly less immunosuppression. This phase 3 trial randomized adult patients (N = 187) with acute leukemias or myelodysplastic syndrome undergoing myeloablative conditioning to receive either Orca-T with tacrolimus or a conventional allograft with tacrolimus and methotrexate (Tac/MTX), using granulocyte colony-stimulating factor-mobilized peripheral blood from HLA-matched donors. The primary end point was survival free from moderate-to-severe chronic GVHD (cGVHD; cGFS). Using a stratified log-rank test, cGFS was significantly higher in the Orca-T arm than in Tac/MTX (hazard ratio, 0.26; 95% confidence interval, 0.14-0.47; P< .001). One-year estimates were as follows: cGFS was 78.0% with Orca-T vs 38.4% with Tac/MTX; cumulative incidence of moderate-to-severe cGVHD was 12.6% with Orca-T and 44.0% with Tac/MTX (Gray test P< .001); overall survival was 93.9% with Orca-T vs 83.1% with Tac/MTX (P = .12); GVHD-free and relapse-free survival was 63.1% and 30.9% in the Orca-T and Tac/MTX arms (P< .001), respectively; nonrelapse mortality (NRM) was 3.4% with Orca-T vs 13.2% with Tac/MTX (P = .03). Orca-T met the primary end point of improved survival free from cGVHD compared with Tac/MTX prophylaxis and should be considered a new therapeutic option with low toxicity for GVHD prophylaxis. Moreover, significantly less toxicity was observed with Orca-T patients, including fewer serious infectious complications and less NRM. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT05316701.

Measurable residual disease (MRD) can predict relapse in patients with advanced myelodysplastic neoplasms (MDS) or acute myeloid leukemia (AML). We report the long-term efficacy and safety of MRD-guided preemptive azacitidine treatment to prevent relapse in the phase 2 Relapse Prevention With Azacitidine (RELAZA2) trial. Patients with MDS or AML after either intensive chemotherapy only or consecutive allogeneic stem cell transplantation were prospectively screened for imminent relapse by molecular MRD assessment. Patients who became MRD positive (MRDpos) during screening received azacitidine for up to 2 years to prevent relapse. The primary end point was the proportion of patients alive and relapse-free 6 months after azacitidine start. Of 357 patients screened, 119 (33.3%) became MRDpos, of whom 95 (79.8%) were eligible for azacitidine treatment. The primary end point was met; 60 (63%) patients were relapse free (95% confidence interval, 54-71; P< .0001) 6 months after azacitidine initiation with no new safety signals. Of 60 patients achieving MRD response during the first 6 cycles of azacitidine, 31 (52%) maintained response without hematological relapse for ≥2 years after azacitidine initiation. The median treatment-free duration after azacitidine discontinuation was 20.8 months; the longest ongoing response was 104 months. After a median follow-up of 6.6 years, 15 initial responders (25%) remained alive and in remission. Among screened patients who remained continuously MRD negative, 60-month overall survival and relapse-free survival were 88% and 79%, respectively. Patients with continuously negative MRD display a very favorable prognosis. Most patients with MRD positivity can be effectively treated with azacitidine with potential long-term remission even after termination of azacitidine. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01462578.

Marstacimab, a monoclonal antibody that inhibits tissue factor pathway inhibitor, is approved for prophylactic use in individuals with hemophilia A or B without inhibitors. We present efficacy and safety for individuals with inhibitors. The open-label, single-arm, phase 3 study evaluated once-weekly subcutaneous flat-dose marstacimab in males aged 12 to <75 years with severe hemophilia A or moderately severe to severe hemophilia B. Participants with inhibitors received bypassing agents (on-demand or routine prophylaxis) during a 6-month observational phase (OP) before entering a 12-month active treatment phase (ATP) with marstacimab. Primary end points were annualized bleeding rate (ABR) of treated bleeds and safety. Of 60 participants with inhibitors in the OP, 51 entered the ATP and received marstacimab. In the on-demand group (n = 48), mean estimated ABR declined from 19.78 (95% confidence interval [CI], 16.12-24.27) in the OP to 1.39 (95% CI, 0.85-2.29) during the ATP (ABR ratio, 0.07 [95% CI, 0.042-0.118]; 2-sided P< .0001). Results were consistent by hemophilia type (ABR ratio, 0.05 [hemophilia A, n = 40]; 0.13 [hemophilia B, n = 8]). Participants reported significant improvements in health-related quality of life. Adverse events were common but mostly mild; 1 treatment-related grade 3 skin rash led to discontinuation. Antidrug antibodies were detected in 19.6% of participants, with no apparent effect on efficacy or safety. In participants with inhibitors, marstacimab was associated with reduced bleeding rates and an acceptable safety profile, with no thromboembolic events. Marstacimab may be a viable treatment option for people with hemophilia A or B with inhibitors. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT03938792. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03938792.

We assessed the overall survival (OS) impact of time to relapse (TTR) in multinational cohorts with independent observational and randomized validation. Patients with nMTCL with frontline complete response were assigned to TTR12 (≤12 months) or without TTR12 based on time to progression or next therapy. OS analyses included modified landmark (m-LM), standard landmark (s-LM), and time-dependent Cox (td-Cox), adjusting for age, histology, and prognostic index for T-cell lymphoma (PIT) score. Across 452 patients, 165 (36.5%) had TTR12, 181 (40%) relapsed at ≥12 months, and 106 (23.5%) remained relapse-free. TTR12 conferred worse OS using m-LM (hazard ratio [HR], 2.14; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.58-2.90; P< .001), s-LM (HR, 1.92; 95% CI, 1.39-2.66; P< .001); and td-Cox (HR, 5.81; 95% CI, 2.94-11.46; P< .001). Results were consistent in the independent validation cohorts. TTR12 consistently conferred worse OS irrespective of frontline stem cell transplantation or PIT score, in peripheral T-cell lymphoma, not otherwise specified (m-LM: HR, 2.32; 95% CI, 1.51-3.55; P< .001; s-LM: HR, 2.10; 95% CI, 1.33-3.31; P = .001), anaplastic large cell lymphoma (m-LM: HR, 3.34; 95% CI, 1.18-9.50; P = .023; s-LM: HR, 2.96; 95% CI, 1.02-8.81; P = .046), and angioimmunoblastic T-cell/T follicular helper cell lymphoma (m-LM only: HR, 1.92; 95% CI, 1.15-3.21; P = .013). Second-line novel therapies improved OS (second-line start to death) vs chemotherapy in TTR12 only (HR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.37-0.97; P = .038; without TTR12: HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.51-1.32; P = .407). TTR12 serves as a prognostic and potential OS surrogate marker, supporting stratification of new risk groups and need for their differential treatment.

The phase 1/2 BelaRd (belantamab mafodotin [belamaf], lenalidomide, and dexamethasone) study evaluated the efficacy and safety of belamaf combined with lenalidomide and dexamethasone in unfit and frail transplant-ineligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM). Part 1 (n = 36) established a recommended belamaf phase 2 dose (RP2D) of 1.9 mg/kg every 8 weeks (median follow-up, 39.3 months). In part 2, 30 patients were randomized 1:1 in group A (n = 15), where belamaf dosing was guided by ophthalmologist-assessed ocular adverse events (OAEs), whereas in group B (n = 15), belamaf dosing was based on hematologist-led vision-related anamnestic (VRA) tool and ophthalmologist-assessed grade ≥3 OAEs. Among the RP2D patients (n = 42), overall response rate was 97.6%, median progression-free survival (PFS)/overall survival have not been reached yet, and the 18-month PFS and time to progression rates were 83.0% and 97.2%, respectively. Ocular toxicities were similar between assessments by hematologists and ophthalmologists, and no ophthalmologist withholding of a hematologist-led dosing occurred. Less than 1% of patients stopped driving/reading because of OAEs. Median time to belamaf reinfusion was 13 weeks. Overall, BelaRd is an effective regimen for transplant-ineligible patients with NDMM and warrants a phase 3 study in this setting. OAEs' impact on quality of life appears limited, and implementation of the hematologist-led VRA tool may eventually reduce the necessity for ophthalmologist assessments. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT04808037.

Hypodiploid and BCR::ABL1+ B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (BCP-ALL) confers a high risk of disease relapse. We investigated post-hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) outcomes within the prospective FORUM trial, comparing outcomes among these genetic subgroups with those of patients without these lesions. The use of pre- and post-HSCT add-on treatments, including tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) and immunotherapies, was also assessed. Multivariate analysis evaluated associations with overall survival (OS), event-free survival (EFS), and cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR). The FORUM trial enrolled 741 patients aged ≥4 years with BCP-ALL who underwent HSCT from HLA-matched donors (2013-2023). The 3-year OS and EFS did not differ significantly between patients with BCR::ABL1 fusion, hypodiploidy, and neither of these 2 genetic lesions. However, patients with hypodiploid BCP-ALL in second complete remission (CR2) showed inferior OS and EFS, driven by higher nonrelapse mortality (NRM), which occurred exclusively in near-diploid cases. No NRM occurred in severe hypodiploid cases conditioned with total body irradiation. Minimal residual disease (MRD) positivity at transplant predicted worse OS, EFS, and CIR in all genetic groups. Patients with hypodiploid BCP-ALL were difficult to salvage after relapse, even with chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy. By contrast, BCR::ABL1+ patients had favorable outcomes, even when MRD positive before HSCT. Prophylactic TKI use after HSCT improved EFS and reduced CIR. BCR::ABL1+ patients who received a transplant in CR2 had a 3-year OS of 96%. In conclusion, the standardized FORUM protocol yielded comparable outcomes across genetic subgroups. Posttransplant TKI maintenance improved outcomes in BCR::ABL1+ BCP-ALL. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01949129 and at www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu as #EudraCT2012-0032-22.

We compared daunorubicin/cytarabine plus fractionated gemtuzumab ozogamicin (DAGO2) with CPX-351 (CPX; 1:2 randomization) in 439 patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) aged ≥60 years (median age, 68 years) without known adverse-risk cytogenetics. Median follow-up was 35 months. Patients not in measurable residual disease (MRD)-negative remission after course 1 could enter a second randomization between standard and intensified chemotherapy. Post-course 1, the overall response rate (complete remission [CR] + CR with incomplete hematological recovery) was greater after DAGO2 (60% vs 47.5%; odds ratio [OR], 0.61; P = .016). Following course 2, the overall response was not significantly different (85% for DAGO2 vs 78% for CPX; P = .095). More patients attained CR with MRD negativity after course 1 in the DAGO2 arm (47% vs 29% for CPX; OR, 0.46; P = .004). We observed better 3-year event-free survival (34% vs 27%; hazard ratio [HR], 0.73; P = .012) and overall survival (52% vs 35%; HR, 0.62; P = .001) with DAGO2. CPX did not provide a survival benefit in patients with myelodysplasia (MDS)-related mutations and was associated with poorer survival in patients with NPM1 (HR, 2.83) and FLT3 mutations (HR, 2.14). Overall, 37% of patients underwent transplantation in first remission, with no difference in transplantation frequency or survival after transplant between randomization groups. Among patients entering the course 2 randomization (n = 107), survival was equivalent between standard and intensified CPX doses (P = .565). In conclusion, in this population of older patients with AML without known adverse-risk cytogenetics, DAGO2 resulted in superior survival compared with CPX. CPX did not benefit patients with MDS-related mutations over DAGO2. This trial was registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT02272478.