Randomized trials conducted by the Intergroupe Française du Myelome (IFM) demonstrate that the use of high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) and stem cell transplantation (SCT) improves event-free (EFS) and overall survival (OS) in younger patients with multiple myeloma (MM). Nevertheless, current HDCT regimens remain inadequate as all patients ultimately relapse following SCT. In an attempt to improve the OS of MM patients post-SCT we used an escalated HDCT regimen incorporating both intensified melphalan (160 mg/m2) and fractionated total body irradiation (12 Gy) to maximize the dose response of myeloma cells to these agents and included infusional etoposide 60 mg/kg in an attempt to eradicate clonal B cells potentially contributing to the myeloma clone. One hundred patients with MM received this intensified SCT regimen. The 100-day treatment-related mortality was 12% predominantly reflecting the development of interstitial pneumonitis (IP) in 28% of patients of whom 7/28 (25%) died. The predicted 5-year OS and EFS following the diagnosis of MM were 60% and 35%, respectively. The median OS from the time of transplant is 41 months and the median EFS is 28 months. More than two prior chemotherapy regimens, previous radiation therapy (RT) and the presence of an abnormal karyotype involving chromosomes 11 or 13 were significantly predictive of poor outcome. Interferon maintenance was not associated with improved outcome. Intensification of the HDCT regimen utilizing etoposide together with escalated melphalan and TBI increases morbidity and mortality without increasing OS beyond that reported with less toxic regimens.

The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of filgrastim, sargramostim, or sequential sargramostim and filgrastim on CD34(+) cell yields and morbidity after myelosuppressive mobilization chemotherapy (MC).

The effect of an indigenous medical preparation--Brahma Rasayana (BR)--on the haemopoetic protection in cancer patients undergoing radio in association with chemotherapy was studied. Administration of BR accelerated the recovery of the haemopoetic system as seen by a rapid rise in total leukocytes. Both lymphocytes and neutrophils were significantly increased by Rasayana treatment. Nadir of WBC was 3633 +/- 120 and 2954 +/- 305 in treated and untreated patients. Nadir of neutrophils was 2830 +/- 964 in treated patients and 1791 +/- 922 in untreated patients. Nadir of lymphocytes remained almost unchanged. Total number of consecutive days of leukopenia, neutropenia and lymphopenia was also significantly reduced after the treatment. Rasayana treatment also made serum lipid peroxidation decrease confirming its capacity of reducing oxidative stress induced by cancer treatment. The use of this non-toxic preparation as an adjuvant in cancer therapy will prove out to be highly beneficial.

Several in vitro and animal studies have shown that IL-3 primes hematopoietic stem cells to become more sensitive to later acting growth factors. We wanted to compare the toxicity and the synergistic stimulatory effect of interleukin-3 (IL-3) followed by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CFS) or granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) on white blood cell (WBC) and platelet counts, after standard-dose chemotherapy (CT) in patients with solid tumors.

To compare the toxicity and effects on hematologic recovery and circulating progenitor cell mobilization of three cytokine regimens administered after high-dose cyclophosphamide (HD-CTX; 6 g/m(2)), given as the first step of a high-dose sequential chemotherapy.

The ability of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) plus erythropoietin (EPO) treatment was compared in a randomized fashion with that of G-CSF treatment alone in promoting hematologic recovery and peripheral-blood progenitor-cell (PBPC) mobilization in previously untreated patients with advanced ovarian cancer who underwent their first course of epirubicin, paclitaxel, and cisplatin (ETP) chemotherapy during a phase II study of intensive outpatient ETP chemotherapy followed by high-dose carboplatin, etoposide, and melphalan (CEM) late intensification with PBPC support.

To determine the feasibility and safety of multiple sequential courses of high-dose chemotherapy and peripheral-blood progenitor cells (PBPCs) administered in a multicenter setting to patients with small-cell lung cancer.

To determine if inhibition of stem-cell activity induced by granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor ([GM-CSF]; Sargramostim; Immunex Corporation, Seattle, WA) withdrawal or priming protects hematopoietic stem cells from the cytotoxic effects of adjuvant chemotherapy for early-stage breast cancer.

The influence of leukapheresis size on the number of harvested peripheral blood progenitor cells is still unclear. A prospective randomized crossover trial was thus performed, to evaluate the effect of large-volume leukapheresis (LVL) versus normal-volume leukapheresis (NVL) on progenitor cells and engraftment in 26 patients with breast cancer and 15 patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma who were eligible for peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation.

Based on our preliminary experience, we have further evaluated the capacity of the paclitaxel/epirubicin combination (at the dose of 175 and 90 mg/m(2), respectively) plus G-CSF to mobilize hematopoietic progenitors into the circulation.

In order to assess the potential clinical benefit of filgrastim (G-CSF) after peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) autotransplantation a randomized study was begun in our center in July 1997: 62 patients were involved (30 received filgrastim after PBSC infusion and 32, the control group, received no cytokines). All were adults (median 40 years, range 18-65). Patients with one of three different pathologies were recruited: 28 had advanced breast carcinoma, 23 had lymphomas (12 Hodgkin's disease and 11 non-Hodgkin's lymphoma) and 11 had de novo AML. All of them were transplanted using myeloablative chemotherapy conditioning regimens. G-CSF was administered subcutaneously from day +5 in the treated group at a dose of 5 microg/kg body weight/day. The numbers of CD34+ and mononuclear (MNC) cells infused were similar in each group. Only minor differences regarding the use of G-CSF could be inferred from the analysis of the data. Faster granulocyte engraftment was evident in the treated group (mean of 10 vs 12 days to achieve >0.5 x 109/l granulocytes, P = 0.0008), without differences in incidence and severity of infections, days of fever or duration of antibiotic treatment between groups. There was slightly slower platelet engraftment (mean of 15 days in the group with G-CSF vs 12 days in the other group to achieve >20 x 109/l platelets, P = NS) in this series, but there were no differences in incidence and severity of haemorrhage or platelet transfusion support. Considering the economical costs, the median expenditure per inpatient stay was Eur5961 (range Eur4386-Eur17186) in the G-CSF group compared with Eur5751 (range Eur3676-Eur15640) in the control group (P = 0.47). From our data it could be concluded that for adult patients transplanted with PBSC there is no clear beneficial impact of post-infusion G-CSF administration.

Filgrastim (r-metHuG-CSF)-mobilized peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) and unstimulated bone marrow (BM) were evaluated and compared for reconstitution after high-dose chemotherapy in patients with relapsed Hodgkin's disease (HD) or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) with respect to engraftment, overall and relapse-free survival, and contamination by lymphoma cells using molecular analysis of immunoglobulin gene rearrangements. Forty-four patients with either NHL or HD underwent autologous transplantation after high-dose chemotherapy. Patients were randomized to receive either Filgrastim-mobilized PBPC (n = 15) or unstimulated BM (n = 14). An additional 15 patients received PBPC without randomization because of a recent history of marrow involvement by lymphoma. Use of PBPC was associated with faster neutrophil engraftment than BM (11 vs 14 days to an absolute neutrophil count >0.5 x 10(9)/l, P = 0.04), but without any difference in platelet engraftment, infectious complications, or overall or event-free survival. Both BM (65%) and PBPC (73%) were frequently contaminated by tumor cells as assessed by CDR3 analysis. Patients with negative polymerase chain reaction analysis of a BM sample during the study had a trend towards an improved survival; however, BM involvement by disease had no impact on the ability to mobilize or collect PBPC. We conclude that PBPC are as effective as BM in reconstituting hematopoiesis after high-dose chemotherapy and that both products are frequently contaminated by sequences marking the malignant clone.

The availability of the myeloid hemopoietic growth factors (HGF) granulocyte- and granulocyte/macrophage-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF and GM-CSF) has enhanced the therapeutic index of high-dose chemotherapeutic antitumoral regimens (HDCT), as well as the rate of severe damage to immune competence. We investigated some immune functions before, during and after one course of HDCT for poor-risk breast cancer and compared the effects of G-CSF and GM-CSF on the immune recovery. They exerted different influences on the functions we examined and showed distinctive patterns of both qualitative and quantitative in vivo activities on the immune system. The main findings were that (a) granulocyte and lymphocyte recovery rates were faster in the patients receiving G-CSF; (b) looking at the lymphocyte compartment, this difference was restricted to the CD3(+)/CD8(+) and CD56(+) lymphocyte subsets; (c) the reconstitution rate of CD19(+) lymphocytes was slow in both groups; (d) at the end of follow-up HLA-DR expression by CD3(+) lymphocytes was higher in the GM-CSF group; (e) the lymphocyte proliferative capacity was restored at a faster rate in the GM-CSF group, whereas cytotoxic activities recovered better in the G-CSF group; (f) the early repopulating phase was characterized by higher interleukin-6 serum levels in the GM-CSF group. Overall, GM-CSF seemed to exert an earlier effect on all T lymphocyte subsets, preventing them from a complete drop during the long-lasting "nadir" of the cell count, whereas G-CSF appeared to boost them strongly, though a few days later, hastening their final recovery. The distinct pattern of the cytokine cascade induced by each factor, consistent with the different functional changes, seemed to account for the peculiarities of their immune modulations.

In this randomized prospective study, we included 30 patients with different hematological diseases (acute myeloid leukemia, acute lymphoblastic leukemia, chronic myeloid leukemia, myelodysplastic syndrome or severe aplastic anemia) to compare peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) (15 patients; mean age 23) and bone marrow (BM) (15 patients; mean age 21.8) as a source for allogeneic transplantation regarding the tempo of hematopoietic recovery and the incidence of acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). In the BM group, the median nucleated cell count harvested was 1.3 x 10(10), while in the PBSC group, the aphereses contained a median of 4.4 x 10(6) CD34+/kg recipient weight. PBSC transplantation (PBSCT) was associated with faster hematopoietic reconstitution measured as absolute neutrophil count (ANC) >0.5 x 10(9)/l (log-rank P value <0.0018) and platelet count >25 x 10(9)/l (log-rank P value <0.0098). Seven patients (46.7%) in the BM group vs only one patient (6.7%) in the PBSC group developed acute GVHD (P = 0.013). Therefore, we conclude that PBSCT is associated with faster hematopoietic recovery and the incidence of acute GVHD does not exceed that seen with BMT.

Relapse remains the major cause of mortality in haematological malignancies treated with autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Graft versus tumour reaction (GVT) associated to autologous graft versus host disease (GVDH) may contribute to eliminate minimal residual disease (MRD) after ASCT. Eighty patients with several diagnostics were submitted to ASCT. After stem cell infusion, patients randomised in 4 groups. Groups were treated as follows: Group A received either a IFN (alpha Interferon--1,000,000 U/d), Cyclosporine A (CSA--1 mg/-kg/d intravencus) for 28 days, and granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF-250/m2/d) until engraftment; B: CSA (same dose and way) and GM-CSF; C: CSA (1 mg/kg/d orally) and GM-CSF and D: only GM-CSF. Patients were inspected daily and if skin rash was detected, a skin biopsy was obtained at that moment, otherwise biopsies were obtained at day 21 after ASCT. GVHD was positive in 23 patients (13 from group A and 10 from group B). All cases were grades I and II. A majority of CD4+ T lymphocytes was seen in skin infiltrates. No significant differences were seen in WBC and platelets engraftment times, antibiotic administration or hospitalisation days required among the four groups. With a median follow up of 18 months, there were no differences in disease free survival (DFS) or overall survival (OS) between the patients who developed GVHD and the others. However, considering that myeloma cells do not express antigen MCH II, which is necessary for GVT effect, we excluded patients with multiple myeloma (MM) from survival analysis, thus obtaining a significant difference in OS results between patients who developed GVHD and those in whom this reaction was not observed (81% vs 58% p:0.05). We conclude that pharmacological induction of GVHD in ASCT is possible with CSA administration (1 mg/kg/d i.v.). Development of GVHD showed a better outcome for patients in our study except for those patients with MM. This results must be confirmed by a longer follow up of our patients and further studies.

To investigate the suitability of recycling single blastomeres to assess multiple genetic variables for preimplantation genetic diagnosis.

Stem cell factor (SCF) has been shown to synergize with filgrastim to mobilize CD34(+) cells into the peripheral blood. To determine if addition of SCF to chemotherapy and filgrastim reduces the number of leukaphereses required to achieve a target yield of 5 x 10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg, 102 patients with multiple myeloma were randomized to receive mobilization chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide (4 g/m(2)) and either SCF (20 micrograms/kg/d) combined with filgrastim (5 micrograms/kg/d) or filgrastim alone (5 micrograms/kg/d), administered daily until leukaphereses were completed. After collection, patients were treated with myeloablative therapy supported by autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) infusion and filgrastim (5 micrograms/kg/d). There was a significant difference between the treatment groups in the number of leukaphereses required to collect 5 x 10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg (median of 1 v 2 for SCF + filgrastim and filgrastim alone, respectively, P =.008). Patients receiving the combination of SCF plus filgrastim had a 3-fold greater chance of reaching 5 x 10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg in a single leukapheresis compared with patients mobilized with filgrastim alone. The median CD34(+) cell yield was significantly increased for the SCF group in the first leukapheresis (11.3 v 4.0 x 10(6)/kg, P =.003) and all leukaphereses (12.4 v 8.2 x 10(6)/kg, P =.007). Total colony-forming unit-granulocyte-macrophage (CFU-GM) and mononuclear cell counts were also significantly higher in the SCF group in the first leukapheresis and in all leukaphereses. As expected for patients mobilized to an optimal CD34(+) cell yield, the time to engraftment was similar between the 2 treatment groups. Cells mobilized with the combination of SCF plus filgrastim were thus considered effective and safe for achieving rapid engraftment. Treatment with SCF plus filgrastim was well tolerated, with mild to moderate injection site reactions being the most frequently reported adverse events. There were no serious allergic-like reactions to SCF. The addition of SCF to filgrastim after cyclophosphamide for PBPC mobilization resulted in a significant increase in CD34(+) cell yield and a concomitant reduction in the number of leukaphereses required to collect an optimal harvest of 5 x 10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg.

The kinetics of mobilization and optimal timing of peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) collection were evaluated in 190 patients with multiple myeloma undergoing stem cell harvest after mobilization with cyclophosphamide, prednisone and G-CSF. There was a strong correlation between the WBC count and the number of CD34+ cells circulating in peripheral blood (r = 0.875). Initiating leukapheresis based on rising WBC and platelet counts rather than on a fixed day increased the mean number of CD34+ cells 115% (9.7 to 20.9 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg; P = 0.010) for the total of all leukaphereses and 59% for the total of all CD34-selected products (5.1 to 8.1 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg; P = 0.011). Although the yield and purity of the CD34-selected product were not significantly affected (P > or = 0.071), the percentage of patients with concentrations of CD34+ cells in the initial leukapheresis of > 1% increased from 47% to 70% (P = 0.004). The mean purity of the selected product was related to the starting percentage: 48.9% if < 1% and 81.5% if > or = 1% (P < 0.001). Collection of stem cells based on rising WBC and platelet counts significantly increased the number of CD34+ cells in leukaphereses and CD34-selected products in comparison with collection on a fixed day.

Peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) can be mobilized by chemotherapy, cytokines, or the combination of both. Recently, data from two non-randomized studies were published, showing an advantage for a combination of rhG-CSF plus rhEpo compared to rhG-CSF alone in mobilization of PBPC. To address this question we initiated a prospective, randomized trial in patients with breast cancer. Thirty (28 female, two male) of 32 randomized patients were evaluable. After primary surgery, therapy consisted of two cycles of VIP-E chemotherapy followed by high-dose (HD) chemotherapy with VIC. Mobilization and harvest of PBPC followed cycle 2. Group A received 5 microg rhG-CSF/kg body weight (bw) plus 150 IU rhEpo/kg bw. Group B was treated with 5 microg rhG-CSF/kg bw from dl until end of harvest. In the peripheral blood CD34+ cells as well as colony-forming units (CFU) started to rise on d8 with a peak on d10, followed by a decrease. No significant differences were observed between the groups. Furthermore, there was no significant difference with regard to MNC, CD34+ cells BFU-E and CFU-GM in apheresis products. Transplantation of > 1 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg bw after HD chemotherapy resulted in normal hematological recovery of all patients. No differences were observed in time to neutrophil or platelet recovery and need for blood product support. In this study addition of rhEpo to our standard mobilization chemotherapy did not result in improved mobilization of PBPC or in clinical benefits after HD chemotherapy.