Interleukin-11 (IL-11) is a pleiotropic cytokine that regulates the growth and development of hematopoietic stem cells and decreases the proinflammatory mediators of cytokine and nitric oxide production. In animal models of arthritis, treatment with recombinant human IL-11 (rhIL-11) reduces both the level of synovitis and the histologic lesion scores in the joints. The goal of this phase-I/II study in adults with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) was to evaluate the safety and clinical activity of different doses and schedules of rhIL-11 in patients with active RA for whom treatment with at least one disease-modifying antirheumatic drug had failed. This was a multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled trial that evaluated the safety and tolerability of rhIL-11 in 91 patients with active RA. rhIL-11 was administered subcutaneously; patients were randomized into one of five treatment groups (ratio of rhIL-11 to placebo, 4:1). Patients were treated for 12 weeks with either 2.5 or 7.5 microg/kg of rhIL-11 or placebo twice per week or 5 or 15 microg/kg of rhIL-11 or placebo once per week. The status of each subject's disease activity in accordance with the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria was assessed before, during, and after completion of administration of the study drug. Administration of rhIL-11 was well tolerated at all doses and schedules. The most frequent adverse event was a reaction at the injection site. The data suggest a statistically significant reduction in the number of tender joints (P < 0.008) at the 15 microg/kg once-weekly dose schedule but showed no overall significant benefit at the ACR criterion of a 20% response. The trial showed rhIL-11 to be safe and well tolerated at a variety of doses and schedules over a 12-week treatment period in patients with active RA. The only adverse event clearly associated with rhIL-11 administration was reaction at the injection site.

Myelosuppressive chemotherapy is frequently used for mobilization of autologous CD34(+) progenitor cells into the peripheral blood for subsequent collection and support of high-dose chemotherapy. The administration of myelosuppressive chemotherapy is typically followed by a myeloid growth factor and is associated with variable CD34 cell yields and morbidity. The two most commonly used myeloid growth factors for facilitation of CD34 cell harvests are granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF). We performed a randomized phase III clinical trial comparing G-CSF, GM-CSF, and sequential administration of GM-CSF and G-CSF following administration of myelosuppressive chemotherapy. We evaluated CD34 yields, morbidity, and cost-effectiveness of the three cytokine schedules. One hundred and fifty-six patients with multiple myeloma, breast cancer, or lymphoma received cyclophosphamide with either paclitaxel or etoposide and were randomized to receive G-CSF 6 microg/kg/day s.c., GM-CSF 250 microg/m(2)/day s.c., or GM-CSF for 6 days followed by G-CSF until completion of the stem cell harvest. Compared with patients who received GM-CSF, patients who received G-CSF had faster recovery of absolute neutrophil count to 0.5 x 10(9) per liter (median of 11 vs14 days, P = 0.0001) with fewer patients requiring red blood cell transfusions (P= 0.008); fewer patients with fever (18% vs 52%, P = 0.001); fewer hospital admissions (20% vs 42%, P = 0.13); and less intravenous antibiotic therapy (24% vs 59%, P = 0.001). Patients who received G-CSF also yielded more CD34 cells (median 7.1 vs 2.0 x 10(6) kg per apheresis, P = 0.0001) and a higher percentage achieved 2.5 x 10(6) CD34 cells per kilogram (94% vs 78%, P = 0.21) and 5 x 10(6) CD34 cells per kilogram (88% vs 53%, P = 0.01) or more CD34 cells per kilogram with fewer aphereses (median 2 vs 3, P = 0.002) and fewer days of growth factor treatment (median 12 vs 14, P = 0.0001). There were no significant differences in outcomes between groups receiving G-CSF alone and the sequential regimen. After high-dose chemotherapy, patients who had peripheral blood stem cells mobilized with G-CSF or the sequential regimen received higher numbers of CD34 cells and had faster platelet recovery with fewer patients requiring platelet transfusions than patients receiving peripheral blood stem cells mobilized by GM-CSF. In summary, G-CSF alone is superior to GM-CSF alone for the mobilization of CD34(+) cells and reduction of toxicities following myelosuppressive chemotherapy. An economic analysis evaluating the cost-effectiveness of these three effective schedules is ongoing at the time of this writing.

To analyse prognostic factors influencing hematopoietic recovery in patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphomas prospectively treated with intensive chemotherapy followed by peripheral blood progenitor-cells transplantation.

The assessment of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) as an end-point in clinical trials requires subjective judgement to distinguish morbidity caused by GVHD from morbidity caused by other complications. We developed a method based on ordinal regression for longitudinal assessment of morbidity involving the skin, liver and gut, regardless of cause as an objective end-point in randomized prospective phase III treatment or prevention trials for which GVHD is an outcome of interest. This method was validated for treatment studies by showing that morbidity was more severe among patients with grade II-IV GVHD than among those who did not have GVHD. We found no differences in morbidity involving the skin, liver and gut after the diagnosis of GVHD in a group of 30 patients who received peripheral blood stem cells and a group of 37 who received marrow in a randomized phase III clinical trial. These preliminary results suggest that objective end-points could be used in randomized clinical trials for treatment of GVHD. Further studies will be needed to determine if similar methods could be used in randomized clinical trials for prevention of GVHD.

The rapid recovery of hematopoiesis after allogeneic blood stem cell transplantation has been attributed to the quality and quantity of hematopoietic progenitors in the blood stem cell grafts from filgrastim-stimulated donors. To determine whether further stimulation with filgrastim after transplantation would affect hematopoietic recovery, a prospective, randomized, controlled study was performed. Forty-two adult recipients of allogeneic blood stem cells from human leukocyte antigen-matched related donors were randomized to receive 10 microg/kg per day filgrastim subcutaneously from day 1 through neutrophil recovery or no growth factor support after transplantation. There was no significant difference between the 2 groups in the number of CD34(+) cells infused (median, 4.8 vs 4.3 x 10(6)/kg). Graft-versus-host (GVHD) disease prophylaxis consisted of tacrolimus and steroids for 9 patients and tacrolimus and minimethotrexate for 33 patients. The group receiving filgrastim had a shorter time to neutrophil levels greater than 0.5 x 10(9)/L (day 12 vs day 15, P =.002) and to neutrophil levels greater than 1.0 x 10(9)/L (day 12 vs day 16, P =.01). The filgrastim group also had a trend for earlier discharge (day 16 vs 20, P =.05). There was no significant difference between the groups in time to platelet recovery, number of transfusions, regimen-related toxicity, infection, incidence of GVHD, relapse, survival, or hospital charges. It can be concluded that the administration of filgrastim after allogeneic blood stem cell transplantation shortens the time to neutrophil recovery. (Blood. 2001;97:3405-3410)

Allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell grafts contain about 10 times more T and B cells than marrow grafts. Because these cells may survive in transplant recipients for a long time, recipients of blood stem cells may be less immunocompromised than recipients of marrow. Immune reconstitution was studied in 115 patients randomly assigned to receive either allogeneic marrow or filgrastim-mobilized blood stem cell transplantation. Between day 30 and 365 after transplantation, counts of most lymphocyte subsets were higher in the blood stem cell recipients. The difference was most striking for CD4 T cells (about 4-fold higher counts for CD45RA(high) CD4 T cells and about 2-fold higher counts for CD45RA(low/-)CD4 T cells; P <.05). On assessment using phytohemagglutinin and herpesvirus antigen-stimulated proliferation, T cells in the 2 groups of patients appeared equally functional. Median serum IgG levels were similar in the 2 groups. The rate of definite infections after engraftment was 1.7-fold higher in marrow recipients (P =.001). The rate of severe (inpatient treatment required) definite infections after engraftment was 2.4-fold higher in marrow recipients (P =.002). The difference in the rates of definite infections was greatest for fungal infections, intermediate for bacterial infections, and lowest for viral infections. Death associated with a fungal or bacterial infection occurred between day 30 and day 365 after transplantation in 9 marrow recipients and no blood stem cell recipients (P =.008). In conclusion, blood stem cell recipients have higher lymphocyte-subset counts and this appears to result in fewer infections. (Blood. 2001;97:3380-3389)

High-dose chemotherapy and peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT) may accelerate telomere length loss in haematopoietic stem cells. As data including pre-and post-treatment samples are lacking, we studied leukocyte telomere length and telomerase activity before and after treatment in breast cancer patients randomized to receive 5 adjuvant courses FEC (5-FU, epirubicin and cyclophosphamide) (n = 17), or 4 x FEC followed by high-dose cyclophosphamide, thiotepa, carboplatin and autologous PBSCT (n = 16). Haemoglobin, MCV, leukocyte-and platelet numbers were assessed prior to (t(0)), 5 months after (t(1)) and 9 months after chemotherapy (t(2)); these parameters were decreased at t(1)and t(2)compared to t(0)(high-dose: all parameters; standard-dose: leukocytes and platelets), and all parameters were lower after high-dose than standard-dose treatment at t(1). Paired individual leukocyte samples of t(0)and t(1)showed telomere length change (determined by telomere restricted fragment (TRF) assay) ranging from +0.8 to -2.2 kb, with a decreased TRF length in 9 patients of both groups. Telomerase activity (determined by TRAP assay) was below detection limit in leukocyte samples of t(0)and t(1). Thus, standard-and high-dose chemotherapy negatively affect haematological reconstitution in this setting. In individual patients, telomere length can be remarkably changed following haematological proliferative stress after treatment.

Several acute hemolysis episodes, sometimes lethal, have been recently described after transplantation of allogeneic peripheral blood hematopoietic stem cells (PBHSCs). Hemolysis resulted from the production of donor-derived antibodies (Abs) directed at ABO antigens (Ags) present on recipient red blood cells (RBCs). A multicenter randomized phase III clinical study comparing allogeneic PBHSC transplantation (PBHSCT) versus bone marrow hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (BMHSCT) has been conducted in France. In the course of this study, serum anti-A and/or anti-B Ab titers were compared before the conditioning regimen and on day +30 after transplantation in 49 consecutive evaluable PBHSCT (n = 21) or BMHSCT (n = 28) recipients. PBHSCT resulted in a higher frequency of increased anti-A and/or anti-B Ab titers 30 days after transplantation as compared to BMHSCT: 8 (38%) of 21 versus 3 (11%) of 28 (P =.04). In PBHSCT recipients, increased titers were observed mostly after receiving a minor ABO mismatch transplant: 5 of 7 versus 3 of 14 in the absence of any minor ABO mismatch (P =.05), whereas this was not the case after BMHSCT: 1 of 8 versus 2 of 20. Anti-A and/or anti-B serum Abs detectable at day +30 after PBHSCT were always directed against A and/or B Ags absent both on donor and recipient RBCs. Finally, 3 of 21 PBHSCT versus 0 of 28 BMHSCT recipients developed anti-allogeneic RBC Abs other than ABO (P =.07). Overall, the data strongly suggest that immunohematologic reconstitution differs significantly after granulocyte colony-stimulating factor-mobilized PBHSCT when compared to BMHSCT. Such a difference could contribute to the acute hemolysis described after PBHSCT as well as to distinct alloreactivity after PBHSCT.

The experiences of 69 (38 marrow and 31 peripheral blood stem cell [PBSC]) donors participating in a randomized trial comparing allogeneic bone marrow with PBSC transplantation were studied. Marrow was collected by means of standard harvest techniques and general or regional anesthesia. PBSC donors were treated with 5 to 7 days of filgrastim at a dose of 16 microg/kg/d and underwent 1 to 3 days of apheresis to obtain 5 x 10(6) CD34(+) cells per kilogram recipient weight. Donors completed questionnaires describing their health experiences before, during, and then weekly after donation until return to baseline status. Both marrow and PBSC donors reported minimal fluctuation in symptoms measuring emotional status. In contrast, both groups of donors reported deterioration in physical status starting with administration of filgrastim (PBSC donors) or after the marrow collection procedure. The symptom burden reported was similar, with pain a prominent symptom for both groups. Equivalent mean levels of maximal pain, average pain, and pain duration through the day were reported, although toxicity peaks occurred at different time points during the harvest procedures. All PBSC donors but only 79% of marrow donors reported good physical status by 14 days after the harvest procedures. These data demonstrate similar levels of physical discomfort for hematopoietic stem cell donors regardless of the collection procedure used, but a quicker resolution of symptoms for PBSC donors.

Some phenotypic and functional properties of lymphocytes from bone marrow or peripheral blood stem cell donors were compared in a randomized study. Lymphocyte subsets were analyzed by immunocytometry in blood harvested from bone marrow donors (n = 27) and from peripheral blood stem cell donors before and after granulocyte colony-stimulating factor mobilization (n = 23) and in bone marrow and peripheral blood stem cell grafts. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor mobilization increased the blood T and B, but not NK, lymphocyte counts. All lymphocyte counts were approximately 10-fold higher in peripheral blood stem cell grafts than in bone marrow grafts. Analysis of CD25, CD95, HLA-DR, and CD45RA expression shows that T-cell activation level was lower after granulocyte colony-stimulating factor mobilization. Similarly, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor reduced by twofold to threefold the percentage of interferon-gamma, interleukin-2, and tumor necrosis factor-alpha-secreting cells within the NK, NK-T, and T-cell subsets and severely impaired the potential for interferon-gamma production at the single-cell level. mRNA levels of both type 1 (interferon-gamma, interleukin-2) and type 2 (interleukin-4, interleukin-13) cytokines were approximately 10-fold lower in peripheral blood stem cell grafts than in bone marrow grafts. This reduced potential of cytokine production was not associated with a preferential mobilization of so-called "suppressive" cells (CD3+CD4-CD8-, CD3+CD8+CD56+, or CD3+TCRVA24+CD161+), nor with a modulation of killer cell receptors CD161, NKB1, and CD94 expression by NK, NK-T, or T cells. Our data demonstrate in a randomized setting that quantitative as well as qualitative differences exist between a bone marrow and a peripheral blood stem cell graft, whose ability to produce type 1 and type 2 cytokines is impaired.

Ro 25-8315 is produced by conjugation of rhG-CSF mutant with polyethylene glycol (PEG). The purpose of this study was to examine the pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of Ro 25-8315 in comparison with Filgrastim (rhG-CSF). Subjects received single subcutaneous doses of Ro 25-8315 ranging from 10 to 150 microg/kg using a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled design. Filgrastim was administered as a single dose (5 or 10 microg/kg) and, following a 14-day washout period, daily for 7 days. Ro 25-8315 increased absolute neutrophil count (ANC) by 6- to 8-fold and CD34+ cell count more than 30-fold at the highest doses tested. Single doses (60-150 microg/kg) of Ro 25-8315 and multiple doses of Filgrastim had similar effects on ANC and CD34+, although Ro 25-8315 had a greater effect on CFU-GM. The pharmacokinetics of Ro 25-8315 were dose-dependent, with peak concentrations and area under the serum concentration-time curve (AUC) increasing 100-fold over the range of doses studied. Time to reach peak concentration (T(max)) and half-life of Ro 25-8315 averaged 20-30 hr at all doses, approximately three times longer than with Filgrastim. Adverse events were not serious and occurred with similar frequency with both products. Pegylation of rhG-CSF mutant results in more desirable pharmacokinetic properties and a longer duration of action with effective increases in ANC and measures of peripheral blood progenitor cell mobilization for at least 1 week.

Since low T cell counts evaluated 1 month after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT) are associated with an increased risk of leukemia relapse (Powles et al., Blood 1998; 91: 3481-3486), we compared, in a randomized multicentric clinical study, the peripheral blood cells obtained 30 days after allogeneic BMT vs allogeneic G-CSF-mobilized peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (BCT) in an HLA-identical setting. T cell counts were higher 30 days after BCT (718+/-142 cells/microl, n = 20) than after BMT (271+/-53 cells/microl, n = 26, P = 0.006). However, T cells were less activated after BCT than after BMT, as demonstrated by a lower expression level of CD25 and a lower percentage of HLA-DR+ and CD95+ T cells. Furthermore, CD4+, CD8+ and CD45RA+ post-BCT T cell counts correlated with the number of cells infused with the PBSC graft, while such a correlation was not observed between post-BMT counts and BM graft cell numbers, suggesting that the intensity of post-transplant peripheral lymphoid expansion and/or deletion differed between BCT and BMT. A comparison of the input of T cells expressing different CD45 isoforms with the post-transplant cell recovery further confirmed that, within the CD4+ T cell subset, post-transplant expansions occurred at a higher level after BMT than after BCT, affecting mainly the CD4+ CD45RO+ subset. Altogether, our data demonstrate for the first time in a randomized setting that homeostasis of the T cell pool is less altered early after BCT than after BMT. This may have a strong impact on the graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) effect and subsequent relapse rate.

Conflicting results have been reported regarding the effect of various growth factors on the mobilization of natural killer (NK) cells and dendritic cells in patients undergoing stem cell mobilization for autotransplantation. We compared the extent of mobilization of NK cells and dendritic cells in non-Hodgkin's (NHL) patients undergoing mobilization with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), granulocyte-macrophage (GM)-CSF, or GM-CSF followed by G-CSF. Overall, 35 patients were studied. NK cells and dendritic were quantitated by flow cytometry. NK cells were defined as the sum of CD56(+) cells and CD56/CD16(+) cells. Dendritic cells were defined as the sum of CD80(+) and CD80(+)/CD14(+) cells. NK activity was determined by by microcytotoxicity assay. NK activity correlated well with the total amount of CD56(+) cells mobilized to the peripheral blood. Patients in the three arms of the study mobilized similar amounts of NK cells and NK activity, and patients who lacked NK activity in the peripheral blood, before mobilization, lacked NK activity in their apheresis collections. In contrast to NK cell mobilization, mobilization of dendritic cells/kg was three- to five-fold higher in patients mobilized with GM-CSF-containing regimens compared to patients mobilized with G-CSF alone. We conclude that GM-CSF-containing mobilization regimens are superior for dendritic cell mobilization but similar in the mobilization of NK cells. Therefore, we recommend using GM-CSF-containing regimens for patients undergoing ex vivo or in vivo manipulation of dendritic cells.

Co-mobilization of CD34(+) cells and tumor has been documented in patients with different types of cancer undergoing peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT). Conflicting reports were published regarding the role of various growth factors in tumor cells mobilization, hence we studied the extent of CD34(+) cells and lymphoma cell mobilization in 35 non-Hodgkin's (NHL) patients primed by cyclophosphamide (Cy) in combination with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (GCSF) (A, 13 patients), granulocyte-macrophage (GM)-CSF (B, 10 patients), or GM-CSF followed by G-CSF (C, 12 patients). CD34(+) cells were quantitated by flow cytometry and lymphoma cells by the TaqMan Real Time PCR for bcl-2 gene rearrangement. Successful collection in 4 days of > or = 2 x 10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg needed for prompt engraftment was obtained in 76%, 60%, and 58% of patients in arms A, B, and C, respectively. Lymphoma cell mobilization was detected in 35% patients tested, 78% of which had follicular lymphoma. Lymphoma cell mobilization was similar in the three arms of the study, however, presence of lymphoma cells was prevalent in patients who failed to mobilize the amount of 0.4 x 10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg in 2 days ("poor mobilizers") and reached 42%, compared to 17% in the "successful mobilizers" group of patients. Lymphoma cell contamination in PBSCs was detected proportionately in the peripheral blood and in the bone marrow. We conclude that bcl-2 gene rearrangement is prevalent in patients with follicular histology, and, in these patients, an inverse relationship was observed between mobilization of CD34(+) cells and lymphoma cells. Our results explain the high relative risk (1.98) for mobilization in patients with follicular histology.

The impact of amifostine on PBPC mobilization with paclitaxel and ifosfamide plus G-CSF was assessed.

CXCR4 is the receptor for the chemokine stromal derived factor-1 (SDF-1), is expressed on CD34+ cells, and has been implicated in the process of CD34+ cell migration and homing. We studied the mobilization of CD34/CXCR4 cells and the plasma levels of SDF-1 and flt3-ligand (flt3-L) in 36 non-Hodgkin's lymphoma patients receiving cyclophosphamide (Cy) plus G-CSF (arm A), Cy plus GM-CSF (arm B), or Cy plus GM-CSF followed by G-CSF (arm C) for peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) mobilization and autotransplantation. We observed lower plasma levels of SDF-1 in PBSCs compared to premobilization bone marrow samples. The mean plasma SDF-1 levels were similar in PBSC collections in the three arms of the study. In contrast, SDF-1 levels in the apheresis collections of the "good mobilizers" (patients who collected a minimum of 2 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg in one to four PBSC collections) were significantly lower than the apheresis collections of the "poor mobilizers" (> or = 0.4 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg in the first two PBSC collections; 288 +/- 82 pg/ml versus 583 +/- 217 pg/ml; p = 0.0009). The mean percentage of CD34+ cells expressing CXCR4 in the apheresis collections was decreased in the PBSC collections compared with premobilization values from 28% to 19.4%. Furthermore, the percentage of CD34+ cells expressing CXCR4 in the good mobilizers was significantly lower compared with the poor mobilizers (14.7 +/- 2.1% versus 33.6 +/- 2.1%; p = 0.002). The good mobilizers had also significantly lower levels of flt3-L compared with the poor mobilizers (34 +/- 4 pg/ml versus 106 +/- 11 pg/ml; p = 0.006), Finally, the levels of flt3-L strongly correlated with SDF-1 levels (r = 0.8; p < 0.0001). We conclude: A) low plasma levels of SDF-1 and low expression of CXCR4 characterize patients with good mobilization outcome, and B) the levels of SDF-1 correlate with flt3-L, suggesting an association of these cytokines in mobilization of CD34+ cells.

This study was conducted to determine the impact of immune activation, cytokine production and apoptosis on the naive CD4+ cell count and the function of hematopoietic progenitor cells during the initial phase of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). Blood samples from 11 HIV-infected patients were collected prior to HAART and after 4 and 12 weeks of therapy. Flow cytometry was used to determine the naive CD4+ count and activated T cells. The cloning efficiency of progenitor cells was determined using a colony-forming cells assay. Finally, apoptosis and cytokine production were determined. During the study period, the naive CD4+ count and the cloning efficiency increased significantly. Immune activation was found in HIV-infected patients and decreased during HAART. The level of immune activation correlated negatively with both the naive CD4+ count and the function of progenitor cells. A negative correlation was found between apoptosis and the naive CD4+ count. Alterations in cytokine production during HAART or correlation between cytokine production and the naive CD4+ count or the cloning efficiency of progenitor cells were not detected. In conclusion, immune activation in HIV-infected patients treated with HAART is inversely correlated with the function of progenitor cells and the naive CD4+ count.

In recipients of allogeneic hematopoietic-cell transplants, peripheral-blood cells mobilized with the use of filgrastim (recombinant granulocyte colony-stimulating factor) engraft more rapidly than bone marrow. However, the relative effects of these techniques on the rates of acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease, overall survival, and disease-free survival have not been determined in randomized studies.

A prospective study of three cell separators was undertaken to compare the mononuclear cell, CD34+ cell and CFU-GM yield. Twenty patients were entered in the study; all had received chemotherapy and daily G-CSF (5 microg/kg subcutaneously) up to and including the first day of leucapheresis. The first leucapheresis was performed on the first day the peripheral blood absolute CD34+ cell count was > or =20 cells/microl. All patients underwent two leucaphereses on consecutive days. The patients were randomised to undergo either the first or second leucapheresis using the COBE Spectra Version 4.7 and then randomised to either the COBE Spectra Version 6 or Haemonetics MCS+ for the other leucapheresis. The target durations of the procedure on the COBE Spectra Version 4.7 and Version 6 were 180 minutes or 2 total blood volumes (TBV), and for the Haemonetics MCS+ was 20 cycles with four recirculations. All machines were operated on the 1997 software supplied by the respective manufacturers. The time taken for the procedure was significantly longer with both the Haemonetics MCS+ and the COBE Spectra Version 6 than the COBE Spectra Version 4.7. Both COBE Spectra versions processed significantly larger volumes of blood than the Haemonetics MCS+. The absolute yield of mononuclear cells, CFU-GM and CD34+ cells were all significantly lower with the Haemonetics MCS+ compared with both COBE Spectra versions, as were the yields per unit volume of blood processed. The product volume was significantly higher with the COBE Spectra Version 4.7 compared to the other two machines. There was no significant difference in the reduction in the platelet count following leucapheresis with any of the machines. The COBE Spectra Version 6 is particularly useful for patients with potentially poor peripheral venous access because of its increased interface stability.