GIM/FP/GP: [Formula: see text] Infectious Disease: [Formula: see text] Public Health: [Formula: see text].

Initiation of treatment with tirzepatide, a once-weekly glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA), early after a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes (T2D) may establish better and more durable glycemic control than current treatment approaches per guidelines and clinical practice.

The growing involvement of private equity in the health care sector raises important questions about its effect on cost, quality, access, and the physician workforce. Private equity investment in health care is associated with increased costs and, in some settings, adverse effects on care delivery and outcomes. Rising costs, administrative burdens, workforce shortages, and declining reimbursement have made independent practice increasingly difficult, contributing to physician transitions to corporate ownership models. Physicians employed by private equity-owned health care organizations may also experience challenges due to the evolving dynamics of their work environment. State and federal regulators, as well as lawmakers, should consider implementing policy interventions to address these challenges. Although corporate investment may improve efficiency and, in limited instances, care delivery, private equity in this sector raises important questions about its role and effects. This American College of Physicians (ACP) position paper builds on the previous ACP position paper on financial profit in medicine, which explored the growing influence of corporate interests and private equity investment in the health care industry. This paper examines the effect of private equity investment on clinical autonomy, health care costs, quality, access, equity, and innovation. It emphasizes the need for more vigorous enforcement of regulatory measures and policy solutions to preserve the quality of patient care and protect the physician workforce. It also offers recommendations to strengthen oversight, transparency, and accountability related to private equity's effects on clinical autonomy, care delivery, and organizational decision making. Finally, it discusses the potential opportunities and challenges associated with private equity investment in health care, including increased consolidation and corporatization.

Medicare Advantage (MA), the private plan option within Medicare, now enrolls more than half of all beneficiaries and is projected to keep expanding. The American College of Physicians (ACP) assesses the ethical and policy dimensions of this growth and its implications for the delivery of fair, high-quality, and fiscally responsible care to older adults and persons with disabilities. Payment and risk adjustment policies have created vulnerabilities to overpayment and favorable risk selection, whereas quality measurement remains fragmented and overly complex. Beneficiaries often face challenges in navigating plan choice, marketing practices, prior authorization, and access to clinicians and postacute services, with these barriers disproportionately affecting persons with low income, persons with several chronic conditions, or persons who live in rural communities. Limited transparency about ownership structures and relationships between insurers, "provider" networks, and investors complicates accountability and public oversight. ACP calls for reforms to ensure accurate payment, streamline and strengthen quality metrics, and protect enrollees from inappropriate utilization controls while supporting innovations that promote coordinated, patient-centered care. Collaborative engagement among policymakers, clinicians, health systems, insurers, and beneficiaries is essential to align MA with its original purpose and ensure that it complements traditional Medicare while providing accessible, affordable, and high-quality coverage for all who depend on it.

Human health and natural systems are intrinsically linked-stable natural systems enable healthy human life. Health systems aim to promote, restore, and maintain health. Health systems may promote human health while having detrimental effects on natural systems, contributing to the transgression of planetary boundaries, such as biosphere integrity, climate change, and the introduction of new entities like microplastics. To date, the health guideline field lacks methods to assess the impacts of health interventions on planetary boundaries. The GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) Working Group established the Planetary Health Project Group in 2023 to develop formal GRADE guidance for integrating planetary health into guideline recommendations to address this gap. Guided by the concepts of planetary health and planetary boundaries and following established methods for GRADE guidance development, the project group conducted iterative case study analyses, expert workshops, and a 2-round global Delphi consensus process. Four case studies were selected for application of this guidance before recommendations were finalized. The GRADE Working Group approved the official guidance. The Planetary Health Project Group presents 7 domains of guidance for incorporating planetary health aspects into the guideline development process, including highly desirable items and optional items. Highly desirable items include formally addressing planetary health in public health and health system guidelines and explicitly justifying its exclusion where it is not addressed. Judgments within the evidence-to-decision (EtD) framework should systematically integrate included evidence across the prioritized planetary boundaries and equity. This guidance aims to support guideline developers and policymakers in making evidence-based, trustworthy recommendations to protect individual and planetary health, while maintaining thoroughness and feasibility for guideline developers within the GRADE approach.

Meta-analyses of randomized trials have shown that sigmoidoscopy screening reduces colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence and death for 15 years.