A 5-day, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial in 23 centers with a total of 273 patients [241 evaluable patients; 126 on placebo and 115 on a long-acting somatostatin analogue (SMS 201-995, octreotide, Sandostatin)] resulted in no difference in stopping bleeding and preventing rebleeding between placebo (70.6%) and SMS 201-995 (69.6%). Surgery rates, blood transfusion requirements, and time required before bleeding stopped were also not significantly different between the two groups. A retrospective subgroup analysis according to age, sex, localization of the ulcers, severity of the bleeding, and arterial spurting vs. oozing showed homogeneity and did not allow identification of a subgroup that might benefit from treatment with SMS 201-995. The tolerability of SMS 201-995 was very good. No difference was found between placebo and SMS 201-995 with regard to the side-effect profile.

The etiology of gastric pain is an unsolved riddle, despite nearly a century of research. While much research and many pharmacologic treatment methods have been aimed at controlling acid secretion, the role of acid in reports of pain is unclear. In this study, 30 patients (10 with endoscopically verified duodenal ulcers, 10 with verified nonulcer dyspepsia, and 10 healthy volunteers) participated in a double-blind crossover study of the effects of ranitidine on pain reports after an injection of pentagastrin. The results showed that whereas pentagastrin caused a significant increase in gastric secretion, only the patients with nonulcer dyspepsia reported any appreciable pain before or after the injection. In addition, they chose more adjectives to describe their pain and reported more symptoms, especially directly after the injection. There were no significant differences between the drug and placebo conditions nor between the ulcer and healthy subjects. The role of acid in reported pain remains unclear.

Clonidine hydrochloride (an alpha 2-adrenoceptor agonist) was tested for antisecretory effects in patients with cholera in a randomized controlled trial. Nineteen adults with diarrhea due to Vibrio cholerae were treated with clonidine (0.9 mg/24 h orally for 72 h) and 18 served as controls. During the first 24 h of treatment and for 24 h afterwards, the mean +/- SD concentrations of sodium (in millimoles per liter) in the stools of clonidine-treated patients were 120.6 +/- 10.9 and 112.3 +/- 11.9, which were significantly lower than 135.5 +/- 17.1 and 125.0 +/- 16.4 in the controls (p less than 0.01). Stool chloride concentrations (in millimoles per liter) were also significantly less in the clonidine group during the same periods: 82.1 +/- 16.8 and 62.4 +/- 19.4 vs. 92.1 +/- 18.3 and 78.0 +/- 23.0, respectively (p less than 0.05). Concentrations of potassium but not bicarbonate were also significantly reduced in the stools of clonidine-treated patients (p less than 0.05). However, there were no significant differences in the mean +/- SD stool volumes (in liters) between the clonidine and the control group in any of the six 12-h periods after treatment or in the cumulative volumes in 72 h (24.2 +/- 10.6 and 22.9 +/- 8.3, respectively). We conclude that clonidine causes modest reduction of stool electrolyte loss but does not significantly reduce fecal fluid loss in patients with cholera.

To determine the efficacy of single nighttime doses of arbaprostil [15(R)-15-methyl prostaglandin E2], 50 or 100 micrograms for 4 wk, a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled multiclinic trial was undertaken. Success was defined as complete healing of the ulcer documented by endoscopy. Fifty-one of 64 patients enrolled were considered evaluable. Ulcer healing was documented in 64.3%, 85.7%, and 31.2% of the 100-micrograms arbaprostil, 50-micrograms arbaprostil, and placebo treatment groups (p value vs. placebo = 0.003 and 0.002, respectively). No difference in side effects or changes in laboratory parameters were found between the treatment groups except that diarrhea, usually mild, was found more often in the 100-micrograms arbaprostil group (60.0%) than in the 50-micrograms arbaprostil (31.8%) or placebo groups (23.5%) (p value 100 micrograms arbaprostil vs. placebo = 0.02). A single nighttime administration of arbaprostil seems to be a safe and efficacious agent for the treatment of acute duodenal ulcer.

Therapeutic paracentesis has recently been reported to eliminate ascites in patients with cirrhosis more rapidly than diuresis. However, diuresis has been shown to increase ascitic fluid opsonic activity. Patients with adequate ascitic fluid opsonic activity have been reported to be protected from spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. In this randomized controlled trial, 19 patients with cirrhotic ascites were treated with diuresis versus daily therapeutic paracenteses during 20 hospitalizations. Serum and ascitic fluid complement concentrations and ascitic fluid opsonic activity were measured at the beginning and end of treatment. Although opsonic activity increased significantly (p less than 0.01) in patients treated with diuresis, this parameter was stable in the paracentesis group. The stability of the ascitic fluid opsonic activity and complement concentration in the paracentesis group were maintained at the expense of a decrease in serum complement, whereas serum and ascitic fluid complement increased in the diuresis group. Diuresis may have the advantage over therapeutic paracentesis of providing better protection from spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. Study of larger numbers of patients will determine if these changes in complement concentrations and opsonic activity translate into an increased risk of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in vivo.

The ability of hypnosis to both stimulate and inhibit gastric acid secretion in highly hypnotizable healthy volunteers was examined in two studies. In the first, after basal acid secretion was measured, subjects were hypnotized and instructed to imagine all aspects of eating a series of delicious meals. Acid output rose from a basal mean of 3.60 +/- 0.48 to a mean of 6.80 +/- 0.02 mmol H+/h with hypnosis, an increase of 89% (p = 0.0007). In a second study, subjects underwent two sessions of gastric analysis in random order, once with no hypnosis and once under a hypnotic instruction to experience deep relaxation and remove their thoughts from hunger. When compared to the no-hypnosis session, with hypnosis there was a 39% reduction in basal acid output (4.29 +/- 0.93 vs. 2.60 +/- 0.44 mmol H+/h, p less than 0.05) and an 11% reduction in pentagastrin-stimulated peak acid output (28.69 +/- 2.34 vs. 25.43 +/- 2.98 mmol H+/h, p less than 0.05). We have shown that different cognitive states induced by hypnosis can promote or inhibit gastric acid production, processes clearly controlled by the central nervous system. Hypnosis offers promise as a safe and simple method for studying the mechanisms of such central control.

In a randomized placebo-controlled study 12 healthy volunteers were treated for 1 wk each with 10 mg of nifedipine four times daily plus placebo or the same dose of nifedipine concurrently with 40 mg of famotidine once a day. Famotidine did not significantly alter pharmacokinetic parameters of nifedipine. Determination of systolic time intervals showed that the preejection period and the ratio of the preejection period and the left ventricular ejection time were significantly reduced by administration of nifedipine plus placebo. Coadministration of famotidine and nifedipine, however, led to a significant increase of these parameters. In an additional double-blind study, a significant rise of the preejection period and of the ratio was detected after administration of famotidine alone. In impedance cardiography stroke volume and cardiac output were significantly reduced by famotidine. Heart rate and blood pressure values were not altered by the H2-antagonist. For the first time, to our knowledge, the observed changes of hemodynamic parameters appear to indicate that famotidine may exert negative effects on cardiac performance which, in our opinion, could be of clinical relevance in elderly subjects or in patients with heart failure.

The results of a study to characterize the effects of the oral administration of isosorbide-5-mononitrate (Is-5-Mn), the active metabolite of isosorbide dinitrate, on portal hypertension in 23 patients with cirrhosis are reported. Patients received 20 mg of Is-5-Mn (n = 10), 40 mg (n = 9), or a placebo (n = 4). No significant changes were observed after the administration of the placebo. However, both doses of Is-5-Mn significantly reduced portal pressure, as evaluated by measurements of the hepatic venous pressure gradient. The fall in portal pressure averaged 10% after the 20-mg dose and 18% after 40 mg and was maintained for the 2 h of observation. Reduction of portal pressure was due to a decrease in the wedged hepatic vein pressure, with no changes in the free hepatic venous pressure. After the 20-mg dose, the decrease in portal pressure was associated with an increase in hepatic blood flow (16%), suggesting a fall in hepatic vascular resistance. However, after the 40-mg dose, a reflex splanchnic vasoconstriction elicited by the fall in arterial pressure (-19%) appeared to contribute to the greater reduction in portal pressure, as suggested by a significant decrease in azygos blood flow (-15%). These beneficial effects on portal pressure were not associated with adverse effects on liver function, as evaluated by measurements of the hepatic clearance of indocyanine green and the hepatic intrinsic clearance. Neither dose of Is-5-Mn caused significant changes in these quantitative parameters of liver function. These findings suggest that Is-5-Mn could be a potentially useful and safe agent in the treatment of portal hypertension.

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multiclinic trial evaluated arbaprostil [15(R)-15 methyl prostaglandin E2] for the treatment of acute gastric ulcer, achieving an overall enrollment of 124 patients (of which 113 were considered evaluable). This 6-wk trial used an arbaprostil dose of 10 micrograms q.i.d., which has little gastric acid antisecretory activity. Endoscopies were performed after 21 and 42 days of treatment, at which times the arbaprostil and placebo healing rates, respectively, were 6/59 (10.2%) and 4/53 (7.6%) on day 21 and 25/59 (42.4%) and 16/50 (32.0%) on day 42. No significant differences between the treatment groups were found for pain relief, antacid consumption, and mucosal healing. This trial documents that a 10-micrograms dose of arbaprostil (which may be considered cytoprotective because of its small effect on gastric acid secretion), although safe and associated with no side effects, is not efficacious in healing acute gastric ulcers.

Saccharomyces boulardii, a nonpathogenic yeast, has been widely used in Europe to prevent antibiotic-associated diarrhea (AAD). We performed a prospective double-blind controlled study to investigate AAD in hospitalized patients and to evaluate the effect of S. boulardii, a living yeast, given in capsule form concurrently with antibiotics. Over 23 mo, 180 patients completed the study. Of the patients receiving placebo, 22% experienced diarrhea compared with 9.5% of patients receiving S. boulardii (p = 0.038). Risk factors found to be associated with AAD were multiple antibiotic combinations (containing clindamycin, cephalosporins, or trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole) and tube feeding. Clostridium difficile, an anaerobe found in the stools of most patients with pseudomembranous colitis, was variably associated with AAD. We evaluated the role of C. difficile in AAD in the study population and found no significant association between the presence of C. difficile or cytotoxin with AAD. Approximately 33% of the patients without diarrhea harbored at least one C. difficile-positive stool and nearly 50% of these patients had detectable cytotoxin. Similar values were obtained in patients with diarrhea. Of C. difficile-positive patients, 31% (5/16) on placebo developed diarrhea compared with 9.4% (3/32) on S. boulardii; this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.07). There were no discernable adverse effects of yeast administration. We conclude that S. boulardii reduces the incidence of antibiotic-associated diarrhea in hospitalized patients.

To determine the relation between the sensation of pain in gastroesophageal reflux and the pH of the refluxate, we studied 25 individuals with symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux and positive Bernstein tests. We quantitatively assessed the sensitivity of the esophageal mucosa to pain associated with the intraesophageal infusion of eight different HCl solutions (pH 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 5, and 6). Test solutions were infused at 8 ml/min through an eight-lumen catheter with the orifices placed 5 cm above the lower esophageal sphincter. Each subject received all eight solutions in a double-blind randomized fashion. The time-to-pain onset increased with increasing pH; i.e., there was a highly significant difference between the time-to-pain and pH (p less than 0.001), with the time-to-pain significantly longer with increasing pH (r = 0.77). In addition to more rapid onset of pain, all subjects experienced pain with the pH 1 and 1.5 solutions, 80% had pain with the pH 2.0 solution, and half had pain with solutions of pH 2.5-6. Fifteen of these subjects underwent 24-h pH monitoring and these tests were examined for factors associated with pain. Only 64% of all pain episodes were associated with a pH drop of less than 4; the lowest pH obtained was not different between episodes with and without pain. Reflux episodes resulting in pain were significantly longer than those without pain and were more often associated with a recently preceding painful episode. Overall, none of the data from the 24-h pH monitoring was useful for predicting pain. The acid infusion studies and the 24-h pH data, taken together, suggest episodes of pain sensitize the patient for subsequent pain.

Ninety-seven patients with recent or active variceal bleeding were randomly assigned to oral propranolol, endoscopic sclerotherapy plus oral propranolol, or transhepatic sclerotherapy plus oral propranolol. The effects of treatment on the number of units transfused, rebleeding of any magnitude, major rebleeding, and death were assessed in these patients, 82% of whom were alcoholic and 81% Child's Class C. After a minimum follow-up interval of 2 yr (range, 27-65 mo), major rebleeding rates were 65% for propranolol alone, 45% for endoscopic sclerotherapy plus propranolol, and 60% for transhepatic sclerotherapy plus propranolol. The corresponding death rates were 81% for propranolol alone, 55% for endoscopic sclerotherapy plus propranolol, and 66% for transhepatic sclerotherapy plus propranolol (p = 0.03). Thirty-three patients (34%) never received propranolol; 8 due to medical contraindications and 25 because they died or bled enough to meet the definition of treatment failure within 3 or 4 days of randomizations (no significant differences among treatment groups). Patients assigned to propranolol alone bled sooner, bled more units, and had a higher mortality rate than patients treated by endoscopic sclerotherapy plus propranolol. Patients treated with transhepatic sclerotherapy plus propranolol had intermediate results. Propranolol alone is inadequate treatment for esophageal variceal bleeding in patients with advanced liver disease.

We have developed a measure of subjective health status (quality of life) for patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Ninety-seven patients with IBD described problems they had experienced as a result of the disease; the 32 most frequent and important items were included in the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ). Sixty-one IBD patients were evaluated twice. One month separated the evaluations, at which disease activity indices, the IBDQ, and a number of other questionnaires were administered. Reproducibility studies in 19 stable patients showed improvement in scores, but also a small within-person standard deviation. Responsiveness studies revealed large changes in scores in patients who had improved or deteriorated and suggested that the IBDQ was more responsive than a general health status measure. Responsiveness appeared greater in patients with ulcerative colitis than in those with Crohn's disease. Predicted and observed correlations between changes in IBDQ score and changes in other measures were similar. We conclude that although further testing is required, particularly in examining the relation between changes in the IBDQ and changes in the activity of Crohn's disease, the IBDQ shows promise as a measure of health status for clinical trials in IBD.

In this study, the pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and tolerability of 25 and 100 micrograms of octreotide given t.i.d. for 7 days subcutaneously were investigated in 12 healthy male subjects. Serum concentrations of the drug were well reproducible within 1 wk. Octreotide significantly raised 24-h median intragastric pH on day 1, but no longer on day 6. Peptone-stimulated gastric acid and volume secretion were markedly less suppressed by octreotide on day 7 compared with day 2. Peptone-stimulated gastrin release was abolished on days 2 and 7, as was peptone-stimulated insulin release. Blood glucose was altered in a biphasic pattern on days 2 and 7. All effects of octreotide were without clear-cut dose-response relationship. A mean half-life of 115 min was calculated. Dose-unrelated side effects (e.g., abdominal cramps, diarrhea, and fatty stools) were registered. In conclusion, octreotide is a powerful inhibitor of gastric acid and volume secretion during acute treatment. Its loss of efficacy during a 1-wk administration may be due to the adaptation of somatostatin receptors and hormonal counterregulation.

We have investigated the effect of oral cisapride (10 mg t.i.d.) in a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in 26 patients with upper gut dysmotility: 11 with gastroparesis (8 diabetic, 3 idiopathic) and 15 with chronic idiopathic intestinal pseudoobstruction. Patients were evaluated at entry and at the end of the 6-wk study by upper gastrointestinal manometry, scintigraphic evaluation of gastric emptying of solids and liquids, measurement of body weight, and scoring of the following symptoms: abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, early satiety, bloating, and distention. Cisapride and placebo groups were strictly comparable for all parameters assessed. Cisapride resulted in a significant increase in the gastric emptying of solids (p less than 0.05) compared with placebo; cisapride also tended to increase the postcibal antral motility and normalize the abnormal manometric features in the patients with intestinal dysmotility, particularly the characteristics of fasting interdigestive motor complexes and the fed motor pattern. Both cisapride and placebo groups showed an improvement in total symptom scores and there was no significant difference in overall symptom response between the two groups. However, the change in abdominal pain was greater with cisapride (p = 0.07). Cisapride facilitates gastric emptying in patients with upper gut dysmotility. The overall symptomatic benefit during a 6-wk trial of cisapride, 10 mg t.i.d., was not greater than that of placebo, and dose-response as well as longer term trials are necessary to determine the clinical efficacy of this medication.

To examine the premise that exercise reduces the gastrointestinal transit time, we evaluated the effect of walking 4.5 km in an hour on mouth-to-cecum transit time. Twenty-three healthy volunteers, 9 men and 14 women, with an age range of 19-28 yr, were studied. After an overnight fast, the subjects ingested 10 g of lactulose in 150 ml of water while breath hydrogen concentrations were analyzed at 15-min intervals. On separate days, in random sequence, subjects either sat in a chair or walked on a treadmill for 60 min. Mean transit time was 55 +/- 8 min when resting and 89 +/- 4 min when exercising (p less than 0.001). In conclusion, light aerobic exercise prolonged the mouth-to-cecum transit time. On the basis of this observation, exercise as a causative factor in runner's diarrhea and its value in the management of chronic constipation may be questioned.

Chronic use of cimetidine and alcohol are commonly associated, but studies on their interactions are the subject of controversy. To investigate this question, a small ethanol dose (0.15 g/kg body wt) was randomly administered on 2 consecutive days either orally or intravenously to 6 normal volunteers, before and after 1 wk of oral administration of 400 mg of cimetidine twice daily. Although cimetidine did not change the areas under the curve of blood ethanol concentrations after intravenous administration, those after oral alcohol intake were twice as large with cimetidine than without. Similar effects were reproduced in rats after intravenous administration of cimetidine (50 mg/kg body wt). In vitro, cimetidine was a noncompetitive inhibitor of gastric alcohol dehydrogenase activity at concentrations as low as 0.01 mM, 100-fold lower than those needed to inhibit the hepatic dehydrogenase. These results indicate that gastric alcohol dehydrogenase activity governs, in part, the systemic bioavailability of ethanol. Consequently, systemic effects of alcohol may be exacerbated in patients receiving cimetidine.

To assess the gastric mucosal protective action of sucralfate against alcohol, a double-blind, controlled, randomized study was carried out in 12 healthy adult men. All subjects received four treatments in a random sequence: sucralfate + ethanol, sucralfate + ethanol placebo, sucralfate placebo + ethanol, and sucralfate placebo + ethanol placebo. Fundal, antral, and duodenal mucosae were submitted to endoscopic examinations, and the antral mucosa underwent histologic examination before and after injury. Biopsy specimens were taken from the antral mucosa to determine by radioimmunoassay its capacity to synthesize prostaglandin E2, thromboxane B2, and 6-keto prostaglandin F1 alpha. In both the fundus and the antrum, the mean endoscopic injury score after sucralfate plus ethanol administration was significantly lower than that after ethanol alone. All treatments tended to increase prostanoid values but 6-keto prostaglandin F1 alpha increased significantly when sucralfate was given. Sucralfate did not affect serum ethanol levels, nor did ethanol affect prostanoid synthesis. It is concluded that sucralfate provides significant protection to the human gastric mucosa against ethanol injury, and that this may be partly due to increased prostanoid synthesis.

Endoscopic distinction between ulcers and erosions is difficult. Consequently, existing literature, which must be taken at face value, may be misleading. Nevertheless, from published studies most gastric and duodenal ulcers associated with nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs appear to heal on antacids or H2-antagonists. Sucralfate appears useful for duodenal but not gastric ulcers. Continuing nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs does not prevent or delay healing of duodenal or small gastric ulcers; their effects on large gastric ulcers remain uncertain. Thus far, only full doses of H2-antagonists, or their combinations with antacids, have been shown to heal ulcers and prevent recurrences. Ulcer recurrences and complications have occurred in small numbers of patients on maintenance doses of H2-antagonists. Available antiulcer drugs (antacids, H2-antagonists, sucralfate) reduce severe acute injury when taken before or with nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs. They also reduce ulcerlike symptoms due to nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs. Inexplicably, chronic prophylaxis with H2-antagonists for 4 wk or more appears ineffective in preventing gastric ulcers, although duodenal injury is reduced. As the efficacy of available prophylactic therapy (H2-antagonists, sucralfate, and antacids) has not been established, routine use in all cases seems unjustified at present.