Epidemiological studies have evaluated the association between ATM 5557G>A (p.D1853N) polymorphism and breast cancer risk. However, the results remain conflicting rather than conclusive. To derive a more precise estimation of the relationship, we performed this meta-analysis. Systematic searches of PubMed and Medline databases were performed. A total of nine studies included 3155 cases and 2752 controls were identified. When all nine studies were pooled into the meta-analysis, there was no evidence for significant association between 5557G>A mutation and breast cancer risk(for G/A vs. G/G: OR = 1.05, 95% CI = 0.83-1.34; for A/A vs. G/G: OR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.58-1.03; for dominant model: OR = 1.04, 95% CI = 0.82-1.31; for recessive model: OR = 0.87, 95% CI = 0.69-1.09). In the subgroup analyses by family history and ethnicity, significant associations were found among Amerindians (for G/A vs. G/G: OR = 2.19, 95% CI = 1.38-3.47; for dominant model: OR = 2.15, 95% CI = 1.37-3.38). In summary, the meta-analysis suggest that ATM 5557G>A polymorphism is associated with increased breast cancer risk among Amerindians. However, due to the small subjects included in analysis and the selection bias existed in some studies, the results for Amerindians should be interpreted with caution.

The associations between E-cadherin (CDH1) gene polymorphisms and gastric cancer (GC) susceptibility are still controversial. Given this uncertainty, we carried out a meta-analysis of published case-control studies to derive more precise estimations of these relationships. Relevant studies were identified from PubMed and EMBASE up to March 2011. Seventeen studies with 3511 GC cases and 4826 controls were selected. Crude odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used to investigate the strength of the associations. No associations between CDH1 (+54T>C, -160C>A, -347G>GA, -616G>C, -2076C>T and -3159T>C) gene polymorphisms and GC risk for all genetic models were found. As for CDH1 -160C>A polymorphism, subgroup analyses by country, gender, study design, smoking status, Helicobacter pylori infection, and the Lauren classification of GC did not change the results. When stratified by ethnicity, we found the A allele carriers had a significantly increased risk of GC among Caucasians (AA vs. CA+CC: OR=1.50, 95% CI=1.03-2.19, P=0.03), but not among Asians (AA vs. CA+CC: OR=0.87, 95% CI=0.56-1.37, P=0.56). No publication bias was found in the present study. This meta-analysis suggests that CDH1 -160C>A gene polymorphism may contribute to increased risk of GC among Caucasians.

The murine double minute 2 (MDM2) gene encodes a negative regulator of the tumor protein p53. A single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) in MDM2 promoter, SNP309 T>G, has been reported to alter MDM2 protein expression and accelerate tumor formation in humans. Studies investigating the association between the polymorphism and human hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) risk reported conflicting results. We performed a meta-analysis to explore the association of this polymorphism and HCC risk.

Gefitinib is an oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor against the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). It has been shown to be active in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) whose tumors contain EGFR mutations.

During the past years, much information has been gathered regarding the genetic and epigenetic programmes leading to the specification and maintenance of primordial germ cells. Expression of the transcriptional regulator BLIMP1 (PRDM1) is regarded as the main event in germ cell specification. BLIMP1 induces a set of target genes, one of them being transcription factor TFAP2C (AP-2γ, Tcfap2c). In murine loss of function models Blimp1 and Tcfap2c share an identical phenotype, strengthening the assumption that they act in the same pathway. One major role of this pathway is the inhibition of somatic differentiation in germ cells. BLIMP1 and TFAP2C are also expressed in carcinoma in situ (CIS, IGCNU, TIN) and in seminoma. As pointed out herein, the presence of both proteins helps to explain the undifferentiated nature of these germ cell tumours. In addition, we performed a meta-analysis of high-throughput datasets searching for TFAP2C/Tcfap2c target genes. This analysis leads us to suggest Nanos3, Dmrt1 and Dnmt3b as potential TFAP2C/Tcfap2c target genes with relevance to germ cell development and germ cell tumours.

Glutathione S-transferases (GSTs) are a family of multifunctional enzymes that are involved in the metabolism of many xenobiotics, including a wide range of environmental carcinogens. The null genotypes GSTM1 and GSTT1 have been implicated in the development of carcinogenesis. We conducted a meta-analysis to examine the association of GSTM1 and GSTT1 homozygous deletion polymorphisms with melanoma risk. In total, 8 relevant studies were identified in searches of the PubMed and Embase databases: 8 investigated GSTM1 (1349 cases and 1560 controls) and 5 GSTT1 (977 cases and 1060 controls). Fixed- and random-effects models were used to assess the summary odds ratios (ORs). No significant association of the GSTM1 and GSTT1 polymorphisms or the GSTM1-GSTT1 interaction on the risk of melanoma was observed (for GSTM1: OR=1.09; 95% confidence interval, 0.94-1.27; and for GSTT1: OR=0.95; 95% confidence interval, 0.76-1.19). Similarly, no significant association was found in a subgroup analysis of hair color. These results indicate that the GSTM1 and GSTT1 polymorphisms may not be a risk factor for developing melanoma.

Glutathione S-transferase M1 (GSTM1) might be involved in inactivation of procarcinogens that contribute to the genesis and progression of cancers. GSTM1 null status has been extensively studied as a risk factor in bladder cancer susceptibility. The aim of this study is to evaluate the role of GSTM1 null genotype in bladder cancer risk. All available studies were considered in this meta-analysis, including 7301 cases and 9405 controls from 33 studies. Significantly increased risk was detected between GSTM1 deletion and bladder cancer susceptibility in all subjects (odds ratio [OR] = 1.409 [1.267-1.568], P < 0.001). The same patterns were observed in Caucasians (OR = 1.434 [1.212-1.697], P < 0.001) and Asians (OR = 1.485 [1.295-1.704], P < 0.001). When stratified with study design, a positive association was also found in hospital-based studies (OR = 1.552 [1.382-1.744], P < 0.001), but no association in population-based ones (OR = 1.088 [0.970-1.221], P = 0.151). In summary, our meta-analysis suggested that GSTM1 null status is associated with a high increase in the risk of bladder cancer, and further studies based on population design are necessary to confirm our conclusion.

Non-metastatic 23 [NM23/nucleoside diphosphate kinases (NDPK)] genes are the first discovered metastasis suppressor genes. More than two decades of research has demonstrated their roles in a variety of biological processes with NME1 and NME2 being most studied in the context of metastasis suppression. Although NME1 and NME2 share >85% homology at amino acid level, they show redundant as well as unique molecular functions. Phenotypic analyses of knockout (KO) mice for NM23 members (NDPK-A, B) and compound KO (A as well as B) showed requirement of both proteins in hematopoiesis suggesting shared functions in development disease. Several reviews have discussed NME1, however the role of NME2 appears to be relatively less understood in the context of metastasis suppression. Here, we focus on NME2 and by meta-analysis of gene expression from multiple tumor types, and survey of in vivo and vitro studies, suggest the possibility that NME2 may be one of the key factors in metastasis. This along with the relevance of normal physiological functions of NME2 in the context of metastasis is discussed. We further examined the genetic and epigenetic features of NME2 and NME1 gene promoters and found aspects of transcription control that could be unique to NME2/NME1. Findings on signaling pathways and small molecules which regulate the expression of NME2 that could be therapeutically important are also discussed.

Relationship of gastric cancer with the GSTM1 polymorphism was reported with inconsistent results. The objective of this study was to quantitatively evaluate the association between GSTM1 polymorphism and gastric cancer susceptibility. Relevant studies were identified from PubMed and references of retrieved articles. A meta-analysis was performed, which included 38 studies with 6,605 gastric cancer cases and 11,311 controls. The combined result based on all studies showed there was a significant link between GSTM1 null genotype and gastric cancer (OR=1.20, 95%CI: 1.08-1.34). When stratifying for the race, the phenomenon was found that gastric cancer case had a significantly higher frequency of GSTM1 null genotype than control in Asians (OR=1.27, 95%CI: 1.10-1.47). However, there was not enough evidence to show there was a significant difference in GSTM1 null genotype distribution between gastric cancer case and control in Caucasians (OR=1.13, 95%CI: 0.96-1.32). This meta-analysis indicated that GSTM1 null genotype might be associated with increased gastric cancer risk in Asians. However, this meta-analysis did not provide an evidence of confirming association between GSTM1 polymorphism and gastric cancer in Caucasians.

Previous data on association between CYP2E1 Rsa I/Pst I polymorphism and oral cancer risk were controversial. To investigate the association between CYP2E1 Rsa I/Pst I polymorphism and oral cancer risk. We performed a meta-analysis to assess the relationship between oral cancer and genotype with English language until June 2010. Twelve published case-control studies of 1259 patients with oral cancer and 2262 controls were acquired. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to assess the strength of the association in codominant and dominant models. Overall, the pooled ORs indicated a significant association between CYP2E1 Rsa I/Pst I polymorphism and oral cancer risk (for c1/c2 vs. c1/c1: OR=1.30, 95% CI=1.04-1.62, Pheterogeneity=0.57; for (c1/c2+c2/c2) vs. c1/c1: OR=1.32, 95% CI=1.07-1.64, Pheterogeneity=0.57, respectively). In subgroup analysis by race, the same significant risks were found among Asian (for c1/c2 vs. c1/c1: OR=1.41, 95% CI=1.05-1.91, Pheterogeneity=0.92; for (c1/c2+c2/c2) vs. c1/c1: OR=1.43, 95% CI=1.08-1.88, Pheterogeneity=0.97, respectively). In conclusion, this meta-analysis demonstrates that CYP2E1 Rsa I/Pst I c2 allele may be a biomarker for oral cancer, especially among Asian populations.

Discovery of the progression-associated genes and pathways in lung adenocarcinoma (LAD) has important implications in understanding the molecular mechanism of tumor development. However, few studies had been performed to focus on the changes of pathways in lung adenocarcinoma development using microarray expression profile.

Methionine synthase reductase (MTRR) gene is involved in tumorigenesis by regulating DNA methylation through activation of methionine synthase (MTR). MTRR is polymorphic at nucleotide 66 (A-to-G) and the resulting variant enzyme has a lower affinity for MTR. The reported associations of MTRR A66G polymorphism with cancer risk are contradictory. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis to better assess the associations, including 18,661 cases and 27,678 controls from 35 studies. Crude ORs with 95% CIs were used to assess the strength of association between the MTRR A66G polymorphism and cancer risk. The pooled ORs were performed for homozygote model (GG vs. AA), heterozygote model (GG vs. GA), recessive genetic model (GG vs. GA + AA), and dominant genetic model (GG + GA vs. AA), respectively. Overall, results indicated that the G allele and GG variant genotypes were associated with a significantly increased cancer risk (G vs. A: OR, 1.039; 95% CI, 1.009-1.078; homozygote model: OR, 1.094; 95% CI, 1.006-1.191). In subgroup analysis by ethnicity, significant increased risks were found among Asians with G allele (G vs. A: OR, 1.063; 95% CI, 1.011-1.119; homozygote model: OR, 1.189; 95% CI, 1.055-1.341; recessive model: OR, 1.197; 95% CI, 1.068-1.341). For stratification analysis, the cancer types with fewer than three studies were categorized into "other cancers", and the results indicated that there was a significant elevated cancer risk in "other cancers" in all genetic models, not in colorectal cancer, lymphoid leukemia or breast cancer. In summary, our study suggests that the MTRR A66G polymorphism is a potential biomarker for cancer risk.

Epidemiological studies have investigated the association between MDM2 promoter SNP 309 (T/G) and endometrial cancer susceptibility. However, the results are still controversial. To obtain a more precise estimate of the relationship, we conducted a meta-analysis of 1,001 cases and 1,889 controls from 6 published case-control studies (one of five articles contains two studies) to estimate the effect of SNP309 on endometrial cancer risk. The strength of association between MDM2 SNP309 and endometrial cancer susceptibility was assessed by calculating pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). When all the eligible studies were pooled in the meta-analysis, we found that elevated endometrial cancer risk was significantly associated with GG variant genotype, however, heterozygous genotype TG seemed to be only a minor modifier on endometrial cancer risk (for GG vs. TT, OR = 1.54, 95% CI = 1.21-1.95, P = 0.0004; for TG vs. TT, OR = 0.96, 95% CI = 0.81-1.14, P = 0.66; for dominant model, OR = 1.09, 95% CI = 0.93-1.29, P = 0.29; for recessive model, OR = 1.65, 95% CI = 1.33-2.04, P < 0.00001). Overall, the meta-analysis suggested that the GG genotype of MDM2 SNP309 was significantly associated with the increased endometrial cancer risk.

Polymorphisms of angiotensin I converting enzyme (ACE) gene have been inconsistently associated with breast cancer risk. We examined these associations by performing a meta-analysis.

Studies investigating the association between genetic polymorphism of cyclin D1 (CCND1) G870A and risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) reported conflicting results. In order to derive a more precise estimation of the relationship, a meta-analysis was performed.

The published data on the association between xeroderma pigmentosum group D (XPD) Lys751Gln and Asp312Asn polymorphisms and colorectal cancer remained controversial. The present meta-analysis of literatures was performed to derive a more precise estimation of the relationship.

Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) play important roles in pathogenesis and development of cancer. Recently, lots of studies showed that there were associations between polymorphisms in the promoter regions of MMPs and risk of colorectal cancer; however, the results remained inconclusive. To clarify these associations, we conducted a meta-analysis.

Treatments for colorectal cancer (CRC) are primarily disease stage based. However, heterogeneity in outcome within even a single stage highlights its limitations in predicting disease behavior. Recently, the role of gene expression as predictive and prognostic markers has been explored. Our objectives were to identify consistently differentially expressed genes through meta-analysis of high-throughput gene-expression studies, and evaluate their predictive and prognostic significance in colon (CC) and rectal (RC) cancers.

Recent studies have shown that microRNAs (miRNA) could play a potential role as diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers of cancers. The aim of this meta-analysis is to summarize the global predicting role of miR-21 for survival in patients with a variety of carcinomas.

There were some studies on the associations between Glutathione S-transferase M1 (GSTM1) and Glutathione S-transferase T1 (GSTT1) polymorphisms and cervical cancer (CC) risk, but the results were inconsistent. Thus, a meta-analysis was performed. The electronic databases PubMed, Science Direct, CBM, and CNKI were searched for possible studies. Finally, 16 studies (1,627 cases and 2,161 controls) were included. For the GSTM1 and GSTT1 polymorphisms, the unadjusted odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) from each study were used to estimate summary OR. Subgroup analyses by ethnicity and histological type of CC were also performed. For the GSTM1 polymorphism, the null genotype of GSTM1 was associated with an increased CC risk in total population (OR=1.32, 95% CI=1.06-1.66). Similar association was found in Asians (OR=1.47, 95% CI=1.11-1.94), but not in Caucasians (OR=0.96, 95% CI=0.73-1.27). For the GSTT1 polymorphism, the null genotype of GSTT1 was not statistically significantly associated with CC risk in total population (OR=1.36, 95% CI=0.97-1.90). This result was also found in Asians (OR=1.27, 95% CI=0.87-1.85) and Caucasians (OR=1.09, 95% CI= 0.66-1.79), but not in Latinos (OR=4.58, 95% CI= 2.04-10.28). For the GSTM1/GSTT1 interaction analysis, the dual null genotypes of GSTM1/GSTT1 were significantly associated with increased CC risk in total population (OR=1.77, 95% CI= 1.14-2.75), and all the six studies were from Asia. For subgroup analyses by histological type of CC, the three aspects of the analyses above were all not significantly associated with CC risk in squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma, respectively. The null genotype of GSTM1 and the dual null genotypes of GSTM1/GSTT1 were risk factors in CC, and the null genotype of GSTT1 was not associated with CC risk.