The human insulin-receptor (hINSR) gene spans a region of greater than 120,000 base pairs (bp) on the short arm of chromosome 19. It is comprised of 22 exons or coding regions that vary in size from 36 to greater than 2500 bp. To a large degree, the introns appear to divide the hINSR gene into segments that encode structural and/or functional elements of the hINSR protein. The exon-intron organization of the hINSR gene provides a clue to the evolutionary history of this gene and suggests that it is a mosaic constructed from protein-coding regions recruited from other genes. Eight mutations in the hINSR gene that result in expression of structurally abnormal proteins have been described. These mutations are associated with insulin resistance and provide insight into the role of the hINSR gene in the development of diabetes mellitus.

Glucose transport by facilitated diffusion is mediated by a family of tissue-specific membrane glycoproteins. At least four members of this gene family have been identified by cDNA cloning. The HepG2-type transporter is the most widely distributed of these proteins. It provides many cells with their basal glucose requirement for ATP production and the biosynthesis of sugar-containing macromolecules. The liver-type transporter is expressed in tissues from which a net release of glucose can occur and in beta-cells of pancreatic islets. A genetic defect resulting in reduced activity of this transporter could hypothetically lead to the two principal features of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, insulin resistance and relative hypoinsulinemia. The adipocyte/muscle transporter is expressed exclusively in tissues that are insulin sensitive with respect to glucose uptake. This protein is an excellent candidate for a highly specific genetic defect predisposing to insulin resistance.

Vanadate ions, low-molecular-weight phosphate analogues, mimic most of the rapid actions of insulin in various cell types. When administered orally to diabetic hyperglycemic rats, vanadate reaches the circulation, mimics insulin stimulation of glucose uptake and metabolism, and leads to normoglycemic and partial anabolic states. In addition, vanadate restores tissue responsiveness to insulin and hepatic glycogen levels and activates new synthesis of key enzymes for carbohydrate metabolism. This suggests that correcting hyperglycemia is sufficient to correct the typical metabolic alterations found in streptozocin-induced diabetic rats. Several weeks of oral administration of vanadate to diabetic rats has not produced detectable liver or kidney toxicity. The mechanism by which vanadate mimics the actions of insulin is still obscure. Unlike insulin, vanadate does not seem to stimulate the autophosphorylation and endogenous tyrosine phosphorylation of insulin-receptor kinase or other intracellular proteins either directly or by virtue of its known inhibitory effect on protein phosphotyrosine phosphatase. Results from many studies support a model in which vanadate activates glucose metabolism by either utilizing an alternative (insulin-independent) cascade or bypassing the early events of the insulin-dependent cascade. Either of these possibilities is of clinical importance, because early insulin events may become defective, as a result of severe hyperinsulinemia, and may contribute to insulin resistance. Alternative pathways by which vanadate may stimulate glucose metabolism, e.g., by increasing intracellular Ca2+ levels and/or regulating intracellular and intravesicular pH, are discussed. From a clinical perspective, studies should be continued in evaluating the level of vanadate toxicity after prolonged treatment and searching for agents that potentiate its insulin mimetic actions in vitro and in vivo.

Glucose tolerance depends on a complex interaction among insulin secretion from the beta-cells, clearance of the hormone, and the actions of insulin to accelerate glucose disappearance and inhibit endogenous glucose production. An additional factor, less well recognized, is the ability of glucose per se, independent of changes in insulin, to increase glucose uptake and suppress endogenous output (glucose effectiveness). These factors can be measured in the intact organism with physiologically based minimal models of glucose utilization and insulin kinetics. With the glucose minimal model, insulin sensitivity (SI) and glucose effectiveness (SG) are measured by computer analysis of the frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test. The test involves intravenous injection of glucose followed by tolbutamide or insulin and frequent blood sampling. SI varied from a high of 7.6 x 10(-4) min-1.microU-1.ml-1 in young Whites to 2.3 x 10(-4) min-1.microU-1.ml-1 in obese nondiabetic subjects; in all of the nondiabetic subjects, SG was normal. In subjects with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM), not only was SI reduced 90% below normal (0.61 +/- 0.16 x 10(-4) min-1.microU-1.ml-1), but in this group alone, SG was reduced (from 0.026 +/- 0.008 to 0.014 +/- 0.002 min-1); thus, defects in SI and SG are synergistic in causing glucose intolerance in NIDDM. One assumption of the minimal model is that the time delay in insulin action on glucose utilization in vivo is due to sluggish insulin transport across the capillary endothelium. This was tested by comparing insulin concentrations in plasma with those in lymph (representing interstitial fluid) during euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic glucose clamps. Lymph insulin was lower than plasma insulin at basal (12 vs. 18 microU/ml) and at steady state, indicating significant loss of insulin from the interstitial space, presumably due to cellular uptake of the insulin-receptor complex. Additionally, during clamps, lymph insulin changed more slowly than plasma insulin, but the rate of glucose utilization followed a time course identical with that of lymph (r = .96) rather than plasma (r = .71). Thus, lymph insulin, which may be reflective of interstitial fluid, is the signal to which insulin-sensitive tissues are responding. These studies support the concept that, at physiological insulin levels, the time for insulin to cross the capillary endothelium is the process that determines the rate of insulin action in vivo.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

A universal finding in hyperglycemic patients with type II (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus is that all share a common defect in glucose recognition resulting in abnormal insulin secretion by pancreatic islet beta-cells. This defect is 1) specific for glucose signals rather than global, 2) related to chronic hyperglycemia, and 3) partially reversible after brief treatment with insulin to induce normoglycemia and through use of other pharmacological agents without normalizing glucose levels. My perspective is that an essential component of this defect is secondary and may represent a state of homologous desensitization of the beta-cell secretory apparatus to glucose. Elucidation of the biochemical mechanism(s) of defective recognition of glucose signals by beta-cells--or glucose "non-sense"--in these patients will provide key insights into the pathogenesis of type II diabetes mellitus.

The actions of insulin are mediated by an integral plasma membrane protein, the insulin receptor. The processed receptor is a tetramer composed of two alpha-subunits that bind insulin and two beta-subunits that traverse the plasma membrane and are, in their cytosolic domains, protein tyrosine kinases. The insulin proreceptor cDNA has been cloned and its complete amino acid sequence deduced. The availability of cDNA permitted an analysis of both the role of protein tyrosine kinase activity in insulin action and the autophosphorylation sites that regulate kinase activity. The human cDNA probe has also been used to identify a putative Drosophila insulin receptor. This work is reviewed, and approaches that may be used to identify physiological substrates for the receptor kinase are suggested.

Impaired islet function is a feature of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM), which is manifested in part by disproportionate proinsulin release. A disproportionate increase in proinsulin also occurs in insulinomas, suggesting that enhanced proinsulin release results from an increase in synthesis and premature release of proinsulin-rich immature granules in both conditions. However, recent human and animal studies suggest that normal beta-cells respond to an increase in synthetic demand by enhancing their ability to process proinsulin. Thus, impaired processing of proinsulin is likely in NIDDM. A new point of similarity with insulinoma has been the demonstration of a novel pancreatic peptide isolated from insulinomas and the pancreas of patients with NIDDM. This peptide, named islet amyloid polypeptide or amylin, is also present in normal islets. Because of its association with two apparently dissimilar disease states, we propose a hypothesis that encompasses the observations related to proinsulin and islet amyloid polypeptide and suggest they are manifestations of the same abnormality. In this hypothesis, we suggest that this new pancreatic peptide is a normal participant in the process of proinsulin processing and storage. We also suggest that in the presence of defective proinsulin processing and insulin release, as occurs in NIDDM, hyperglycemia stimulates amylin biosynthesis so that this peptide is deposited in increased quantities in the islet as amyloid. This then further exacerbates the diabetic process, resulting in progressive hyperglycemia and deterioration in islet function.

Diabetic retinopathy involves anatomic changes in retinal vessels and neuroglia. The pathogenetic mechanism responsible for retinopathy is imperfectly understood, but much of the mechanism is apparently reproduced by experimental diabetes in animals and by chronic elevation of blood galactose in nondiabetic animals. The evidence that retinopathy is a consequence of excessive blood sugars and their sequelae is consistent with a demonstrated inhibition of retinopathy by strict glycemic control in diabetic dogs. However, retinopathy in the dog model has shown a tendency to resist intervention by strict control. Biochemical and pathophysiological sequelae of hyperglycemia possibly critical to the development of retinopathy in humans and animal models are being studied in many laboratories. Retinopathy occurs in experimental galactosemia in the absence of the renal hypertrophy, mesangial expansion, and glomerular obliteration typical of diabetes in humans and dogs, implying that retinopathy and nephropathy differ appreciably in pathogenesis.

Diabetic nephropathy leading to kidney failure is a major complication of both type I (insulin-dependent) and type II (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus, and glomerular structural lesions (especially expansion of the mesangium) may constitute the principal cause of decline in kidney function experienced by a significant fraction of diabetic patients. Although the biochemical bases of these mesangial abnormalities remain unknown, an understanding of the natural history of diabetic nephropathy from a combined structural and functional approach can lead to greater pathophysiological insight. Work in animals has supported the concept that the metabolic disturbances of diabetes mellitus cause diabetic nephropathy, with structural and functional lesions prevented or reversed with improved or normalized glycemic control. Additional research must address this fundamental issue in humans, especially the response of advancing mesangial lesions to improved glycemic control. Factors not directly related to the metabolic perturbations of diabetes may serve to accelerate or diminish the pathophysiological processes of diabetic nephropathy. The elucidation and management of these factors, when coupled with improved glycemic control, may moderate the development or progression of diabetic kidney lesions in humans.

Numerous genes that might contribute to the development of diabetes mellitus and/or its complications have been isolated and characterized. One approach to determining whether these "candidate" genes influence susceptibility to diabetes is to compare the frequency of a DNA marker(s) (restriction-fragment-length polymorphism) for each gene is appropriately matched groups of patients and control subjects. The identification of a DNA-marker association would suggest that genetic variation at this gene may increase or reduce the risk of developing diabetes. However, the absence of an association does not necessarily imply that this gene does not contribute to the development of diabetes. We discuss the genetic rationale of disease association studies and the importance of sample size and disease-marker allele frequencies in these studies.

Hyperexpression of major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecules by islet cells is a prominent, early feature of islet pathology in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus and concomitant with beta-cell failure after exposure of islets to specific cytokines or viruses. The transgenic expression of a class I MHC gene (H-2Kb) in the beta-cells of either syngeneic or allogeneic mice leads to beta-cell failure by a nonimmune mechanism. Several class II MHC transgenes, with one exception, have the same effect, but the expression of other transgenes that have products that are membrane proteins is not necessarily detrimental. Class I MHC molecules have been shown to interact directly with other membrane proteins. The inappropriate expression of MHC molecules could therefore interfere with key cellular functions. We postulate that the hyperexpression of MHC molecules in the beta-cell, e.g. in response to viruses, is a primary, nonimmune mechanism of beta-cell failure that precedes a secondary autoimmune response.

Although initially described two decades ago, biphasic insulin secretion has gradually been understood to reflect beta-cell rate sensitivity, be important in minimizing overinsulinization in normal individuals, be defective in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM), and be useful as an early predictor in prediabetic individuals. Recently, a third phase of insulin secretion has been observed in fully in vitro islets or pancreatic preparations. This phase is characterized as a spontaneous decline of secretion (desensitization) during 24 h of sustained exposure to glucose or other secretagogues and does not appear to be simply an artifact of in vitro preparations. The impaired secretion is localized to the final release process in that neither glucose-stimulated proinsulin synthesis nor its conversion to insulin is affected. The mechanisms responsible for the third phase of reduced secretion are unknown. Kinetic evidence suggests it is not caused by emptying of a single finite insulin storage compartment but does not exclude the possibility that the decreased release reflects depletion of threshold-sensitive beta-cells recruited at a given secretagogue level. Alternatively, the third phase may reflect inhibition of a priming or terminal insulin-release process by metabolic feedback. Because several secretagogues cause similar third-phase impaired release, even in the absence of glucose, desensitization probably occurs at a common fundamental site in the secretory site (e.g., calcium metabolism). Preliminary studies indicate the third phase is not the result of a paracrine effect by other islet hormones or of a change in muscarinic regulation. Whether other neurologic effectors are involved requires further investigation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

The potential role of omega-3 fatty acids in the prevention of atherosclerotic disease in the nondiabetic population currently engenders interest, enthusiasm, and controversy. Some apparently beneficial effects of omega-3 fatty acids on platelet function, eicosanoid formation, plasma triglyceride levels, and blood pressure have been described in patients with diabetes mellitus. However, enthusiasm for the use of omega-3 fatty acids in diabetes has been dampened by reports of potentially deleterious effects of these agents, including increased plasma glucose, glycosylated hemoglobin, plasma total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol, and serum apolipoprotein B levels. These adverse effects have been achieved with large, perhaps excessive, doses of omega-3 fatty acids, in the range of 4-10 g/day. The magnitude of these adverse effects has been small (typically 10-36%). It cannot be assumed that the effects of omega-3 fatty acids are the same in patients with diabetes mellitus as in nondiabetic subjects or patients with primary hyperlipidemia. First, the biosynthesis and composition of fatty acids is abnormal in diabetic animals and possibly in diabetic patients. Second, many potential mechanisms implicated in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis are present in diabetic but not necessarily in nondiabetic subjects. Third, the mechanisms of many of the risk factors in diabetic patients differ from the mechanisms of these abnormalities in nondiabetic subjects, reflecting the effects of insulin deficiency, hyperglycemia, and their sequelae. Finally, because diabetes is a heterogeneous group of diseases, the effects of omega-3 fatty acids must be addressed separately for patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, and possibly other forms of diabetes.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

A workshop sponsored by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development was held in June 1988 to discuss the initial events in the pathogenesis of insulin-dependent diabetes and to make recommendations for future studies. Better definition of immunological markers to reliably predict the disease will enable the detection and study of the earliest pathogenic events involved. The precise autoimmune mechanisms and the role of the environment, both in the initiation of the disease process and precipitation of clinically overt disease, need to be accurately determined to define strategies that might eventually lead to its prevention.

Catecholamines released from the sympathochromaffin system produce metabolic changes similar to those of diabetes mellitus. However, increased sympathochromaffin activity does not appear to be a feature of insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM), although physiologic catecholamine increments may contribute to short-term metabolic derangements under some conditions. Increased glycemic sensitivity to epinephrine is a feature of IDDM but is the result of the inability to secrete insulin rather than of increased cellular sensitivity to catecholamines. Absolute insulin deficiency results in increased metabolic (glycemic, lipolytic, and ketogenic) sensitivity to catecholamines. More generalized hypersensitivity occurs in diabetic autonomic neuropathy. However, the clinical relevance of these alterations in sensitivity remains to be established. On the other hand, decreased sympathochromaffin activity is common and causes considerable morbidity and some mortality in people with diabetes. In addition to increased sensitivity to catecholamines, decreased sympathochromaffin activity results in the clinical syndromes of postural hypotension, hypoglycemia unawareness, defective glucose counterregulation, or a combination of these. The latter two syndromes cause an increased frequency of severe iatrogenic hypoglycemia, at least during intensive therapy of IDDM. Thus, decreased rather than increased sympathochromaffin activity often complicates IDDM. Clearly, ways to prevent, correct, or compensate for this component of diabetic autonomic neuropathy must be learned before diabetes can be managed effectively and safely in all patients who suffer from the disease until diabetes mellitus is eradicated.

Numerous studies have demonstrated that poor glycemic control is associated with elevated plasma cholesterol levels in diabetic patients. Experiments have shown that cholesterol synthesis is increased in the small intestine of various diabetic animals. This increase is a generalized phenomenon occurring in all segments of the small intestine. Insulin therapy that normalizes blood glucose levels markedly decreases intestinal cholesterol synthesis in diabetic animals to a level similar to that observed in control animals. Studies have suggested that the hyperphagia that accompanies poorly controlled diabetes is the chief stimulus for the increase in intestinal cholesterol synthesis. However, the direct contact of the intestinal mucosa with nutrients is not the sole trigger for increasing cholesterol synthesis in the small intestine, suggesting that circulating and/or neurological factors play a role. The transport of newly synthesized cholesterol, most of which is in the chylomicron lipoprotein fraction, from the intestines to the circulation is increased in diabetic rats. The sterols associated with these chylomicrons are rapidly cleared from the circulation and delivered to the liver. The increased transport of chylomicrons from the intestine to the circulation in diabetic patients could potentially result in several alterations in lipid metabolism that may increase the risk of atherosclerotic vascular disease.

From December 1966 to March 1988, 1394 pancreas transplants were reported to the International Pancreas Transplant Registry. For the 1129 cases since 1982, the overall 1-yr graft and recipient survival rates were 46 and 82%, respectively. When analyzed according to the three most common duct-management techniques, polymer injection (n = 324), intestinal drainage (n = 282), and bladder drainage (n = 462), the 1-yr function rates were 47, 45, and 54%, respectively. The graft survival rates were also similar, whether whole (n = 492) or segmental (n = 634) grafts were transplanted (47 vs. 46% at 1 yr). Graft survival rates according to preservation times were 49, 42, and 43% at 1 yr for those stored less than 6 h (n = 694), 6-12 h (n = 237), and greater than 12 h (n = 89), respectively. Immunosuppressive regimens that included both cyclosporin and azathioprine were associated with significantly (P less than .03) higher graft survival rates than those that included only one of the drugs, with 1-yr graft survival rates for technically successful grafts of 67, 54, and 39% for patients treated with azathioprine plus cyclosporin (n = 602), cyclosporin without azathioprine (n = 201), and azathioprine without cyclosporin (n = 44). Pancreas-graft survival rates differed according to whether a kidney was or was not transplanted and according to the timing of the transplant: 53, 40, and 32%, respectively, at 1 yr for cases in which a simultaneous kidney was transplanted (n = 685), a kidney had previously been transplanted (n = 201), or a kidney had never been transplanted (n = 202).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

We report on 92 pancreas transplantations with exocrine diversion by pancreaticoenterostomy. All recipients suffered from long-term type I (insulin-dependent) diabetes. In most transplantations, cadaveric segmental grafts were used (n = 89). In a few patients, segmental grafts from related donors were used (n = 3), and in a few other patients, whole-organ cadaveric grafts were used (n = 4). There were 9 retransplantations. Most pancreas transplantations were performed in uremic diabetic patients in combination with a kidney transplantation (n = 58). In a few patients the pancreas transplantation was performed after a kidney transplantation (n = 6). The remaining transplantations were in nonuremic diabetic patients who received only a pancreas (n = 25). Over the years, the results have improved considerably; in the 1986-1987 series the overall 1-yr patient survival (ps) and graft survival (gs) rates were 97 and 56%, respectively. The best results were achieved with the combined procedure (ps 100%, gs 77%); with pancreas only, the figures were inferior (ps 92%, gs 34%). Several factors explain the improved results. The incidence of graft thrombosis has been reduced by the use of anticoagulation, and posttransplantation pancreatitis has been reduced by avoiding ischemic injury to the graft. Cyclosporin has helped reduce the incidence of graft rejection, and monitoring of the exteriorized pancreatic juice has helped in the diagnosis of rejection.

Between November 1977 and January 1987, 55 transplantations of pancreas segments from living donors related to their recipients were performed at the University of Minnesota. A preliminary analysis of metabolic test results in donors tested 1 yr after hemipancreatectomy showed an increase in mean glucose and a decrease in mean insulin values during oral glucose tolerance tests (OGTTs) in 18 donors, a 14% increase in the mean of the mean glucose levels during 24-h metabolic profiles in 12 donors, and a decrease of 45% in the mean 24-h urinary C-peptide excretion in 21 donors. Including the studies performed postdonation, 11 of 31 (35%) donors developed an abnormal OGTT result. In a retrospective analysis, preoperative results of intravenous glucose tolerance tests (IVGTTs) and cortisone-stimulated OGTTs were found to be statistically significant predictors of an abnormal OGTT after hemipancreatectomy. The mean of the 5- to 50-min IVGTT insulin values was the best predictive test. With the cutoff value set at 62 microU/ml, this test result had a sensitivity of 100%, a specificity of 83%, and a positive predictive value of 75% for identifying donors who developed an abnormal OGTT. The sum of the 5- and 10-min IVGTT insulin (cutoff 140 microU/ml) had a sensitivity of 100%, a specificity of 67%, and a predictive value of only 60%, whereas the delta-insulin had values of 86, 71, and 60%, respectively. Both the IVGTT mean insulin and the sum of the 5-min and 10-min insulin test results were 100% predictive of an abnormal test (0% risk), but the IVGTT mean insulin excluded the lowest proportion of otherwise suitable donors (a low "false-alarm" rate). The IVGTT mean insulin can be used to identify or exclude potential donors who would develop an abnormal OGTT result should hemipancreatectomy be performed.

Glucose counterregulation is the sum of processes that protect against development of hypoglycemia and that restore euglycemia if hypoglycemia should occur. In order of importance, the key counterregulatory factors are glucagon, epinephrine, growth hormone, cortisol, and hepatic autoregulation. These act primarily by increasing hepatic glucose output, initially via breakdown of glycogen and later by gluconeogenesis. In people without diabetes and in people with type II (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes, suppression of endogenous insulin secretion during hypoglycemia is also important in permitting full expression of the effects of counterregulation. People with diabetes are more prone to develop hypoglycemia for various reasons (e.g., insulin overdose, skipped meals, and intensive exercise); one that has recently been identified is impaired glucose counterregulation: patients with type I (insulin-dependent) diabetes (and to a lesser extent, patients with type II diabetes) lose the glucagon response to hypoglycemia; subsequent development of autonomic neuropathy with concomitant loss of the epinephrine response leads to almost complete paralysis of counterregulation and loss of recognition of hypoglycemia. To make matters worse, an episode of hypoglycemia that causes activation of counterregulation can lead to rebound hyperglycemia (Somogyi phenomenon); if this is improperly treated, brittle diabetes may follow. Thus, abnormalities in glucose counterregulation may predispose to severe hypoglycemia and prevent achievement of optimal glycemic control in patients with diabetes.