Erythrocyte mean corpuscular volume (MCV) evolution was studied during cytotoxic therapy in 12 patients with Hodgkin's disease who developed secondary acute leukemia and in 83 patients with Hodgkin's disease without secondary leukemia as control group. Significant differences were observed in the maximum MCV and in the MCV maximum increase during therapy between the two groups of patients. These differences remained significant between the patients treated with chemotherapy alone and those treated with chemotherapy and radiotherapy. MCV maximum increase greater than 23.9 fl was observed in all patients with secondary leukemia and in only 20% of those without secondary leukemia; it was reached 46.3 months before the first sign of preleukemia. Its value in predicting the leukemic risk in Hodgkin's disease is discussed.

We compared the efficacy and safety of the gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogue, leuprolide (1 mg subcutaneously daily), with diethylstilbestrol (DES, 3 mg by mouth daily) in patients with prostate cancer and distant metastases (Stage D2) who had not previously received systemic treatment. Initial therapy (leuprolide or DES) was continued for as long as an objective response was noted; cross-over to the alternative arm occurred at the time of disease progression or intolerable adverse reactions. Ninety-eight patients were randomly assigned to leuprolide, and 101 to DES. Suppression of testosterone and dihydrotestosterone and decreases in acid phosphatase were comparable in the two groups. Patients receiving DES experienced more frequent painful gynecomastia (P less than 0.00001), nausea and vomiting (P = 0.02), edema (P = 0.008), and thromboembolism (P = 0.065) than those receiving leuprolide. The leuprolide group reported more "hot flashes" (P = 0.00001). Overall, 86 per cent of the leuprolide group had an objective response (complete response, 1 per cent; partial response, 37 per cent; stable disease, 48 per cent), as compared with 85 per cent of the DES group (complete, 2 per cent; partial, 44 per cent; stable, 39 per cent). Actual survival rates at one year were 87 per cent for the leuprolide group and 78 per cent for the DES group (P = 0.17). We conclude that leuprolide offers an important alternative treatment that is therapeutically equivalent to and causes fewer side effects than DES for the initial systemic management of metastatic prostate cancer.

A phase II double-blind placebo-controlled, randomized dose-ranging trial was undertaken to determine the antiemetic efficacy and toxicity of the synthetic cannabinoid levonantradol at doses of 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0 mg. Intramuscular levonantradol was prophylactically administered in random dosing to 20 subjects with a documented history of refractory emesis due to chemotherapy in advanced cancer. The selected dose was administered prior to the chemotherapy and was serially repeated over 12 hours, and efficacy and toxicity data were evaluated for 24 hours. Significant (P less than 0.01) antiemetic activity over placebo was observed with all doses of levonantradol administered, and a dose-effect response was not observed. Doses up to 2.0 mg were well tolerated, and observed toxicity increased with increased doses and with repeated dosing. Psychomimetic effects were mild and tolerable, and the limiting side effects were somnolence and hypotension.

The efficacy of orally administered trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole for infection prevention following induction chemotherapy was evaluated in 43 patients with acute leukemia. Twenty patients were randomly assigned to treatment with trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole during 20 episodes of profound granulocytopenia; 23 patients in the control group were followed through 25 granulocytopenic episodes. The incidences of superficial skin and overall infections were significantly lower in those patients with multiple relapses who received trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (p = 0.008); however, there was no difference between the groups in regard to days of fever, days of antibiotic administration, days of hospitalization, or gram-negative rod bacteremia. As a result of this study, this regimen cannot be unequivocally recommended for infection prevention in neutropenic patients with acute leukemia undergoing induction or reinduction chemotherapy.

Ninety outpatients with histologically confirmed malignancy receiving chemotherapy entered a randomized crossover trial to assess the antiemetic efficacy of low-dose metoclopramide versus methylprednisolone. Treatment consisted of either metoclorpramide (MCP) 60 mg or methylprednisolone (MPN) 375 mg administered in 3 equal doses just prior to chemotherapy and 6 and 12 hours after treatment. Patients receiving MPN had significantly less nausea (p less than 0.001) and fewer episodes of vomiting (p less than 0.0003) than patients receiving MCP. MPN also proved to be the more effective agent in cross-over trials. Both MPN and MCP were well tolerated. No important side effects were observed. MPN is a safe, effective, antiemetic treatment suitable for use in the outpatient.

Mayo clinic and georgetown university carried out a cooperative phase II study of chlorozotocin in measurable advanced large bowel carcinoma. Of 78 evaluable patients randomized, 39 received low-dose (120 mg/m2 if previously untreated, 100 mg/m2 if previously treated) and 39 high-dose (200 mg/m2 if previously untreated, 175 mg/m2 if previously treated) chlorozotocin intravenously at 6-week intervals. Both groups were comparable in regard to age, prior treatment, treating institution, site of metastases, and performance scores. Overall response rate was 8%, including 5% in low-dose patients and 10% in high-dose patients. Toxicity was mild to moderate, with gastrointestinal toxicity substantially, and hematologic toxicity somewhat less, than seen with other nitrosoureas. Time to progression and survival showed no significant difference between patients treated on the low- and high-dose schedules. As chlorozotocin produced less nausea and vomiting than other nitrosoureas, even in the high-dose regimen, it should be considered for evaluation in neoplasms where nitrosoureas have shown more activity than in colorectal carcinoma.

Eighty-two patients with small cell lung carcinoma refractory to standard chemotherapy were entered in this phase II randomized study of PALA, amsacrine, teniposide, and zinostatin. Of the 66 evaluable patients, one partial response occurred among 17 patients treated with teniposide and no responses occurred with the other drugs. Two patients each treated with amsacrine and teniposide experienced life-threatening hematologic toxic effects and one patient treated with zinostatin died of thrombocytopenic pulmonary hemorrhage. The overall median patient survival was 9.6 weeks. Weight loss greater than or equal to 5% prior to therapy, extensive disease, and a nonambulatory status were associated with poor survival.

We conducted a randomized, double-blind, crossover study comparing the antiemetic efficacy of dexamethasone and prochlorperazine in 42 patients with cancer who were receiving outpatient chemotherapy, mainly without cisplatin. Patients experienced significantly less nausea and vomiting with dexamethasone than with prochlorperazine (P less than 0.02 and less than 0.03, respectively). Twenty-five patients experienced no nausea with dexamethasone, as compared with 14 patients taking prochlorperazine (P less than 0.001). Similarly, 29 patients receiving dexamethasone did not vomit, as compared with 18 receiving prochlorperazine (P less than 0.001). Somnolence was the most frequent side effect, occurring in 60 per cent of patients receiving prochlorperazine and in 12 per cent of those receiving dexamethasone (P less than 0.001). Patients also experienced less suppression of appetite while receiving dexamethasone (P less than 0.02). We conclude that dexamethasone is an effective and safe antiemetic in patients receiving cancer chemotherapy without cisplatin.

Thirty-five noninfected patients undergoing induction chemotherapy for acute nonlymphoblastic leukemia (ANLL) were randomized to either receive (19 patients) or not receive (16 control patients) prophylactic granulocyte transfusions (PGT) when their granulocyte count fell below 0.5 X 10(9)/1. Both groups received identical anti-infectious and supportive care except for granulocyte transfusions. The authors found a nonstatistically significant decrease of the infection rate in the prophylactic group. However, the bacteriologically documented infections and septicemia incidence was significantly higher in the control than in the prophylactic group (P less than 0.05). In the control group they observed in 8 of 16 cases life-threatening infections in contrast with only 1 case in the prophylactic group (P less than 0.01). A significant reduction of deaths due to infectious causes in the prophylactic versus control group were also found (P less than 0.05). The authors did not find an increase of pneumonia or pulmonary infiltrates in the patients belonging to prophylactic in comparison to control group.

One hundred four children with advanced leukemia in relapse (74 with acute lymphocytic leukemia [ALL] and 30 with acute nonlymphocytic leukemia [ANLL]) received AMSA (4'-(9-Acridinylamino) methanesulfon -m-anisidide) at a dose of 120 mg/m2/day for 5 days (Regimen I) or 60 mg/m2/day for 10 days (Regimen II). Children with ALL were randomized between Regimens I and II (31 and 36 evaluable patients, respectively). All 29 evaluable patients with ANLL were treated on Regimen I. Eighty-eight percent of evaluable patients experienced severe or life-threatening toxicity, with no statistical differences between Regimens I and II. Bacterial or fungal infections (considered life-threatening or fatal) occurred in 17 children with ALL and in 7 with ANLL. Fatal cardiac toxicity occurred in one patient. Complete or partial response occurred in 25.0% (SE = 8.8%), 28.1% (SE = 8.0%), and 25.9% (SE = 8.4%) of evaluable patients on ALL Regimen I, ALL Regimen II, and ANLL, respectively. However, responses were of short duration (16-91 days). There was no significant difference in the duration of survival from treatment start for the two ALL regimens (P = 0.46). The median duration of survival for ANLL patients was significantly longer (P = 0.004) than that of ALL patients treated on Regimens I and II combined. Eighty-two percent of the complete or partial responses (18 of 22) occurred after the first course of AMSA. At the dose schedules investigated, and in a heavily pretreated patient population, AMSA had activity in childhood leukemia. However, the high incidence of severe, life-threatening, or fatal infections meant that the quality and quantity of responses and survival was not commensurate with the toxicity, and that it would be difficult to incorporate this drug into combination chemotherapy with other myelosuppressive agents.

Little is known about how cancer patients manage the side effects of chemotherapy, so 48 cancer patients in chemotherapy were randomized into four groups to determine their self-care behaviors. The first group received drug information only; the second group received information on side-effect management techniques (SEMT); the third group received combined drug and SEMT information; the fourth group were controls. Pre- and postintervention scores on chemotherapy knowledge, self-care behavior, and general affective state were evaluated by analysis of covariance. Patients who received drug information alone or in combination with other information had higher chemotherapy knowledge scores. Patients who received SEMT information alone or in combination with other information performed more self-care behaviors. Although an additive effect of combined information was noted, i.e., patients who received both types of information showed improved chemotherapy knowledge and self-care behaviors, the combined information did not produce a significantly improved affective state.

Forty-eight neutropenic patients with acute leukaemia were randomly allocated to receive, as antifungal prophylaxis, either ketoconazole, 400 mg once daily (K), or amphotericin B tablets and lozenges (A), or both ketoconazole and amphotericin B together (K + A). Antifungal prophylaxis was considered to have failed if (1) there was evidence of increasing colonization of the oropharynx or faeces with Candida spp. or other yeasts, or (2) if systemic antifungal therapy was begun empirically. Prophylaxis failed in nine of 17 patients given K, in four of 19 given A, and in four of 12 given K + A. The differences between the three regimens were not statistically significant, neither was there any significant difference in the mean duration of neutropenia before prophylaxis failed. The absorption of ketoconazole was impaired when patients were neutropenic. We conclude that ketoconazole was neither more nor less effective than amphotericin B in the prevention of yeast colonization in neutropenic patients.

Oropharyngeal candidiasis is frequently a complication of patients with altered immune states. Clotrimazole troches are effective in the treatment of Candida and were evaluated in this study in a prophylaxis regimen. Patients with malignant neoplasms who were receiving chemotherapy and renal transplant recipients who were receiving immunosuppressives were randomized to receive either clotrimazole (10 mg) or placebo troches three times a day in a prospective, double-blinded study. Eighty-four patients were randomized into the study, 18 patients with leukemia, 19 patients with malignant neoplasms, and 47 patients with renal transplants. Among all patients, thrush developed in 57% while receiving placebo compared with 13% while receiving clotrimazole prophylaxis. Prophylaxis showed significant benefit for the renal transplant recipients and for patients with solid malignant neoplasms, but not for the leukemic patients. Clotrimazole troches are effective in preventing oral candidiasis in a select group of patients.

The anti-emetic action of alizapride was compared to that of metoclopramide in a strict double-blind study of 57 cases files derived from 21 patients treated with anti-mitotic chemotherapy. For each treatment, each patient received two ampoules before and after the chemotherapy. Each ampoule contained either 50 mg of alizapride or 10 mg of metoclopramide. There were 24 good or excellent results and 4 nil results with alizapride and 16 good or excellent results and 13 nil results with metoclopramide. The superiority of alizapride over metoclopramide was therefore established with statistical significance (0.05 greater than p greater than 0.02).

In an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group non-Hodgkin's lymphoma clinical trial, 90 patients with Stage III or IV diffuse histiocytic lymphoma (DHL) were treated with one of four chemotherapy regimens. All patients were previously untreated with chemotherapy, and careful restaging was required to document responses. Each treatment included cyclophosphamide, vincristine and prednisone (COP) plus Adriamycin (COPA), BCNU (BCVP) or bleomycin (COPB and CPOB). The two bleomycin-containing regimens differed only in the schedule of drug administration. CPOB-treated patients received cyclophosphamide on day 1, prednisone on days 1 to 5 and vincristine and bleomycin on day 15 of each 21-day cycle. COPB-treated patients received the same four drugs in the same dosage; however, the schedule was changed so that vincristine and bleomycin were given on day 1. Treatment of responders was continued for 8 cycles. Those with a complete response (CR) were randomized to maintenance therapy with BCVP or no treatment. Treatment with CPOB yielded a CR rate of 55% compared to 25% for COPB (P = 0.07). In contrast to COPB, treatment with CPOB was associated with a significantly longer median duration of CR (26.5 versus 5.7 months; P less than 0.05) and median survival (27.7 versus 11.2 months; P less than 0.02). The CR rate was 31% for BCVP and 45% for COPA, and the median survivals were 10.7 months and 14.4 months, respectively. One half of the CPOB-treated patients who achieved CR remained alive in continuous CR after 30 to 72 months. No advantage for maintenance therapy was observed. Myelotoxicity was greater with CPOB than COPB, but comparable to COPA. This trial demonstrated that the results of treatment of DHL with COP plus bleomycin were strikingly dependent upon the schedule of administration of bleomycin and vincristine. Bleomycin effectively combined with COP, as in CPOB, yielded results comparable to those obtained when Adriamycin was added to COP. CPOB appears to be an effective treatment for DHL that should be considered as an alternative to other regimens, particularly for patients who cannot receive Adriamycin.