A single blind randomised trial of two different anti-emetic regimens (A and B) was performed in 26 patients with breast carcinoma undergoing emetic i.v. cytotoxic chemotherapy. They all received oral Motival (nortriptylene/fluphenazine) for 48 h after therapy and for regimen A received N-saline i.v. with their cytotoxics whilst for regimen B patients were given 16 mg dexamethasone i.v. Patients were given the alternative regimen at the subsequent course of treatment. They were asked to assess overall nausea and number of vomiting episodes in the 24 h following therapy. There was a statistically significant reduction in both for the regimen containing dexamethasone. This agent causes few side effects and is particularly suited for out-patient use.

Fifty-one patients with ovarian cancer were entered in a randomised trial comparing treatment with cisplatin + adriamycin + cyclophosphamide (PAC) to cisplatin + 4'epi-adriamycin + cyclophosphamide (PEC). Complete response rates for the two treatment arms were similar (9/27 PAC, 14/24 PEC). Patients with less than 2 cm residual disease had significantly higher rate of complete remission than those with greater than 2 cm residual disease. Cardiotoxicity was significantly less in the PEC-treated group (0/24) as compared with the PAC-treated group (6/27, chi2 = 4.09, p less than 0.05).

In a study of the antiemetic effectiveness of high-dose oral metoclopramide, 66 previously untreated patients receiving 60 mg/m2 cisplatin were entered into a double-blind randomized trial. Patients were stratified according to age and tumor type, then randomized to receive either oral or intravenous (IV) high-dose metoclopramide. Patients were evaluated for antiemetic protection, toxicity, affect (anxiety, hostility, and depression), and autonomic arousal (pulse rate and blood pressure) at three-hour intervals on the day of their chemotherapy. Metoclopramide serum levels were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography. Results indicated no significant differences between the oral and IV groups on any measurement of antiemetic protection, affect, or autonomic arousal. There were also no significant differences in side effects except for frequency of stools; patients who received oral metoclopramide had significantly more stools than patients who received IV metoclopramide. The mean (+/- SD) serum metoclopramide level at four hours achieved orally was 1,171 +/- 660 ng/mL; the mean (+/- SD) level achieved IV was 1,030 +/- 392 ng/mL (P = .498). We conclude that high-dose oral and IV regimens of metoclopramide as administered in this study have equivalent antiemetic efficacy in previously untreated patients receiving 60 mg/m2 cisplatin.

A prospective randomized double-blind trial comparing the butyrophenone analogue domperidone (D) and the synthetic cannabinoid nabilone (N) in the treatment of cytotoxic-induced emesis was conducted in 38 patients receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy regimens (70% containing cisplatin). Patients received 20 mg D or 1 mg N the night before chemotherapy and 8-hourly on each chemotherapy day for two consecutive cycles of treatment. Three of 19 patients randomized to N completed only one cycle because of disease progression or subjectively adverse effects. Four of 19 patients completed only one cycle of D because of lack of efficacy or chemotherapy toxicity. In all, 32 cycles of N and 33 cycles of D were evaluable for efficacy. The mean number of vomiting episodes in cycle 1 was 4.76 for N and 12.95 for D (P less than 0.02). The corresponding values for cycle 2 were 4.27 and 7.69 (P greater than 0.10), and for cycles 1 and 2 combined, 4.53 for N and 10.81 for D (P less than 0.01). Nausea and food intake scores did not differ significantly, although there was a trend towards less nausea and an increased food intake with N. Subjectively adverse effects were more frequent with N and included drowsiness, dizziness, dry mouth, and postural hypotension. N is superior to D for the control of cytotoxic-induced emesis.

A prospective randomized study was conducted to compare the antiemetic efficacy of metoclopramide (MCP) versus its recent derivative alizapride (ALZ) in patients undergoing cancer chemotherapy. Both drugs were given at a dose of 2 mg/kg i.v. push for 5 doses. A positive response was defined as absence of nausea or emesis, or moderate nausea with one or two emeses per day. Eighty-two patients were evaluable. Forty-two received MCP and 40 received ALZ. A positive response was observed in 54% MCP-treated and 41% ALZ-treated patients. Neurologic toxicity, mainly extrapyramidal disturbances, was the most remarkable adverse side effect; it occurred more frequently in the MCP-treated group (31%) than in the ALZ-treated group (17%). Both drugs were found to be more effective in previously untreated patients and when employed together with steroids. MCP was more effective (52% positive response) than ALZ (41% positive response) in cisplatin-treated patients. To better control drug-induced vomiting, we believe that future trials should evaluate slow i.v. infusion of antiemetic agents and their combination with dexamethasone.

A total of 202 evaluable cancer patients were randomly assigned to receive or not receive oral clotrimazole as antifungal prophylaxis during hospitalization. Oropharyngeal candidiasis occurred in 1% of the former patients and 27% of the latter patients (P less than .00001). Candida sp were cultured from the initial throat specimens of 53 control patients and 55 patients who received prophylaxis. Oropharyngeal candidiasis subsequently developed in 2% of the former patients and 38% of the latter patients (P = less than .00001). Oral clotrimazole is an effective agent for prophylaxis of oropharyngeal candidiasis in susceptible cancer patients.

Twelve patients with early mycosis fungoides were enrolled in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Isolated plaques were injected three times a week with recombinant alpha 2-interferon in nine patients and with the vehicle in three patients. Two additional plaques were evaluated in each patient; one was left untreated, and another was treated topically with either placebo ointment or betamethasone ointment. Biopsies were taken from an untreated, representative plaque prior to treatment and from all test sites following treatment for light microscopy and T lymphocyte subsets. Three of the nine lesions injected with interferon cleared, and all showed improvement. Thirteen of eighteen noninjected lesions improved in patients who received interferon, showing a systemic effect. In the control group, none of the injected lesions improved and only two of the noninjected lesions showed any change. Histopathologic changes confirmed the clinical impression. This study shows that intralesional interferon may be given safely and has a beneficial effect, both locally and systemically.

In a controlled, prospective, randomized clinical trial, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of leuprolide, a superactive analog of luteinizing hormone releasing hormone, given in a single subcutaneous injection dose of 1 mg per day, versus diethylstilbestrol (DES) 3 mg per day by mouth in patients with previously untreated Stage D2 prostatic adenocarcinoma. Eleven leuprolide patients and 10 DES patients were evaluated for therapeutic response. Eighty per cent of patients in each group experienced subjective improvement in bone pain and urinary obstructive signs and symptoms. Although the pooled percentages of complete, partial, and stable objective responses were greater for the leuprolide group than the DES group, the sums of the percentages of complete and partial objective responses were comparable for both treatment groups during the first forty-eight and sixty weeks of the study, respectively. In addition, patients not responding to leuprolide generally experienced no benefit with crossover to DES, and vice versa. Serious adverse reactions were more common in the DES group and included fatal myocardial infarction, arrhythmia, deep venous thrombosis, and gynecomastia. Vasomotor flushing, disease flare, and injection site irritation occurred most often in leuprolide patients, but did not require modification or discontinuation of treatment.

Forty-three patients, most with solid tumours, were included in a study comparing the antifungal prophylactic effect of ketoconazole (Nizoral; Janssen) 200 mg/d and 400 mg/d during the period of immunosuppressive therapy. Seven patients were not seen for follow-up and 6 died of their underlying disease without clinical evidence of mycosis. Twelve of the patients who could be evaluated received ketoconazole 200 mg/d and 18 received 400 mg/d. No infections occurred during the period of prophylactic treatment. In the group receiving 200 mg/d 10 of 36 cultures (28%) were positive for Candida albicans before prophylaxis. During prophylaxis 5 of 18 cultures (28%) were positive and at the end of the prophylactic regimen 1 out of 37 cultures (3%) was positive. In the 400 mg/d group, 13 of 47 cultures (28%) were positive at the start, 2 out of 20 (10%) were positive during prophylaxis and 1 out of 45 (2%) was still positive at the end. The drug was clinically well tolerated. Twenty of the 30 evaluable patients had no significant biochemical abnormalities, 5 had an increased serum transaminase level, 2 had an increased alkaline phosphatase level, and 3 had combined increases of serum transaminase and alkaline phosphatase levels. These abnormalities are regularly seen in patients with metastatic malignant disease, and are not necessarily related to the ketoconazole prophylaxis.

Fifty-four patients with advanced breast cancer who had failed prior non-anthracycline combination chemotherapy were randomized to treatment with either epirubicin 85 mg/m2 or doxorubicin 60 mg/m2 intravenously every three weeks. Of 52 evaluable patients, 25% (six of 24) treated with epirubicin, and 25% (seven of 28) treated with doxorubicin experienced major therapeutic responses. The median duration of response to epirubicin was 11.9 months compared to 7.1 months with doxorubicin. Cardiotoxicity was monitored by serial multigated radionuclide cineangiocardiography performed at rest and after exercise. Laboratory evidence of cardiotoxicity was defined as a decrease in resting left ventricular ejection fraction of greater than 10% from the baseline value, or a decrease of 5% or greater with exercise compared with the resting study performed on the same day. Fifteen patients treated with epirubicin and 18 patients treated with doxorubicin had at least two determinations of left ventricular ejection fraction and were evaluable for laboratory cardiotoxicity. Using methods of survival analysis, the median doses to the development of laboratory cardiotoxicity were estimated to be 935 mg/m2 of epirubicin and 468 mg/m2 of doxorubicin. Four patients treated with epirubicin and five treated with doxorubicin developed symptomatic congestive heart failure. The median cumulative dose at which congestive heart failure occurred was 1,134 mg/m2 of epirubicin compared with 492 mg/m2 of doxorubicin. Fewer episodes of nausea and vomiting were observed in patients receiving epirubicin. Epirubicin is a new anthracycline with reduced cardiac toxicity, but preserved efficacy in the treatment of patients with advanced breast cancer.

During a 6-month interval, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group randomized 127 patients who had received prior chemotherapy, and who had advanced measurable, surgically incurable colorectal cancer, to receive piperazinedione (PZD), Yoshi-864, or razoxane (ICRF-159). The observed response (and median survival) rates were: PZD, one of 35 patients (17 weeks); Yoshi-864, one of 34 (19 weeks), and ICRF-159, none of 38 (23 weeks). Among 107 evaluable patients, there were five episodes of life-threatening toxicity with PZD (one death) and four with ICRF-159 (two deaths). In the same protocol, 42 evaluable patients who had not received prior chemotherapy were randomized to be treated with lomustine (CCNU) or one of the three drugs in the "previously treated" trial. One CR (41 weeks) was seen with ICRF-159 and two PRs were seen with CCNU. Life-threatening toxicity occurred in three patients, two who received CCNU (one death) and one who received PZD. No survival advantage was seen. We do not encourage further phase II trials in colorectal cancer with the agents studied.

Animal studies have indicated that the time of administration of adriamycin and cisplatin, two widely used anticancer drugs, has a profound effect on their toxicity. This effect in cancer chemotherapy was studied in 31 patients with advanced ovarian cancer. Patients received at least eight monthly courses of adriamycin that were followed 12 hours later by cisplatin, with adriamycin randomly administered at either 6 a.m. or 6 p.m. The results show that in the group receiving adriamycin in the evening and cisplatin in the morning (i) twice as many patients required reductions in dosage and delays in treatment, (ii) four times as many treatments had to be delayed, (iii) drug dosages had to be modified downward three times as often, and (iv) even with more dose attenuation and treatment delays, treatment complications were still about two times more common as in the group receiving adriamycin in the morning and cisplatin in the evening. These findings show that the circadian stage at which anticancer drugs are given to patients should be carefully considered.

Factors influencing preference for THC vs. Compazine (prochlorperazine) as an antiemetic agent during cancer chemotherapy were studied in 139 patients who received both medications in a double-blind randomized crossover design trial. Nausea reduction was the main determinant of preference. THC preference was associated with more, rather than fewer, drug-related side effects than Compazine, particularly sedation. Patients who reported being anxious or depressed did not experience accentuation of their mood states with either regime. Mood effects, nausea reduction, incidence of side effects, and drug preference were the same in patients under and over 50 years of age. Patients with a history of illicit drug use reported fewer side effects from THC, but reported no difference in drug preference or nausea reduction compared to those patients without a history of illicit use.

A randomized controlled trial of the value of oral adjuvant cytotoxic chemotherapy in the treatment of potentially curable breast cancer has been in progress in the Oxford Region since 1977. Eighty-seven patients were allocated to treatment with melphalan 0.2 mg/kg for 5 consecutive days every 6 weeks for 2 years; 98 patients were allocated to treatment with oral combination therapy consisting of melphalan 10 mg daily for 5 consecutive days, plus methotrexate 15 mg and 5-fluorouracil 250 mg on the first day, courses being repeated every 6 weeks for 2 years; and 88 patients were allocated to a control group which received no adjuvant chemotherapy. So far, 125 patients have suffered a recurrence of breast cancer and 85 have died. No statistically significant differences in outcome are apparent between the three treatment groups, although there is some indication of a beneficial effect of chemotherapy on disease-free interval in pre-menopausal women. Toxic effects of treatment, notably nausea, vomiting and bone marrow depression, have been moderately severe. In our view, the beneficial effects of current adjuvant cytotoxic chemotherapy, if any, are too modest to justify the suffering which such treatment can cause at a time when a woman with breast cancer might otherwise expect to feel physically well.

Mitoxantrone (Novantrone; dihydroxyanthracenedione) is an anthraquinone previously shown to be active in human breast cancer. It appears to have less toxicity than doxorubicin. Results of this phase II-III randomized cross-over trial to determine the relative efficacy and toxicity of mitoxantrone in comparison to doxorubicin, are presented. Patients with measurable, recurrent breast cancer with limited prior chemotherapy with or without radiotherapy for metastatic disease, and who had not been exposed to prior doxorubicin, were randomized to receive either mitoxantrone or doxorubicin every three weeks with cross-over on progression. Response rates, duration of remission, time to treatment failure, and drug toxicity, including cardiac toxicity evaluated with serial radionuclide angiocardiography, were evaluated. Differences in the response rates for the two groups were not statistically significant. Neither time to treatment failure nor duration of response are significantly different (p greater than 0.05). With respect to toxicity, mitoxantrone treated patients consistently exhibited a lower incidence and less severe drug toxicity as compared to their doxorubicin-treated counterparts. Cardiac toxicity was carefully monitored and thus four patients on doxorubicin have had drug related congestive heart failure, as compared to none on mitoxantrone. In summary, mitoxantrone appears to be as active as doxorubicin in patients with stage IV breast cancer previously treated with chemotherapy; however, mitoxantrone causes significantly less nausea, vomiting, stomatitis and alopecia at doses which induce equal or greater myelosuppression than doxorubicin, and appears to be less cardiotoxic.

New agents with increased activity and/or reduced toxicity are needed for the treatment of advanced breast cancer. The anthracene derivatives mitoxantrone and bisantrene had significant activity and acceptable toxicity in phase II trials. In an ongoing phase III trial we have now randomized 150 patients with advanced breast cancer to either doxorubicin (60 mg/m2), mitoxantrone (14 mg/m2) or bisantrene (260 mg/m2) i.v. q 3 weeks with re-randomization for cross-over at the time of progression to determine the relative efficacy and toxicity of these three agents. To be eligible, patients must have had only one previous chemotherapy regimen. ER positive patients must have failed endocrine therapy. Patients with CHF or severe cardiac disease were ineligible. In this preliminary evaluation, 117 patients are evaluable for response and 110 for toxicity. Median age for all patients is 58 years (range 26-78). The majority (86%) are postmenopausal. Fifty-nine percent percent of the patients have visceral dominant disease. Estrogen receptor is positive in 37%, negative in 39% and unknown in 24% of patients. Median performance status (SWOG) is 1, range 0-2. Objective responses have been observed on each arm (doxorubicin 9/35, mitoxantrone 6/38, bisantrene 6/44). Thirty-two patients are evaluable for cross-over response (doxorubicin 2/13, mitoxantrone 1/11, bisantrene 0/8). The predominant toxicity is leukopenia with a nadir WBC count less than 2000 in 45% of all courses administered. Leukopenia is similar with the three drugs. Significant nausea, vomiting and alopecia are common with doxorubicin and uncommon with the other agents. Congestive heart failure has been observed in one patient (doxorubicin). Definitive conclusions regarding the efficacy and toxicity of these agents await the completion of this trial.