We have performed an open parallel randomized study of the efficacy of two antiemetic drug combinations. Dexamethasone (10 mg i.v.), diphenhydramine (25 mg i.v.), and metoclopramide (3 mg/kg, 15 min i.v.) or droperidol (1.25 mg slow push) were given 30 min before and 90 min after start of chemotherapy. Thirty-six patients treated with cisplatin-based regimens (30 mg/m2 x 3 days or 60 mg/m2 day 1 only), have been observed for 48 h after their last chemotherapy. Twelve (67%, confidence interval 95%: 41-87%) experienced no vomiting while on metoclopramide and 11 (61%, confidence interval 36-83%) were protected by droperidol. Further patient accrual was stopped because of side effects in one study arm. Moderate sedation (difficulty to keep up a conversation) was observed in 48% of those on metoclopramide versus 14% of those on droperidol (p less than 0.05). We conclude that low-dose droperidol combinations can offer antiemetic protection for patients treated with moderate-dose cisplatin-based chemotherapies. In view of the potential for severe long-term neurologic problems due to metoclopramide or droperidol, these and similar drugs should be used at the lowest possible dose.

The antiemetic efficacy of metoclopramide and lorazepam (MTC + L) versus alizapride and lorazepam (ALZ + L) was compared in 100 patients receiving chemotherapy, in a prospective randomized double-blind study. In highly emetogenic (HE) regimen (including platinum) patients received MTC 1 mg/kg or ALZ 3 mg/kg x 4 doses, and lorazepam 2.5 mg 30 min before therapy. In moderately emetogenic (ME) regimen patients received MTC 0.5 mg/kg or ALZ 1.5 mg kg x 3 doses, and lorazepam 2.5 mg 30 min before therapy. In both HE and ME regimen groups there was no statistically significant difference between MTC + L and ALZ + L treatments as regards the number of vomiting episodes, the duration of emesis and nausea, the intensity of nausea and side effects, but a statistically significant difference between treatments was found in the HE group where MTC-L was superior to ALZ + L in obtaining complete protection from vomiting (37 vs 11%, p = 0.05). No significant difference in side effects was observed.

Droloxifene, a new tamoxifen (TAM)-derived compound, has excellent antiestrogenic activity. This compound exhibits less endogenously estrogenic but higher antiestrogenic activity, with better tolerability than TAM in experimental models. Two phase II studies of droloxifene were performed in 47 Japanese institutions to assess the optimal dose. The first was a randomized comparative study using 20, 40, and 80 mg, respectively, once a day. The other was a pilot study using 120 mg once a day. The subjects of both studies were women with primary or recurrent advanced breast cancer, regardless of estrogen receptor status and menopausal status. Of 94 patients enrolled in the comparative study, 22, 26, and 23 were evaluable in the 20-, 40-, and 80-mg groups, respectively. Of the 71 evaluable patients, 14 (19.7%) were negative for estrogen receptor, and 36 (50.7%) had a previous history of TAM therapy. The response rate complete response + partial response (CR + PR) was 13.6% for 20 mg, 15.4% for 40 mg, and 17.4% for 80 mg. The rate of no change (NC) was 31.9%, 46.1%, and 47.8%, and that of progressive disease (PD) was 54.5%, 38.5% and 34.8%, respectively, in the 20-, 40-, and 80-mg groups. In the other study, 16 patients were enrolled in the pilot study with 120 mg of droloxifene, of whom 14 were evaluable. The response rate was slightly higher: four responders (28.6%) were assessed as CR + PR, six (42.9%) as NC, and four (28.6%) as PD. These results suggest that the response rate may be dose-dependent and that PD rates seem lower in the higher doses. No serious side effects were encountered, and droloxifene was well tolerated even in the higher doses. At present, a final randomized dose-finding study with 80 mg/day and 120 mg/day is being carried out.

Pharmacokinetics and metabolism of droloxifene, a new antiestrogenic drug, have been investigated by single- and multiple-dose studies in postmenopausal patients with advanced breast cancer. Short terminal elimination half-life, low accumulation, and improved drug tolerability are the most striking features of this safe and effective new antiestrogen. Bioequivalence of film-coated tablet, tablet, and standard solution of droloxifene has been shown. The concentrations of droloxifene and its metabolites have been determined by a highly selective HPLC method.

Results of a randomized trial on antiemesis for cisplatin (CDDP) and non-CDDP chemotherapy-induced vomiting are reported. One hundred and sixty-three outpatients received 282 chemotherapy courses (141 with CDDP and 141 without CDDP). Patients were randomly assigned to receive either high-dose metoclopramide plus methylprednisolone (arm A) or the same drugs plus lorazepam (arm B). In both arms a high protection rate for vomiting was obtained, on the whole without statistically significant differences. Patients who received lorazepam had, however, significantly fewer nausea episodes during first day post-chemotherapy (p less than 0.05). Arm B was also superior in anxiety control during the first day of chemotherapy (p less than 0.01). Both regimens were significantly more effective in patients who had not been given chemotherapy previously (p less than 0.01). No differences in antiemetic protection were found between CDDP and non-CDDP courses. No significant differences were found in premonitory vomiting control between the two arms of the trial. Toxicity was very mild with both regimens, although sedation was significantly higher in arm B (p less than 0.001). We conclude that high-dose metoclopramide plus methylprednisolone is a highly effective combination for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting, and that it is quite suitable for outpatient use. Lorazepam did not significantly increase the antiemetic potency of the combination, nor did it improve premonitory vomiting control, although it gave a better control of acute nausea and anxiety.

Doxorubicin is an essential component of the treatment of aggressive lymphoma, childhood solid tumors, bone and soft tissue sarcomas, and breast cancer and additional indications are emerging. On the other hand, daunorubicin has occupied the central position of interest in the treatment of acute leukemia. Epirubicin has a spectrum very similar to doxorubicin but lesser toxicity. The ability to protect against cardiotoxicity with ICRF-187 further enhances clinical interest in exploiting modifications in doze intensity to therapeutic advantage. Idarubicin has at least equivalent activity to daunorubicin and doxorubicin in leukemia. New areas of research in relation to anthracycline antibiotics include introduction of new the analogs, insight into mechanisms of resistance, the reversal of multidrug resistance in vitro, the protection of cardiac toxicity, and the study of other important biochemical reactions relevant to cytotoxicity. Orally active anthracyclines such as idarubicin and compounds which lack cross-resistance with the parent drugs or have other mechanisms for cytotoxicity are being developed. It is likely that these modifications will lead to an expanding therapeutic spectrum for these already widely useful drugs.

Tropisetron is a novel antiserotoninergic drug with potent and specific activity against cancer chemotherapy-induced emesis. High-dose cyclophosphamide or high-dose melphalan are chemotherapeutic regimens associated with severe nausea and vomiting refractory to current antiemetic medications. We compared in a randomised open label study the antiemetic efficacy of tropisetron and alizapride in a first group of 32 consecutive patients treated with high-dose alkylating agent chemotherapy with or without autologous bone marrow transplantation. Tropisetron was more effective than alizapride in reducing vomiting episodes. In the first 24 h of treatment the median number of episodes in patients treated with tropisetron was 5 compared with 9 episodes in the alizapride group (P = 0.005). In the 72 h study period the median number of emetic episodes was 6 in the tropisetron group and 12 in the alizapride group (P = 0.004). In a second group of 26 consecutive patients, a combination of tropisetron plus haloperidol, a dopamine antagonist, was employed for prevention of emesis. This combination was more effective than tropisetron as single agent in preventing emetic episodes, as the median number of emetic episodes in the 72 h of observation was only 3, while they were 6 in the tropisetron group. The side-effects of tropisetron were mild and reversible upon discontinuation of the drug. We conclude that tropisetron is an effective antiemetic drug when employed in high-dose alkylating agent chemotherapy, and that its activity is potentiated by the association with haloperidol.

To test the value of pefloxacin for the prevention of infections in patients with chemotherapy-induced neutropenia, oral pefloxacin plus vancomycin (PV) (n = 76) or gentamicin, colistin sulphate and vancomycin (GCV) (n = 74) were administered in a randomised double-blind study. Infections were significantly less severe in the PV than in the GCV group. Patients receiving PV had significantly fewer episodes of bacteraemia and central venous line infections than patients treated with GCV. Gram-positive and gram-negative infections were significantly less frequent in patients receiving PV, because of fewer infections with Staphylococcus species and enterobacteriaceae. Stool culture detected significantly more gram-positive organisms in the PV group and more gram-negative organisms in the GCV group. Thus, PV was more efficacious than GCV for the prevention of gram-positive and gram-negative infections in the neutropenic patients, despite lower efficacy in eradicating gram-positive organisms from the lower intestinal tract.

Forty premenopausal patients with advanced breast cancer entered a prospective and randomized study in which high-dose medroxyprogesterone acetate (HD MAP) and oophorectomy (OPX) were compared. All the patients were first treated for advanced disease. Twenty-two patients received HD MAP (1,000 mg b.i.d. p.o.) and 18 patients received OPX. Complete remission (CR) was achieved in 2 (9%) in the HD MAP group and in 2 (11%) in the OPX group for a duration of 20-24 and 30-54 months respectively. Partial remission (PR) was achieved in 10 (45%) patients in the HD MAP group and in 4 (22%) patients in the OPX group for a median duration of 9 and 7 months respectively. The objective response rates (CR + PR) were 55% for the HD MAP group and 33% for the OPX group (p = 0.17). Ten patients who received OPX as first-line treatment received HD MAP when the disease progressed and were evaluable for response: PR was achieved in 6 patients (2 responders and 4 nonresponders to OPX) for a median duration of 5 months. Two out of 4 patients who received OPX at progression after objective response to HD MAP presented PR. HD MAP induced a significant decrease in pain intensity and, compared to OPX, a more frequent improvement was induced in performance status. No difference was observed between the two groups in terms of overall survival. This study shows that HD MAP is an active treatment in premenopausal patients with advanced breast cancer and that it can induce a response in some patients resistant to OPX.

During a 2-year period, 37 patients with symptomatic metastatic prostatic cancer were included in a prospective randomized phase-III trial. Nineteen patients were randomized to subcapsular orchiectomy, and 18 to cyproterone acetate (CPA) treatment with a dose of 50 mg b.i.d. The median age of the patients was 74 years (range 48-88 years), with no differences between the treatment groups. At 3, 6, and 12 months after initiation of the therapy and then every 6 months, patients were clinically and biochemically examined, and isotope scans and X-rays were performed. All patients were followed until death. Relief from symptoms was found following 3 months of treatment in 70.6% (95% confidence limits = 44.0-89.7%) of the patients treated with CPA, and in 83.3% (95% confidence limits = 58.6-96.4%) of the orchiectomized patients. The median time to relapse was 9 months in the CPA group, and 11 months in the orchiectomy group (p greater than 0.05). The median survival time was 13 months, with no differences between the groups. The treatment of advanced prostatic cancer with CPA is found to be a valuable alternative to orchiectomy.

The effects of recombinant granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rG-CSF) on the myelosuppression, especially neutropenia, induced by cancer chemotherapy in patients with urogenital cancer were investigated in a randomized, controlled clinical study. In this study, rG-CSF was given subcutaneously at a dose of 2 micrograms/kg per day for 14 consecutive days. Changes in neutrophil counts were compared between the first (no rG-CSF) and second cycles (rG-CSF treatment period) of chemotherapy. rG-CSF administration was found to be effective in reducing the duration of neutropenia, in elevating the neutrophil nadir, and in reducing recovery time. Based on comparisons between the randomized rG-CSF treatment group (with rG-CSF) and the control group, treatment with rG-CSF resulted in the moderation or prevention of neutropenia and the acceleration of recovery. These results demonstrate that in chemotherapy of patients with urogenital cancer, in which neutropenia is a dose- or schedule-limiting factor, the concomitant use of rG-CSF may enable an increase in the dose (higher single dose or increased dose per unit of time) or shorten the chemotherapy period.

Research-based oral care protocols for the control and treatment of stomatitis secondary to cytotoxic therapy are scarce in the nursing literature. The purpose of this pilot study was to determine the efficacy of two different oral care protocols in decreasing the incidence of stomatitis in patients with hematologic malignancies receiving chemotherapy and radiation therapy. It was hypothesized that patients with hematologic malignancies using oral care protocol A would have a lower incidence of treatment-induced stomatitis than patients using oral care protocol B. Eighteen subjects with hematologic malignancies treated with high doses of chemotherapy alone or in combination with radiation therapy were randomly assigned to one of two specific oral care protocols. Protocols differed in the type of lip lubricant, toothette, and mouthwash used. The Oral Assessment Guide (21) was used to assess oral status five times a week for the duration of each subject's hospitalization. A t test for independent samples was used to determine if the difference in the condition of the oral cavity was related to the different oral care treatments. A statistically significant difference was not found between the mean oral assessment scores of the two groups. A trend emerged, however, of a lower incidence of stomatitis in the subjects using the experimental oral care protocol. A serendipitous finding was that reinforcement of oral care instructions and nursing assessments of the oral cavity seemed to promote patient compliance with the oral care regime. A supplementary analysis revealed a statistically significant (r = -0.7177) negative correlation between the degree of stomatitis and the peripheral white blood cell count.

We analyzed 56 of 75 previously untreated patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who entered on a prospectively randomized trial of acivicin versus 4'deoxydoxorubicin (esorubicin). At least one episode of severe toxicity was documented in 23% of the patients on acivicin and 45% of those on 4'deoxydoxorubicin. Two patients responded to 4'deoxydoxorubicin. One response was partial, lasting 58 weeks, and one was complete, lasting more than 4 years. The 90% confidence interval for response is 1-20%. In view of a 45% rate of severe or worse toxicity with 4'deoxydoxorubicin, this drug cannot be recommended as treatment. There were no responses on acivicin.

Nineteen patients receiving cancer chemotherapy were randomized in a double-blind fashion to receive either (a) dronabinol, 10 mg plus placebo q.i.d.; (b) prochlorperazine, 10 mg plus placebo q.i.d.; or (c) dronabinol plus prochlorperazine, each 10 mg q.i.d. There were six evaluable patients in each of the two single-agent groups and five in the combination group. The median duration and severity per episode of nausea was significantly greater in the group receiving prochlorperazine alone versus the other two groups. The median duration per episode of vomiting was also significantly greater in the prochlorperazine group than in the other two groups. The proportion of patients vomiting was the same in all groups; however, only one patient in the combination group versus three each in the single-agent groups experienced nausea (p = NS). The majority of side effects were associated with the CNS, including somnolence, dizziness, and confusion. Side effects were somewhat more common in both groups receiving dronabinol, though they were not statistically different from the side effects in the group receiving prochlorperazine as a single agent. Efficacy, as measured by duration of nausea and vomiting and by severity of nausea, was significantly greater in both groups receiving dronabinol.

Do results from recently reported phase II trials of combination chemotherapy and concurrent radiation warrant evaluation in a randomized study? Our bias is that only treatment regimens associated with a twofold increase in median survival should be considered for a phase III trial increase in median survival. Therefore, for stage IIIA N2 NSCLC patients median survival should increase from 12 to 24 months, and for stage IIIB patients, it should increase from 9 to 18 months. Although survival results from some combined modality trials are encouraging, thus far no concurrent chemotherapy-radiation regimen appears to have produced the preceding results.

The effects of medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) on the mechanism of coagulation in postmenopausal patients were studied and compared with those of tamoxifen by a retrospective analysis. The coagulation test parameters tested included platelet count, bleeding time, clotting time, prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time, and the levels of fibrinogen, fibrin degradation products, factor II, factor V, plasminogen, alpha 2-plasmin inhibitor (alpha 2-PI) and alpha 2-plasmin inhibitor-plasmin complex (alpha 2-PI-P). A shortened APTT was noted and the levels of factors II, V, alpha 2-PI and alpha 2-PI-P were also out of the normal range during treatment in the MPA-treated group. However, these abnormal parameters recovered to within the normal range from 6 months or more after the commencement of treatment without any termination of drug administration. The patients were all asymptomatic. In contrast, a slight prolongation of bleeding time which persisted for more than 6 months was observed in the patients treated with tamoxifen. These data suggest that MPA causes a hypercoagulable state and that any change must be carefully monitored during treatment with either MPA or tamoxifen.

Eighty eight patients with FIGO stage IIb/c (postoperative residual) or III/IV epithelial ovarian cancer were randomised to receive cycles of cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m2) with either iproplatin (240 mg/m2), cisplatin (100 mg/m2) or carboplatin (300 mg/m2). A total of six cycles were given at monthly intervals. Patients were well-balanced for major prognostic factors. There was no significant difference in overall response rate (iproplatin arm, 64.3%, cisplatin arm 72.7% and carboplatin arm 66.7%). There were more complete remissions on the carboplatin arm, 45.8% compared with 21.4% on iproplatin and 22.7% on cisplatin but the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.11). With a median follow up of 50 months the median survival for the iproplatin arm is 18 months, for the cisplatin arm 19 months and for the carboplatin arm 24 months (p = 0.15). Toxicity was greatest with cisplatin and least with carboplatin. Myelotoxicity limited the dose delivery of iproplatin as measured by total dose, dose intensity and dose intensity product. Carboplatin is at least as effective and less toxic than cisplatin when used in conjunction with cyclophosphamide for the treatment of ovarian carcinoma, and this analogue has been selected for dose intensification studies in this tumour at the Christie Hospital.

Fifty six patients, with histologically confirmed cancer, who received highly emetogenic chemotherapy, were entered on a randomized double blind, low versus high dose, study of granisetron, a 5HT3 receptor antagonist. A single dose of intravenous granisetron protected the majority of patients from nausea and vomiting, 160 micrograms/kg was more effective than 40 micrograms/kg with no more side effects. Additional doses of granisetron conferred added benefit to patients who experienced breakthrough symptoms. Granisetron at a dose range of 40-240 micrograms/kg over a 24 hour period was well tolerated with the only side effect being mild headache.