The antiemetic efficacy and safety of granisetron (40 micrograms/kg), a selective and potent 5-hydroxytryptamine (serotonin) antagonist, was compared with that of metoclopramide (7 mg/kg) plus dexamethasone (12 mg) in patients receiving fractionated chemotherapy. Patients receiving cisplatin at doses of at least 15 mg/m2 or etoposide at least 120 mg/m2 or ifosfamide at least 1.2 g/m2 on each of 5 consecutive days were eligible. A total of 143 patients received granisetron and 141 received the comparator regimen. The 5-day complete response rate (no vomiting, no worse than mild nausea) for granisetron (46.8%) was equivalent to that for metoclopramide plus dexamethasone (43.9%). The overall 5-day response profile was superior for granisetron (P = 0.013) because of fewer failures in this group. The overall incidence of adverse experiences was significantly lower in the granisetron group (60.8% versus 77.3%, P = 0.003). Headache and constipation, more prevalent in the granisetron group, are recognized side-effects of serotonin antagonists. Extrapyramidal syndrome, not seen in any granisetron patients, occurred in 20.6% of comparator patients (P < 0.0001). The majority of granisetron patients only required a single prophylactic dose of the drug on each treatment day (at least 82%). In conclusion, granisetron showed at least equivalent efficacy to metoclopramide plus dexamethasone in patients receiving 5-day fractionated chemotherapy. In addition it offered a simple and convenient dosing regimen and a safer side-effect profile.

The efficacy and safety of a novel antiemetic, granisetron, was assessed at two dose levels (40 micrograms/kg and 160 micrograms/kg) in a randomized, double-blind study of 504 patients undergoing treatment with a range of standard cytostatic therapies. In the first 24 h, 75% of patients in the lower-dose group and 81% in the higher were complete responders (i.e. experienced no vomiting and no, or only mild, nausea). Two additional doses of granisetron (40 micrograms/kg) were allowed on the first day to treat any symptoms of nausea and vomiting. This produced improvement or resolution of symptoms in 94% of patients in the lower-dose group and 97% of patients in the higher-dose group. Over the 7 days of the study a complete response was maintained by 56% of patients in each group. No differences in efficacy or safety between the two doses of granisetron were established. Granisetron was very well tolerated. The commonest adverse event was headache, occurring in about 15% of patients, which required no more than simple analgesia. No extrapyramidal effects were observed. There was no relationship between the total dose of granisetron and the number or severity of specific adverse events.

Gram-positive infections have become prevalent among neutropenic patients with cancer. A prospective, randomized, double-blind trial of teicoplanin, 6 mg/kg every 12 h for three doses then every 24 h, versus vancomycin hydrochloride, 15 mg/kg every 12 h, in the empirical treatment of febrile neutropenic patients was undertaken among 50 consecutive patients with haematological malignancy. The patients also received piperacillin sodium, 3 g every 4 h, and tobramycin sulphate, 1.5-2 mg/kg every 8 h. Both groups (25 teicoplanin and 25 vancomycin) were comparable in age, sex, renal function, underlying disease and concurrent therapy. Among 22 patients (44%) with culture-proven infection, Gram-positive organisms were isolated in 15 (9 with bacteraemia) and Gram-negative in 11 (4 with bacteraemia). Mixed or polymicrobial infection occurred in 8 patients. Serum 1-h peak and trough levels at steady state were 41 +/- 15 and 12 +/- 3 mg/l for teicoplanin (at 14 +/- 4 days), and 40 +/- 10 and 8 +/- 5 mg/l for vancomycin (at 0.9 +/- 0.6 days). Mean elimination half-life and apparent volume of distribution at steady state were 80.5 +/- 21.5 h and 1.4 +/- 0.8 l/kg for teicoplanin, and 5.6 +/- 1.8 h and 0.6 +/- 0.2 l/kg for vancomycin. Empirical antimicrobial therapy was successful in 23 teicoplanin and 21 vancomycin patients, respectively (p = 0.67; two-tailed Fisher's exact test). Nephrotoxicity (serum creatinine > 110 mmol/l), however, was more common among vancomycin patients (10 versus 2; p = 0.02), while termination of treatment due to adverse effects was also more common among vancomycin patients (10 versus 2; p = 0.02).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

In all, 88 patients with haematological malignancies requiring Hickman catheters for intensive chemotherapy were randomized to receive either one single bolus intravenous injection of teicoplanin, 400 mg, or no teicoplanin immediately before insertion of a double-lumen Hickman catheter. Lower incidences of catheter-related Gram-positive sepsis were recorded in patients receiving prophylactic teicoplanin; exit site infection, tunnel infection and catheter-related Gram-positive septicaemia were all reduced. The benefit of prophylactic teicoplanin was observed particularly among patients who were already neutropenic at the time of catheterization. All Gram-positive organisms isolated from infected skin sites or from blood cultures taken from Hickman catheters were susceptible to teicoplanin. No adverse reaction was reported in any of the patients receiving prophylaxis. Prophylactic teicoplanin, therefore, may be used routinely for patients requiring insertion of Hickman catheters for intensive chemotherapy, to reduce the early incidence of catheter-related sepsis, particularly during the period of neutropenia following chemotherapy.

An open, two-armed, multicentre trial was conducted in 231 patients with malignant disease who had previously failed to respond to conventional antiemetic treatment for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. Patients were randomized to receive either tropisetron (5 mg/day; n = 115) or a standard antiemetic therapy, which was considered optimal for each individual but did not include a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist (n = 116). Acute vomiting on Day 1 was controlled in 60 (52%) tropisetron patients, compared with only 29 (25%) patients receiving optimal standard therapy (p < 0.001). Acute nausea was completely inhibited in 37 (32%) tropisetron patients, compared with 22 (19%) patients on optimal standard therapy (p < 0.05). On Day 1, delayed vomiting was also significantly better prevented by tropisetron (p < 0.001). Side effects from tropisetron (headache and constipation) were mild, and no extrapyramidal symptoms were observed in any tropisetron patients, in contrast, to 14 (13%) patients in the 'optimal standard' group. In conclusion, in cases of acute nausea and vomiting it is more effective to switch refractory patients to tropisetron rather than attempt to optimize the dose of standard antiemetic therapy. For delayed nausea and vomiting, combination antiemetic therapy, with differing types of receptor antagonism and corticosteroids may provide the best way forward. Such studies are in progress.

121 patients with 132 febrile episodes were randomised to ceftriaxone or latamoxef monotherapy in order to compare antibiotic efficacy in neutropenic patients treated with cytotoxic chemotherapy for solid tumours. In 80 evaluable episodes no significant differences were observed between the two groups with respect to efficacy and fatal failure rates. Of episodes treated with ceftriaxone, 67% showed a favourable clinical response vs. 61% in the latamoxef group. The clinical response rates in episodes with documented bacterial infections were 67 and 56% in the two treatment groups. In 18% of the episodes with documented initial infections the patients died of presumably uncontrolled infection. The convenient once daily dosage schedule combined with fewer severe adverse reactions favours the use of ceftriaxone instead of latamoxef. Although a relative high degree of response was seen, empirical antibiotic monotherapy apparently does not offer a sufficient antibacterial cover in infections in this type of patient with defective host immunity.

The efficacy and tolerance of the nonsteroidal antiandrogen nilutamide in the treatment of prostatic cancer were studied in a large double-blind clinical trial initiated in 1986. Patients with metastatic prostatic cancer without prior endocrine manipulation underwent orchiectomy and were randomized to 1 of 2 groups receiving nilutamide (225 patients) or placebo (232). Nilutamide and placebo were evaluated for efficacy in 207 and 216 patients, respectively. Progression-free survival was significantly longer in the nilutamide group (median time to progression 20.8 months on nilutamide and 14.9 months on placebo, p = 0.005). Median time to death from prostatic cancer was 30.0 months in the placebo group and 37 months in the nilutamide group. Objective regressions were higher in the nilutamide group (41%) than in the placebo group (24%). Significant differences in favor of the nilutamide group were found at several intervals for bone pain, prostatic acid phosphatase, prostate specific antigen, alkaline phosphatase and bone scan isotope uptake. Nilutamide and orchiectomy constitute a more effective treatment for metastatic prostatic cancer than orchiectomy alone, and the adverse effects of nilutamide, usually minor, are outweighed by the significant improvements in most disease measures and progression-free survival.

Chromosomal aberrations were studied in peripheral blood lymphocytes from only surgery treated testicular cancer patients and treated with chemo- and/or radiotherapy. A distinct increase in spontaneous aberration frequency over the level of 27 healthy controls in 27 patients treated with surgery alone was found. Our data suggest the existence of a certain degree of chromosome instability, which may be a factor to the development of testicular tumour. The frequency of aberrant cells was much higher in 102 treated patients than in the controls. The decrease in aberrant cells was only time-dependently gradual in VPB and X-ray treated patients, while the second line combined treatment modalities caused the highest frequency of aberrant cells in the first two years after the end of courses. The possible relationship between the persistence of chromosomal aberrations and the development of malignancies are discussed in this paper.

The selective 5-hydroxytryptamine3 antagonist ondansetron has been shown to be effective in preventing nausea and vomiting associated with highly emetogenic cisplatin chemotherapy. Two multicenter, placebo-controlled, dose-comparison studies (S3A-361 and S3A-362) were undertaken to investigate the efficacy and safety of oral ondansetron in patients receiving non-cisplatin, cyclophosphamide-based regimens in the outpatient setting. Chemotherapy-naive patients undergoing their first cycle of cyclophosphamide-based (> or = 500 mg/m2) chemotherapy were randomized to receive placebo or ondansetron, 1, 4, or 8 mg, three times per day for 3 days. In addition to cyclophosphamide, all patients received doxorubicin, methotrexate, or another low-to-moderately emetogenic agent. In study S3A-361, 318 of 349 patients were evaluable for efficacy; 297 of 324 patients in study S3A-362 were evaluable for efficacy. All patients in both studies were evaluable for safety. All ondansetron groups were superior to placebo groups in both studies for all measured efficacy parameters. In the two studies combined, 14%, 47%, 65%, and 66% of patients in the placebo, 1-, 4-, and 8-mg ondansetron groups, respectively, experienced no emetic episodes. The rate of therapeutic failure was statistically lower in the ondansetron groups in both studies compared with the placebo groups. In addition, therapeutic failure decreased in a dose-dependent manner. Severity of nausea, food intake, time to first emetic episode, and need for rescue antiemetics were also improved for the ondansetron groups. When the patients were stratified for doxorubicin-containing regimens, those patients receiving doxorubicin had a lower response rate with placebo and ondansetron than those on non-doxorubicin regimens. However, a dose-related improvement in efficacy was still observed with ondansetron in this subset of patients. In patients receiving the more emetogenic high-dose cyclophosphamide (> or = 600 mg/m2) regimens, a dose-related improvement in efficacy also was observed. In conclusion, oral ondansetron was found to be an effective and safe antiemetic for patients receiving cyclophosphamide-based chemotherapy in the outpatient setting. The 8-mg dose was optimal, particularly in patients receiving doxorubicin-containing or high-dose cyclophosphamide regimens.

This study combines secondary analysis of efficacy and side-effect data from a randomised controlled trial with estimates of resource use to evaluate the likely economic effects of the new antiemetic agent ondansetron. Costs, effects and cost-effectiveness of ondansetron in the prophylaxis of acute nausea and vomiting induced by chemotherapy are assessed relative to antiemetic therapy with metoclopramide. Superior efficacy of ondansetron is quantified both in terms of significant emesis avoided and emesis management costs avoided. A simple cost analysis, with the metoclopramide dosage priced at 10 pounds, indicates that therapy with ondansetron would give equivalent net treatment costs, at a price ratio (ondansetron/metoclopramide) of 2.3 to 1. If therapeutic success is defined as the avoidance of emesis and antiemetic side-effects, then the two therapies would be equally cost-effective at a drug price ratio of 5 to 1. We conclude that, (i) economic evaluation prior to price setting is feasible and informative; (ii) such models can indicate prospective data collection priorities.

Following a single intravenous dose given pre-chemotherapy, the efficacy and tolerability of oral ondansetron treatment given twice daily was compared with the established three times daily oral supplementary regimen in the prophylaxis of nausea and vomiting induced by cyclophosphamide (greater than or equal to 500 mg/m2) in combination with doxorubicin (greater than or equal to 40 mg/m2) or epirubicin (greater than or equal to 40 mg/m2). Oral ondansetron given twice daily or three times daily was equally effective in controlling nausea and emesis. The twice daily oral treatment prevented emesis in 73% of patients in the first 24 hours and in 65% of patients over 3 days. Both dose schedules were safe and were tolerated well. Twice daily oral ondansetron showed good efficacy for controlling emesis and nausea in oncology outpatients.

Eighty previously treated postmenopausal women with metastatic breast cancer were randomized to receive fadrozole (CGS 16 949A), a new aromatase inhibitor, 1 or 4 mg orally per day. Seventy eight patients were evaluable for toxicity and response. Only mild to moderate toxicity, namely hot flushes (28%), nausea and vomiting (13%), fatigue (8%) and loss of appetite (5%) occurred. Complete response was documented in 10% and partial response in 13% of patients with 45% having a no change status for at least 2 months. The median time to treatment failure is 4.1 months. The median survival is 23.7 months. The median survival is 23.7 months. The response and survival in patients with estrogen receptor positive and estrogen receptor unknown disease were not significantly different. Neither response nor survival was significantly different between the patients receiving 1 or 4 mg of fadrozole per day. Fadrozole is a well tolerated, effective second line treatment for women with metastatic breast cancer.

Ototoxicity of cis-diammine glycolato platinum, 254-S, was evaluated from the results obtained in phase II studies for head & neck cancer, lung cancer, breast cancer, gastrointestinal cancer, urogenital cancer and gynecological cancer at 114 institutions, and in randomized comparative study of 254-S plus vindesine vs. cisplatin plus vindesine for advanced non-small cell lung cancer conducted at 41 institutions. In these studies, 254-S was administered at doses ranging from 80 to 100 mg/m2, repeated at least 2 times at 4-week intervals. Impaired hearing was examined in a hearing audiometry test before and after 254-S administration. The incidence of impaired hearing was 25.8% (16/62) in the 254-S phase II studies. The incidences in the randomized comparative study were 17.6% (3/17) for the 254-S/vindesine group and 20.0% (3/15) for the cisplatin/vindesine group. From these results, the ototoxicity of 254-S was thought to be similar to that of cisplatin in incidence and type.

Studies have shown that response to a given chemotherapy in previously untreated patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer is superior to that in patients previously treated with other regimens. This finding raises the question of whether it is necessary and ethical to study the effects of new anticancer agents in untreated patients. Such studies appear to be the best test for drug development, but there has been no evaluation of whether survival of untreated patients, whose cancer is sensitive to established drugs, is adversely affected in trials of new drugs.

The goal of reducing oral complications during chemotherapy and bone marrow transplantation has received attention at several centers. The current randomized study of 86 adults with leukemia treated with chemotherapy or bone marrow transplantation assessed the potential role of chlorhexidine, nystatin, and saline solution rinses to reduce the findings of oral mucositis, gingivitis, and oral infection. The results of this study did not show a reduction in mucositis with the use of these rinses. However, potential bacterial and fungal pathogens were identified less frequently in the patients using chlorhexidine rinse.

Granisetron is a new serotonin-receptor antagonist with considerable activity in preclinical models and early clinical studies against drug-induced nausea and vomiting. In a randomized, double-blind trial, two dose levels of granisetron were compared with regard to their efficacy and safety if given to patients receiving emetogenic chemotherapy with or without cisplatin. The present paper reports the Dutch experience with 125 patients included in this international trial. The two dose levels (40 and 160 micrograms/kg given once i.v. prior to chemotherapy) were equally effective in preventing acute emesis and nausea (within the first 24 h); in the group receiving cisplatin doses of 50 mg/m2 or more, 39% of patients had a complete response (no vomiting and mild nausea at most), with a complete response rate of 82% in the patients receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy. Sixty-three percent of patients receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy with a complete response within 24 h lost this response during the next 6 days, as did 20% of the other patients. Headache was the most frequently reported adverse event (18%), followed by constipation (6%) and dizziness (4%). All adverse events were mild and occurred equally frequently at both dose levels. Granisetron at 40 micrograms/kg i.v. given once is effective in the prevention of acute chemotherapy-induced emesis and nausea, in particular in patients receiving moderately emetogenic therapy.

To determine the efficacy of vitamin E in the treatment of chemotherapy-induced mucositis in patients with malignancy.

High-dose isotretinoin has been reported to have a prophylactic effect on nonmelanoma skin cancer, although it is associated with significant toxicity.