The effect of formulation on the urinary pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and relative bioavailability of cabergoline was investigated. Twelve healthy female volunteers, aged 23-35 years, were treated, according to an open, randomized, crossover design, with cabergoline (1-mg single oral dose) both as tablets and as a solution. The two administrations were separated by a 4-week wash-out period. Cabergoline and prolactin were measured in urine and plasma, respectively, by specific radioimmunoassays. Blood samples were collected before and up to 30 days after dosing. Urine was collected before and up to 8 days after dosing. Cabergoline elimination half-lives calculated from urinary data were 68 and 63 h after administration of the tablets and the solution, respectively. Urinary excretion of unchanged cabergoline accounted, on average, for 1.92% (range, 0.14-3.26) and 1.80% (range, 0.67-3.09) of the dose after administration of the tablets and the aqueous solution, respectively. Relative bioavailability of tablets vs solution was 99% (geometric mean with the 90% confidence intervals of 68-144%). Prolactin levels in 10 out of 12 subjects fell below the detection limit of the assay (1.5 micrograms/L) after both treatments. The mean maximum prolactin decrease (ca. 70%) was achieved by 2 or 3 h after dosing; the effect persisted up to 9 days, being completely exhausted 23-28 days after dosing. The analysis of variance performed on the pharmacodynamic effects of the two cabergoline formulations indicated that the percent decreases of plasma prolactin levels were not significantly different for tablets and solution. These results indicate that the pharmacodynamics and relative bioavailability of cabergoline are not influenced by formulation, as tablets or solution.

A study was carried out in 14 cancer patients to assess the relative bioavailability of two oral formulations of navelbine. A single 130 mg oral dose of the drug was given according to a randomized two-way crossover design as two capsules: one contained the drug in powder (formulation A, reference); another contained the drug in solution (formulation B). A 7 d washout period separated each dose. Navelbine was rapidly absorbed after administration of either formulation and exhibited a biphasic concentration decay pattern. The peak plasma level was reached within 2 h of administration in most patients. Formulation B resulted in better navelbine absorption with respect to peak plasma concentration (Cmax) and area under the plasma concentration-time curves (AUC) than did formulation A as ascertained by analysis of variance (ANOVA). The relative bioavailabilities (solution versus powder) were, respectively, 286.0% and 268.0% as estimated from experimental (0-72 h) and extrapolated (0-infinity) AUC.

To determine if filgrastim (recombinant human methionyl granulocyte colony-stimulating factor) used in addition to standard inpatient antibiotic therapy accelerated recovery from infection associated with chemotherapy-induced neutropenia.

The feasibility of administering vinorelbine (Navelbine, Burroughs Wellcome Co, Research Triangle Park, NC), a semisynthetic vinca alkaloid with broad activity, as a liquid-filled gelatin capsule was evaluated in a bioavailability (F) and pharmacokinetic study.

Vinorelbine is a semisynthetic vinca alkaloid with a broad spectrum of antitumour activity. The drug is effective as a single agent in inoperable/advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), producing objective response rates of about 15 to 30%, and as first-line or later chemotherapy for metastatic spread in advanced breast cancer. Combining vinorelbine with standard chemotherapeutic regimens improves response rates in these indications compared with vinorelbine monotherapy: in NSCLC response rates increase to 30 to 50% when vinorelbine is administered with cisplatin. Importantly, survival was prolonged by a further 9 weeks with this combination in a trial in > 600 patients with NSCLC. Comparative trials evaluating vinorelbine in women with advanced breast cancer are few at present. However, results suggest greater efficacy for vinorelbine than for melphalan as second-line chemotherapy, and similar efficacy for vinorelbine plus doxorubicin compared with doxorubicin plus 2 other drugs as first-line chemotherapy. Vinorelbine has tended to yield superior response rates when compared with vindesine, and appears to have greater haematological toxicity (i.e. granulocytopenia) but less neurological toxicity (peripheral neuropathy, constipation, loss of deep tendon reflexes) than this agent. Myelosuppression is the most frequent cause of vinorelbine treatment delay or dose reduction. Other consequences of vinorelbine therapy are those typically seen with antineoplastic agents, such as diarrhoea, nausea and vomiting, and alopecia. However, these are rarely severe. Early clinical investigations indicate that the antitumour effects of vinorelbine in other malignancies including ovarian carcinoma, lymphoma and head and neck cancer warrant further exploration, as does the efficacy of the drug relative to standard approaches and its possible beneficial effects on quality of life of cancer patients. Clarification is also required of the feasibility of an oral dosage form, which in preliminary investigations has shown some efficacy in NSCLC, but a variable response rate and high incidence of gastrointestinal disturbances in women with breast cancer. Thus, vinorelbine as a single agent or combined palliative therapy is effective against advanced NSCLC, and as first- or second-line chemotherapy in advanced breast cancer. This semisynthetic vinca alkaloid has a manageable tolerability profile and potential for use in other malignancies and as an oral formulation. With these attributes, vinorelbine is a valuable option which extends the range of treatments available for these difficult-to-treat malignancies.

We performed a randomized clinical trial in granulocytopenic patients with carcinoma or leukemia. Patients with persistent fever for more than 2 days despite antibiotic therapy were randomized to antibiotic plus fluconazole therapy group (FLCZ group) or antibiotic therapy only group (antibiotic group) by the envelope method. It was possible to evaluate clinical efficacies in 62 patients (37 patients in FLCZ group and 25 patients in antibiotics group). In patients whose neutrophil counts were less than 100/microliters on the initial day of therapy, clinical efficacy rates were 72.0% (18/25) in FLCZ group and 57.1% (8/14) in antibiotics group. In patients whose neutrophil counts continued to be less than 100/microliters during therapy, clinical efficacy rates were 64.3% (9/14) and 50.0% (3/6), respectively. Further, in patients whose neutrophil counts continued to be less than 500/microliters during therapy, they were 76.9% (20/26) and 53.3% (8/15), respectively. No severe side effects nor severe case of abnormal change in laboratory test values due to fluconazole were observed in this trial. These data suggest that empiric antifungal therapy with fluconazole is effective for fungal infections in granulocytopenic patients with carcinoma and leukemia.

To study the effectiveness of hypnosis for decreasing antiemetic medication usage and treatment of chemotherapy-related nausea and vomiting in children with cancer, we conducted a prospective, randomized, and controlled single-blind trial in 20 patients receiving chemotherapy for treatment of cancer. Patients were randomized to either hypnosis or standard treatment. The hypnosis group used hypnosis as primary treatment for nausea and vomiting, using antiemetic medication on a supplemental (p.r.n.) basis only, whereas the control group received a standardized antiemetic medication regimen. Nausea, vomiting, and p.r.n. antiemetic medication usage were measured during the first two courses of chemotherapy. Anticipatory nausea and vomiting were assessed at 1 to 2 and 4 to 6 months postdiagnosis. Patients in the hypnosis group used less p.r.n antiemetic medication than control subjects during both the first (p < .04) and second course of chemotherapy (p < .02). The two groups did not differ in severity of nausea and vomiting. The hypnosis group experienced less anticipatory nausea than the control group at 1 to 2 months postdiagnosis (p < .02). Results suggest self-hypnosis is effective for decreasing antiemetic medication usage and for reducing anticipatory nausea during chemotherapy.

Many micronutrients are currently being tested for cancer prevention activity. A short-term study recently suggested that two of these nutrients, beta-carotene and alpha-tocopherol, may have an adverse interaction, with beta-carotene supplementation leading to markedly decreased serum concentrations of alpha-tocopherol. We have analyzed the effect of beta-carotene supplementation on serum concentrations of alpha-tocopherol in 2319 participants enrolled in the Carotene and Retinol Efficacy Trial who have taken beta-carotene and vitamin A for up to 6 years. One thousand thirty-five participants enrolled in two pilot trials to the Carotene and Retinol Efficacy Trial had serum collected at yearly intervals; an additional 1284 recently recruited participants had serum collected at biennial intervals. Using standard high pressure liquid chromatography techniques, with attention to quality control, these samples were analyzed for beta-carotene and alpha-tocopherol. After up to 6 years of supplementation with beta-carotene (30 mg/day) and vitamin A (25,000 international units/day) we found a small but statistically significant increase in the serum concentration of alpha-tocopherol in participants taking the active agents. No evidence of a decrease was found in any of the subpopulations examined. We conclude that long-term supplementation with the combination of beta-carotene and vitamin A does not decrease serum concentrations of alpha-tocopherol. Our long-term trial validates results from several shorter trials conducted by others. The concept of adverse interactions between supplemental micronutrients is important. All cancer prevention trials should closely monitor serum concentrations of micronutrients, as well as the incidence of other significant disease.

Hydrazine sulfate, an agent that appears to inhibit gluconeogenesis, has been studied in cancer patients for approximately 20 years. There was a recent resurgence of interest in this drug when subset analysis of a small placebo-controlled, double-blind, clinical trial reported improved survival among non-small-cell lung cancer patients with a good performance status who were randomized to receive this drug along with standard chemotherapy.

Hydrazine sulfate is a controversial agent that was originally studied in cancer patients approximately 20 years ago. Based on a series of recent trials that suggested that this drug might have utility in cancer patients, we conducted this study.

In a prospective, randomized open study, a long-acting LHRH agonist (Zoladex) was compared with polyoestradiol phosphate (Estradurin), both widely used in Finland for palliative treatment of prostatic carcinoma, as regards efficacy and side effects. Of the 236 enrolled patients, 129 were randomized to receive LHRH agonist and 107 to oestrogen treatment. The median follow-up was 25 months. Reduction of prostatic volume was quicker and more effective in the LHRH than in the oestrogen group, and serum testosterone concentrations fell to castration level after 1 month and 1 year, respectively. In locally advanced (M0) and histologically well or moderately differentiated tumours, LHRH agonist therapy was considerably more effective than oestrogen as regards time to progression of the carcinoma, but in metastatic (M1) and histologically poorly differentiated tumours both methods gave similar results. Cardiovascular complications showed equal incidence in both groups. LHRH agonist therapy thus seemed to be more effective than polyoestradiol phosphate against locally advanced prostatic cancer in the doses used.

This study examines whether the schedule of ondansetron significantly influences its antiemetic efficacy in the first 24 hours after chemotherapy, whether the administration of oral ondansetron after 24 hours is effective in preventing delayed emesis, and whether the efficacy of ondansetron is preserved over multiple courses of moderately emetogenic chemotherapy.

A number of prognostic factors have been reported to influence the probability of developing nausea and vomiting after cytotoxic chemotherapy. This study used data collected in four randomized anti-emetic trials conducted by the Clinical Trials Group of the National Cancer Institute of Canada (NCIC-CTG) to assess the consistency of the effects of these prognostic factors. A total of 582 patients, all of whom had received moderately emetogenic chemotherapy for the first time, but who were assigned to different anti-emetics, were included in the analysis. The major findings was that the probability of post-chemotherapy nausea and vomiting was much more strongly influenced by the type of chemotherapy given and the type of anti-emetic used than by patient (e.g., age, gender) or environmental (e.g., treatment location, time of administration) characteristics. Further, patient-related factors had different, and sometimes opposite, effects in different anti-emetic and chemotherapy subgroups. Finally, the relative potency of anti-emetics appeared to vary with chemotherapy regimens. Implications of these findings for future studies are discussed.

Patients receiving chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer are at high risk of thromboembolic disease. Long-term oral anticoagulant therapy is needed but increases the risk of haemorrhagic complications. We have assessed the safety and efficacy of warfarin in very low doses as prophylaxis. Women receiving chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer were randomly assigned either very-low-dose warfarin (152 patients) or placebo (159). The warfarin dose was 1 mg daily for 6 weeks and was then adjusted to maintain the prothrombin time at an international normalised ratio (INR) of 1.3 to 1.9. Study treatment continued until 1 week after the end of chemotherapy. The average daily dose from initiation of titration was 2.6 (SD 1.2) mg for the warfarin group and the mean INR was 1.52. The mean time at risk of thrombosis was 199 (126) days for warfarin-treated patients and 188 (137) days for placebo recipients (p = 0.45). There were 7 thromboembolic events (6 deep-vein thrombosis, 1 pulmonary embolism) in the placebo group and 1 (pulmonary embolism) in the warfarin group, a relative risk reduction of about 85% (p = 0.031). Major bleeding occurred in 2 placebo recipients and 1 warfarin-treated patient. There was no detectable difference in survival between the treatment groups. Very-low-dose warfarin is a safe and effective method for prevention of thromboembolism in patients with metastatic breast cancer who are receiving chemotherapy.

Retinoids enhance differentiation of most epithelial tissues. Epidemiologic studies have shown an inverse relationship between dietary intake or serum levels of vitamin A and the development of cervical dysplasia and/or cervical cancer. Pilot and phase I investigations demonstrated the feasibility of the local delivery of all-trans-retinoic acid (RA) to the cervix using a collagen sponge insert and cervical cap. A phase II trial produced a clinical complete response rate of 50%.

Anemia associated with advanced cancer is common. Contributing factors include the anemia of chronic disease, chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and bone marrow invasion with tumor. Based on the observation that endogenous erythropoietin (EPO) levels in anemic patients with cancer are inadequate for the degree of anemia, three randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO) treatment in anemic patients with cancer were performed in patients (1) not receiving concomitant chemotherapy (NO CTX), (2) receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy that did not include cisplatin (CTX-NO PLAT), and (3) receiving myelosuppressive cisplatin-containing chemotherapy (CTX-PLAT). In the NO CTX trial, patients were treated with rHuEPO 100 U/kg or placebo subcutaneously (SQ) three times per week for up to 8 weeks. In the CTX trials, patients were treated with rHuEPO 150 U/kg or placebo SQ three times per week for 12 weeks. Four hundred thirteen patients were enrolled (124, NO CTX; 157, CTX-NO PLAT; and 132, CTX-PLAT). In all three trials, patients receiving rHuEPO had a significantly (P < .004) greater increase in hematocrit (HCT) than placebo-treated patients. In the two CTX trials combined, rHuEPO-treated patients also had a significantly (P < or = .009) lower transfusion requirement than placebo-treated patients after the first month of therapy. Quality of life improved significantly (P < .05) in responding (> or = 6%-point HCT increase without transfusion) rHuEPO-treated patients compared with placebo-treated patients. Overall, no adverse events occurred more frequently in rHuEPO-treated patients compared with placebo-treated patients. Following completion of the double-blind phase, patients received rHuEPO on an open-label basis as needed for correction of anemia with the dose titrated to a maximum of 900 U/kg/wk. During total rHuEPO exposure (either started at the beginning of double-blind therapy for patients initially randomized to rHuEPO or at the beginning of open-label therapy for patients initially randomized to placebo; 363 treated/347 evaluable for efficacy), 40.0%, 56.1%, and 58.3% of the NO-CTX, CTX-NO PLAT, and CTX-PLAT patients, respectively, responded to rHuEPO therapy with an increase of HCT > or = 6% unrelated to transfusion.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

There were 80 patients with measurable metastatic or unresectable pancreatic cancer randomly assigned to treatment with either DHAD, VP-16, aclacinomycin, or spirogermanium. There were no complete or partial responses. Two deaths from leukopenia occurred in patients treated with DHAD. One patient receiving spirogermanium experienced a seizure. No other life-threatening toxicities occurred. Maximal toxicities were not significantly more frequent with any treatment group. Median survival was 10 weeks, and median time to progression was only 6 weeks, with no difference among these four therapies.

Chemoprevention is a clinical strategy to block or reverse carcinogenesis before the development of invasive cancer. Studies of chemoprevention in the lungs and upper aerodigestive tract have relied on the field carcinogenesis hypothesis, which predicts that diffuse epithelial injury will result from exposure of that epithelium to carcinogens. This hypothesis is supported by the frequent occurrence of multiple primary tumors within the exposed field. In addition, the understanding of carcinogenesis as a multistep process supports the use of interventions in damaged epithelium before the development of clinically invasive cancer. Current efforts are focused on applying to chemoprevention studies the increasing knowledge of the molecular events in carcinogenesis. In our program, clinical trials in lung and head and neck chemoprevention have focused on individuals with evidence of field carcinogenesis, i.e., a history of previous epithelial cancer or the presence of premalignant lesions. These trials include studies to develop clinically applicable intermediate markers of carcinogenesis and large Phase III trials to evaluate the efficacy of the retinoid isotretinoin in preventing second primary tumors following head and neck or lung cancers.

In a double blind study of 58 episodes of fever and profound neutropenia, children with cancer received either recombinant human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (rhGM-CSF) or placebo, combined with identical antimicrobial therapy, i.e. imipenem, on admission. The criteria for discontinuation of therapy were identical. A difference was demonstrated both in the number of hospital days, totaling 252 days in the rhGM-CSF group and 354 in the placebo group, days receiving antibiotics (220 vs. 322), and in the resolution of neutropenia (4.5 days vs. 6.0 days; P < 0.05). The number of episodes requiring antimicrobial therapy for longer than 10 days was 5 of 28 (12%) in the rhGM-CSF group as opposed to 15 of 30 (50%) in the placebo group (P = 0.01). rhGM-CSF was well-tolerated. We conclude that rhGM-CSF was efficacious in accelerating myeloid recovery and reducing the length of hospitalization in febrile neutropenia.