To report the efficacy and safety of intraoperative application of mitomycin C in surgery for pterygium.

Although previous research has delineated medical, cognitive, and neuropsychologic late effects of central nervous system (CNS) prophylaxis for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), it has been difficult to draw conclusions about the long term psychosocial sequelae of these treatments due to methodologic problems that led to inconclusive results in past studies. In the current study, the authors examined the long term psychosocial functioning of childhood ALL survivors who had been treated on a Phase III clinical protocol (Cancer and Leukemia Group B [CALGB] 7611) between 1976 and 1979, in which they were randomized to receive either 2400 centigray of cranial radiation (CRT) with intrathecal methotrexate (IT-MTX) or intermediate dose systemic methotrexate (IV-MTX) with IT-MTX.

Clinical trials have demonstrated that high dose radiation therapy and daily cisplatin (CDDP) could increase local control and survival in carcinoma from various sites. The present phase I-II study has combined high dose radiation therapy and daily CDDP at escalating dosages.

The authors examined the effect of tamoxifen (TAM), a multiple-drug resistance modulator, on the pharmacokinetics of doxorubicin (DOX) in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma treated according to the CHOP-protocol which included DOX, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisone. The dose of DOX was 50 mg/m2, but was reduced 25% if the patient was older than 60 years. Of these, 10 randomly-selected patients received a daily dose of 480 mg of TAM (Group-1) and 10 others did not (Group-2). Blood samples were collected at different time intervals, and DOX was measured in plasma by liquid chromatography. The concentration-time data of DOX exhibited the characteristics of the two-compartment open model well. The mean (SEM) values of alpha, beta, k12, k21, k10, Vc, Vss, AUC, total clearance, and mean residence time observed in Group-1 were 4.06 (0.96) hr(-1), 0.0395 (0.0068) hr(-1), 3.13 (0.79) hr(-1), 0.264 (0.052) hr(-1), 0.708 (0.19) hr(-1), 525 (156) l/m2, 1060 (163) l/m2, 1145 (234) microg x hr/l, 49.3 (8.5) l/hr x m2, and 26.8 (6.6) hours, respectively. Those in Group-2 were 4.99 (1.13) hr(-1), 0.0432 (0.0073) hr(-1), 2.46 (0.63) hr(-1), 0.111 (0.026) hr(-1), 2.46 (0.86) hr(-1), 231 (53) l/m2, 812 (149) l/m2, 1690 (276) microg x hr/l, 30.3 (4.1) l/hr x m2, and 29.7 (5.1) hours, respectively. Of these parameters, the difference between the two groups was significant (p < or = 0.0169) only in k21. Thus, the coadministration of TAM at the earlier-mentioned dose appears generally to have no significant influence on the pharmacokinetics of doxorubicin when used in the CHOP-protocol.

To report the effects of the anti-oestrogen tamoxifen on biochemical and haematological parameters.

To determine the effects of low-dose oral eflornithine hydrochloride (difluoromethylornithine [DFMO]) administration on hearing and to identify factors that influence those effects.

Neutropenia is one of the risk factors for severe therapy-related morbidity in childhood malignancies. We have studied the potential of GM-CSF to shorten the neutropenic period after normal-dose chemotherapy in children who were treated for solid tumors. Patients with osteosarcomas, with Ewing sarcomas, or with rhabdomyosarcomas received 10 daily subcutaneous doses GM-CSF (Leucomax, 5 micrograms/kg) after a course of normal-dose chemotherapy in an open-label study. Because these patients were treated with different combinations of chemotherapeutic agents, they were randomized before each pair of identical courses of chemotherapy to receive GM-CSF after the first or after the second course. Fourteen such combinations could be evaluated in eight patients. The results show that GM-CSF significantly reduced the mean duration of the chemotherapy-induced neutropenia (mean reduction +/- SEM in days: 2.2 +/- 0.6, P = .003). There was no significant difference between the mean number of days with fever in either group. GM-CSF was well tolerated by all patients. We conclude that GM-CSF reduced the mean neutropenic period in children with solid tumors who were treated with standard-dose chemotherapy.

The objective was to evaluate the efficacy of Org 2766 (a hexapeptide analogue of ACTH) in the prevention or delay of cisplatin-induced neuropathy during chemotherapy in women with ovarian cancer as measured by vibration perception threshold (VPT).

The purpose of this study was to examine the effectiveness of progressive muscle relaxation (PMR) in reducing the nausea, vomiting, and anxiety induced by chemotherapy in Japanese patients. Subjects comprised 60 cancer chemotherapy patients who were hospitalized in a cancer center. These subjects were randomly assigned to either the experimental or control group. In addition to routine nursing care, subjects in the experimental received PMR training, while those in the control received contact with the investigator. Results from this study verified the effectiveness of PMR in reducing total scores used to measure nausea, vomiting, and retching; subscale scores of nausea; and subjective feelings of anxiety. The efficacy of PMR to reduce subscale scores of vomiting was not verified, partly due to an extremely low incidence of vomiting.

We conducted a prospective, randomized, open, single-center, parallel group study comparing the anti-emetic efficacy and toxicity of granisetron with that of ondansetron in patients receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy. From December 1994 to May 1995, patients who were to receive moderately emetogenic chemotherapy for the first time or who had not received chemotherapy (80 to 100 mg/m2 of cisplatin or 40 mg/m2 of doxorubicin) within 4 weeks previously were enrolled in this study. The following anti-emetic regimens were used: 3 mg of granisetron were given intravenously before chemotherapy for a single dose; 8 mg of ondansetron were given intravenously before chemotherapy and then every 8 hours for a total of 3 doses, plus 8 mg of an oral maintenance dose every 12 hours for 5 consecutive days. We evaluated 97 patients (48 received granisetron and 49 received ondansetron). In the first 24 hours after chemotherapy, complete and major responses were achieved in 76.6% of the patients receiving granisetron and in 72.9% of patients receiving ondansetron (p = 0.9033). Additionally, there was no difference in the control of delayed nausea and vomiting between the two groups (51.1% versus 54.2%, p = 0.9200), and there were no significant adverse effects or toxicities. We have concluded that a single dose of granisetron is as effective in prophylaxis of emesis induced by moderately emetogenic chemotherapy as a triple dose of ondansetron plus oral maintenance.

The efficacies of granisetron plus dexamethasone and granisetron alone in controlling nausea and vomiting during two consecutive cycles of moderately emetogenic chemotherapy given for up to 5 days were compared in a two-centre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study. In all, 110 evaluable patients received either dexamethasone, 20 mg i.v., or matching placebo, plus open-label granisetron, 3 mg i.v., given on each chemotherapy day. At cycle 2, patients crossed over to the alternative treatment; 72 patients completed the crossover. In these 72 patients, the complete response rates over 24 h for granisetron plus dexamethasone and granisetron plus placebo in cycle 1 were 87% and 70% (ns), respectively. In cycle 2 the complete response rates over 24 h were 73% and 62% (ns). Combining the two cycles, the complete response rates over 24 h were 80.6% (granisetron plus dexamethasone) and 65.3% (granisetron plus placebo; P = 0.015). Granisetron plus dexamethasone was significantly more effective in terms of times to less than complete response (P = 0.041), to first episode of moderate/severe nausea (P = 0.04), to first episode of vomiting (0.03) and to use of rescue medication (P = 0.02). Adverse events tended to be minor, with asthenia and insomnia the most common. Of those patients who expressed a preference, 67% preferred granisetron plus dexamethasone (P < 0.05). A single dose of dexamethasone added to granisetron thus enhances the efficacy of granisetron alone in preventing nausea and vomiting after moderately emetogenic chemotherapy.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the renal protective effect of linotroban, a thromboxane A2 receptor antagonist, in 25 patients with malignant tumours scheduled for cisplatin therapy. Cisplatin was administered 1 h after the start of a 24-h continuous infusion of linotroban or placebo. Glomerular filtration rate and effective renal plasma flow were measured. Infusions of cisplatin decreased glomerular filtration rate by 17 +/- 25 mL min-1 (P = 0.049 vs. baseline) and effective renal plasma flow by 94 +/- 150 mL min-1 (P = 0.049 vs. baseline) in the placebo group. In the linotroban group a decrease in glomerular filtration rate by 11 +/- 18 mL min-1 (P = 0.050 vs. baseline) and in effective renal plasma flow by 26 +/- 63 mL min-1 (P = 0.2 vs. baseline) was noted. However, no difference was noted between groups in response to treatment. Our findings indicate that linotroban may not be useful for prevention of cisplatin's acute nephrotoxic effects.

To prospectively evaluate the pharmacokinetic monitoring and drug dose adjustment of Etanidazole (Eta) in patients treated on the RTOG randomized trial for Stage III and IV head and neck cancer.

Cisplatin is one of the most effective cytotoxic drugs used in the treatment of certain neoplasms, but is also one which most frequently induces nausea and vomiting. Combination of corticosteroids with ondansetron enables greater control of emesis than that obtained with ondansetron alone, but some patients still experience symptoms. The objective of this randomised, double-blind, multicentre, parallel group study was to examine the benefit of the addition of metopimazine (MPZ), a dopamine receptor antagonist, to the combination of ondansetron + methylprednisolone (O + M) in the prevention of cisplatin-induced nausea and vomiting in patients uncontrolled [i.e., at least one emetic episode (vomiting and/or retching) or moderate or severe nausea] during their previous course of cisplatin based chemotherapy, despite antiemetic treatment with a combination of a 5-hydroxytryptamine3 receptor antagonist (5HT3) with a corticosteroid. The impact of the treatment on the patients' quality of life was also evaluated using two specific questionnaires the FLIC (Functional Living Index for Cancer), and the FLIE (Functional Living Index for Emesis).

Ninety previously untreated patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stages IIC, III, and IV) were randomized, after initial cytoreductive surgery, to receive paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ) 175 mg/m2 as a 3-hour infusion with either carboplatin at an area under the concentration-time curve of 7 (group A) or carboplatin at an area under the concentration-time curve of 7 on courses 1, 3, and 5, alternating with cisplatin 75 mg/m2 on courses 2, 4, and 6 (group B). Treatment was given every 3 weeks, up to a total of six courses. Sixty-one patients (33 and 28 patients in groups A and B, respectively) had residual disease after the initial cytoreductive surgery. Patients with measurable or evaluable disease had a high overall response (82% v 57%). A 52% and 39% complete response rate for groups A and B, respectively, with no statistically significant difference between the groups was also observed. With a median follow-up of 12 months (range, 0.33 to 24 months), 29 patients have progressed (18 and 11 in groups A and B, respectively), and 13 have died (seven and six, respectively). Median time to progression was 20.36 months (range, 0.20 to 23.54 months) for group A, whereas this has not yet been reached for group B. Median survival has not yet been reached, but there is no significant difference between the two groups (P = .6972). Treatment was generally well tolerated. Grade 3 and 4 neutropenia was 20% and 32% for groups A and B, respectively, while grade 3 and 4 thrombocytopenia was 4% and 7%, respectively, with no significant difference between the two groups. In conclusion, both combinations seem very active for the treatment of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer and are associated with acceptable toxicity.

Since publication of the results of the Gynecologic Oncology Group III study, the combination of cisplatin/paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ) has been widely adopted as standard treatment for advanced ovarian cancer. Further attempts to optimize first-line chemotherapy with platinum and taxanes include the substitution of cisplatin with carboplatin, individualization of the carboplatin dose by calculating it according to the area under the concentration-time curve, and reduction of paclitaxel infusion duration. These attempts have led to the initiation of several phase I/II trials evaluating the combination of carboplatin/paclitaxel. The promising results of these small studies have prompted the initiation of three phase III trials comparing carboplatin/paclitaxel with the standard combination of cisplatin/paclitaxel. The interim analysis after 15 months' accrual of the prospectively randomized German Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie (AGO) study is presented here. As of January 1997, 518 of 660 planned patients have been recruited. The interim analysis is based on data from 449 evaluable patients. The preliminary data indicate that hematologic toxicity occurred more frequently in arm A (carboplatin/paclitaxel), whereas nonhematologic toxicity occurred slightly more frequently in arm B (cisplatin/paclitaxel). Dose-intensity analysis did not reveal cumulative dose reductions or an increased need for colony-stimulating factors over subsequent courses in both arms. Forty-four patients with measurable disease following surgery completed chemotherapy and were evaluable for response, which remains blinded at this time and is reported for the group as a whole. So far, there have been 18 complete responses (41%) and 15 partial responses (34%), for an overall response rate of 75%. Retrospective comparison reveals no significant difference in response rates between patients in the cisplatin/paclitaxel arm of Gynecologic Oncology Group III and those in the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie study. Overall, this interim analysis did not reveal any reason for an early termination of this study. Accrual is ongoing and is expected to be completed this year.

The side effects of cisplatin (75 mg/m2) in combination with paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ) (175 mg/m2 over 3 hours) are expected to be more severe and frequent than those of carboplatin (area under the concentration-time curve of 5) in combination with the same dose of paclitaxel, but the combinations are expected to be equally effective. A disadvantage of the cisplatin-based regimen is that patients need to be admitted to the hospital. The carboplatin regimen can be administered to outpatients. We tested both combinations administered every 3 weeks in a randomized phase III study in patients with previously untreated epithelial ovarian cancer. An interim analysis for toxicity was performed in 145 patients shortly after study closure. We observed a difference in the incidence of nausea, vomiting, and neurotoxicity favoring the women treated with the carboplatin regimen, but this regimen caused more myelotoxicity. Maturation of the study is awaited before survival data can be analyzed and final conclusions can be drawn.

The second International Collaborative Ovarian Neoplasm study (ICON 2), was a large, international randomized study of cyclophosphamide/doxorubicin/cisplatin (CAP) versus single-agent carboplatin in patients with previously untreated ovarian cancer. Patients in the CAP arm received 500 mg/m2 cyclophosphamide, 50 mg/m2 doxorubicin, and 50 mg/m2 cisplatin. Carboplatin was dosed to an area under the concentration-time curve of 5. Chemotherapy was given every 3 weeks for a total of 6 months for each regimen. Results of a 1995 interim analysis in 1,377 patients showed that overall, the total dose received in the CAP group was greater than 75% of the planned dose, with 75% of patients receiving greater than 87%, greater than 80%, and greater than 83% of the planned doses of cisplatin, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide, respectively. Of carboplatin patients, 75% received greater than 1,450 mg/m2 (of a median planned dose of 1,800 mg/m2). There were significant differences in grades 3/4 toxicity between the two arms: leukopenia occurred in 34% of CAP patients versus 10% of carboplatin patients, alopecia in 70% versus 3%, nausea and vomiting in 21% versus 9%, and mucositis in 21% versus 0%, respectively. However, thrombocytopenia was more frequent in the carboplatin group (16% v 7%). At the 1996 analysis, 1,526 patients had been entered, 1,498 had been randomized, and 740 had progressed or died. The interim conclusions were that although the more toxic CAP regimen may improve progression-free survival by a small amount, there was no evidence of any survival benefits or difference within the subgroups. Given that a sufficient number of patients had been accrued to ICON 2 and that starting accrual for ICON 3 markedly slowed accrual to ICON 2, the trial was closed. The full analysis of ICON 2 should be available in the summer of 1997. ICON 3 was designed to consider the role of paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ) in previously untreated ovarian cancer. Patients received paclitaxel at a dose of 175 mg/m2 (3-hour infusion) in combination with carboplatin dosed to an area under the concentration-time curve of 5 (based on chromium ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid) or 6 (based on calculated creatinine clearance). The control arm was either CAP or carboplatin. Patients were randomized 2:1 in favor of the control arm. In all, 1,070 patients have been entered to date. At the first planned interim analysis, in April 1996 in 434 patients, it was too early to provide efficacy data. The plan was to continue accruing to the trial to a maximum of 2,000 patients, with review in mid-1997, when the events for analysis will be virtually doubled and the data can be interpreted in light of the results of the Intergroup study (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, the National Cancer Institute of Canada, and the Scottish study) and Gynecologic Oncology Group trial 132.

A hyperfractionated radiation therapy (HFX RT) trial (1.2 Gy twice daily, b.i.d.) (HFX) for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) showed that 69.6 Gy resulted in better survival than did lower total doses (Radiation Therapy Oncology Group, RTOG 83-11) and that cisplatin concurrent with irradiation improved local control and survival over RT alone (Radiation Therapy Oncology Group, RTOG 91-06). Concurrent combination chemotherapy and HFX could improve both local and systemic control. In a phase II trial (RTOG 91-06) for inoperable NSCLC, two cycles of PE were used [cisplatin 50 mg/m2 intravenously (i.v.) days 1 and 8, etoposide 50 mg orally (p.o.) b.i.d., 75 mg/day if body surface area (BSA) < 1.7 m2, days 1-14] starting on day 1 of HFX (69.6 Gy) and repeated on day 29. HFX/PE was compared with HFX (69.6 Gy) from an earlier phase II trial (RTOG 83-11). Seventy-six patients treated with HFX/PE and 203 patients who received HFX alone were compared for toxicity, response, survival, and patterns of failure. The rates of grade 4 nonhematologic toxicity were similar (3.0% for HFX/PE, 3.0% for HFX), but grade 4 hematologic toxicity occurred only with HFX/PE 56.6%. Three (3.9%) HFX/PE patients had fatal toxicity (2 pulmonary, 1 renal); 1 HFX patient had fatal esophageal toxicity. Response and metastasis rates were similar for the two treatments, but infield (p = 0.054) and overall (p = 0.04) progression-free survival rates were better with HFX/PE. Median survivals were 18.9 months with HFX/PE and 10.6 months with HFX. Two-year survival rates were 36% for HFX/PE and 22% for HFX (p = 0.014). The differences in survival between HFX/PE and HFX remained borderline statistically significant (p = 0.0593) in the multivariate model, which included weight loss, Karnofsky performance status (KPS), sex, and stage. HFX/PE is an effective regimen in patients with inoperable NSCLC, although it is considerably more toxic, and is undergoing a comparison in a three-arm randomized phase III study against induction cisplatin/vinblastine plus standard once-daily RT and against cisplatin/vinblastine concurrent with standard RT.