In an open prospective, multicenter study enrolling 48 selected patients with chronic immune thrombocytopenia who achieved complete response for 1 year on thrombopoietin receptor agonists, half of the patients maintained a sustained response off treatment 4 years after treatment discontinuation.

Mosunetuzumab, a CD20×CD3 T-cell engaging bispecific antibody, redirects T cells to eliminate malignant B cells. We present updated efficacy and safety data of a pivotal phase 1/2 study after a median follow-up of 37.4 months in 90 patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) follicular lymphoma (FL) and ≥2 prior lines of therapy treated with fixed-duration mosunetuzumab. Investigator-assessed complete response (CR) rate and objective response rate were 60.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 49.1-70.2) and 77.8% (95% CI, 67.8-85.9), respectively. Among 70 responders, median duration of response was 35.9 months (95% CI, 20.7 to not estimable [NE]). Among 54 patients who achieved CR, 49 remained in CR at the end of treatment; median duration of CR was not reached (NR; 95% CI, 33.0 to NE); Kaplan-Meier-estimated 30-month remission rate was 72.4% (95% CI, 59.2-85.6). Estimated 36-month overall survival (OS) rate was 82.4% (95% CI, 73.8-91.0); median OS was NR (95% CI, NE to NE). Median progression-free survival was 24.0 months (95% CI, 12.0 to NE). Median time to CD19+ B-cell recovery was 18.4 months (95% CI, 12.8-25.0) after 8 cycles of mosunetuzumab treatment. No new cytokine release syndrome events or fatal, serious, or grade ≥3 adverse events were reported. With extended follow-up, mosunetuzumab demonstrated high response rates, durable remissions, and manageable safety with no long-term concerns. This supports outpatient mosunetuzumab administration as an off-the-shelf, fixed-duration, safe, and effective treatment for patients with R/R FL, including those with high-risk disease. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02500407.

TP53-mutant mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is associated with poor survival outcomes with standard chemoimmunotherapy. We conducted a multicenter, phase 2 study of zanubrutinib, obinutuzumab, and venetoclax (BOVen) in untreated patients with MCL with a TP53 mutation. Patients initially received 160 mg zanubrutinib twice daily and obinutuzumab. Obinutuzumab at a dose of 1000 mg was given on cycle 1 day 1, 8, and 15, and on day 1 of cycles 2 to 8. After 2 cycles, venetoclax was added with weekly dose ramp-up to 400 mg daily. After 24 cycles, if patients were in complete remission with undetectable minimal residual disease (uMRD) using an immunosequencing assay, treatment was discontinued. The primary end point was met if ≥11 patients were progression free at 2 years. The study included 25 patients with untreated MCL with a TP53 mutation. The best overall response rate was 96% (24/25) and the complete response rate was 88% (22/25). Frequency of uMRD at a sensitivity level of 1 × 10-5 and uMRD at a sensitivity level of 1 × 10-6 at cycle 13 was 95% (18/19) and 84% (16/19), respectively. With a median follow-up of 28.2 months, the 2-year progression-free, disease-specific, and overall survival were 72%, 91%, and 76%, respectively. Common side effects were generally low grade and included diarrhea (64%), neutropenia (32%), and infusion-related reactions (24%). BOVen was well tolerated and met its primary efficacy end point in TP53-mutant MCL. These data support its use and ongoing evaluation. This trial was registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT03824483.

Glutamine dependency has been shown to be a metabolic vulnerability in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Prior studies using several in vivo AML models showed that depletion of plasma glutamine, induced by long-acting crisantaspase (pegcrisantaspase [PegC]) was synergistic with the B-cell lymphoma-2 (BCL-2) inhibitor venetoclax (Ven), resulting in significantly reduced leukemia burden and enhanced survival. Here, we report a phase 1 study of the combination of Ven and PegC (VenPegC) for treating adult patients with relapsed or refractory AML, including patients who had previously received Ven. The primary end points were the incidence of regimen-limiting toxicities (RLTs) and the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Twenty-five patients received at least 1 PegC dose with Ven, and 18 efficacy-evaluable patients completed at least 1 VenPegC cycle; 12 (67%) had previously received Ven. Hyperbilirubinemia was the RLT and occurred in 60% of patients treated with VenPegC; 20% had grade ≥3 bilirubin elevations. MTD was determined to be Ven 400 mg daily with biweekly PegC 750 IU/m2. The most common treatment-related adverse events of any grade in 25 patients who received VenPegC included antithrombin III decrease (52%), elevated transaminases (36%-48%), fatigue (28%), and hypofibrinogenemia (24%). No thromboembolic or hemorrhagic adverse events or clinical pancreatitis were observed. The overall complete remission rate in efficacy-evaluable patients was 33%. Response correlated with alterations in proteins involved in messenger RNA translation. In patients with RUNX1 mutations, the composite complete remission rate was 100%. This study was registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT04666649.

A robust prognostic and biological classification for newly diagnosed follicular lymphoma (FL) using molecular profiling remains challenging. FL tumors from patients treated in the RELEVANCE trial with rituximab-chemotherapy (R-chemo) or rituximab-lenalidomide (R2) were analyzed using RNA sequencing, DNA sequencing, immunohistochemistry (IHC), and/or fluorescence in situ hybridization. Unsupervised gene clustering identified 2 gene expression signatures (GSs) enriched in normal memory (MEM) B cells and germinal center (GC) B-cell signals, respectively. These 2 GSs were combined into a 20-gene predictor (FL20) to classify patients into MEM-like (n = 160) or GC-like (n = 164) subtypes, which also displayed different mutational profiles. In the R-chemo arm, patients with MEM-like FL had significantly shorter progression-free survival (PFS) than patients with GC-like FL (hazard ratio [HR], 2.13; P = .0023). In the R2 arm, both subtypes had comparable PFS, demonstrating that R2 has a benefit over R-chemo for patients with MEM-like FL (HR, 0.54; P = .011). The prognostic value of FL20 was validated in an independent FL cohort with R-chemo treatment (GSE119214 [n = 137]). An IHC algorithm (FLcm) that used FOXP1, LMO2, CD22, and MUM1 antibodies was developed with significant prognostic correlation with FL20. These data indicate that FL tumors can be classified into MEM-like and GC-like subtypes that are biologically distinct and clinically different in their risk profile. The FLcm assay can be used in routine clinical practice to identify patients with MEM-like FL who might benefit from therapies other than R-chemo, such as the R2 combination. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01476787 and #NCT01650701.

Dasatinib is an effective treatment for Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) acute leukemia, but some patients develop resistance. Combination treatment with dasatinib and asciminib, an allosteric inhibitor of BCR::ABL1, may deepen responses and prevent the emergence of dasatinib-resistant clones. In this phase 1 study (NCT03595017), 24 adults with Ph+ acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL; n = 22; p190, n = 16; p210, n = 6) and chronic myeloid leukemia in lymphoid blast crisis (n = 2) were treated with escalating daily doses of asciminib in combination with dasatinib 140 mg daily plus prednisone 60 mg/m2 daily to determine the maximum tolerated dose. After a 28-day induction, dasatinib and asciminib were continued indefinitely or until hematopoietic stem cell transplant. The median age was 64.5 years (range, 33-85; 50% aged ≥65 years). The recommended phase 2 dose of asciminib was 80 mg daily in combination with dasatinib and prednisone. The dose limiting toxicity at 160 mg daily was asymptomatic grade 3 pancreatic enzyme elevation without symptomatic pancreatitis. There were no vaso-occlusive events. Among patients with de novo ALL, the complete hematologic remission rates at days 28 and 84 were 84% and 100%, respectively. At day 84, 100% of patients achieved complete cytogenetic remission, 89% achieved measurable residual disease negativity (<0.01%) by multicolor flow cytometry, and 74% and 26% achieved BCR::ABL1 reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction <0.1% and <0.01%, respectively. Dual BCR::ABL1 inhibition with dasatinib and asciminib is safe with encouraging activity in patients with de novo Ph+ ALL. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02081378.

This phase 2 trial assessed high-dose IV ascorbic acid in TET2 mutant clonal cytopenia. Eight of 10 patients were eligible for response assessment, with no responses at week 20 by International Working Group Myelodysplasia Syndromes/Neoplasms criteria. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT03418038.

The B-cell lymphoma 2 inhibitor venetoclax has shown promise for treating acute myeloid leukemia (AML). However, identifying patients likely to respond remains a challenge, especially for those with relapsed/refractory (R/R) disease. We evaluated the utility of ex vivo venetoclax sensitivity testing to predict treatment responses to venetoclax-azacitidine in a prospective, multicenter, phase 2 trial. The trial recruited 104 participants with previously untreated (n = 48), R/R (n = 39), or previously treated secondary AML (sAML) (n = 17). The primary end point was complete remission or complete remission with incomplete hematologic recovery (CR/CRi) rate in ex vivo sensitive trial participants during the first 3 therapy cycles. The key secondary end points included the correlations between ex vivo drug sensitivity, responses, and survival. Venetoclax sensitivity was successfully assessed in 102 of 104 participants, with results available within a median of 3 days from sampling. In previously untreated AML, ex vivo sensitivity corresponded to an 85% (34/40) CR/CRi rate, with a median overall survival (OS) of 28.7 months, compared with 5.5 months for ex vivo resistant patients (P = .002). For R/R/sAML, ex vivo sensitivity resulted in a 62% CR/CRi rate (21/34) and median OS of 9.7 vs 3.3 months for ex vivo resistant patients (P < .001). In univariate and multivariate analysis, ex vivo venetoclax sensitivity was the strongest predictor for a favorable treatment response and survival. This trial demonstrates the feasibility of integrating ex vivo drug testing into clinical practice to identify patients with AML, particularly in the R/R setting, who benefit from venetoclax. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT04267081.

No randomized trial has directly compared daratumumab and lenalidomide (D-R) maintenance with standard-of-care lenalidomide (R) alone after transplant. Herein, we report the primary results of the phase 3 AURIGA study evaluating D-R vs R maintenance in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) who had very good or better partial response, were minimal residual disease (MRD)-positive (10-5) and anti-CD38-naïve after transplant. Two hundred patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to D-R (n = 99) or R (n = 101) maintenance for up to 36 cycles. The MRD-negative (10-5) conversion rate by 12 months from start of maintenance (primary end point) was significantly higher for D-R than R (50.5% vs 18.8%; odds ratio [OR], 4.51; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.37-8.57; P < .0001). MRD-negative (10-6) conversion rate was similarly higher with D-R (23.2% vs 5.0%; OR, 5.97; 95% CI, 2.15-16.58; P = .0002). At median follow-up (32.3 months), D-R achieved a higher overall MRD-negative (10-5) conversion rate (D-R, 60.6% vs R, 27.7%; OR, 4.12; 95% CI, 2.26-7.52; P < .0001) and complete response rate or better (75.8% vs 61.4%; OR, 2.00; 95% CI, 1.08-3.69; P = .0255) vs R. Progression-free survival (PFS) favored D-R vs R (hazard ratio, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.29-0.97); estimated 30-month PFS rates were 82.7% for D-R and 66.4% for R. Incidences of grade 3/4 cytopenias (54.2% vs 46.9%) and infections (18.8% vs 13.3%) were slightly higher with D-R than R. In conclusion, D-R maintenance achieved a higher MRD-negative conversion rate and improved PFS after transplant vs R, with no new safety concerns. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT03901963.

Dexamethasone is a key component of induction for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM), despite common toxicities, including hyperglycemia and insomnia. In the randomized ECOG E4A03 trial, dexamethasone 40 mg once weekly was associated with lower mortality than higher doses. However, the performance of dexamethasone dose reductions below this threshold with regard to progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in NDMM has not been fully characterized. We conducted a secondary pooled analysis of the SWOG 0777 and SWOG 1211 studies of NDMM, which used lenalidomide and dexamethasone (Rd) alone, with or without bortezomib, and with or without elotuzumab. The planned dexamethasone intensity was 40 to 60 mg weekly in all arms. Patients were categorized into FD-DEX (full-dose dexamethasone maintained throughout induction) or LD-DEX (lowered-dose dexamethasone or discontinuation; only permitted for grade 3+ toxicities per both study protocols). Of the 541 evaluated patients, the LD-DEX group comprised 373 patients (69%). There were no differences in PFS or OS between the FD-DEX and LD-DEX groups, which were balanced in terms of age, stage, and performance status. Predictors of PFS and OS in the multivariate models were treatment arm, age ≥70 years, and thrombocytopenia. FD-DEX did not significantly improve either outcome. Our study suggests that dexamethasone dose reductions are common in multiple myeloma, even within clinical trials. Given the many toxicities and unclear benefits of dexamethasone in the era of modern treatment regimens, dexamethasone dose reduction during NDMM induction warrants further prospective studies. These trials were registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00644228 and NCT01668719.

A metronomic, low-dose schedule of decitabine and venetoclax was safe and effective in myeloid malignancies with few dose reductions or interruptions in an older diverse population. Median overall survival for patients with acute myeloid leukemia and a TP53-mutation was 16.1 and 11.3 months, respectively. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT05184842.

The ALPINE trial established the superiority of zanubrutinib over ibrutinib in patients with relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia and small lymphocytic lymphoma; here, we present data from the final comparative analysis with extended follow-up. Overall, 652 patients received zanubrutinib (n = 327) or ibrutinib (n = 325). At an overall median follow-up of 42.5 months, progression-free survival benefit with zanubrutinib vs ibrutinib was sustained (hazard ratio [HR], 0.68; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.54-0.84), including in patients with del(17p)/TP53 mutation (HR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.33-0.78) and across multiple sensitivity analyses. Overall response rate remained higher with zanubrutinib compared with ibrutinib (85.6% vs 75.4%); responses deepened over time with complete response/complete response with incomplete bone marrow recovery rates of 11.6% (zanubrutinib) and 7.7% (ibrutinib). Although median overall survival has not been reached in either treatment group, fewer zanubrutinib patients have died than ibrutinib patients (HR, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.55-1.06]). With median exposure time of 41.2 and 37.8 months in zanubrutinib and ibrutinib arms, respectively, the most common nonhematologic adverse events included COVID-19-related infection (46.0% vs 33.3%), diarrhea (18.8% vs 25.6%), upper respiratory tract infection (29.3% vs 19.8%), and hypertension (27.2% vs 25.3%). Cardiac events were lower with zanubrutinib (25.9% vs 35.5%) despite similar rates of hypertension. Incidence of atrial fibrillation/flutter was lower with zanubrutinib vs ibrutinib (7.1% vs 17.0%); no cardiac deaths were reported with zanubrutinib vs 6 cardiac deaths with ibrutinib. This analysis, at 42.5 months median follow-up, demonstrates that zanubrutinib remains more efficacious than ibrutinib with an improved overall safety/tolerability profile. This trial was registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT03734016.

Children with ETV6::RUNX1 or high-hyperdiploid B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) have favorable outcomes. The St. Jude (SJ) classification considers these patients low risk, regardless of their National Cancer Institute (NCI) risk classification, except when there is slow minimal residual disease (MRD) response or central nervous system/testicular involvement. We analyzed outcomes in children (aged 1-18.99 years) with these genotypes in the SJ Total XV/XVI studies (2000-2017). Patients with ETV6::RUNX1 (n = 222) or high-hyperdiploid (n = 296) B-ALL had 5-year event-free survival (EFS) of 97.7% ± 1.1% and 94.7% ± 1.4%, respectively. For ETV6::RUNX1, EFS was comparable between NCI standard-risk and high-risk patients and between SJ low-risk and standard-risk patients. Of the 40 NCI high-risk patients, 37 who received SJ low-risk therapy had excellent EFS (97.3% ± 2.8%). For high-hyperdiploid B-ALL, NCI high-risk patients had worse EFS than standard-risk patients (87.6% ± 4.5% vs 96.4% ± 1.3%; P = .016). EFS was similar for NCI standard-risk and high-risk patients classified as SJ low risk (96.0% ± 1.5% and 96.9% ± 3.2%; P = .719). However, EFS was worse for NCI high-risk patients than for NCI standard-risk patients receiving SJ standard/high-risk therapy (77.4% ± 8.2% vs 98.0% ± 2.2%; P = .004). NCI high-risk patients with ETV6::RUNX1 or high-hyperdiploid B-ALL who received SJ low-risk therapy had lower incidences of thrombosis (P = .013) and pancreatitis (P = .011) than those who received SJ standard/high-risk therapy. MRD-directed therapy yielded excellent outcomes, except for NCI high-risk high-hyperdiploid B-ALL patients with slow MRD response, who require new treatment approaches. Among NCI high-risk patients, 93% with ETV6::RUNX1 and 54% with high-hyperdiploid B-ALL experienced excellent outcomes with a low-intensity regimen. These trials were registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00137111 and #NCT00549848.

Outcomes are poor in triple-class-exposed (TCE) relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (R/RMM). In the phase 3 KarMMa-3 trial, patients with TCE R/RMM and 2 to 4 prior regimens were randomized 2:1 to idecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel) or standard regimens (SRs). An interim analysis (IA) demonstrated significantly longer median progression-free survival (PFS; primary end point; 13.3 vs 4.4 months; P < .0001) and higher overall response rate (ORR) with ide-cel vs SRs. At final PFS analysis (median follow-up, 30.9 months), ide-cel further improved median PFS vs SRs (13.8 vs 4.4 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.49; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.38-0.63). PFS benefit with ide-cel vs SRs was observed regardless of number of prior lines of therapy, with greatest benefit after 2 prior lines (16.2 vs 4.8 months, respectively). ORR benefit was maintained with ide-cel vs SRs (71% vs 42%; complete response, 44% vs 5%). Patient-centric design allowed crossover from SRs (56%) to ide-cel upon progressive disease, confounding overall survival (OS) interpretation. At IA of OS, median was 41.4 (95% CI, 30.9 to not reached [NR]) vs 37.9 (95% CI, 23.4 to NR) months with ide-cel and SRs, respectively (HR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.73-1.40); median OS in both arms was longer than historical data (9-22 months). Two prespecified analyses adjusting for crossover showed OS favoring ide-cel. This trial highlighted the importance of individualized bridging therapy to ensure adequate disease control during ide-cel manufacturing. Ide-cel improved patient-reported outcomes vs SRs. No new safety signals were reported. These results demonstrate the continued favorable benefit-risk profile of ide-cel in early-line and TCE R/RMM. This trial was registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT03651128.

Teclistamab is a B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-directed bispecific antibody approved for the treatment of patients with triple-class exposed relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (R/RMM). In the phase 1/2 MajesTEC-1 study, a cohort of patients who had prior BCMA-targeted therapy (antibody-drug conjugate [ADC] or chimeric antigen receptor T-cell [CAR-T] therapy) was enrolled to explore teclistamab in patients previously exposed to anti-BCMA treatment. At a median follow-up of 28.0 months (range, 0.7-31.1), 40 patients with prior BCMA-targeted therapy had received subcutaneous 1.5 mg/kg weekly teclistamab. The median prior lines of treatment was 6 (range, 3-14). Prior anti-BCMA therapy included ADC (n = 29), CAR-T (n = 15), or both (n = 4). The overall response rate was 52.5%; 47.5% of patients achieved very good partial response or better, and 30.0% achieved complete response or better. The median duration of response was 14.8 months, the median progression-free survival was 4.5 months, and the median overall survival was 15.5 months. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were neutropenia, infections, cytokine release syndrome, and anemia; cytopenias and infections were the most common grade ≥3 TEAEs. Infections occurred in 28 patients (70.0%; maximum grade 3/4, n = 13 [32.5%]; grade 5, n = 4 [10%]). Before starting teclistamab, baseline BCMA expression and immune characteristics were unaffected by prior anti-BCMA treatment. The MajesTEC-1 trial cohort C results demonstrate favorable efficacy and safety of teclistamab in patients with heavily pretreated R/RMM and prior anti-BCMA treatment. This trial was registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT03145181 and #NCT04557098.

Anti-D can occur in D-positive patients who inherit RHD genetic variants encoding partial D antigen expression, but unexpected anti-D is also found in the plasma of patients with sickle cell disease who have conventional RHD gene(s) and are transfused with units from Black donors. These anti-D are likely stimulated by variant Rh expressed on donor cells; however, patients with anti-D, regardless of cause, are transfused for a lifetime with D-negative (Rh-negative) blood. This results in significant increased use of Rh-negative units, especially for those requiring chronic transfusion, which can strain Rh-negative blood inventories. We tested whether D-positive patients who made anti-D and had conventional RhD by RHD genotyping could safely be returned to D-positive transfusions without anti-D reappearance or compromised red blood cell survival using RHD genotype-matched units from Black donors. Five patients receiving chronic red cell exchange received an increasing number of D-positive units per procedure with a total of 72 D-positive RHD genotyped units transfused, with no anti-D restimulation. Unexpected anti-C and anti-E were identified during the study associated with donors with variant RHCE alleles. RH genotyping of D-positive units for transfusion may improve use and allocation of valuable Black donor units and reduce demand for Rh-negative blood. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT04156906.

Patients with relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) or lymphoblastic lymphoma (LL) have poor outcomes compared with newly diagnosed, treatment-naïve patients. The phase 2, open-label DELPHINUS study evaluated daratumumab (16 mg/kg IV) plus backbone chemotherapy in children with relapsed/refractory B-cell ALL (n = 7) after ≥2 relapses, and children and young adults with T-cell ALL (children, n = 24; young adults, n = 5) or LL (n = 10) after first relapse. The primary end point was complete response (CR) in the B-cell ALL (end of cycle 2) and T-cell ALL (end of cycle 1) cohorts, after which patients could proceed off study to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT). Seven patients with advanced B-cell ALL received daratumumab with no CRs achieved; this cohort was closed because of futility. For the childhood T-cell ALL, young adult T-cell ALL, and T-cell LL cohorts, the CR (end of cycle 1) rates were 41.7%, 60.0%, and 30.0%, respectively; overall response rates (any time point) were 83.3% (CR + CR with incomplete count recovery [CRi]), 80.0% (CR + CRi), and 50.0% (CR + partial response), respectively; minimal residual disease negativity (<0.01%) rates were 45.8%, 20.0%, and 50.0%, respectively; observed 24-month event-free survival rates were 36.1%, 20.0%, and 20.0%, respectively; observed 24-month overall survival rates were 41.3%, 25.0%, and 20.0%, respectively; and allogeneic HSCT rates were 75.0%, 60.0%, and 30.0%, respectively. No new safety concerns with daratumumab were observed. In conclusion, daratumumab was safely combined with backbone chemotherapy in children and young adults with T-cell ALL/LL and contributed to successful bridging to HSCT. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT03384654.

DNA methyltransferase inhibitor decitabine plus anti-programmed cell death 1 (DP) therapy was effective in relapsed/refractory classic Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL). However, a subset of patients experienced primary resistance or relapse/progression after DP therapy. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of a triplet regimen consisting of the histone deacetylase inhibitor chidamide, decitabine, and anti-PD-1 camrelizumab (CDP) in 52 patients who previously received DP therapy. CDP treatment was well tolerated and resulted in an objective response rate of 94% (95% confidence interval [CI], 84-99), with 50% (95% CI, 36-64) of patients achieving complete response (CR). Notably, all patients who were recalcitrant to previous DP treatment exhibited therapeutic responses after CDP therapy, although their CR rate was lower than patients responsive to prior DP. Overall, the median progression-free survival was 29.4 months. Through single-cell RNA sequencing of pretreatment and on-treatment cHL tumor biopsy samples, we observed the heterogeneity of rare malignant Hodgkin Reed/Sternberg (HRS)-like cells. The classical CD30+ HRS-like cells interacted with abundant immunosuppressive IL21+CD4+ T helper cells, forming a positive feedback loop that supported their survival. While the CD30- HRS-like cell population showed potential resistance to anti-PD-1 immunotherapy. CDP treatment promoted the activation of diverse tumor-reactive CD8+ T cells and suppressed the proliferation of IL21+CD4+ T cells by inhibiting STAT1/3 signaling, thereby alleviating their immunosuppressive effects. These findings provide insights into the cHL microenvironment that contributes to anti-PD-1 resistance and highlight the therapeutic effectiveness of dual epi-immunotherapy in overcoming immunotherapy resistance. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT04233294.

In the CLL14 study, patients with previously untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and coexisting conditions were randomized to 12 cycles of venetoclax-obinutuzumab (Ven-Obi, n = 216) or chlorambucil-obinutuzumab (Clb-Obi, n = 216). Progression-free survival (PFS) was the primary end point. Key secondary end points included time-to-next-treatment (TTNT), rates of undetectable minimal residual disease (uMRD), overall survival (OS), and rates of adverse events. Patient reported outcomes of time until definitive deterioration (TUDD) in quality of life (QoL) were analyzed. At a median observation time of 76.4 months, PFS remained superior for Ven-Obi compared with Clb-Obi (median, 76.2 vs 36.4 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.40; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.31-0.52; P < .0001). Likewise, TTNT was longer after Ven-Obi (6-year TTNT, 65.2% vs 37.1%; HR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.33-0.58; P < .0001). In the Ven-Obi arm, presence of del(17p), unmutated immunoglobulin heavy-chain variable region, and lymph node size of ≥5 cm were independent prognostic factors for shorter PFS. The 6-year OS rate was 78.7% in the Ven-Obi and 69.2% in the Clb-Obi arm (HR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.48-1.01; P = .052). A significantly longer TUDD in global health status/QoL was observed in the Ven-Obi than in the Clb-Obi arm (median, 82.1 vs 65.1 months; HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.51-0.97). Follow-up-adjusted second primary malignancies incidence rates were 2.3 and 1.4 per 1000 patient-months in the Ven-Obi and Clb-Obi arm, respectively. The sustained long-term survival and QoL benefits support the use of 1-year fixed-duration Ven-Obi in CLL. This trial was registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT02242942.

Our phase 1 graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prevention trial of JAK2 inhibitor, pacritinib (PAC; recommended phase 2 dose: 100 mg orally twice a day on day 0 to +70) plus sirolimus and tacrolimus (SIR/TAC) demonstrated the regimen was safe and free of pan-JAK myelosuppression after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT). PAC inhibits interleukin 6 (IL-6) receptor activity and pathogenic T helper cell 1 (Th1)/Th17 differentiation in preclinical models and the phase 1 trial. Herein, we report on our completed phase 2 trial of PAC/SIR/TAC after 8/8 human leukocyte antigen matched alloHCT. This single-arm phase 2 trial (NCT02891603) was powered to determine if PAC/SIR/TAC suppressed percentage phosphorylated STAT3 (pSTAT3)+ CD4+ T cells at day +21 (primary end point: percentage pSTAT3+ CD4+ T cells ≤ 35%) and estimated grade II to IV acute GVHD by day +100. The impact of PAC/SIR/TAC on T-cell subsets, CD28 (pS6 and pH3ser10), and IL-2 receptor (pSTAT5) signal transduction was also evaluated. Eligible patients (n = 28) received alloHCT for hematologic malignancies or myeloproliferative neoplasms. Reduced or myeloablative intensity conditioning was permitted. PAC/SIR/TAC met the primary end point, reducing percentage pSTAT3+ CD4+ T cells to 9.62% at day +21. Th1/Th17 cells were decreased at day +21, increasing the ratio of regulatory T cells to Th1 and Th17 cells with PAC/SIR/TAC at recommended phase 2 dose PAC compared with dose level 1 PAC. The cumulative incidence of grade II to IV acute GVHD by day +100 with PAC/SIR/TAC was similar to historic SIR/TAC values (46% vs 43%). Although PAC/SIR/TAC suppressed pSTAT3 and Th1/Th17 cells, the regimen did not improve acute GVHD prevention.