The TaqIB cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) gene polymorphism (B1B2) is a determinant of HDL cholesterol in nondiabetic populations. Remarkably, this gene effect appears to be modified by environmental factors. We evaluated the effect of this polymorphism on HDL cholesterol levels and on the lipoprotein response to a linoleic acid-enriched, low-cholesterol diet in patients with type 1 diabetes. In 44 consecutive type 1 diabetic patients (35 men), CETP polymorphism, apolipoprotein (apo) E genotype, serum lipoproteins, serum CETP activity (measured with an exogenous substrate assay, n = 30), clinical variables, and a diet history were documented. The 1-year response to diet was assessed in 14 type 1 diabetic patients, including 6 B1B1 and 6 B1B2 individuals. HDL cholesterol was higher in 10 B2B2 than in 14 B1B1 homozygotes (1.63 +/- 0.38 vs. 1.24 +/- 0.23 mmol/l, P < 0.01). HDL cholesterol, adjusted for triglycerides and smoking, was 0.19 mmol/l higher for each B2 allele present. CETP activity levels were not significantly different between CETP genotypes. Multiple regression analysis showed that VLDL + LDL cholesterol was associated with dietary polyunsaturated:saturated fatty acids ratio (P < 0.02) and total fat intake (P < 0.05) in the B1B1 homozygotes only and tended to be related to the presence of the apo E4 allele (P < 0.10). In response to diet, VLDL + LDL cholesterol fell (P < 0.05) and HDL cholesterol remained unchanged in 6 B1B1 homozygotes. In contrast, VLDL + LDL cholesterol was unaltered and HDL cholesterol decreased (P < 0.05) in 6 B1B2 heterozygotes (P < 0.05 for difference in change in VLDL + LDL/HDL cholesterol ratio). This difference in response was unrelated to the apo E genotype. Thus, the TaqIB CETP gene polymorphism is a strong determinant of HDL cholesterol in type 1 diabetes. This gene effect is unlikely to be explained by a major influence on the serum level of CETP activity, as an indirect measure of CETP mass. Our preliminary data suggest that this polymorphism may be a marker of the lipoprotein response to dietary intervention.

Chromium is an essential nutrient involved in normal carbohydrate and lipid metabolism. The chromium requirement is postulated to increase with increased glucose intolerance and diabetes. The objective of this study was to test the hypothesis that the elevated intake of supplemental chromium is involved in the control of type 2 diabetes. Individuals being treated for type 2 diabetes (180 men and women) were divided randomly into three groups and supplemented with: 1) placebo, 2) 1.92 micromol (100 microg) Cr as chromium picolinate two times per day, or 3) 9.6 micromol (500 microg) Cr two times per day. Subjects continued to take their normal medications and were instructed not to change their normal eating and living habits. HbA1c values improved significantly after 2 months in the group receiving 19.2 pmol (1,000 microg) Cr per day and was lower in both chromium groups after 4 months (placebo, 8.5 +/- 0.2%; 3.85 micromol Cr, 7.5 +/- 0.2%; 19.2 micromol Cr, 6.6 +/- 0.1%). Fasting glucose was lower in the 19.2-micromol group after 2 and 4 months (4-month values: placebo, 8.8 +/- 0.3 mmol/l; 19.2 micromol Cr, 7.1 +/- 0.2 mmol/l). Two-hour glucose values were also significantly lower for the subjects consuming 19.2 micromol supplemental Cr after both 2 and 4 months (4-month values: placebo, 12.3 +/- 0.4 mmo/l; 19.2 micromol Cr, 10.5 +/- 0.2 mmol/l). Fasting and 2-h insulin values decreased significantly in both groups receiving supplemental chromium after 2 and 4 months. Plasma total cholesterol also decreased after 4 months in the subjects receiving 19.2 micromol/day Cr. These data demonstrate that supplemental chromium had significant beneficial effects on HbA1c, glucose, insulin, and cholesterol variables in subjects with type 2 diabetes. The beneficial effects of chromium in individuals with diabetes were observed at levels higher than the upper limit of the Estimated Safe and Adequate Daily Dietary Intake.

High-dose intravenous insulin infusion at the onset of IDDM has been suggested to improve beta-cell function during the 1st year of insulin treatment. To test this hypothesis, we randomly assigned newly diagnosed IDDM patients to receive either an experimental 2-week high-dose intravenous insulin infusion (n = 9; age, 25 +/- 7 years; HbA1e, 10.5 +/- 2.0%) or an intensive insulin therapy of four injections per day (n = 10; age, 28 +/- 7 years; HbA1c, 12.3 +/- 3.0%). The experimental-therapy group received three times more insulin (1.2 +/- 0.4 U.kg-1.day-1) than the intensive-therapy group (0.4 +/- 0.1 U.kg-1. day-1, P < 0.0005). By week 3, both groups were treated similarly with intensive insulin therapy and were followed for 1 year. beta-cell function was evaluated with fasting plasma C-peptide and glucagon-stimulated and mixed meal-stimulated C-peptide concentrations. In both groups, insulin doses were comparable, and HbA1c levels were near normal during follow-up. At diagnosis of IDDM, fasting C-peptide was 0.40 +/- 0.13 nmol/l in the experimental-therapy group and 0.39 +/- 0.23 nmol/l in the intensive-therapy group. Irrespective of treatment, a slight decline of fasting C-peptide was observed in sequential measurements up to 12 months in both groups (delta, -0.13 and -0.08 nmol/l, respectively; NS). Glucagon-stimulated C-peptide concentrations decreased from 0.54 +/- 0.18 and 0.70 +/- 0.39 nmol/l at month 0 to 0.41 +/- 0.20 and 0.61 +/- 0.52 nmol/l, respectively, at month 12. In the experimental-therapy group, mixed meal-stimulated C-peptide concentrations (area under the curve over 2 h) increased from 82.10 +/- 43.72 to 101.20 +/- 32.53 nmol/l and in the intensive-therapy group, from 75.05 +/- 46.01 to 107.20 +/- 102.51 nmol/l. Changes in stimulated C-peptide concentrations between month 0 and 12 were not significant in both groups. During follow-up, fasting and stimulated C-peptide concentrations were not significantly different between the experimental-therapy group and the intensive-therapy group. We conclude that as initial treatments of newly diagnosed IDDM, high-dose intravenous insulin infusion and intensive insulin therapy equally preserve beta-cell function during the 1st year of insulin therapy.

This study evaluates the effects of insulin versus glibenclamide on lipoprotein metabolism at comparable levels of blood glucose control, in particular on the concentration and distribution of VLDL subfractions and lipolytic enzyme activities in nine NIDDM men (aged 56 +/- 3 years, BMI 26.5 +/- 0.9 kg/m2) (means +/- SE) participating in a crossover study. After a 3-week washout period, patients were randomly assigned to 2-month treatment periods (insulin or glibenclamide); thereafter, each patient crossed to the other treatment. At the end of each period, mean daily blood glucose (MDBG), HbA1e, plasma lipids, lipoproteins (VLDL, LDL, HDL), lipoprotein subfractions (VLDL1, 2, 3; HDL2, HDL3), and post-heparin lipase activities (lipoprotein lipase [LPL], hepatic lipase [HL]) were evaluated. Although glucose control was similar at the end of both periods (MDBG 8.3 +/- 0.3 vs. 7.9 +/- 0.3 mmol/l; HbA1c 7.4 +/- 0.3 vs. 7.0 +/- 0.2%, insulin versus glibenclamide), insulin compared with glibenclamide induced a significant reduction in plasma triglycerides (0.9 +/- 0.1 vs. 1.1 +/- 0.1 mmol/l, P < 0.05), VLDL triglycerides (50.1 +/- 12.2 vs. 63.6 +/- 12.3 mg/dl, P < 0.02), VLDL1 lipid concentration (24.9 +/- 7.5 vs. 39.9 +/- 9.5 mg/dl, P < 0.006), and increased HDL2 cholesterol (25.2 +/- 1.6 vs. 20.3 +/- 1.3 mg/dl, P < 0.03). In terms of VLDL percentage subfraction distribution, with insulin, there was a decrease in the larger subfractions (VLDL1 26.5 +/- 3.0 vs. 37.8 +/- 3.4%, P < 0.02) and an increase in the smallest (VLDL3 47.3 +/- 3.8 vs. 37.3 +/- 3.3%, P < 0.05). Moreover, HL activity was significantly lower after insulin than after glibenclamide (HL 247.2 +/- 22.3 vs. 263.5 +/- 22.6 mU/ml, P < 0.05). In conclusion, compared with glibenclamide, insulin treatment (independent of variations in glucose control) is able to decrease significantly plasma triglycerides, to increase HDL2 cholesterol, and to reduce only the concentration of the larger VLDL subfractions, with a consequent redistribution of their profile.

Subjects with NIDDM have increased plasma proinsulin concentrations, compared with nondiabetic subjects, both in absolute terms and as a proportion of circulating insulin-like molecules. It remains uncertain whether this reflects a primary beta-cell defect in proinsulin processing or is secondary to hyperglycemia. We addressed this question by assessing the effects of reducing hyperglycemia on relative hyperproinsulinemia in subjects with NIDDM. Eight subjects with NIDDM underwent three 8-week periods in a randomized crossover design of therapy with diet alone, sulfonylurea (gliclazide), or insulin (ultralente). The effects on beta-cell peptide concentrations were assessed 1) fasting, 2) in response to hyperglycemic clamping, and 3) in response to an injection of the nonglucose secretogogue arginine and compared with measurements in seven nondiabetic control subjects. Both sulfonylurea and insulin therapy substantially reduced fasting plasma glucose and glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1e) concentrations, compared with diet therapy alone. The diabetic subjects on diet therapy had relative hyperproinsulinemia, assessed relative to C-peptide concentrations, fasting and in response to hyperglycemic clamping and arginine, compared with control subjects. Neither sulfonylurea nor insulin therapy altered the relative hyperproinsulinemia. Insulin therapy reduced fasting proinsulin concentrations from geometric mean 29.4 (1 SD range, 14.6-59.0) pmol/l on diet therapy to 18.7 (7.3-48.1) pmol/l (P < 0.05). A similar trend was evident with fasting C-peptide concentrations with a reduction from 0.9 (0.6-1.4) nmol/l on diet therapy to 0.6 (0.4-0.9) nmol/l (P = 0.06), so that the relative hyperproinsulinemia, assessed as the ratio of fasting proinsulin to C-peptide, was unchanged by insulin. Similarly, insulin therapy failed to reduce the ratio of proinsulin to C-peptide concentrations in response to a hyperglycemic clamp and in the acute incremental response to arginine. Failure to improve the relative hyperproinsulinemia of NIDDM, despite significant reduction of hyperglycemia with exogenous insulin therapy, supports the hypothesis that relative hyperproinsulinemia in NIDDM is a reflection of a primary beta-cell defect rather than being secondary to hyperglycemia.

IDDM is associated with elevated circulating levels of growth hormone (GH) and reduced insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I). GH antagonizes the action of insulin-increasing insulin requirements in IDDM. The effects of subcutaneously administered rhIGF-I on glycemic control, insulin requirements, and GH secretion were studied in eight adults with IDDM. Patients received either placebo or rhIGF-I (50 microg/kg b.i.d.) for 19 days in a randomized, double-blind, parallel-design, placebo-controlled trial. Overnight GH, plasma glucose, free insulin, IGF-I, fructosamine, and lipid profiles were assessed during this period. rhIGF-I therapy increased IGF-I concentration from 117.1 +/- 14.2 (mean +/- SE) ng/ml (baseline) to 310.5 +/- 40.6 and 257.1 +/- 41.2 ng/ml on day 5 (P < 0.01 vs. baseline) and day 20 (P < 0.01 vs. baseline), respectively. After 19 days of rhIGF-I treatment, fructosamine concentrations were unchanged compared with baseline (439 +/- 32 vs. 429 +/- 35 micromol/l, day -1 vs. day 20, respectively), yet insulin requirements were decreased by approximately 45% (0.67 +/- 0.08 vs. 0.36 +/- 0.07 U x kg(-1) x day(-1), day -1 vs. day 19, respectively, P < 0.005). After 4 days of rhIGF-I therapy, there was a decrease in free insulin levels (8.38 +/- 1.47 vs. 4.98 +/- 0.84 mU/l, P < 0.05), mean overnight GH concentration (12.6 +/- 3.3 vs. 3.8 +/- 2.1 mU/l, P = 0.05), and total cholesterol and triglycerides (4.68 +/- 0.31 vs. 4.25 +/- 0.35 mmol/l, P < 0.05, 1.27 +/- 0.19 vs. 0.95 +/- 0.21 mmol/l, P < 0.001, respectively). There was no change in any variable in the placebo-treated patients. This study demonstrates that subcutaneous administration of rhIGF-I decreases insulin requirements and improves the plasma lipid profile while maintaining glycemic control in adults with IDDM. The excess nocturnal release of GH, characteristic of IDDM, is also decreased by rhIGF-I therapy.

Antioxidant treatment has been shown to prevent nerve dysfunction in experimental diabetes, providing a rationale for a potential therapeutic value in diabetic patients. The effects of the antioxidant alpha-lipoic acid (thioctic acid) were studied in two multicenter, randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled trials. In the Alpha-Lipoic Acid in Diabetic Neuropathy Study, 328 patients with NIDDM and symptomatic peripheral neuropathy were randomly assigned to treatment with intravenous infusion of alpha-lipoic acid using three doses (ALA 1,200 mg; 600 mg; 100 mg) or placebo (PLAC) over 3 weeks. The total symptom score (TSS) (pain, burning, paresthesia, and numbness) in the feet decreased significantly from baseline to day 19 in ALA 1,200 and ALA 600 vs. PLAC. Each of the four individual symptom scores was significantly lower in ALA 600 than in PLAC after 19 days (all P < 0.05). The total scale of the Hamburg Pain Adjective List (HPAL) was significantly reduced in ALA 1,200 and ALA 600 compared with PLAC after 19 days (both P < 0.05). In the Deutsche Kardiale Autonome Neuropathie Studie, patients with NIDDM and cardiac autonomic neuropathy diagnosed by reduced heart rate variability were randomly assigned to treatment with a daily oral dose of 800 mg alpha-lipoic acid (ALA) (n = 39) or placebo (n = 34) for 4 months. Two out of four parameters of heart rate variability at rest were significantly improved in ALA compared with placebo. A trend toward a favorable effect of ALA was noted for the remaining two indexes. In both studies, no significant adverse events were observed. In conclusion, intravenous treatment with alpha-lipoic acid (600 mg/day) over 3 weeks is safe and effective in reducing symptoms of diabetic peripheral neuropathy, and oral treatment with 800 mg/day for 4 months may improve cardiac autonomic dysfunction in NIDDM.

The aim of the study was to determine the effects of specific levels of antecedent hypoglycemia on subsequent autonomic, neuroendocrine, and metabolic counterregulatory responses. Eight healthy, overnight-fasted male subjects were studied during 2-day protocols on four separate randomized occasions separated by at least 2 months. On day 1, insulin was infused at a rate of 9 pmol x kg(-1) x min(-1) and 2-h clamped euglycemia (plasma glucose 5.2 +/- 0.2 mmol/l) or differing hypoglycemia (plasma glucose 3.9 +/- 0.1, 3.3 +/- 0.1, or 2.9 +/- 0.1 mmol/l) was obtained during morning and afternoon. The next morning after an evening meal and 10-h overnight fast, each subject underwent a 2-h hyperinsulinemic (9 pmol x kg(-1) x min[-1]) hypoglycemic (2.9 +/- 0.1 mmol/l) clamp study. Despite equivalent day 2 plasma glucose and insulin levels, differing levels of antecedent hypoglycemia produced specific blunting of subsequent counterregulatory responses. Day 1 hypoglycemia of 3.9 mmol/l resulted in significantly (P < 0.01) blunted epinephrine, muscle sympathetic nerve activity, and glucagon responses. Day 1 hypoglycemia of 3.3 mmol/l resulted in additional significant blunting (P < 0.01) of pancreatic polypeptide, norepinephrine, growth hormone, endogenous glucose production, and lipolytic responses. Deeper day 1 hypoglycemia of 2.9 mmol/l produced similar day 2 counterregulatory failure as day 1 hypoglycemia of 3.3 mmol/l. In summary, in healthy overnight-fasted men, mild antecedent hypoglycemia of 3.9 mmol/l significantly blunts sympathoadrenal and glucagon, but not other forms of neuroendocrine counterregulatory responses, to subsequent hypoglycemia. Antecedent hypoglycemia of 3.3 mmol/l resulted in additional significant blunting of all major neuroendocrine and metabolic responses to subsequent hypoglycemia. We conclude that in normal humans, there is a hierarchy of blunted counterregulatory responses that are determined by the depth of antecedent hypoglycemia.

The aim of our study was to evaluate whether inhibition of ACE (lisinopril 10-20 mg/day) can reduce the rate of decline in kidney function more than reducing blood pressure with conventional antihypertensive treatment (atenolol 50-100 mg/day), usually in combination with a diuretic. We performed a prospective, randomized, parallel study for 42 months, double blind for the first 12 months and single blind thereafter. Forty-three (21 lisinopril and 22 atenolol) hypertensive NIDDM patients with diabetic nephropathy were enrolled. Data from 36 patients (17 lisinopril and 19 atenolol, 60 +/- 7 years of age, 27 men) who completed at least 12 months of the study period are presented. At baseline, the two groups were comparable: glomerular filtration rate (51Cr-EDTA plasma clearance) was 75 +/- 6 and 74 +/- 8 ml x min(-1) x 1.73 m(-2), mean 24-h ambulatory blood pressure (A&D TM2420) was 110 +/- 3 and 114 +/- 2 mmHg, and 24-h urinary albumin excretion rate was 961 (range 331-5,727) and 1,578 (476-5,806) mg/24 h in the lisinopril and atenolol groups, respectively. The mean follow-up time was similar, 37 and 35 months in the lisinopril and atenolol groups, respectively. Mean ambulatory blood pressure was equally reduced in the two groups, 12 +/- 2 and 10 +/- 2 mmHg in the lisinopril and atenolol groups, respectively. Glomerular filtration rate declined in a biphasic manner with a faster initial (0 to 6 months) change of 1.25 +/- 0.49 and 0.81 +/- 0.29 ml x min(-1) x month(-1) followed by a slower sustained decline (6 to 42 months) of 0.59 +/- 0.10 and 0.54 +/- 0.13 ml x min(-1) x month(-1) in the lisinopril and atenolol groups, respectively. No significant differences were observed in either initial or sustained decline in glomerular filtration rate between the two groups. Urinary albumin excretion was reduced (% reduction of baseline) more in the lisinopril than in the atenolol group, at 55 (95% CI 29-72) and 15% (-13 to 34), respectively (P = 0.01). In conclusion, the relentless decline in kidney function characteristically found in hypertensive NIDDM patients with diabetic nephropathy can be reduced equally effectively by two antihypertensive treatments, the beta-blocker atenolol and the ACE inhibitor lisinopril.

During hypoglycemia, cerebral blood flow (CBF) does not increase significantly until peripheral glucose levels are very low (2.0 mmol/l), that is, well below the blood glucose threshold for impairment of cognitive function (3.0 mmol/l). Because increased rates of cerebral blood flow will increase glucose transport, a failure of flow to rise earlier, before brain function is threatened, might be considered maladaptive. To examine the influence of inducing an earlier rise in CBF during hypoglycemia, eight healthy volunteers participated in three studies using a randomized, placebo-controlled design. In all three studies, a hyperinsulinemic (60 mU x m2 x min(-1)) clamp was used to maintain blood glucose levels at 4.5 mmol/l for 60 min. Thereafter, for EUG-ACZ, blood glucose was maintained at 4.5 mmol/l from 60 to 170 min and at 90 min from the start of this study, and 1-g acetazolamide i.v. was given to induce an early rise in CBF; for HYPO-ACZ, glucose was lowered over 20 min to 2.8 mmol/l and kept at that level for 90 min, and acetazolamide was given 90 min from the start of this study; and for HYPO-CON, glucose was treated as in HYPO-ACZ, and matching placebo was given in place of acetazolamide. Injection of acetazolamide was associated with a 30% rise in right (95% CI 24-34%) and left (20-32%) middle cerebral artery velocity (an index of CBF) during euglycemia without any change in hypoglycemia awareness or counterregulatory hormone levels. When glucose was lowered to 2.8 mmol/l, acetazolamide caused a similar rise in middle cerebral artery velocity in the HYPO-ACZ study. However, all subjects were less "aware" of hypoglycemia, had fewer adrenergic symptoms (sweating, palpitations, tremors; all P < 0.05), and had lower plasma epinephrine levels (1,026 vs. 1,790 pmol/l; -764 [437 to 1,097] pmol/l, point estimate of difference [95% CI]; P < 0.001), compared with the HYPO-CON study, whereas levels of other counter-regulatory hormones and norepinephrine were similar. Cognitive function (latency of the P300 evoked response) was unaffected by increasing CBF. In conclusion, enhanced rates of cerebral blood flow at the onset of systemic hypoglycemia are associated with diminished perception of low blood glucose levels and attenuation of the epinephrine counterregulatory response. These findings suggest that augmenting cerebral blood flow leads to an enhanced rate of substrate delivery to the central nervous system.

Despite evidence that the autonomic nervous system (ANS) makes a significant contribution to increased glucagon secretion during insulin-induced hypoglycemia in several animal species, including a recent study in nonhuman primates, the role of the ANS in mediating this important counterregulatory response in humans remains controversial. Therefore, glucagon responses to insulin-induced hypoglycemia were examined in seven nondiabetic women (BMI, 28.0 +/- 2.0 kg/m2) with and without the presence of the ganglionic nicotinic receptor antagonist trimethaphan. Trimethaphan impairs neurotransmission across parasympathetic and sympathetic autonomic ganglia and in the adrenal medulla and, therefore, markedly impairs autonomic activation during insulin-induced hypoglycemia. The studies were performed in random order at least 4 weeks apart. Trimethaphan was infused at a variable rate (0.3-0.6 mg/min) to modestly lower blood pressure (approximately 10 mmHg) without producing hypotension. Regular human insulin was infused (0.28 pmol x m(-2) x min(-1)) with a variable rate glucose infusion to lower the plasma glucose from 4.9 +/- 0.2 to 2.6 +/- 0.2 mmol/l in the control study and from 4.9 +/- 0.2 to 2.5 +/- 0.2 mmol/l in the trimethaphan study. Trimethaphan impaired parasympathetic and sympathoadrenal activation during insulin-induced hypoglycemia as assessed by 70% reductions of the plasma pancreatic polypeptide response and epinephrine response (both P < 0.05 vs. control study). Glucagon secretory responses during insulin-induced hypoglycemia were assessed as peak responses and as the area under the curve (AUC) above baseline values during insulin-induced hypoglycemia. Plasma glucagon increased in the control study from 44 +/- 5 ng/l to a peak of 76 +/- 9 ng/l (delta = 32 +/- 8 ng/l; P < 0.005 vs. baseline) and in the trimethaphan study from 41 +/- 3 to 50 +/- 7 ng/l (delta = 10 +/- 5 ng/l; P < 0.02 vs. control subjects). The glucagon response to insulin-induced hypoglycemia as assessed by the AUC was 948 +/- 272 ng x 1(-1) x 45 min(-1) in the control study (P < 0.01 vs. baseline), but was reduced by 75% in the trimethaphan study (AUC = 203 +/- 94 ng x 1(-1) x 45 min(-1); P < 0.02 vs. control subjects). Trimethaphan did not affect the glucagon response to arginine administration. These results demonstrate that the ANS mediates the majority of the glucagon response to insulin-induced hypoglycemia of 2.5 mmol/l in postmenopausal nondiabetic women.

Endothelial dysfunction has been implicated in the pathogenesis of diabetic vascular disorders such as diabetic retinopathy. We hypothesized that either local endogenous nitric oxide (NO) synthesis or local reactivity to endogenous NO might be impaired in patients with IDDM and that this may contribute to the development of diabetic retinopathy. Ten otherwise healthy patients with long-standing IDDM and ten healthy control subjects were studied according to an open randomized two-way cross-over design. Subjects received intravenous infusions of either N(G)-monomethyl-L-arginine, an inhibitor of NO-synthase, or L-arginine, the precursor of NO synthesis, on two separate study days. Ocular hemodynamics were assessed by laser interferometric measurement of fundus pulsations and Doppler sonographic measurement of blood flow velocity in the ophthalmic artery. N(G)-monomethyl-L-arginine decreased fundus pulsations and blood flow velocity in the ophthalmic artery and increased blood pressure in healthy subjects. The responses to NO-synthase inhibition were significantly less in diabetic subjects. In contrast, L-arginine caused a comparable increase in fundus pulsations and decrease in blood pressure in both cohorts. These results indicate that systemic and ocular hemodynamic reactivity to NO-synthase inhibition is reduced in patients with long-standing IDDM, compared with healthy control subjects. Thus, this study indicates that either NO-synthase activity is increased or NO sensitivity is decreased in patients with IDDM and supports the concept of an involvement of the L-arginine-NO system in the pathophysiology of diabetic retinopathy.

The effects of subcutaneous administration of 10, 30, or 100 microg q.i.d. pramlintide, an analog of human amylin, on plasma glucose regulation in patients with IDDM were evaluated in a multicenter trial. The plasma glucose response to a Sustacal test meal was significantly reduced compared with placebo both after 1 week and after 2 weeks of administration of 30 or 100 microg pramlintide. In addition, 24-h mean plasma glucose concentrations were significantly lowered in patients receiving 30 microg of pramlintide for 2 weeks compared with placebo, while the 100-microg pramlintide dose did not reach statistical significance for the 24-h glucose profiles. At 10 microg, pramlintide had no effect on the 24-h glucose profile or on the plasma glucose response to a Sustacal test meal. The reduction in 24-h glucose concentrations and glucose concentrations after the Sustacal test meal observed at the 30-microg pramlintide dose was not accompanied by an increased incidence of hypoglycemic events. The most frequent adverse events were dose-related and involved transient upper gastrointestinal symptoms. A majority (>80%) of the patients who reported these adverse events during week 1 did not report them in week 2. These data indicate that pramlintide effectively reduces plasma glucose concentrations as reflected in both a 24-h glucose profile and a Sustacal test meal while maintaining an acceptable safety profile.

Our objective was to compare the effect of a long-acting calcium antagonist (nisoldipine) versus an ACE inhibitor (lisinopril) on albuminuria, arterial blood pressure, and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in hypertensive IDDM patients with diabetic nephropathy. We performed a 1-year, double-blind, double-dummy, randomized, controlled study comparing nisoldipine (20-40 mg once daily) with lisinopril (10-20 mg once daily) in 52 hypertensive IDDM subjects with diabetic nephropathy. Three patients dropped out, and results for the remaining 49 (25 nisoldipine, 24 lisinopril) are presented. Diuretics were required in 10 nisoldipine- and 8 lisinopril-treated patients. Every 3 months, 24-h ambulatory blood pressure (TM2420, A&D, Tokyo, Japan) and albuminuria in three 24-h samples (enzyme immunoassay) were measured; GFR (51Cr-EDTA plasma clearance) was recorded every 6 months. Mean arterial blood pressure (24 h) was reduced from (mean +/- SE) 108 +/- 3 mmHg at baseline to 101 +/- 2 in average during treatment in the lisinopril group and from 105 +/- 2 to 103 +/- 2 in the nisoldipine group (P = 0.06 comparing changes in the two groups). Albuminuria was reduced 47% (95% CI 21-65) in the lisinopril group versus an increase of 11% (-3 to 27) in the nisoldipine group (P = 0.001). Fractional albumin clearance was reduced 37% (95% CI 4-59%) in the lisinopril versus an increase of 35% (8-69%) in the nisoldipine group (P < 0.01). GFR decreased from 85 +/- 5 ml x min(-1) x 1.73 m(-2) to 73 +/- 5 in the lisinopril group and from 84 +/- 6 to 80 +/- 7 in the nisoldipine group (P < 0.05). The effect of study medication on albuminuria and GFR was independent of changes in systemic blood pressure and baseline variables in multiple regression analyses. In summary, lisinopril reduced albuminuria, but also GFR, to a greater extent than did nisoldipine in hypertensive IDDM patients with diabetic nephropathy during the 1st year of treatment. Longer follow-up is required to clarify whether these drugs have different renoprotective effects.

Insulin lispro is a human insulin analog that dissociates more rapidly than human regular insulin after subcutaneous injection, resulting in higher insulin levels at an earlier point in time and a shorter duration of action. The aim of the study was to evaluate if this pharmacokinetic difference would translate into better postprandial and overall control in 30 IDDM patients (age, 35.1 +/- 1.5 years; male-female ratio, 17:13; BMI, 24.8 +/- 0.5 kg/m2; HbA1c, 8.03 +/- 0.13% at baseline) treated with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII; Disetronic H-TRON V100) in a double-blind crossover clinical study. Patients were randomized to insulin lispro or human regular insulin for 3 months before crossing over to the other insulin for another 3 months. All meal boluses were given immediately before breakfast, lunch, and supper. An eight-point blood glucose profile was measured once weekly, and HbA1c levels were measured monthly. At the end of the 3-month treatment period, HbA1c levels were significantly lower with insulin lispro, compared with human regular insulin: 7.66 +/- 0.13 vs. 8.00 +/- 0.16% (P = 0.0041). While preprandial, bedtime, and 2:00 A.M. values for blood glucose were not significantly different, 1-h postprandial blood glucose was significantly improved after breakfast, lunch, and dinner with insulin lispro, compared with human regular insulin: 8.35 vs. 9.79 mmol/l (P = 0.006), 7.58 vs. 8.74 mmol/l (P = 0.049), and 7.85 vs. 9.01 mmol/l (P = 0.03). The incidence of hypoglycemia per 30 days (blood glucose levels, <3.0 mmol/l) was 8.4 +/- 1.3 before randomization, decreasing to 6.0 +/- 0.9 for insulin lispro and to 7.6 +/- 1.3 for regular insulin during the last month of the study. Two patients in each group reported insulin precipitation. We conclude that insulin lispro improves glycemic control in CSII without increasing the risk of hypoglycemia.

Troglitazone is a thiazolidinedione under development for the treatment of NIDDM and potentially other insulin-resistant disease states. Treatment with troglitazone is associated with an improvement in hyperglycemia, hyperinsulinemia, and insulin-mediated glucose disposal. No significant side effects have been observed in humans. Because of reported cardiac changes in animals treated with drugs of this class, this multicenter 48-week study was conducted to evaluate whether NIDDM patients treated with troglitazone develop any cardiac mass increase or functional impairment. A total of 154 NIDDM patients were randomized to receive troglitazone 800 mg q.d. or glyburide titrated to achieve glycemic control (< or =20 mg b.i.d. or q.d.). Two-dimensional echocardiography and pulsed Doppler were used to measure left ventricular mass index (LVMI), cardiac index (CI), and stroke volume index (SVI). All echocardiograms were performed at each center (baseline, 12, 24, 36, and 48 weeks), recorded on videotape, and forwarded to a blinded central echocardiographic interpreter for analysis. The results showed that LVMI of patients treated with troglitazone was not statistically or clinically different from baseline after 24 or 48 weeks. Statistically significant increases in SVI and CI and a statistically significant decrease in diastolic pressure and estimated peripheral resistance were observed in troglitazone-treated patients. These results were not sex-specific. Glycemic benefits of troglitazone treatment were observed as evidenced by long-term improvement of HbA1c and C-peptide levels. Furthermore, triglycerides were significantly lower, and HDL was significantly higher at weeks 24 and 48. In conclusion, NIDDM patients treated with troglitazone do not show any cardiac mass increase or cardiac function impairment. Conversely, patients on troglitazone benefited from enhanced cardiac output and stroke volume, possibly as a result of decreased peripheral resistance. Treatment with troglitazone appears to have a favorable impact on known cardiovascular risk factors and could potentially lower cardiovascular morbidity in NIDDM patients.

Although the relationship between the actions of cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) and atherosclerosis is complex, a strong body of evidence suggests that its activity (cholesteryl ester transfer [CET]) is proatherogenic. We have previously shown that CET is increased in IDDM patients receiving conventional subcutaneous insulin treatment and normalized when systemic insulin levels are lowered with intraperitoneal insulin delivery (IP). Since CET has been found by many observers to also be accelerated in NIDDM, we sought to determine whether the same salutary effect could be achieved in insulin-requiring NIDDM men before and 7 months after randomization to an intensive treatment regimen (Rx) of either IP (n = 9) or multiple daily insulin injections (MDI; n = 13). HbA1c improved to the same degree in both groups (MDI group: 9.4 +/- 1.1% pre-Rx vs. 7.2 +/- 0.7% post-Rx [P < 0.001]; IP group: 9.2 +/- 1.3% pre-Rx vs. 7.1 +/- 0.5% post-Rx [P < 0.001]). Compared with pre-Rx levels, plasma triglycerides were not significantly changed by either treatment (MDI group: 136 +/- 80 mg/dl pre-Rx vs. 139 +/- 87 mg/dl post-Rx; IP group: 157 +/- 63 mg/dl pre-Rx vs. 188 +/- 89 mg/dl post-Rx), though an upward trend followed IP. Before randomization, CET estimated with both mass and isotopic assays was greater in the NIDDM subjects than in nondiabetic control subjects (P < 0.001). With improved glycemic control, CE mass transfer declined in both groups, but only reached normal levels in the IP group (MDI group at 2 h: 49.0 +/- 13.7 [mean +/- SD] pg pre-Rx vs. 29.5 +/- 15.3 microg post-Rx [-39.7%, P < 0.01]; IP group at 2 h: 40.8 +/- 23.3 microg pre-Rx vs. 10.9 +/- 6.5 microg post-Rx [-73.2%, P < 0.05]) and remained abnormally increased (P < 0.005) in the subjects receiving MDI. Total lipolytic activity after intensive treatment was unchanged from pretreatment levels, which were similar to those of the reference group. Although directional changes in lipoprotein lipase (LpL) and hepatic triglyceride lipase (HTGL) similar to those found in IDDM after MDI and IP were observed, they were not statistically significant. Thus, while improved glycemic control alone achieved by either MDI or IP reduced the pathological increase in CET in these insulin-treated NIDDM men, normalization was only achieved in those treated with IP. Despite near-normal HbA1c levels, CET remained abnormally increased in NIDDM patients treated rigorously with conventional subcutaneous insulin delivery.

A total of 1,441 patients with IDDM were randomly assigned to receive either intensive (n = 711) or conventional (n = 730) diabetes therapy in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT). The patients were followed for an average of 6.5 years. Subjects were instructed to report all episodes of suspected severe hypoglycemia to their health care team. In addition, at quarterly follow-up visits, each subject was asked about the occurrence of severe hypoglycemia. There were 3,788 episodes of severe hypoglycemia (requiring assistance); 1,027 of these episodes were associated with coma and/or seizure. A total of 65% percent of patients in the intensive group vs. 35% of patients in the conventional group had at least one episode of severe hypoglycemia by the study end; the overall rates of severe hypoglycemia were 61.2 per 100 patient-years vs. 18.7 per 100 patient-years in the intensive and conventional treatment groups, respectively, with a relative risk (RR) of 3.28. The relative risk for coma and/or seizure was 3.02 for intensive therapy. The increased risk with intensive treatment persisted over each of the 9 years of follow-up in the DCCT and over the calendar years 1984-1993 during which the study was conducted. When baseline patient characteristics were examined for effects on the risk of severe hypoglycemia, the relative risk of hypoglycemia for intensive versus conventional treatment was > or = 2 for all subgroups. Several subgroups defined by baseline characteristics, including males, adolescents, and subjects with no residual C-peptide or with a prior history of hypoglycemia, had a particularly high risk of severe hypoglycemia in both treatment groups. Analyses of the cumulative incidence of successive episodes indicated that intensive treatment was also associated with an increased risk of multiple episodes within the same patient (e.g., 22% experienced five or more episodes of severe hypoglycemia within the first 5 years of follow-up vs. 4% in the conventional group). Within both treatment groups, patients who experienced severe hypoglycemia were at increased risk of subsequent episodes. Approximately 30% of patients in each group experienced a second episode within the 4 months following the first episode of severe hypoglycemia. Within each treatment group, the number of prior episodes of hypoglycemia was the strongest predictor of the risk of future episodes, followed closely by the current HbA1c value. After adjustment for the current quarterly HbA1c level, intensive treatment was still associated with a significantly increased risk of hypoglycemia, indicating that the increased risk with intensive treatment is not completely explained by differences in HbA1c values.

Insulin lispro, an insulin analog recently developed particularly for mealtime therapy, has a fast absorption rate and a short duration of action. We compared insulin lispro and regular human insulin in the mealtime treatment of 1,008 patients with IDDM. The study was a 6-month randomized multinational (17 countries) and multicenter (102 investigators) clinical trial performed with an open-label crossover design. Insulin lispro was injected immediately before the meal, and regular human insulin was injected 30-45 min before the meal. Throughout the study, the postprandial rise in serum glucose was significantly lower during insulin lispro therapy. At the endpoint, the postprandial rise in serum glucose was reduced at 1 h by 1.3 mmol/l and at 2 h by 2.0 mmol/l in patients treated with insulin lispro (P < 0.001). The rate of hypoglycemia was 12% less with insulin lispro (6.4 +/- 0.2 vs. 7.2 +/- 0.3 episodes/30 days, P < 0.001), independent of basal insulin regimen or HbA1c level. The reduction was observed equally in episodes with and without symptoms. When the total number of episodes for each patient was analyzed according to the time of occurrence, the number of hypoglycemic episodes was less with insulin lispro than with regular human insulin therapy during three of four quarters of the day (P < 0.001). The largest relative improvement was observed at night. In conclusion, insulin lispro improves postprandial control, reduces hypoglycemic episodes, and improves patient convenience, compared with regular human insulin, in IDDM patients.

Insulin lispro [Lys (B28), Pro (B29) human insulin] is a rapidly absorbed analog that has diminished tendency to self-associate. In four open-label, 1-year-long international randomized trials, we contrasted the immunogenicity of insulin lispro versus regular human insulin (RHI) in patients previously treated with insulin who had IDDM or NIDDM. Using a self-blank subtraction assay, we assessed sera for the presence of insulin-specific antibodies (ISA), insulin lispro-specific antibodies (LSA), and cross-reactive antibodies (CRA). Basal insulin needs were provided either with human ultralente (UL) or NPH insulins. After 2 to 4 weeks of therapy with RHI plus UL or RHI plus NPH, 50% of patients were randomly assigned to begin insulin lispro or continue on RHI. At baseline, few pretreated patients had LSA (0-4%) and approximately 10% had ISA, whereas 41-45% of patients with IDDM and 23-27% of patients with NIDDM had CRA (IDDM vs. NIDDM, P < 0.001). Within studies, no significant differences were noted over time in ISA, LSA, or CRA attributable to the type of short-acting insulin. When data were pooled, inconsistent changes were noted in ISA and LSA (LSA were greater in NIDDM vs. IDDM at baseline, P = 0.001, and ISA were greater in IDDM vs. NIDDM at 6 months, P = 0.007). Significant levels of CRA were more common in IDDM at all times (P < 0.001, P = 0.022, and P = 0.002 at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months, respectively). For patients receiving insulin lispro, no significant changes occurred in antibody status among IDDM and NIDDM patients throughout the study (became positive, remained positive, became negative, or remained negative). IDDM patients were more likely to develop or maintain CRA levels (P = 0.008 vs. NIDDM), whereas antibody levels were comparable among positive individuals. No evidence was noted that insulin lispro differs in immunogenicity from RHI in previously treated IDDM and NIDDM patients.