Paclitaxel was the first identified member of a new class of anticancer drugs known as the taxanes. This compound has significant single-agent activity against a number of solid tumors including nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In the first-line setting, single-agent paclitaxel has been studied on a number of different schedules and dose levels. Initial studies were done on the 24-h infusion schedule with doses of 200-250 mg/m2. Response rates were 21%-24%. Median survival ranged from six to nine months with one-year survival rates of 38%-42%. The major toxicity of this infusion schedule was myelosuppression, mainly neutropenia. Subsequent single-agent studies employed shorter infusion durations (three hours), with doses ranging from 175-225 mg/m2. The cumulative experience of the 3-h infusion schedule shows an overall response rate of 28.5% with median survival of 6-11 months and a one-year survival of 37.5%. Similar results were obtained in the one study examining the 1-h infusion schedule with doses ranging from 135-200 mg/m2. The major toxicities of the shorter infusion schedule include neutropenia, neuropathy, and myalgia/arthralgia syndrome. Weekly administration of paclitaxel also showed significant activity in advanced, metastatic NSCLC. Overall response rates have ranged from 30%-56% in the phase I/II setting with one-year survival rates of 42%-53%. A recently completed phase III trial comparing single-agent paclitaxel at 200 mg/m2 over three hours every three weeks to best supportive care (BSC) in advanced or metastatic NSCLC has shown a survival advantage for the single-agent paclitaxel arm (median survival 6.8 months for paclitaxel versus 4.8 months for BSC, p = 0.045). An ongoing phase III trial is comparing single-agent paclitaxel to the combination of carboplatin and paclitaxel (CALGB 9730) in advanced, metastatic NSCLC. Paclitaxel has also been studied in the second-line setting. Infusion schedules have ranged from 1 h, 24 h and 96 h on an every-three-week schedule. Weekly paclitaxel has also been evaluated in the second-line setting. Although the overall experience is limited, response rates have ranged from 0%-38%. The overall role of single-agent paclitaxel in prolonging survival and improving quality of life remains uncertain in this setting. The cumulative experience of single-agent paclitaxel in advanced, metastatic NSCLC suggests that it is a highly active cytotoxic agent in this setting. The consistent finding of a 35%-40% one-year survival rate is notable. The major toxicities include neutropenia, neuropathy, and myalgia/arthralgia syndrome. Given the overall activity and impact on survival along with an acceptable toxicity profile, single-agent paclitaxel warrants comparison to other active agents and combination regimens in advanced, metastatic NSCLC.

The disappointing results of chemotherapy in glioblastoma might be caused by the choices of agents, which mostly include nitrosurea. We compared the in vitro efficacy of chemotherapeutic agents, developing a method to summarize published data.

Is there a role for the use of gemcitabine in the treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC)?

Colorectal cancer is the fourth most common cancer and the second leading cause of cancer death in the United States. Accumulating evidence indicates that postmenopausal hormone therapy may reduce the risk of colorectal cancer in women.

Owing to the wide spread perception of a possible benefit from paclitaxel in the second-line situation the Nordic Gynecologic Oncology Group (NGOG) conducted two prospective phase II studies of paclitaxel single agent treatment (175 mg/m2, three-hour i.v. infusion with standard pre-medication every third week) in patients with relapsing or progressing epithelial ovarian cancer following platinum.

A meta-analysis of 55 prospective randomized clinical trials including more than 37,000 patients has analyzed the effectiveness of tamoxifen in the treatment of breast cancer. Standard treatment consists of 20 mg tamoxifen daily for 5 years in patients with either a positive estrogen receptor or a positive progesterone receptor status. This treatment achieves a 50% improvement of the 5-year relapse-free survival and a 28% improvement of the overall survival. Tamoxifen is effective in lymph node-negative and lymph node-positive patients as well as in premenopausal and postmenopausal women. The combination of chemotherapy with hormonal treatment is even more effective and brings a further improvement of survival of 50%. In addition, tamoxifen reduces the number of contralateral breast cancer cases to 50%, but increase the occurrence of endometrial cancers from 1.2/1,000 breast cancer patients within 10 years to 4.4/1,000 women. In conclusion, tamoxifen 20 mg daily for 5 years is the standard treatment of hormone receptor-positive breast cancer patients.

To perform a meta-analysis to estimate the efficacy of quinolone antibiotics in preventing infections, fevers, and deaths among cancer patients neutropenic following chemotherapy.

In a prior Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB), 16% of a small cohort of patients with extensive small call lung cancer who had failed to obtain a complete remission with chemotherapy did obtain a complete remission after therapy with interleukin-2 (IL-2). In this current trial, 10 patients with extensive small cell lung cancer who had had no prior therapy were treated with subcutaneous IL-2 as induction therapy and then standard chemotherapy with etoposide/cisplatin. Only one patient experienced an objective response to the IL-2 administered prior to chemotherapy. The factors governing response to IL-2 in the first trial but not in this trial are discussed.

The administration of fluorouracil (5-FU) by continuous intravenous infusion (CI) is an alternative to the bolus administration of 5-FU in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. Although more than 1,200 patients have been enrolled onto randomized trials that compared these two treatment modalities, there is still no definitive evidence of an advantage of 5-FU CI, and the magnitude of this advantage, if any, is also controversial. A meta-analysis was performed to assess this benefit in terms of tumor response and survival, and to compare the toxicity profiles of these two modalities of administration of 5-FU.

This meta-analysis was conducted to compare the effects of single agent versus combination chemotherapy on response rate, toxicity, and survival of patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC).

P-glycoprotein (gp170; encoded by the MDR1 gene [also known as PGY1]) is a membrane protein capable of exporting a variety of anticancer drugs from cells. MDR1/gp170 expression has been studied in breast cancer, but the prevalence of this expression and its role in breast tumor drug resistance are unclear.

Gemcitabine is a novel anticancer agent showing activity with relatively mild toxicity across a range of solid tumors including non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In studies using similar doses and schedules, consistent response rates of around 20% were recorded in NSCLC. In an integrated safety study using data from 360 patients with NSCLC, gemcitabine exhibits a mild safety profile for such an active drug. Hematological toxicity is mild and short lasting, and the level of infection associated with this degree of myelosuppression was low. Mild transaminase elevations occurred frequently but were not progressive or dose limiting. There was no evidence of cumulative hepatic or renal toxicity. Nausea and vomiting were mild, rarely dose limiting and generally well controlled with standard antiemetics. Mild flu-like symptoms were experienced in a small proportion of patients and rarely resulted in discontinuation. Where edema or peripheral edema were experienced, there was no evidence of any association with cardiac, hepatic or renal failure. Hair loss was rare and there was no grade 4 alopecia. In conclusion, gemcitabine is a promising new agent in the treatment of NSCLC. Its mild toxicity which is non-overlapping with other cytotoxics has prompted investigation into its use in combination with other chemotherapy regimens.

Gemcitabine is active against non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), with single-agent response rates of 20% or more in previously untreated patients. Its mild toxicity profile suggests that it should be well tolerated by older patients. To assess the impact of age on the efficacy and tolerance of gemcitabine, the results of four phase II trials of single-agent gemcitabine for the treatment of NSCLC were analyzed retrospectively. Starting doses for gemcitabine ranged from 800 to 1,250 mg/m2/wk, and in all studies gemcitabine was administered weekly for 3 weeks followed by a 1-week rest period. Response rates, toxicity, and dose delivery were compared for two age groups, less than 65 years (255 patients) or > or = 65 years (105 patients). The pretreatment characteristics for both patient groups were well balanced. Overall response rates were 16% and 24% for the younger and older patients, respectively (P = .072). Median survival and 1-year survival rates were 8.1 months and 27% and 9.1 months and 36%, respectively, for patients aged less than 65 years and > or = 65 years. Hematologic and nonhematologic toxicities were similar for both age groups. The number of cycles associated with dose reductions or dose omissions and the mean number of treatment cycles administered were also similar. In summary, gemcitabine is active and well tolerated in elderly patients with NSCLC, and is a promising new alternative for the treatment of this patient population.

Ten years after it was demonstrated in the ferret that cisplatin-induced emesis could be blocked by the selective 5-HT3 receptor antagonist MDL 72222, 5-HT3 receptor antagonists have become routine anti-emetic agents for chemotherapy-induced emesis. However, although in association with highly emetogenic, mainly cisplatin-containing regimens, the use of these agents is well justified, the net benefit of 5-HT3 receptor antagonists in association with moderately emetogenic regimens has not been that well clarified. Here, we present an overview of 30 randomised studies comparing 5-HT3 antagonists with the conventional anti-emetics in the prophylaxis of acute vomiting induced by cytotoxic chemotherapy. A meta-analysis showed that 5-HT3 antagonists reduce the risk of acute vomiting in comparison to conventional anti-emetics both with cisplatin treatments (15 trials; odds ratio 0.60; 95% confidence interval 0.51-0.70) and with moderately emetogenic treatments (11 trials; odds ratio 0.47; 95% confidence interval 0.39-0.58). The risk of acute vomiting seems to be further reduced when 5-HT3 antagonists are combined with dexamethasone.

Because of the predictability of significant emesis after its use, cisplatin serves as the standard emetic stimulus for trials of antiemetic drugs. To define better the incidence, severity, and pattern of emesis that follows cisplatin, facilitate the testing of new agents, and obviate the need for further placebo-controlled trials for this indication, individual patient data were compiled from completed studies with placebo antiemetics and cisplatin.

To optimize fotemustine chemotherapy, the authors considered how to combine independent Phase II trials to predict the risk of first occurrence of severe toxicity as a function of initial patient characteristics.

Adjuvant tamoxifen for early breast cancer provides an improvement in relapse-free (RFS) and overall survival (OS), especially for older women. We carried out a meta-analysis to find out whether the benefit of adding chemotherapy to tamoxifen outweighs its costs in terms of toxic effects for postmenopausal patients.

Standard meta-analytical and pharmacoeconomic techniques were used to study the clinical effectiveness and the cost-effectiveness ratio of the prophylactic (or pre-emptive) administration of G-CSF to patients with small cell lung cancer treated with conventional myelosuppressive cytotoxic chemotherapy. In the first part of our study, we conducted a meta-analysis of the randomized clinical trials evaluating G-CSF for this clinical indication. Three trials were identified by our literature search and were included in the meta-analysis (overall number of patients = 606). The end-points for evaluating G-CSF included mortality from infection and the cumulative incidence of neutropenic fever over six cycles of chemotherapy. The results of our meta-analysis demonstrate that prophylactic G-CSF did not affect mortality but significantly reduced the incidence of neutropenic fever from 68.3% to 38.7% (pooled odds ratio = 0.29, 95% CI: 0.21-0.40; P < 0.001). In the second part of our study, we carried out a pharmacoeconomic analysis to estimate the cost-effectiveness ratio of pre-emptive G-CSF (i.e. the 'average' cost associated with the prevention of an episode of neutropenic fever). This cost-effectiveness ratio was US$ 14,372 using the Italian price of the drug converted into dollars, or US$ 41 088 using the US price. Finally, we estimated the revenue-neutral price of G-CSF based on American data of the cost-of-illness. The price ranged from US$ 395 to US$ 569 per cycle, a figure higher than the value (US$ 150) previously reported in the literature.

Using the technique of meta-analysis, we aim to illustrate the potential benefit, or lack of it, in adding chemotherapy to locoregional definitive treatment in a prospective randomized setting.

Two new drugs from two new chemotherapy compound families were developed concomitantly: Taxoter (docetaxel), a taxane derivate and CPT 11 (irinotecan) a topoisomerase inhibitor. Six phase I trials of Taxoter were performed. The limiting toxicity is neutropenia. The recommended dosage for phase II trial is 100 mg/m2 administered in 1 hour perfusion, every 21 days. Neutropenic fever is unfrequent. Other toxicities are mucositis, skin toxicity, hypersensibility reaction, weight gain and oedema. None of these toxicities were limiting. Six phase I studies were conducted to determine the maximum tolerated dose of CPT 11 (irinotecan). Two different schedules were studied: the weekly 30-90 minutes infusion and an infusion administered every three weeks in one day or daily over three or five consecutive days. The limiting toxicity of the weekly schedule is diarrhea. Therefore the recommended dosage is 100-150 mg/m2/week. While dose limiting toxicities in the three week schedule are diarrhea as well as neutropenia. The recommended dose is 350 mg/m2. Since diarrhea appeared to be the major problem in achieving high dose intensity with CPT 11, a dose escalation trial with drug support against diarrhea was performed. A recommended dosage of 500 mg/m2 is therefore described. These two drugs are under evaluation in a large spectrum of tumors. Their original mechanism of action suggests interesting therapeutic properties. Clinical studies in combination with other drugs are in progress to define the role of topoisomerase I inhibitors and taxane in cancer therapy.