Data from two randomized trials, evaluating a single-day regimen of palonosetron plus dexamethasone against emesis due to moderately emetogenic chemotherapy, were assessed for the impact of age on outcome in a pooled sample of women receiving anthracycline and/or cyclophosphamide (AC)-containing chemotherapy.

Zoledronic acid is widely used as adjuvant chemotherapy for the treatment of breast cancer. However, previous trials reported inconsistent findings regarding their clinical efficacy and safety. We carried out a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the effects of zoledronic acid on disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and drug-related toxicities.

To investigate the efficacy and safety of regional intra-arterial chemotherapy (RIAC) versus systemic chemotherapy for stage III/IV pancreatic cancer.

Registration of new anticancer drugs is usually based on results of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) showing improved efficacy when compared with standard therapy. There is relatively less emphasis on toxicity. In our study, we analyze serious toxicities of newly approved anticancer drugs reported in pivotal RCTs used for drug registration.

Dermatological toxicity, usually in the form of acneiform rash, is frequently observed in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with anti-EGF receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). The objective of this review was to assess the predictive value of skin rash for outcome in patients with NSCLC treated with erlotinib and gefitinib.

Toremifene (TOR) and tamoxifen (TAM) can both be used as treatments for advanced breast cancer.

This is an update of a Cochrane review that was first published in Issue 1, 2009. Gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN) is a rare but curable disease arising in the fetal chorion during pregnancy. Most women with low-risk GTN will be cured by evacuation of the uterus with or without single-agent chemotherapy. However, chemotherapy regimens vary between treatment centres worldwide and the comparable benefits and risks of these different regimens are unclear.

Pertuzumab is a novel humanized monoclonal antibody that blocks human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) dimerization. It was recently approved by the US FDA for use in combination with trastuzumab and docetaxel for patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer who have not received prior anti-HER2 therapy or chemotherapy for metastatic disease. Rash is inconsistently reported as a common adverse event in most clinical trials of pertuzumab, at varying incidences. In this study, we have investigated the overall incidence and risk of rash with pertuzumab. Relevant studies were identified from the PubMed database (1966-2012), abstracts presented at the American Society of Clinical Oncology annual conference (2004-2011), and Web of Science database (1998-2012). Eligible studies were prospective phase II-III clinical trials using pertuzumab in cancer patients. Incidence, relative risk (RR), and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using random-effects or fixed-effects models based on the heterogeneity of included studies. Data from a total of 1,726 patients (pertuzumab, n = 1,157; controls, n = 569) with breast, ovarian, and prostate cancers from eight clinical trials were included for analysis. The incidence of all-grade and high-grade rash with pertuzumab were 24.6 % (95 % CI 19.3-30.8 %) and 1.1 % (95 % CI 0.5-2.2 %), respectively. The risk varied with tumor types, as patients with prostate cancer had a lower incidence of rash (13.2 %; 95 % CI 8.0-21.1 %) than those with breast, ovarian, fallopian tube, and peritoneal cancer (P = 0.001). Overall, pertuzumab significantly increased the risk of rash in comparison with controls (RR 1.53; 95 % CI 1.12-2.09; P = 0.007). Pertuzumab is associated with a significant risk of rash, and the incidence varies among different tumor types. Prevention, early recognition, and appropriate treatment of this rash may lead to improvement in patient quality of life, adherence to therapy, and possibly optimize clinical outcomes.

The aim of the study was to perform a meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of (bortezomib plus lenalidomide/thalidomide)- vs. (bortezomib or lenalidomide/thalidomide)-containing regimens as induction therapy in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. We searched electronic and printed sources for relevant articles published. Inclusion criteria was as follows: randomized controlled trials (RCT) of (bortezomib plus lenalidomide/thalidomide) vs. (bortezomib or lenalidomide/thalidomide)-containing regimens as induction therapy in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Two reviewers independently assessed potentially eligible studies and extracted relevant data. We retrieved five RCT studies including a total of 1,200 patients. Using the random-effects model to pool the five RCT with a statistically significant heterogeneity (P = 0.03; X² = 10.69; df = 4; I² = 63%), the weighted risk ratios of a complete response (CR) for (bortezomib plus lenalidomide/thalidomide)-containing regimens was 1.81 (P = 0.005; 95% CI: 1.20-2.73). When we excluded the study by Cavo et al. (Lancet 376:2075-2085, 2010), the pooled risk ratio for CR was 1.59 (P < 0.0001, 95% CI: 1.29-1.96) with no statistically significant heterogeneity (P = 0.54; X² = 2.14; df = 3; I² = 0%) among four RCT under the fixed effects mode. The pooled odds ratio for the main grade III/IV adverse events (the peripheral neuropathy, thrombotic events, and infections) were 1.76 (P = 0.32; 95% CI: 0.58-5.31), 0.92 (P = 0.76, 95% CI: 0.52-1.61), and 1.05 (P = 0.82, 95% CI: 0.70-1.57), respectively. Our analysis showed (bortezomib plus lenalidomide/thalidomide)-containing regimens as induction treatment in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma improved CR but did not increase the risk of major adverse events (the peripheral neuropathy, thrombotic events, and infections).

We conducted a systematic review and bibliometric network analysis (SeBriNA) of rituximab for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Aromatase inhibitors (AI) are currently the first line therapy for estrogen receptor (ER)-positive postmenopausal women. De novo AI resistance is when a patient intrinsically does not respond to an AI therapy as well as other targeted endocrine therapy. To characterize this type of resistance and to examine potential therapies for treatment, we have generated two cell models for de novo resistance. These models derive from MCF-7 cells that stably overexpress aromatase and Akt (AKT-aro) or HER2 (HER2-aro). Evaluation of these cell lines revealed that the activities of aromatase and ER were inhibited by AI and ICI 187280 (ICI) treatment, respectively; however, cell growth was resistant to therapy. Proliferation in the presence of the pure anti-estrogen ICI, indicates that these cells do not require ER for cell growth and distinguishes these cells from the acquired AI resistant cells. We further determined that the HSP90 inhibitor 17-DMAG suppressed the growth of the AI-resistant cell lines studied. Our analysis revealed 17-DMAG-mediated decreased expression of growth promoting signaling proteins. It was found that de novo AI resistant AKT-aro and HER2-aro cells could not be resensitized to letrozole or ICI by treatment with 17-DMAG. In summary, we have generated two cell lines which display the characteristics of de novo AI resistance. Together, these data indicate the possibility that HSP90 inhibitors may be a viable therapy for endocrine therapy resistance although additional clinical evaluation is needed.

The clinical efficacy of glutamine in the control of chemotherapy-induced diarrhea remains controversial. We conducted a meta-analysis, including as many randomized control trails (RCTs) as possible, to clarify the effectiveness of prophylactic glutamine in patients requiring chemotherapy.

It remains disputed whether doublets are more effective than single-agent chemotherapy for elderly patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of doublets and single-agent chemotherapy for elderly patients with NSCLC.

Pre-emptive irinotecan dose reduction for UGT1A1*28 homozygotes may result in reduced risk of severe neutropenia and diarrhea. However, clinical utility and cost-effectiveness are dependent upon such a dose reduction not impacting irinotecan efficacy. Whether UGT1A1*28 genotype is associated with irinotecan response therefore is an important gap in existing knowledge to inform clinical utility.

Nanoparticulate paclitaxel carriers have entered clinical evaluation as alternatives to the Cremophor-based standard Taxol(®) (Cre-pac). Their pharmacokinetics (PK) is complex, and factors influencing their pharmacodynamics (PD) are poorly understood. We aimed to develop a unified quantitative model for 4 paclitaxel carriers that captures systems-level PK, predicts micro-scale PK processes, and permits correlations between carrier properties and observed PD.

Although Chinese herbal medicine (CHM) has been widely used as an adjunctive therapy for colorectal cancer in Asia, its efficacy is not well defined. The purpose of this systematic review is to assess the efficacy of CHM as an adjunctive therapy to chemotherapy for the patients with colorectal cancer. Randomized controlled trials with CHM to treat colorectal cancer were extensively searched in seven databases. Two researchers independently assessed the quality and validity of included trials and extracted outcome data for synthesis. 20 trials were included for analysis. Compared to using chemotherapy alone, CHM combined with chemotherapy significantly increased 1- and 3-year survival rate [odds ratio (OR) 2.41, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.32-4.41; OR 2.40, 95% CI 1.49-3.87]. The combined therapy significantly slowed colorectal cancer progression (OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.32-0.77) and improved quality of life (OR 3.43, 95% CI 2.35-5.02). It had positive effects in immunoregulation. CHM as an adjunctive therapy also had significant advantages in reducing the adverse effects of chemotherapy. This systematic review suggests that CHM as an adjunctive therapy with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone has significant efficacy in terms of prolonging survival, enhancement of tumor response, improvement of quality of life, immunoregulation, and alleviation of acute adverse effects. However, a firm conclusion could not be reached because of the poor quality of the included trials. Further trials with higher quality are required and the efficacy in other forms of advantages remains to be further determined.

We performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing thalidomide maintenance with other regimens after induction chemotherapy for multiple myeloma. Overall, 6 trials including 2786 patients were identified. Patients treated with thalidomide maintenance had marginally better overall survival (hazard ratio HR 0.83, P=0.07). The improvement was especially prominent in a subgroup of studies using corticosteroids with thalidomide (HR 0.70, P=0.02). Thalidomide improved progression-free survival (HR 0.65, P<0.01), but had more frequent venous thrombosis (risk difference 0.024, P<0.05) and peripheral neuropathy (risk difference 0.072, P<0.01). These results suggest that thalidomide maintenance with corticosteroids is effective in prolonging survival for multiple myeloma.

The standard of chemotherapy regimens for advanced or metastatic gastric cancer and the clinical outcome were heterogeneous in Asian versus non-Asian countries. This study aimed to explore predictors of safety and efficacy of chemotherapy for patients with advanced or metastatic gastric cancer.

The long-acting somatostatin analogue octreotide is used either as an adjuvant or primary therapy to lower growth hormone (GH) levels in patients with acromegaly and may also induce pituitary tumor shrinkage.

Objectives were to compare systemic mould-active vs fluconazole prophylaxis in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy or haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT).