Sentinel node biopsy may be useful in the staging of breast cancer. In experienced hands presence or absence of metastasis in the sentinel node accurately predicts the nodal status and in patients with a negative sentinel node biopsy axillary dissection may be avoided. The technique, however, shows a clear learning curve and hasty introduction may lead to an unacceptable rate of false negative biopsies. Moreover, the introduction of the technique in general practice should be well coordinated in order to prevent large differences between hospitals in the staging and treatment of breast cancer patients. On the initiative of NABON (Nationaal Borstkanker Overleg Nederland; 'national breast cancer consultation') and the Nederlandse Vereniging voor Chirurgische Oncologie (Netherlands Association for Surgical Oncology) a study group was formed to co-ordinate the introduction of the sentinel node biopsy in breast cancer patients in the Netherlands. Important topics are central registration of all procedures in order to evaluate its applicability and technical variations, the performance in each centre of at least 50 procedures together with axillary node dissection to evaluate the results before clinical application is considered, and nationwide co-ordination to find the best therapy for patients with positive sentinel nodes.

The Association of Directors of Anatomic and Surgical Pathology has developed recommendations for the surgical pathology report for common malignant tumors. The recommendations for cutaneous melanoma are reported.

The liver biopsy remains the 'gold standard' for the diagnosis of chronic hepatitis, particularly since it is the only investigation that permits assessment of the severity (grade of histological activity and stage of fibrosis) of liver injury. As outlined below, the liver biopsy is invaluable for both diagnosis and the monitoring of therapy. To optimise the value of the liver biopsy, a standardised approach for assessment and reporting of chronic hepatitis is recommended.

Should preoperative (neoadjuvant) cisplatin-based chemotherapy with or without postoperative radiotherapy be offered to patients with technically resectable stage IIIA non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) to improve survival? (Resectability should be determined preoperatively by a thoracic surgeon.)

1) Does the use of postoperative, adjuvant radiotherapy or chemotherapy, alone or in combination, improve survival rates among patients with completely resected, pathologically confirmed stage II or IIIA non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC)? 2) Does the use of radiotherapy reduce the risk of local recurrence among patients with completely resected stage II or IIIA NSCLC?

Should patients with resected stage III colon cancer receive adjuvant therapy? If so, which therapy should be recommended?

A national organized mass-screening effective programme is the only way to reduce the risk of cervical cancer, if properly organized and correlated with a system of Quality Assurance. Since 1900, an Association for Quality Assurance was created by the French pathologists, named "AFAQAP". These pathologists thus demonstrated their interest in this kind of action that should be effective if women and clinicians are also implied. The pathologists have concluded the first part of their programme with these French guidelines for internal quality control of pap smears.