Fifty patients with either lymphoid or selected solid tumor malignancies were apheresed an identical number of times for PBSC collection after being randomized to receive either G-CSF 10 microg/kg/day alone (arm I), or G-CSF at the same dose with GM-CSF 5 microg/kg/day (arm II). Growth factor(s) was/were given as the stem cell mobilizing agent for 5 days before the start of PBSC collection, and were continued throughout the 4 days of apheresis. Aspiration and cryopreservation of autologous bone marrow occurred on day 3 or 4 of growth factor(s). Thirty-one of 50 patients received one cycle only at time of evaluation, and 19 patients received two cycles of HDCT, each supported with PBSC with or without autologous bone marrow. No patients received growth factors post-autologous stem cell transplant, unless the absolute neutrophils count (ANC) failed to recover to > or = 100/microl by day +18 post-transplant. The median number of days to recovery of ANC to 100/microl, 500/microl and 1000/microl, and of platelet counts to 20000/microl, 50000/microl and 100000/microl after either cycle 1 or cycle 2 of HDCT and the number of febrile days and platelet and PRBC transfusion requirements was not significantly different between the two arms of the study. The duration of hospitalization was similar between study arms for cycle 1 of HDCT, but was 3.5 days less with arm II compared to arm I (P = 0.0248) for cycle 2 of HDCT. The bone marrow buffy coat and PBSC product mononuclear cell count (x 10(8)/kg) and CD34+ cell count (x 10(6)/kg) collected by each method of stem cell mobilization was not significantly different. There is questionable clinical benefit with PBSC products mobilized with the combination of G-CSF and GM-CSF vs G-CSF alone. Perhaps different dosages, schedules, or other growth factor combinations with G-CSF might enhance these differences.

To verify the percentage of chromosomally abnormal preimplantation embryos in patients with a poor prognosis and possibly to increase the chance of implantation by selecting chromosomally normal embryos.

Autologous transplantation for non-Hodgkins lymphoma and Hodgkin's disease is widely used as standard therapy for those with high-risk or relapsed tumor. Peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) collections have nearly completely replaced bone marrow stem cell (BMSC) harvests because of the perceived advantages of more rapid engraftment, less tumor contamination in the inoculum, and better survival after therapy. The advantage of PBSC, however, may derive from the hematopoietic stimulating cytokines used for PBSC mobilization. Therefore, we tested a randomized comparison of GM-CSF vs. G-CSF used to prime either BMSC or PBSC before collection for use in autologous transplantation. Sixty-two patients receiving transplants (31 PBSC; 31 BMSC) for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (n = 51) or Hodgkin's disease (n = 11) were treated. All patients received 6 days of randomly assigned cytokine. Those with cellular marrow in morphologic remission underwent BMSC harvest, while those with hypocellular marrow or microscopic marrow tumor involvement had PBSC collected. Neutrophil recovery was similarly rapid in all groups (median 14 days; range 10-23 days), though two patients had delayed neutrophil recovery using GM-CSF primed PBSC (p = 0.01). Red cell and platelet recovery were significantly quicker after BMSC mobilized with GM-CSF or PBSC mobilized with G-CSF. This speedier hematologic recovery resulted in earlier hospital discharge as well. However, in multivariate analysis, neither the stem cell source nor randomly assigned G-CSF vs. GM-CSF was independently associated with earlier multilineage hematologic recovery or shorter hospital stay. Relapse-free survival was not independently affected by either the assigned stem cell source or the randomly assigned priming cytokine, though malignant relapse was more frequent in those assigned to PBSC (RR of relapse 3.15, p = 0.03). These data document that BMSC, when collected following cytokine priming, can yield a similarly rapid hematologic recovery and short hospital stay compared with cytokine-primed PBSC. Using primed BMSC, no difference in malignant relapse or relapse-free survival was observed. These findings suggest that despite widespread use of PBSC for transplantation, BMSC, when collected following hematopoietically stimulating cytokines, may remain a satisfactory source of stem cells for autologous transplantation. G-CSF and GM-CSF are both effective in priming autologous PBSC or BMSC for collection.

Administration of hematopoietic growth factors is being used increasingly to obtain populations of blood progenitor/stem cells (PBPC) for clinical transplantation. Here we examined the effect of combining stem cell factor (SCF ) and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF ) versus G-CSF alone in a randomized clinical study involving 62 women with early-stage breast cancer. In the first patient cohorts, escalating doses of SCF were administered for 7 days with concurrent G-CSF administration. At baseline, levels of progenitor cells in the bone marrow or blood were comparable in the different patient groups. As with administration of G-CSF alone, the combination of SCF plus G-CSF did not alter the wide variation in levels of PBPC observed between individuals and did not alter the selective nature of PBPC release, with preferential release of day-14 granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CFC) versus day-7 GM-CFC. However, SCF acted to sustain the levels of PBPC after cessation of growth factor treatment; levels of PBPC were elevated 100-fold at later timepoints compared with G-CSF alone. In addition, the maximum levels of PBPC observed were increased approximately fivefold at day 5 of growth-factor administration. The increased levels of PBPC resulted in significantly increased levels of PBPC obtained by leukapheresis. In a subsequent patient cohort, 3-days pretreatment with SCF was introduced and followed by 7 days concurrent SCF plus G-CSF. The 3-days pretreatment with SCF resulted in an earlier wave of PBPC release in response to commencement of G-CSF. In addition, maximum PBPC levels in blood and PBPC yield in leukapheresis products were further increased. Unexpectedly however, SCF pretreatment resulted in progenitor cells with enhanced self-generation potential. Recloning assays documented the ability of approximately 30% of primary granulocyte-macrophage (GM) colonies from control cell populations to generate secondary GM colonies (n = 1,106 primary colonies examined). In contrast approximately 90% of GM colonies from PBPC after SCF pretreatment generated secondary clones and 65% generated secondary colonies. The action of SCF was not explicable in terms of altered SCF, GM-CSF, or G-CSF responsiveness, but SCF pretreatment was associated with maximum serum SCF levels at the time G-CSF was commenced. These results show that PBPC populations mobilized by different growth factor regimens can differ in their functional properties and caution against solely considering number of harvested progenitor cells without regard to their function.

Since reduced marrow cellularity and prolonged pancytopenia following autologous bone marrow transplantation (ABMT) have been frequently observed in patients with acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) included in the AML10 GIMEMA/EORTC trial, the question was raised to what extent hematopoietic and microenvironmental progenitor cells were involved in these patients. Marrow hematopoietic progenitors were investigated by a short-term methylcellulose assay quantitating multipotent CFU-Mix, erythroid BFU-E and granulocyte-macrophage CFU-GM, as well as a long-term assay quantitating long-term culture-initiating cells (LTC-IC). The marrow microenvironment was studied by evaluating the incidence of fibroblastoid progenitors (CFU-F) and the capacity of stromal layers to support allogeneic hematopoietic progenitors. As compared to normal controls (n = 57), AML patients (n = 26) showed a statistically significant reduction of the mean (+/-s.e.m.) number of CFU-Mix (5.3 +/- 0.6 vs 0.8 +/- 0.2, P < or = 0.0001), BFU-E (68 +/- 5 vs 20 +/- 4, P < or = 0.0001), CFU-GM (198 +/- 11 vs 144 +/- 15, P < or = 0.008), and LTC-IC (302 +/- 46 vs 50 +/- 8, P < or = 0.001). The mean (+/-s.e.m.) incidence of marrow CFU-F was not significantly reduced as compared to normal controls (48 +/- 6 vs 52 +/- 7, P < or = 0.73). Seventeen AML stromal layers were tested for their capacity to support the growth of allogeneic hematopoietic progenitors. Seven samples failed to support any progenitor cell growth, seven had a significantly lower supportive activity as compared to normal stromal layers (13 +/- 5 vs 249 +/- 56, P < or = 0.002), whereas three cultures could not be analyzed due to contamination. In conclusion, induction and consolidation regimens used in AML patients of the AML10 protocol induce a markedly defective in vitro growth of primitive hematopoietic progenitors and a severe functional defect of marrow stroma. The association of hematopoietic with microenvironmental damage might play a key role in the delayed hematopoietic regeneration observed following ABMT in patients of the AML10 trial.

In vitro studies indicate that lenograstim (glycosylated G-CSF) is more potent than filgrastim (nonglycosylated G-CSF) on a weight for weight basis. However, such a difference has not yet been shown in vivo. The primary objective of this trial was to compare the efficacy of equivalent doses (microgram) of lenograstim and filgrastim in mobilizing CD34+ cells. Thirty-two healthy male volunteers, median age 27 yr (19-44 yr), were randomized to receive either lenograstim 10 micrograms/kg followed by filgrastim 10 micrograms/kg or vice versa with a washout period of a minimum 4 wk. Both drugs were administered as s.c. injections once daily for 5 d (d 1-5). CD34+ cells were mobilized with a similar kinetics, peaking at median d 6 (5-6) for both drugs. A significant difference in favour of lenograstim was shown for peak number of CD34+ cells/microliter blood (104 +/- 38 vs. 82 +/- 35, mean +/- 1 SD, p < 0.0001, paired t-test, n = 30) and number of CFU-GM/microliter blood at d 6 (14.6 +/- 8.4 vs. 10.2 +/- 4.6, p < 0.0001), respectively. There was no difference in the d 6 number of CD3+ cells. Both drugs were generally well tolerated and did not differ with respect to number of adverse events. In conclusion, lenograstim 10 micrograms/kg/d mobilizes PBPC more efficiently than the identical dose of filgrastim, indicating a difference in in vivo potency between the two G-CSFs.

To explore into the theoretical basis of Busui Shengxue Capsule (BSSXC) in treating chronic aplastic anemia (CAA).

A cross-over study of glycosylated and non-glycosylated G-CSF was performed in 20 healthy male volunteers to compare the effects of the different forms of G-CSF, the extent of inter-individual progenitor cell mobilization and to determine whether any differences observed were related to the serum concentrations of G-CSF attained. The peak WBC achieved during 6 d of G-CSF administration at a dose of 5 microg/kg/d was significantly higher with the glycosylated than the non-glycosylated product (P = 0.02) as was the peak level of granulocyte-monocyte colony forming cells (GM-CFC) (P=0.03). The average GM-CFC count on days 5, 6 and 7 was 28% higher with the glycosylated product (P=0.003). Serum concentrations of G-CSF achieved were significantly higher with the non-glycosylated G-CSF, however, suggesting that the difference in bio-efficacy was not due to a difference in G-CSF stability. Marked inter-individual variation in progenitor mobilization was observed, but this was not related to serum G-CSF levels. The G-CSF concentrations on day 6 were approximately one third of those on day 1, with both forms of G-CSF.

Although a large amount of data is available on the effects of filgrastim (granulocyte colony-stimulating factor [G-CSF]) on the mobilization of stem cells in the circulation, data concerning its effects on bone marrow (BM) harvesting is scarce and controversial. We have designed a randomized trial comparing filgrastim-mobilized peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) transplantation with filgrastim-primed autologous bone marrow transplantation (ABMT). Fifty-five patients affected by non-Hodgkin's (n = 38) or Hodgkin's (n = 17) lymphoma, selected for autologous transplantation over a 12-month period in a single institution, were randomized 2:1 to undergo BM or PB harvest/collection after priming for 3 days with filgrastim, 16 microg/kg body weight daily subcutaneously. BM priming with G-CSF allowed the harvest of a significantly higher number of mononuclear cells (MNC) (0.53 x 10(8)/kg, range, 0.32 to 1.40), as compared with a historical control of unprimed BM harvests (0.43 x 10(8) MNC/kg, range, 0.15 to 0.72, P = .001). After high-dose ablative therapy, median time to neutrophil recovery above 0.5 x 10(9)/L was 12 days for BM and 11 days for PB (P = .219); median time to platelet recovery above 20 x 10(9)/L was 13 days for BM and 11 days for PB (P = .242). The same number of red blood cells, platelet transfusions, and posttransplant G-CSF doses were required in the two groups of patients. Less patients (50% v 70%) became febrile in the group transplanted with mobilized PB, but days of fever/patient and days on antibiotics were overlapping. The median time spent in the hospital after reinfusion was 16.5 and 15.5 days after primed BM and primed PB, respectively (P = .134). These data suggest that in patients with lymphoma submitted to autologous transplantation, the reinfusion of filgrastim-primed BM or filgrastim-mobilized PB leads to similar results, with an advantage of only 1 day in the neutrophil recovery and 1 day on the time spent in the hospital in favor of primed PB. Either option can be chosen on the basis of the availability of a surgery room or cell separator facilities and considering the patients' characteristics and wishes.

To explore the effective method in treating infantile chronic aplastic anemia (ICAA) by using traditional Chinese medicine (TCM).

In order to investigate the effect of human Fallopian tube epithelial cell co-culture on fertilization and cleavage rates in tubal, male and unexplained infertility, oocytes collected from 91 patients were randomized to wells containing Fallopian tube epithelial cell monolayers or conventional culture medium, and inseminated with spermatozoa. Fertilization and cleavage were assessed at 18 and 52 h, respectively. Co-culture significantly increased the fertilization rates over the control values in male infertility (41.67 versus 23.43%, P = 0.00005), but not in tubal infertility (69.33 versus 67.93%) or unexplained infertility (65.93 versus 54.36%). Cleavage rates were not different in co-culture and conventional in-vitro fertilization systems in any of the infertility subgroups. The number of blastomeres was significantly higher in the co-culture group on the day of embryo transfer (3.63 +/- 1.12 versus 3.04 +/- 1.26, P < 0.001). Pregnancy rates were similar in all infertility subgroups. There was no significant association between the number of co-cultured embryos transferred and the pregnancy, abortion and multiple pregnancy rates. It was concluded that human Fallopian tube epithelial cell co-culture clearly improves fertilization rates in male infertility but not in tubal or unexplained infertility. Improved fertilization rates in co-culture may be due to positive effect of co-culture on impaired sperm function.

The most important physiological regulator of megakaryocytopoiesis is the ligand for the c-mpl receptor (thrombopoietin/megakaryocyte growth and development factor, MGDF). We examined the effect of pegylated-recombinant human MGDF (PEG-rHuMGDF): patients received PEG-rHuMGDF at doses of 0.03, 0.1, 0.3 or 1.0 microg/kg/d or placebo for 10d maximum in a double-blinded randomized study. There was a dose-dependent elevation in circulating platelet counts but no alteration in erythrocyte or total leucocyte counts. The number of bone marrow megakaryocytes was increased approximately 2-fold. The frequency of bone marrow progenitor cells was not altered. In contrast, both to the bone marrow results and to published pre-clinical data, there was a dose-dependent mobilization into the blood of progenitor cells of multiple cell lineages. Increased levels of Meg-CFC (maximum increase 30-fold), day 7 and day 14 GM-CFC and BFU-E were demonstrated at doses of 0.3 and 1.0 microg/kg/d PEG-rHuMGDF. At 0.1 microg/kg/d, mobilization of Meg-CFC alone occurred in two-thirds of patients. Maximum blood levels of progenitor cells occurred at day 12. Thus, administration of PEG-rHuMGDF to humans resulted in mobilization of progenitor cells of multiple lineages despite its 'lineage-specific' activity on mature cell development.

To ensure that a sufficient number of CD34+ cells are collected for an allogeneic blood progenitor cell transplant, the most effective blood cell separator should be used to collect peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) components. We compared the effectiveness of two blood cell separators. We gave 29 healthy people 7.5 or 10 micrograms kg-1 of granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) daily for 5 days and collected one PBSC component with either a Fenwal CS3000 (n = 15) or a Cobe Spectra (n = 14) blood cell separator. The volume of blood processed was the same for each machine (8.4 +/- 1.0 L; range = 4.9-9.4 L for the CS3000 and 8.9 +/- 1.0 L; range 6.7-10.9 L; P = 0.71). The components collected with the CS3000 contained more mononuclear cells (39.6 +/- 21.9 x 10(9) compared with 26.9 +/- 5.6 x 10(9), P = 0.02) and fewer neutrophils (1.38 +/- 1.88 x 10(9) compared with 5.53 +/- 8.71 x 10(9), P = 0.001). The total number of CD34+ cells collected with the two instruments was the same (470 +/- 353 x 10(6) for the CS3000 and 419 +/- 351 x 10(6) for the Spectra; P = 0.64) as was the number of CD34+ cells collected per litre of whole blood processed (55.9 +/- 42.0 x 10(6) L-1 compared with 45.9 +/- 37.9 x 10(6) L-1; P = 0.59). The mononuclear cell collection efficiency was greater for the CS3000 (82.4 +/- 54.9% compared with 53.3 +/- 14.1; P = 0.04) but the CD34+ cell collection efficiencies were the same (87.4 +/- 61.1% for the CS3000 compared with 56.3 +/- 23.5% for the Spectra; P = 0.07). In conclusion, both blood cell separators collected components which contained large numbers of CD34+ cells, but those collected with the CS3000 contained fewer neutrophils and the CS3000 was more efficient at collecting mononuclear cells.

Peripheral blood is rapidly replacing bone marrow as a source of hematopoietic progenitor cells for autologous transplantation. The advantages of peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation are enhanced by the ability to collect sufficient progenitor cells to ensure rapid neutrophil and platelet recovery in a single procedure on some cell separators.

A study of bone marrow morphology and apoptosis was undertaken in 51 patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) treated with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and erythropoietin (EPO). In 19 of these patients (37%), a significant improvement in the hemoglobin level was found after treatment. Apoptosis was measured using a nick-end labeling (TUNEL) technique. Patients with MDS had a significantly higher percentage of labelled (apoptotic) cells in the bone marrow compared to healthy individuals (56.3 +/- 3.8% vs. 16.2 +/- 1.4%, p = 0.0001). Patients with RAS showed a lower percentage of apoptotic cells than patients with RA (68.5 +/- 9% vs. 46.5 +/- 4.8%, p < 0.05), while patients with RAEB did not differ significantly from either RA or RAS. In the patients who responded to treatment, the bone marrow samples displayed significant morphological changes. The percentages of erythroid precursors and myeloblasts were reduced after treatment, and patients who had ring sideroblasts before treatment also showed a reduction in the percentage of these cells. Total erythroid index also decreased in responding patients. The percentage of apoptotic cells decreased significantly in responding patients (58.8 +/- 4.8% before treatment vs. 44.5 +/- 5.5% after treatment, mean reduction 18.3%, p = 0.0003), whereas no significant change was found in non-responding patients. Our results suggest that one important mechanism behind the positive effects of treatment with G-CSF and EPO is a reduction in the degree of ineffective hematopoiesis in MDS.

To examine the safety and efficacy of recombinant-methionyl human stem cell factor (r-metHuSCF), 38 patients with intermediate-grade or immunoblastic high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma who were eligible for autologous transplantation were randomized to receive r-metHuSCF (5, 10, 15, or 20 microg/kg/d) plus Filgrastim (10 microg/kg/d) or Filgrastim (10 microg/kg/d) alone to mobilize peripheral blood progenitor cells. Subcutaneous administration of r-metHuSCF was well tolerated in conjunction with a multi-agent pre-medication regimen; local injection site reactions were the most commonly seen adverse event. The total mononuclear cell count, CD34+ cell content, granulocyte-macrophage colony-forming cells (GM-CFC), and burst-forming units-erythroid (BFU-E) per kilogram in the apheresis product was similar when all patients were analyzed by treatment cohort and mobilization regimen (Filgrastim or r-metHuSCF in combination with Filgrastim); however, when prior chemotherapy was taken into account in a supplementary analysis, clinically important differences were observed. Extensive prior therapy was defined as the amount of exposure to specific stem cell toxic chemotherapeutic agents that patients received. These agents include procarbazine, nitrogen mustard, melphalan, nitrosoureas (> or = 2 cycles of any of these drugs) or greater than 7.5 g of cytosine arabinoside. In these patients, there was an increased number of CD34+ cells (1.76 v 0.28 x 10(6)/kg), GM-CFC (20.5 v 5.0 x 10(4)/kg), and BFU-E (36.9 v 8.9 x 10(4)/kg) in patients receiving r-metHuSCF and Filgrastim (N = 18) compared with Filgrastim alone (N = 5). These patients also had a decreased time to an untransfused platelet count of 20 x 10(9)/L that was 10.5 days shorter in the patients who received r-metHuSCF and Filgrastim (12.5 v 23 days). These differences were not found to be statistically significant, possibly because of small size, but are clinically important.

Thrombocytopenia caused by chemotherapy is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in the treatment of malignant disease. Recombinant human megakaryocyte growth and development factor (PEG-rHuMGDF) is a potent stimulator of megakaryocytopoiesis and prevents chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia in preclinical studies. We administered PEG-rHuMGDF with filgrastim after dose-intensive chemotherapy to 41 patients with advanced cancers to determine its safety and effects on hematologic recovery. Carboplatin 600 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 1,200 mg/m2 were administered to patients with advanced cancer. Patients were randomly assigned to receive blinded study drug, either PEG-rHuMGDF or placebo (3-to-1 ratio), commencing the day after chemotherapy. PEG-rHuMGDF was given at doses of 0.03, 0.1, 0.3, 1.0, 3.0, and 5.0 microg per kilogram body weight by daily subcutaneous injection for between 7 and 20 days. All patients received concurrent filgrastim 5 microg per kilogram body weight per day until neutrophil recovery. Fifteen patients had received PEG-rHuMGDF alone in a previous phase I study. Platelet function and peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) were assessed. PEG-rHuMGDF enhanced platelet recovery in a dose-related manner when compared with placebo. The platelet nadir occurred earlier in patients given PEG-rHuMGDF (P = .002) but there was no difference in the depth of the nadir. Recovery to baseline platelet count was achieved significantly earlier following PEG-rHuMGDF administration compared with placebo (median, 17 days for PEG-rHuMGDF 0.3 to 5.0 microg/kg versus 22 days for placebo, P = .014). In addition, platelet recovery was faster in patients who had previously received PEG-rHuMGDF, suggesting that pretreatment might be beneficial. Platelet function did not change during or after administration of PEG-rHuMGDF. Levels of PBPC on day 15 after chemotherapy were significantly greater in patients administered PEG-rHuMGDF 0.3 to 5.0 microg/kg and filgrastim compared with those given placebo plus filgrastim. PEG-rHuMGDF was well tolerated at all doses. Two patients given PEG-rHuMGDF had a thrombotic episode. PEG-rHuMGDF accelerates platelet recovery after moderately dose-intensive carboplatin and cyclophosphamide, and is likely to be clinically useful in treatment of chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia. Because it enhances mobilization of PBPC by filgrastim, PEG-rHuMGDF might also allow more efficient collection of stem cells for autologous or allogeneic transplantation.

Autologous transplantation using bone marrow stem cells (BMSC) or peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) is widely used for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) and Hodgkin's disease (HD). We report a randomized, comparative trial comparing BMSC vs. non-mobilized PBSC for responsive NHL or HD. Patients randomized to BMSC (n = 13) vs. PBSC (n = 15) had more rapid neutrophil recovery (median 23 vs. 30 days), RBC independence (25 vs. 62 days), platelet independence (24 vs. 54 days), and shorter hospital stay. However, neither relapse, overall survival, nor relapse-free survival were different receiving BMSC vs. PBSC (all P > .7). Concurrently, 54 others (34 BMSC, 20 PBSC) were assigned non-randomly because of resistant disease or marrow unsuitable for harvest and similar patterns of engraftment favoring BMSC over PBSC were observed. In the entire group, BMSC transplantation (n = 47) led to quicker neutrophil recovery (P = .02), RBC (P = .06), and platelet independence (P =.04) and earlier hospital discharge (P = .02) vs. PBSC (n = 35). No difference in relapse, overall, or relapse-free survival were observed using BMSC vs. PBSC. These data suggest that non-mobilized PBSC are a satisfactory alternative to BMSC in patients with unsuitable marrow; however, transplantation with non-mobilized PBSC was associated with slower hematologic recovery, and longer hospital stay. No difference in tumor recurrence rates was observed between the PBSC or BMSC recipients. Unprimed PBSC transplantation offered no clinical advantage to BMSC.