1. [Effects of extended aromatase inhibitors in women with hormone-dependent breast cancer who have already received five years of adjuvant hormone therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis].
作者: Kossi Clément Trenou.;Miceline Mésidor.;Caroline Diorio.;Aida Eslami.;Denis Talbot.
来源: Bull Cancer. 2024年111卷4期356-362页
Evaluating the benefits and risks of prolonged hormonal treatment with aromatase inhibitors (AIs) for treating hormone-dependent breast cancer.
2. [Good clinical practice in nutritional management of head and neck cancer patients].
作者: J Meuric.;V Garabige.;M P Blanc-Vincent.;Y Lallemand.;P Bachmann.
来源: Bull Cancer. 1999年86卷10期843-54页
The "Standards, Options and Recommendations" (SOR) project, started in 1993, is a collaboration between the Federation of the French Cancer Centres (FNCLCC), the 20 French Cancer Centres and specialists from French Public Universities, General Hospitals and Private Clinics. The main objective is the development of clinical practice guidelines to improve the quality of health care and outcome for cancer patients. The methodology is based on literature review and critical appraisal by a multidisciplinary group of experts, with feedback from specialists in cancer care delivery.
3. [Standards, options and recommendations: concomitant radiochemotherapy for cancer of the cervix: a critical analysis of the literature and update of SOR].
作者: C Haie-Meder.;B Fervers.;J Chauvergne.;E Fondrinier.;C Lhommé.;J P Guastalla.;M Resbeut.
来源: Bull Cancer. 1999年86卷10期829-41页
The "Standards, Options and Recommendations" (SOR) project, started in 1993, is a collaboration between the National Federation of the French Cancer Centres (FNCLCC), the 20 French Cancer Centres (CRLCC) and specialists from French public universities, general hospitals and private clinics. The main objective is the development of clinical practice guidelines to improve the quality of health care and outcome for cancer patients. The methodology is based on literature review and critical appraisal by a multidisciplinary group of experts, with feedback from specialists in cancer care delivery.
4. [Taxotere (docetaxel) and CPT 11 (irinotecan): phase I trials].
Two new drugs from two new chemotherapy compound families were developed concomitantly: Taxoter (docetaxel), a taxane derivate and CPT 11 (irinotecan) a topoisomerase inhibitor. Six phase I trials of Taxoter were performed. The limiting toxicity is neutropenia. The recommended dosage for phase II trial is 100 mg/m2 administered in 1 hour perfusion, every 21 days. Neutropenic fever is unfrequent. Other toxicities are mucositis, skin toxicity, hypersensibility reaction, weight gain and oedema. None of these toxicities were limiting. Six phase I studies were conducted to determine the maximum tolerated dose of CPT 11 (irinotecan). Two different schedules were studied: the weekly 30-90 minutes infusion and an infusion administered every three weeks in one day or daily over three or five consecutive days. The limiting toxicity of the weekly schedule is diarrhea. Therefore the recommended dosage is 100-150 mg/m2/week. While dose limiting toxicities in the three week schedule are diarrhea as well as neutropenia. The recommended dose is 350 mg/m2. Since diarrhea appeared to be the major problem in achieving high dose intensity with CPT 11, a dose escalation trial with drug support against diarrhea was performed. A recommended dosage of 500 mg/m2 is therefore described. These two drugs are under evaluation in a large spectrum of tumors. Their original mechanism of action suggests interesting therapeutic properties. Clinical studies in combination with other drugs are in progress to define the role of topoisomerase I inhibitors and taxane in cancer therapy.
5. [Role of ondansetron in oncology].
The aim of this paper is to compare ondansetron to other antiemetic products used in cancerology. Twenty randomised trials studying ondansetron, and published in international reviews, were analyzed and synthesized. The conclusion is that ondansetron is of demonstrated short term efficiency. It seems to be slightly more efficient than metoclopramide, and its association with dexamethasone increases its efficiency. Doses of 8 mg or 24 mg do not differ from doses of 32 mg, and bolus administration from infusion administration. There are no data on the duration of the protection after the first course of chemotherapy.
|