Melanoma is a skin cancer whose incidence is increasing steadily. The recent discovery of frequent and recurrent genetic alterations in cutaneous melanoma allowed a molecular classification of tumors into distinct subgroups, and paved the way for targeted therapy. Several signaling pathways are involved in the progression of this disease with oncogenic mutations affecting signaling pathways: MAPK, PI3K, cAMP and cyclin D1/CDK4. In each of these pathways, several potential therapeutic targets have been identified and specific inhibitors have already been developed and have shown clinical efficacy. The use of these inhibitors is often conditioned by tumors genotyping. In France, melanomas genotyping is supported by the platforms of the National Cancer Institute (INCA), which implemented a national program ensuring access to innovation for personalized medicine. The identification of new targets in melanoma supplies a very active dynamic development of innovative molecules contributing to changing the therapeutic landscape of this pathology.

Metastatic melanoma has been a very poor prognostic cancer with a median of survival between six to eight months. A lot of new therapies have been discovered these last years. Two types of treatment have emerged: immunotherapy and targeted therapy. Targeted therapies have been developed because of the discovery of new oncogenic mutations with a big impact of melanoma development. The efficacy is great with a high overall response and a good tolerance. However, most of patients escape in few months of targeted therapy. The sequence of drug using and their combination are the question for the next years.

Metastatic melanoma treatment has been radically modified over the last four years with the emergence of new and effective therapeutic strategies targeted anti-BRAF therapies as well as immunotherapy. Following this latter immunotherapy strategy, anti-CTLA4 antibody ipilimumab demonstrated a benefit in terms of overall survival in patients with metastatic melanoma and is now challenged by other checkpoint inhibitors, antibodies directed against PD-1 and PD-L1 that have extremely promising benefit/risk ratio. Adverse events as well as evaluation criteria are different from the ones associated with classical chemotherapy or targeted therapies. The challenge for the next years will be to optimize these new strategies, by possibly using these new drugs sequentially or in combination for a higher clinical benefit for our patients.

High rates of early colorectal cancers (CRC) are observed in Tunisia suggesting genetic susceptibility. Nevertheless, up to now no molecular studies have been performed in the Tunisian population.

BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations account for 40% of cancer predisposition gene mutations identified in the current French diagnostic setting. The proteins encoded by these genes are implicated in DNA repair pathways. As a result, loss of BRCA1 or BRCA2 function may modify chemo-sensitivity. This literature review aims to determine whether BRCA1 mutation status should influence the choice of systemic treatment in breast cancer. Fourteen articles and four abstracts from 12 retrospective analyses and 6 prospective studies were identified in the literature review. CMF-type and taxane-based protocols appear to be insufficiently effective, while anthracycline activity does not seem to be affected by BRCA1 status. BRCA1-mutated tumours appear to be highly sensitive to platinum, in both the neoadjuvant and metastatic setting. Olaparib, a PARP inhibitor, has only been evaluated in one study in metastatic patients, with promising results. The presence of a BRCA1 mutation can lead to an adaptation of therapies in the metastatic stages in breast cancer. The rapid identification of BRCA1 mutations and the adaptation of treatment according to this status in the (neo)adjuvant setting is likely to become a reality in the coming years.

In clinical oncology, obtaining sequence data from tumour samples has become practical in terms of logistics, turnover time and costs. The major issue now is the interpretation of this sequence to define actionable targets, i.e. genome changes that are involved in tumorogenesis and that predict the efficacy of existing and available targeted treatments. This is the focus of major efforts from public clinical centres and from companies that see it as a promising commercial activity.

Genetic markers are now widely used in the clinics, particularly in cancer patient management. Indeed, these tumor markers can help in the diagnosis and prognosis of the disease, and provide valuable information for treatment orientation in the context of personalized medicine. The presence of circulating cell-free tumor DNA (cftDNA) and thus of tumor markers in the blood can be considered to partly avoid the use of solid biopsies. The use of blood samples, as liquid biopsies, is less invasive and described as more representative of tumor heterogeneity. However, cftDNA can be found in blood in low proportion that can vary according to the nature and the progression of the tumor. For these reasons, the use of highly sensitive, specific and ideally quantitative methods for its detection are required. These requirements constituted until recently a technological limit, which now can be overcome thanks to digital PCR. This technology could now become a very efficient and non-invasive tool in oncology, complementary to conventional diagnostic techniques.

Fertility preservation has become the second major objective in association with the remission, in young patients suffering from breast cancer. Patients should be referred for oncofertility counseling, as soon as possible after the diagnosis. A multidisciplinary approach, involving oncologists, reproductive endocrinologists and embryologists will allow an optimal strategy according to patients' age, the ovarian reserve and the cancer treatments. The field of fertility preservation is improving and offers more and more flexible techniques. Oocyte vitrification is no more considered experimental. Ovarian stimulation combining exogenous FSH and aromatase inhibitors may be the optimal strategy of fertility preservation, while maintaining physiologic serum estradiol levels. In vitro maturation of oocyte may offer an interesting option, possibly in combination with ovarian tissue cryopreservation, in case of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy. All these techniques should not be considered only as a frozen hope but should be part of the treatment of young patients.

The incidence of glioblastoma increases with age, with a median age, at diagnosis, of 65 years. Indeed, the optimization of standard of care of elderly glioblastoma patients in an aging population in Western countries becomes crucial. The age remains the main prognostic factor of glioblastoma. Survival among elderly patients is significantly less than among younger patients. The median survival of elderly glioblastoma patients is generally inferior to 6 months. More aggressive tumor behavior, less aggressive treatments, increased toxicity of therapies and more unfavorable clinical factors and comorbidities could explain a higher severity of the disease in the elderly. The balance between treatment efficacy and quality of life is a major focus because of the shorter life expectancy of patients. The standard of care of glioblastoma in elderly patients remains controversial. Large optimal resection, when achievable, should be preferred to biopsy. Survival is longer after adjuvant radiotherapy, either normofractionated over 6-weeks course or hypofractionated over 3-weeks course, for patients with good clinical status. Hypofractionation is often preferred because of shorter procedure. Chemotherapy alone with temozolomide can be proposed to patients with methylated MGMT promoter. A phase III randomized study, testing short-course adjuvant radiotherapy with or without temozolomide in elderly patients with good clinical status, is ongoing.

In France, endometrial cancer is at the first rank of gynecological cancers for cancer incidence, before ovarian and cervical cancers. In fact, the number of incident cases has been estimated to 7275 for the year 2012; the number of death due to endometrial cancer to 2025. This cancer is hormone-dependent and endogenous (reproductive factors) or exogenous (oral combined contraceptives, hormone replacement therapy) causes of exposition to estrogens are the major environmental risk factors for both types of endometrial cancers: type I or well-differentiated endometrioid adenocarcinomas; and type II including all other histological types: papillary serous adenocarcinomas, clear cell adenocarcinomas and carcinosarcomas, also known as malignant mixed Mullerian tumor, MMMT. Obesity, diabetes mellitus and adjuvant treatment of breast cancer with tamoxifen are also associated with an increased risk of endometrial cancer. Genetic factors may also be implicated in the pathogenesis of endometrial cancer either as "minor genetic factors" (susceptibility factors), which remain largely unknown and are responsible for the increased observed risk in relatives of women affected with endometrial cancer; or as major genetic factors responsible for hereditary forms and namely for Lynch syndrome whose genetic transmission is of autosomic dominant type. The appropriate recognition of Lynch syndrome is of critical importance because affected patients and their relatives should benefit from specific care. The aims of this review is to describe major environmental and genetic risk factors for endometrial cancer with specific attention to most recent advances in this field and to describe recommendations for care of at-risk women.

For several years, the identification of molecular sequencing alterations has considerably changed the perception and treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). These alterations have been defined as "driver mutations", such as mutations in EGFR and EML4-ALK fusion gene, and are highly sensitive to specific therapies. Other targets have also been identified recently. Personalized medicine is now a reality for patients with advanced NSCLC on the basis of routine screening for EGFR, HER2, KRAS, BRAF, PI3KCA mutations and EML4-ALK rearrangement. This article describes identified biomarkers, available targeted therapies, and the main clinical research approaches in NSCLC.

Urinary bladder tumors are mainly of urothelial type. Classifications include stage and grade to provide with the required prognostic factors and help to select the most adequate treatment. Though somatic mutations in bladder tumors are known, their used for targeted therapy are restricted to clinical trials. Upper urinary tract tumors are classified as urinary bladder tumor at histological level, but tumor staging is specified according to calyx, renal pelvis or ureter location; in young patients with upper urinary tract tumor, a Lynch syndrome should be eliminated.

Melanomas have a high rate of brain metastases. Both the functional prognosis and the overall survival are poor in these patients. Until now, surgery and radiotherapy represented the two main modalities of treatment. Nevertheless, due to the improvement in the management of the extracerebral melanoma, the systemic treatment may be an option in patients with brain metastases. Immunotherapy with anti-CTLA4 (cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4) - ipilimumab - or BRAF (serine/threonine-protein kinase B-raf) inhibitors - vemurafenib, dabrafenib - has shown efficacy in the management of brain metastases in a- or pauci-symptomatic patients. Studies are ongoing with anti-PD1 (programmed cell death 1) and combinations of targeted therapies associating anti-RAF (raf proto-oncogene, serine/threonine kinase) and anti-MEK (mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase).