The Pediatric Hodgkin Consortium hypothesized that by increasing chemotherapeutic dose density for Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) they could increase the complete response (CR) rate among patients with favorable-risk HL after 8 weeks of Stanford V (vinblastine, doxorubicin, vincristine, bleomycin, mechlorethamine, etoposide and prednisone) compared with 8 weeks of VAMP (vinblastine, Adriamycin [doxorubicin], methotrexate, and prednisone). This would translate to a decrease in patients who required radiation therapy (RT) to achieve a cure. The HOD08 study was a phase 2 multicenter, investigator-initiated single-arm trial for patients aged ≤21 years with previously untreated stage 1A or 2A HL without mediastinal bulk or extranodal disease extension and <3 sites of disease. Treatment consisted of a modified 8-week Stanford V regimen. Modified, tailored, field RT was administered only to disease sites achieving less than a CR. The primary objective was to increase CR rate after 8 weeks of chemotherapy by at least 20% (from an estimated 44% to 64%) compared with patients treated on a previous trial (HOD99). HOD08 enrolled 85 patients with HL and 72 were evaluable for the primary objective, of whom 55 (76.4%) achieved a CR at all sites and did not receive RT. The 5-year event-free survival and overall survival rates for the entire cohort were 87.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 80.4-95.0) and 98.7% (95% CI, 96.2-100), respectively. A dose-dense modified Stanford V regimen reduced the proportion of pediatric patients with low-risk HL who received RT while maintaining excellent outcomes. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00846742.

Many patients receiving frontline tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) for chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML-CP) experience inadequate disease control and/or adverse events (AEs) that impair quality of life. Treatments offering optimal efficacy, safety, and tolerability will support long-term therapy. In the primary analysis from the ASC4FIRST trial, a phase 3 randomized trial comparing asciminib with investigator-selected TKIs (IS-TKIs) in newly diagnosed CML-CP, asciminib demonstrated superior efficacy vs all IS-TKIs and vs imatinib in the imatinib stratum, meeting both primary objectives. In the secondary analysis (2.2 years' median follow-up), major molecular response (MMR) rate at week 96 was 74.1% with asciminib vs 52.0% with IS-TKIs (treatment difference, 22.4% [95% confidence interval (CI), 13.6-31.3]; 1-sided P< .001) and 76.2% with asciminib vs 47.1% with imatinib in the imatinib stratum (treatment difference, 29.7% [95% CI, 17.6-41.8]; 1-sided P< .001), meeting both key secondary objectives. MMR rate was 72.0% with asciminib vs 56.9% with second-generation (2G) TKIs (treatment difference, 15.1% [95% CI, 2.3-28.0]; 1-sided P< .05), suggesting possible clinical benefit, although the study was not designed to formally confirm statistical significance for this secondary end point. Safety/tolerability remained favorable with asciminib vs IS-TKIs. Dose reductions and interruptions, respectively, occurred with asciminib (18.5%; 46.5%), imatinib (23.2%; 47.5%), and 2G TKIs (54.9%; 63.7%). The hazard ratio for time to discontinuation of treatment due to AEs for asciminib vs 2G TKIs was 0.46 (95% CI, 0.215-0.997). With longer follow-up, asciminib continued to demonstrate a favorable benefit-risk profile over IS-TKIs and imatinib, supporting its potential as a treatment option for newly diagnosed CML-CP. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT04971226.

To prevent graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) in patients undergoing myeloablative allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT), a calcineurin inhibitor plus methotrexate is routinely used. Early phase studies suggested improved outcomes with Orca-T, an allogeneic T-cell immunotherapy that uses purified donor regulatory T cells to prevent GVHD with significantly less immunosuppression. This phase 3 trial randomized adult patients (N = 187) with acute leukemias or myelodysplastic syndrome undergoing myeloablative conditioning to receive either Orca-T with tacrolimus or a conventional allograft with tacrolimus and methotrexate (Tac/MTX), using granulocyte colony-stimulating factor-mobilized peripheral blood from HLA-matched donors. The primary end point was survival free from moderate-to-severe chronic GVHD (cGVHD; cGFS). Using a stratified log-rank test, cGFS was significantly higher in the Orca-T arm than in Tac/MTX (hazard ratio, 0.26; 95% confidence interval, 0.14-0.47; P< .001). One-year estimates were as follows: cGFS was 78.0% with Orca-T vs 38.4% with Tac/MTX; cumulative incidence of moderate-to-severe cGVHD was 12.6% with Orca-T and 44.0% with Tac/MTX (Gray test P< .001); overall survival was 93.9% with Orca-T vs 83.1% with Tac/MTX (P = .12); GVHD-free and relapse-free survival was 63.1% and 30.9% in the Orca-T and Tac/MTX arms (P< .001), respectively; nonrelapse mortality (NRM) was 3.4% with Orca-T vs 13.2% with Tac/MTX (P = .03). Orca-T met the primary end point of improved survival free from cGVHD compared with Tac/MTX prophylaxis and should be considered a new therapeutic option with low toxicity for GVHD prophylaxis. Moreover, significantly less toxicity was observed with Orca-T patients, including fewer serious infectious complications and less NRM. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT05316701.

Measurable residual disease (MRD) can predict relapse in patients with advanced myelodysplastic neoplasms (MDS) or acute myeloid leukemia (AML). We report the long-term efficacy and safety of MRD-guided preemptive azacitidine treatment to prevent relapse in the phase 2 Relapse Prevention With Azacitidine (RELAZA2) trial. Patients with MDS or AML after either intensive chemotherapy only or consecutive allogeneic stem cell transplantation were prospectively screened for imminent relapse by molecular MRD assessment. Patients who became MRD positive (MRDpos) during screening received azacitidine for up to 2 years to prevent relapse. The primary end point was the proportion of patients alive and relapse-free 6 months after azacitidine start. Of 357 patients screened, 119 (33.3%) became MRDpos, of whom 95 (79.8%) were eligible for azacitidine treatment. The primary end point was met; 60 (63%) patients were relapse free (95% confidence interval, 54-71; P< .0001) 6 months after azacitidine initiation with no new safety signals. Of 60 patients achieving MRD response during the first 6 cycles of azacitidine, 31 (52%) maintained response without hematological relapse for ≥2 years after azacitidine initiation. The median treatment-free duration after azacitidine discontinuation was 20.8 months; the longest ongoing response was 104 months. After a median follow-up of 6.6 years, 15 initial responders (25%) remained alive and in remission. Among screened patients who remained continuously MRD negative, 60-month overall survival and relapse-free survival were 88% and 79%, respectively. Patients with continuously negative MRD display a very favorable prognosis. Most patients with MRD positivity can be effectively treated with azacitidine with potential long-term remission even after termination of azacitidine. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01462578.

Marstacimab, a monoclonal antibody that inhibits tissue factor pathway inhibitor, is approved for prophylactic use in individuals with hemophilia A or B without inhibitors. We present efficacy and safety for individuals with inhibitors. The open-label, single-arm, phase 3 study evaluated once-weekly subcutaneous flat-dose marstacimab in males aged 12 to <75 years with severe hemophilia A or moderately severe to severe hemophilia B. Participants with inhibitors received bypassing agents (on-demand or routine prophylaxis) during a 6-month observational phase (OP) before entering a 12-month active treatment phase (ATP) with marstacimab. Primary end points were annualized bleeding rate (ABR) of treated bleeds and safety. Of 60 participants with inhibitors in the OP, 51 entered the ATP and received marstacimab. In the on-demand group (n = 48), mean estimated ABR declined from 19.78 (95% confidence interval [CI], 16.12-24.27) in the OP to 1.39 (95% CI, 0.85-2.29) during the ATP (ABR ratio, 0.07 [95% CI, 0.042-0.118]; 2-sided P< .0001). Results were consistent by hemophilia type (ABR ratio, 0.05 [hemophilia A, n = 40]; 0.13 [hemophilia B, n = 8]). Participants reported significant improvements in health-related quality of life. Adverse events were common but mostly mild; 1 treatment-related grade 3 skin rash led to discontinuation. Antidrug antibodies were detected in 19.6% of participants, with no apparent effect on efficacy or safety. In participants with inhibitors, marstacimab was associated with reduced bleeding rates and an acceptable safety profile, with no thromboembolic events. Marstacimab may be a viable treatment option for people with hemophilia A or B with inhibitors. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT03938792. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03938792.

We assessed the overall survival (OS) impact of time to relapse (TTR) in multinational cohorts with independent observational and randomized validation. Patients with nMTCL with frontline complete response were assigned to TTR12 (≤12 months) or without TTR12 based on time to progression or next therapy. OS analyses included modified landmark (m-LM), standard landmark (s-LM), and time-dependent Cox (td-Cox), adjusting for age, histology, and prognostic index for T-cell lymphoma (PIT) score. Across 452 patients, 165 (36.5%) had TTR12, 181 (40%) relapsed at ≥12 months, and 106 (23.5%) remained relapse-free. TTR12 conferred worse OS using m-LM (hazard ratio [HR], 2.14; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.58-2.90; P< .001), s-LM (HR, 1.92; 95% CI, 1.39-2.66; P< .001); and td-Cox (HR, 5.81; 95% CI, 2.94-11.46; P< .001). Results were consistent in the independent validation cohorts. TTR12 consistently conferred worse OS irrespective of frontline stem cell transplantation or PIT score, in peripheral T-cell lymphoma, not otherwise specified (m-LM: HR, 2.32; 95% CI, 1.51-3.55; P< .001; s-LM: HR, 2.10; 95% CI, 1.33-3.31; P = .001), anaplastic large cell lymphoma (m-LM: HR, 3.34; 95% CI, 1.18-9.50; P = .023; s-LM: HR, 2.96; 95% CI, 1.02-8.81; P = .046), and angioimmunoblastic T-cell/T follicular helper cell lymphoma (m-LM only: HR, 1.92; 95% CI, 1.15-3.21; P = .013). Second-line novel therapies improved OS (second-line start to death) vs chemotherapy in TTR12 only (HR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.37-0.97; P = .038; without TTR12: HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.51-1.32; P = .407). TTR12 serves as a prognostic and potential OS surrogate marker, supporting stratification of new risk groups and need for their differential treatment.

The phase 1/2 BelaRd (belantamab mafodotin [belamaf], lenalidomide, and dexamethasone) study evaluated the efficacy and safety of belamaf combined with lenalidomide and dexamethasone in unfit and frail transplant-ineligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM). Part 1 (n = 36) established a recommended belamaf phase 2 dose (RP2D) of 1.9 mg/kg every 8 weeks (median follow-up, 39.3 months). In part 2, 30 patients were randomized 1:1 in group A (n = 15), where belamaf dosing was guided by ophthalmologist-assessed ocular adverse events (OAEs), whereas in group B (n = 15), belamaf dosing was based on hematologist-led vision-related anamnestic (VRA) tool and ophthalmologist-assessed grade ≥3 OAEs. Among the RP2D patients (n = 42), overall response rate was 97.6%, median progression-free survival (PFS)/overall survival have not been reached yet, and the 18-month PFS and time to progression rates were 83.0% and 97.2%, respectively. Ocular toxicities were similar between assessments by hematologists and ophthalmologists, and no ophthalmologist withholding of a hematologist-led dosing occurred. Less than 1% of patients stopped driving/reading because of OAEs. Median time to belamaf reinfusion was 13 weeks. Overall, BelaRd is an effective regimen for transplant-ineligible patients with NDMM and warrants a phase 3 study in this setting. OAEs' impact on quality of life appears limited, and implementation of the hematologist-led VRA tool may eventually reduce the necessity for ophthalmologist assessments. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT04808037.

Hypodiploid and BCR::ABL1+ B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (BCP-ALL) confers a high risk of disease relapse. We investigated post-hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) outcomes within the prospective FORUM trial, comparing outcomes among these genetic subgroups with those of patients without these lesions. The use of pre- and post-HSCT add-on treatments, including tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) and immunotherapies, was also assessed. Multivariate analysis evaluated associations with overall survival (OS), event-free survival (EFS), and cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR). The FORUM trial enrolled 741 patients aged ≥4 years with BCP-ALL who underwent HSCT from HLA-matched donors (2013-2023). The 3-year OS and EFS did not differ significantly between patients with BCR::ABL1 fusion, hypodiploidy, and neither of these 2 genetic lesions. However, patients with hypodiploid BCP-ALL in second complete remission (CR2) showed inferior OS and EFS, driven by higher nonrelapse mortality (NRM), which occurred exclusively in near-diploid cases. No NRM occurred in severe hypodiploid cases conditioned with total body irradiation. Minimal residual disease (MRD) positivity at transplant predicted worse OS, EFS, and CIR in all genetic groups. Patients with hypodiploid BCP-ALL were difficult to salvage after relapse, even with chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy. By contrast, BCR::ABL1+ patients had favorable outcomes, even when MRD positive before HSCT. Prophylactic TKI use after HSCT improved EFS and reduced CIR. BCR::ABL1+ patients who received a transplant in CR2 had a 3-year OS of 96%. In conclusion, the standardized FORUM protocol yielded comparable outcomes across genetic subgroups. Posttransplant TKI maintenance improved outcomes in BCR::ABL1+ BCP-ALL. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01949129 and at www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu as #EudraCT2012-0032-22.

We compared daunorubicin/cytarabine plus fractionated gemtuzumab ozogamicin (DAGO2) with CPX-351 (CPX; 1:2 randomization) in 439 patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) aged ≥60 years (median age, 68 years) without known adverse-risk cytogenetics. Median follow-up was 35 months. Patients not in measurable residual disease (MRD)-negative remission after course 1 could enter a second randomization between standard and intensified chemotherapy. Post-course 1, the overall response rate (complete remission [CR] + CR with incomplete hematological recovery) was greater after DAGO2 (60% vs 47.5%; odds ratio [OR], 0.61; P = .016). Following course 2, the overall response was not significantly different (85% for DAGO2 vs 78% for CPX; P = .095). More patients attained CR with MRD negativity after course 1 in the DAGO2 arm (47% vs 29% for CPX; OR, 0.46; P = .004). We observed better 3-year event-free survival (34% vs 27%; hazard ratio [HR], 0.73; P = .012) and overall survival (52% vs 35%; HR, 0.62; P = .001) with DAGO2. CPX did not provide a survival benefit in patients with myelodysplasia (MDS)-related mutations and was associated with poorer survival in patients with NPM1 (HR, 2.83) and FLT3 mutations (HR, 2.14). Overall, 37% of patients underwent transplantation in first remission, with no difference in transplantation frequency or survival after transplant between randomization groups. Among patients entering the course 2 randomization (n = 107), survival was equivalent between standard and intensified CPX doses (P = .565). In conclusion, in this population of older patients with AML without known adverse-risk cytogenetics, DAGO2 resulted in superior survival compared with CPX. CPX did not benefit patients with MDS-related mutations over DAGO2. This trial was registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT02272478.

GPRC5D has emerged as a promising therapeutic target in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (R/R MM), particularly following progression after B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-directed chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell (CAR-T) therapies. RD118 is a novel CAR-T therapy incorporating a fully human single-domain antibody fragment targeting GPRC5D. In this phase 1 study, 18 R/R patients (17 with MM and 1 with a history of primary plasma cell leukemia) received a single infusion of RD118 at 1.0 × 106, 2.0 × 106, or 3.0 × 106 CAR+ T cells per kg. At a median follow-up of 17.0 months, the overall response rate (ORR) was 94.4%, including 72.2% complete or stringent complete responses. Among the 7 patients previously exposed to BCMA-directed CAR-T therapy, ORR reached 85.7%. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 18.2 months (95% confidence interval, 14.4 to not estimable), with 12-month PFS and overall survival rates of 82.1% and 93.3%, respectively. Cytokine release syndrome occurred in 88.9% of the patients, primarily grade 1 to 2. One patient developed grade 3 immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity, which resolved within 72 hours. No cerebellar toxicities or treatment-related deaths were reported. These findings support that RD118 is a highly effective and safe therapeutic option for heavily pretreated R/R MM. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT05759793 and #NCT05219721.

Myeloid leukemia of Down syndrome (ML-DS) is associated with an excellent prognosis but high treatment-related toxicity and mortality. The Phase 3 Clinical Trial for CPX-351 in ML-DS 2018 aimed to maintain the excellent event-free survival (EFS) achieved in the previous ML-DS 2006 trial while reducing the treatment intensity. Intensity-reduced induction and reinduction therapy with cytarabine and idarubicin with or without etoposide was replaced with CPX-351 (66 U/m2 on 3 days in course 1 and on 2 days in course 2). Risk stratification was based on flow cytometric measurable residual disease (MRD) after first induction. High-risk patients received high-dose cytarabine (3 g/m2 per 12 hour) in consolidation; standard-risk patients received cytarabine at a dose of 1 g/m2 per 12 hour. A total of 35 patients were enrolled until the trial was halted because of an unexpectedly high relapse rate. A per-protocol interim analysis revealed a significantly lower 24-month EFS when compared with the ML-DS 2006 trial (69% vs 90%; P< .001). In contrast with previous studies, most patients who relapsed responded to salvage therapy, leading to a comparable 24-month overall survival of 88% (vs 92%; P = .612). CPX-351 demonstrated a favorable toxicity profile with no treatment-related mortality. Positive MRD by error-corrected GATA1 next-generation sequencing, the presence of trisomy 8 or a complex karyotype were associated with an increased risk for relapse. In conclusion, replacing intensity-reduced induction therapy with CPX-351 in ML-DS led to a significantly lower EFS, highlighting the need for dose optimization to balance the efficacy and toxicity in this sensitive patient population. This trial was registered at https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu as EudraCT #2018-002988-25.

Circulating tumor cells (CTC) represent a high-risk biomarker in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM); however, their prognostic value among transplant-eligible (TE) patients receiving daratumumab/bortezomib/lenalidomide/dexamethasone (D-VRd) remains unknown. In this study, we analyzed CTC in the phase 3 PERSEUS/EMN017 trial. TE-NDMM patients were randomized (1:1) to D-VRd with daratumumab/lenalidomide maintenance (D-VRd group) or bortezomib/lenalidomide/dexamethasone (VRd) with lenalidomide maintenance (VRd group), both with transplant. A subset of 451 of 709 patients from PERSEUS (D-VRd, 231/355; VRd, 220/354) had screening blood samples collected for CTC analysis by flow cytometry. CTC were detected in 370 patients (82%; median limit of detection, 0.0004%). CTC were prognostic of progression-free survival (PFS), independent of other factors, as a continuous (hazard ratio [HR], 1.36 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.15-1.60]; P< .001) and categorical variable (≥0.175% CTC-high, optimal threshold). D-VRd improved PFS vs VRd in CTC-low patients (4-year rates: 88% vs 74%; HR, 0.42 [95% CI, 0.25-0.70]; P = .0013). Regardless of study treatment, minimal residual disease (MRD)-negativity rates were lower in CTC-high vs CTC-low patients (10-5: 52.2% vs 66.2%; 10-6: 34.8% vs 52.4%). D-VRd significantly increased MRD-negativity rates vs VRd among CTC-high (10-5: 69.4% vs 33.3%; 10-6: 47.2% vs 21.2%; both P< .05) and CTC-low patients (10-5: 74.4% vs 57.8%; 10-6: 65.6% vs 38.5%; both P< .001), with similar observations for sustained MRD-negativity. CTC levels are an independent prognostic factor in TE-NDMM treated with standard-of-care frontline quadruplet. D-VRd improved and sustained MRD-negativity rates in CTC-high and CTC-low, and improved PFS for CTC-low with a positive trend in CTC-high patients. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT03710603.

The primary objective in multiply relapsed hairy cell leukemia and variant (HCL/HCLv) was to determine whether pentostatin-rituximab (DCFR) and bendamustine-rituximab (BR) each achieve an overall response rate (ORR) exceeding that historically achieved by rituximab alone (∼40%) in favor of 65%. Prospective data were unreported for either regimen. Fifty-six patients received 6 28-day cycles of rituximab (375 mg/m2, days 1 and 15) with either bendamustine (90 mg/m2, days 1 and 2) or pentostatin (4 mg/m2, days 1 and 15). Eligibility required ≥2 purine analogs, or 1 purine analog plus rituximab for response of <1 year to the initial purine analog. Although patients were assigned to either regimen through randomization to increase homogeneity of the 2 treatment groups, the DCFR arm had fewer previous purine analogs (P = .021) and lower baseline marrow HCL/HCLv infiltration (P = .013). ORRs for DCFR and BR were 93% (95% confidence intervals [CI], 83-102) and 86%, (95% CI, 73-99), respectively, exceeding 40% (P< .0001) for each group. Rates for complete remission (CR) and minimal residual disease-free CR and median progression-free survival (141 vs 50 months; HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.32-1.25) numerically favored DCFR, but that arm was significantly enriched with less previous purine analogs and marrow infiltration, each of which was associated post hoc with better response. Post hoc subgroup analysis, particularly for 41 patients with classic HCL, suggested any superiority of DCFR vs BR might apply to patients with more favorable disease. DCFR and BR were highly effective in multiply relapsed HCL/HCLv. Possible DCFR superiority was hypothesis-generating, given uneven baseline risks and trial design. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01059786.

Pirtobrutinib, a noncovalent, reversible Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor (BTKi), demonstrated efficacy in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), resistant to covalent BTKi (cBTKi). We analyzed genomic correlations with response and resistance to pirtobrutinib in relapsed/refractory (R/R) patients with CLL pretreated with cBTKi enrolled in the phase 1/2 BRUIN trial. DNA sequencing was performed on peripheral blood mononuclear cells at baseline, on treatment, and at progressive disease (PD). Common alterations at baseline included mutations in BTK (43%), TP53 (38%), SF3B1 (25%), NOTCH1 (23%), ATM (19%), XPO1 (11%), PLCG2 (9%), BCL2 (8%), and 17p deletion (28%). Common baseline BTK mutations included C481S (85%), C481R (10%), C481F (6%), and C481Y (4%). At PD, 60 of 88 patients (68%) acquired ≥1 mutation, including 44% with acquired BTK mutations and 24% with other acquired mutations. A total of 55 acquired BTK mutations were detected in 39 patients, including gatekeeper mutations (T474I/F/S/Y/L, 26%), kinase-impaired L528W (16%), C481S/R/Y (5%), V416L (2%), and A428D (1%) and others proximal to the adenosine triphosphate-binding pocket, D539A/G/H (1%) and Y545N (1%). Decrease or complete clearance of BTK C481x was observed at PD in 36 of 43 patients (84%). Using a more sensitive assay, 37% (18/49) of acquired BTK mutations were detected at baseline at low allele frequency. Using a highly sensitive assay at progression, a similar frequency of acquired BTK mutations (39%) was detected, and all patients had detectable acquired mutations. This study highlights the complex clonal dynamics of BTK mutations in patients with R/R CLL undergoing pirtobrutinib treatment, and the extent of resistance without an obvious genomic driver. Trial registration: #NCT03740529 at www.ClinicalTrials.gov.

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) poses a challenge in hematology given its varied symptoms, and the complex interplay between disease and treatment effects on health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The phase 3 POLARIX study demonstrated superior progression-free survival and a similar safety profile with polatuzumab vedotin plus rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and prednisone (Pola-R-CHP) vs R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone) in patients with previously untreated DLBCL. Here, we evaluate HRQoL through patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments to fully characterize the patient experience in the POLARIX study. Changes from baseline in HRQoL, lymphoma symptoms, and gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms were assessed, as well as incidence and severity of common symptoms by PROs vs clinician-reported adverse events (AEs). Baseline characteristics of PRO-evaluable patients (N = 874) were consistent. Comparison between PROs and clinician-reported AEs revealed a notable discordance; patients generally reported a higher incidence of symptoms than clinicians, emphasizing the need for patient-centric tools to accurately capture the patient experience. Both treatments exhibited rapid and sustained improvements in HRQoL and lymphoma symptoms, with the most substantial improvements seen in global health status/QoL, lymphoma symptoms, fatigue, role, emotional, and social functioning. GI symptoms (diarrhea, constipation, nausea, and vomiting) were generally similar between treatment arms and returned to baseline levels after treatment completion. These HRQoL data underscore the complementarity of PROs, as an adjunct to clinician-reported AEs, in evaluating the efficacy and tolerability of new treatments, including Pola-R-CHP, which may represent a new benchmark for patient-reported HRQoL in previously untreated DLBCL. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT03274492.

The CASSIOPEIA trial demonstrated superior progression-free survival (PFS) with the addition of daratumumab to bortezomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone (D-VTd) induction/consolidation, and with daratumumab maintenance vs observation in transplant-eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM). The companion study, CASSIOPET, assessed the prognostic value of premaintenance (PM) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) response, based on the standardized Deauville score on PFS and overall survival (OS), in addition to bone marrow (BM) minimal residual disease (MRD) detection by multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC) at 10-5 level. PM PET/CT was available for 225 patients: 112 patients treated with daratumumab after D-VTd (59) or bortezomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone (VTd; 53), and 113 patients followed by observation after D-VTd (56) or VTd (57). At PM, 92% of the 175 baseline PET-positive patients achieved PET negativity, with a longer PFS in univariate analysis (P = .019) and a major trend of prolonged OS (P = .056). In univariate analysis, patients who achieved both PET and MFC negativity were found to have a better PFS (P < .0001) than those who had at least 1 positive result. In daratumumab-treated patients, PM PET negativity was associated with prolonged PFS and OS in univariate analysis (P = .0023 and P = .033, respectively), and double MFC and PET negativity was independently associated with PFS by multivariate analysis (P = .0006). This study confirms the prognostic relevance of a PM PET response in patients with NDMM treated with daratumumab in addition to MRD detection by MFC at the BM level. This trial was registered at ww.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02541383.

Talquetamab, a G protein-coupled receptor class C group 5 member D-targeting bispecific antibody for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (R/R MM), plus daratumumab, may lead to deeper and more durable responses than either therapy alone. In the phase 1b TRIMM-2 study, patients with R/R MM (at least 3 previous lines of therapy or double refractory to a proteasome inhibitor and an immunomodulatory drug) received subcutaneous talquetamab 0.4 mg/kg weekly (QW; "QW cohort") or 0.8 mg/kg every other week (Q2W cohort) plus daratumumab 1800 mg per the approved schedule. The primary end point was safety. Secondary end points included overall response and duration of response. Progression-free survival was an exploratory end point. Sixty-five patients (median 5 previous lines of therapy; 61.5% triple-class refractory; 24.6% bispecific antibody exposed) received talquetamab plus daratumumab (QW, n = 14; Q2W, n = 51; median follow-up of 18.6 months). Most common adverse events were oral events, skin events, cytokine release syndrome, and infections. Grade 3 or 4 events occurred in 81.5%. Two patients had dose-limiting toxicities, both in the Q2W cohort (grade 3 stomatitis/oral mucositis, and grade 3 maculopapular rash). Responses occurred in 71.4% (QW cohort) and 82.4% (Q2W cohort) of patients. Median progression-free survival was 23.3 and 21.2 months, respectively, in each cohort. Pharmacodynamic results suggest the immunomodulatory action of daratumumab contributes to a conducive environment for talquetamab by reducing immunosuppressive cells. Talquetamab plus daratumumab demonstrated promising efficacy outcomes in patients with heavily pretreated disease, with a safety profile consistent with each agent as monotherapy. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT04108195.

In this response-adapted clinic trial with daratumumab monotherapy for older patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM), we identified target antigen expression, a plasma cell phenotype, and an activated immune tumor microenvironment (iTME) as critical features associated with response to CD38 monoclonal antibody therapy. Here, patients achieving a partial response after 2 cycles continued daratumumab, otherwise lenalidomide or bortezomib was added. This strategy resulted in an overall response rate of 97% and low rates of adverse events, with 37% of patients able to continue daratumumab monotherapy. Importantly, we found that higher CD38 expression, plasma cell gene expression programming, and an activated iTME were associated with patients who were able to continue daratumumab therapy alone. In contrast, patients requiring the addition of lenalidomide or bortezomib had increased expression of adhesion, tumor necrosis factor signaling, KRAS signaling, and B-cell programs, as well as an immunosuppressed iTME. Tracking of clonal dynamics illustrated the selection of subclones enriched for de novo resistance gene expression programs after only 2 cycles of daratumumab monotherapy. Upon relapse, daratumumab refractory MM cells were characterized by the expansion of preexisting minor subclones with mixed transcriptomic programs containing the plasma cell phenotype with decreased CD38 expression and maintenance of resistance programs, suggesting development of acquired resistance involves an uncoupling of transcriptional programs present in therapy-naïve tumors. To our knowledge, this is the first study to demonstrate the effectiveness of response-adapted daratumumab treatment and describe critical biomarkers of single-agent daratumumab sensitivity in vulnerable patients with therapy-naïve MM. This trial was registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT04151667.

The IELSG37 trial enrolled 545 patients with primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma (PMBCL) and demonstrated that consolidation radiotherapy (RT) can be omitted in patients with complete metabolic response, defined by the Lugano classification as Deauville score (DS) 1 to 3. This report evaluates outcomes after different frontline rituximab- and doxorubicin-based immunochemotherapy regimens chosen according to local practice. Patients treated with R-CHOP21 (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisolone, administered every 21 days) showed a significantly higher percentage of DS 5 than those on other regimens (23.8% vs 8.2% average; P < .001) and a trend toward additional unplanned treatments (53.2% vs 46.9%; P = .30). The increased risk of poor response was confirmed in a multinomial logistic regression analysis adjusted for age, sex, international prognostic index score, and performance status. R-CHOP21 was also associated with smaller reductions in metabolic tumor volume and less pronounced decreases in maximum standardized uptake value. Patients with DS 5 more often received additional treatment (RT and/or salvage chemotherapy with or without autologous consolidation) after induction immunochemotherapy (96% vs 41%; P < .001) and experienced significantly poorer outcomes. Although differences in progression-free and overall survival between R-CHOP21 and more aggressive regimens were not statistically significant, R-CHOP21 may increase the risk of additional treatments and may be inadvisable as frontline therapy for PMBCL. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01599559.

Isatuximab is an immunoglobulin G1κ monoclonal antibody that binds with high affinity to CD38 expressed on plasma cells. Anti-CD38 antibodies have shown efficacy as monotherapy and in combination in a variety of settings for patients with multiple myeloma and light chain (AL) amyloidosis. This multicenter, cooperative group phase 2 trial was designed to evaluate hematologic response, organ response, and safety of isatuximab monotherapy for the treatment of relapsed AL amyloidosis. Isatuximab at 20 mg/kg was administered IV weekly during the first 28-day cycle, and then every other week during cycles 2 to 24. Forty-three patients were registered, with 35 patients being evaluable for response. The overall hematologic response rate was 77.1%, with 57% of patients achieving a very good partial response (VGPR) or better. The median time to partial response (PR) or better was 1.1 months. Renal response occurred in 50% (7/14) of patients with renal involvement, and cardiac response occurred in 57% (8/14) of patients who were evaluable utilizing N-terminal pro b-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) with cardiac involvement. The most common treatment-related grade ≥3 adverse events included lymphopenia (n = 3, 8.5%) and infection (n = 2, 6%). Isatuximab demonstrated substantial efficacy in previously treated patients with AL amyloidosis, and was associated with a good safety profile. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT03499808.