Familial aggregation of Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) has been demonstrated in large population studies, pointing to genetic predisposition to this hematological malignancy. To understand the genetic variants associated with the development of HL, we performed whole genome sequencing on 234 individuals with and without HL from 36 pedigrees that had 2 or more first-degree relatives with HL. Our pedigree selection criteria also required at least 1 affected individual aged <21 years, with the median age at diagnosis of 21.98 years (3-55 years). Family-based segregation analysis was performed for the identification of coding and noncoding variants using linkage and filtering approaches. Using our tiered variant prioritization algorithm, we identified 44 HL-risk variants in 28 pedigrees, of which 33 are coding and 11 are noncoding. The top 4 recurrent risk variants are a coding variant in KDR (rs56302315), a 5' untranslated region variant in KLHDC8B (rs387906223), a noncoding variant in an intron of PAX5 (rs147081110), and another noncoding variant in an intron of GATA3 (rs3824666). A newly identified splice variant in KDR (c.3849-2A>C) was observed for 1 pedigree, and high-confidence stop-gain variants affecting IRF7 (p.W238∗) and EEF2KMT (p.K116∗) were also observed. Multiple truncating variants in POLR1E were found in 3 independent pedigrees as well. Whereas KDR and KLHDC8B have previously been reported, PAX5, GATA3, IRF7, EEF2KMT, and POLR1E represent novel observations. Although there may be environmental factors influencing lymphomagenesis, we observed segregation of candidate germline variants likely to predispose HL in most of the pedigrees studied.

Despite recent progress in identifying the genetic drivers of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), prognosis remains poor for those individuals who experience disease recurrence. Moreover, acute leukemias of ambiguous lineage lack a biologically informed framework to guide classification and therapy. These needs have driven the adoption of multiple complementary single-cell sequencing approaches to explore key issues in the biology of these leukemias, including cell of origin, developmental hierarchy and ontogeny, and the molecular heterogeneity driving pathogenesis, progression, and therapeutic responsiveness. There are multiple single-cell techniques for profiling a specific modality, including RNA, DNA, chromatin accessibility and methylation; and an expanding range of approaches for simultaneous analysis of multiple modalities. Single-cell sequencing approaches have also enabled characterization of cell-intrinsic and -extrinsic features of ALL biology. In this review we describe these approaches and highlight the extensive heterogeneity that underpins ALL gene expression, cellular differentiation, and clonal architecture throughout disease pathogenesis and treatment resistance. In addition, we discuss the importance of the dynamic interactions that occur between leukemia cells and the nonleukemia microenvironment. We discuss potential opportunities and limitations of single-cell sequencing for the study of ALL biology and treatment responsiveness.

The era of genomic medicine has allowed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) researchers to improve disease characterization, optimize risk-stratification systems, and develop new treatments. Although there has been significant progress, AML remains a lethal cancer because of its remarkably complex and plastic cellular architecture. This degree of heterogeneity continues to pose a major challenge, because it limits the ability to identify and therefore eradicate the cells responsible for leukemogenesis and treatment failure. In recent years, the field of single-cell genomics has led to unprecedented strides in the ability to characterize cellular heterogeneity, and it holds promise for the study of AML. In this review, we highlight advancements in single-cell technologies, outline important shortcomings in our understanding of AML biology and clinical management, and discuss how single-cell genomics can address these shortcomings as well as provide unique opportunities in basic and translational AML research.

This open-label, randomized, phase 3 trial (NCT02577406) compared enasidenib, an oral IDH2 (isocitrate dehydrogenase 2) inhibitor, with conventional care regimens (CCRs) in patients aged ≥60 years with late-stage, mutant-IDH2 acute myeloid leukemia (AML) relapsed/refractory (R/R) to 2 or 3 prior AML-directed therapies. Patients were first preselected to a CCR (azacitidine, intermediate-dose cytarabine, low-dose cytarabine, or supportive care) and then randomized (1:1) to enasidenib 100 mg per day or CCR. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints included event-free survival (EFS), time to treatment failure (TTF), overall response rate (ORR), hematologic improvement (HI), and transfusion independence (TI). Overall, 319 patients were randomized to enasidenib (n = 158) or CCR (n = 161). The median age was 71 years, median (range) enasidenib exposure was 142 days (3 to 1270), and CCR was 36 days (1 to 1166). One enasidenib (0.6%) and 20 CCR (12%) patients received no randomized treatment, and 30% and 43%, respectively, received subsequent AML-directed therapies during follow-up. The median OS with enasidenib vs CCR was 6.5 vs 6.2 months (HR [hazard ratio], 0.86; P = .23); 1-year survival was 37.5% vs 26.1%. Enasidenib meaningfully improved EFS (median, 4.9 vs 2.6 months with CCR; HR, 0.68; P = .008), TTF (median, 4.9 vs 1.9 months; HR, 0.53; P < .001), ORR (40.5% vs 9.9%; P <.001), HI (42.4% vs 11.2%), and red blood cell (RBC)-TI (31.7% vs 9.3%). Enasidenib safety was consistent with prior reports. The primary study endpoint was not met, but OS was confounded by early dropout and subsequent AML-directed therapies. Enasidenib provided meaningful benefits in EFS, TTF, ORR, HI, and RBC-TI in this heavily pretreated older mutant-IDH2 R/R AML population.

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) is a potentially curative treatment for patients with high-risk acute leukemias, but unfortunately disease recurrence remains the major cause of death in these patients. Infusion of donor lymphocytes (DLI) has the potential to restore graft-versus-leukemia immunologic surveillance; however, efficacy varies across different hematologic entities. Although relapsed chronic myeloid leukemia, transplanted in chronic phase, has proven remarkably susceptible to DLI, response rates are more modest for relapsed acute myeloid leukemia and acute lymphoblastic leukemia. To prevent impending relapse, a number of groups have explored administering DLI preemptively on detection of measurable residual disease (MRD) or mixed chimerism. Evidence for the effectiveness of this strategy, although encouraging, comes from only a few, mostly single-center retrospective, nonrandomized studies. This article seeks to (1) discuss the available evidence supporting this approach while highlighting some of the inherent challenges of MRD-triggered treatment decisions post-transplant, (2) portray other forms of postremission cellular therapies, including the role of next-generation target-specific immunotherapies, and (3) provide a practical framework to support clinicians in their decision-making process when considering preemptive cellular therapy for this difficult-to-treat patient population.

Advances in conditioning, graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis and antimicrobial prophylaxis have improved the safety of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), leading to a substantial increase in the number of patients transplanted each year. This influx of patients along with progress in remission-inducing and posttransplant maintenance strategies for hematologic malignancies has led to new GVHD risk factors and high-risk groups: HLA-mismatched related (haplo) and unrelated (MMUD) donors; older recipient age; posttransplant maintenance; prior checkpoint inhibitor and autologous HCT exposure; and patients with benign hematologic disorders. Along with the changing transplant population, the field of HCT has dramatically shifted in the past decade because of the widespread adoption of posttransplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy), which has increased the use of HLA-mismatched related donors to levels comparable to HLA-matched related donors. Its success has led investigators to explore PTCy's utility for HLA-matched HCT, where we predict it will be embraced as well. Additionally, combinations of promising new agents for GVHD prophylaxis such as abatacept and JAK inhibitors with PTCy inspire hope for an even safer transplant platform. Using 3 illustrative cases, we review our current approach to transplantation of patients at high risk of GVHD using our modern armamentarium.

Disease relapse is the leading cause of failure for patients receiving allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT). Maintenance therapy administered after allo-HCT is a promising strategy to reduce the incidence of relapse and enhance the curative potential of allo-HCT. Research investigations and clinical applications of this approach have greatly increased in recent years, with an expanding number of available therapeutic agents to introduce in the posttransplant setting. However, many questions and challenges remain regarding the feasibility and clinical impact of maintenance. In this article, we present four common case scenarios addressing select available therapeutic agents as a framework to review published data and ongoing studies and describe our current standard practice in the rapidly evolving field of maintenance therapy after allo-HCT.